GFG Expands Aljo Gold System 150 m East with Step-Out Results of 7.23 g/t Au over 2.0 m as Discovery-Driven Exploration Advances Across Goldarm

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
GFG Resources Inc.
Ticker
GFG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Ontario, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 15:14:36 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

GFG Resources Inc. reported high-grade step-out drill results from the Aljo Gold Project, expanding the gold system 125-150m east of the historic mine workings. Holes ALJ-25-037 and ALJ-25-038 returned intercepts including 7.23 g/t Au over 2.0 m and 13.30 g/t Au over 0.5 m, confirming strong continuity and significant growth potential. The company plans an aggressive 6,000 m follow-up drill program in H1-2026 to further advance the project.

Reasoning: The new step-out drill results significantly expand the Aljo gold system 125-150m to the east of historic workings, demonstrating strong continuity and high-grade intercepts (up to 13.30 g/t Au over 0.5 m and 7.23 g/t Au over 2.0 m) that exceed the 75th percentile for orogenic gold deposits. This successful exploration is being followed by a substantial 6,000m drill program.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Continuity
  • Expansion Potential
  • Follow-up Program
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Compositing Transparent

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Facts used in scoring: 105

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states 'GFG Expands Aljo Gold System 150 m East with Step-Out Results' and describes the holes as '125-150 metre (“ m ”) step-out holes to the east'.

Evidence · text

“GFG Expands Aljo Gold System 150 m East with Step-Out Results”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 7.23 g/t Au over 2.0 m and 13.30 g/t Au over 0.5 m are significantly above the 75th percentile for orogenic gold deposits (5.252 g/t Au) and are highlighted as 'high-grade' in the release.

Evidence · text

“7.23 g/t Au over 2.0 m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures, including supervision by a Qualified Person, analysis by accredited laboratories (Activation Laboratories Ltd. and Bureau Veritas), and methods like certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“All scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been prepared under the supervision of Anders Carlson, P.Geo. and Vice President, Exploration of GFG, a qualified person within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101. Drill core samples are being analyzed for gold by Activation Laboratories Ltd. in Timmins, Ontario. ... Quality control and assurance measures include the monitoring of results for inserted certified reference materials, coarse blanks and preparation duplicates of drill core.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document clearly states the cut-off grade used for reporting intercepts and the rules for internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Drill intercepts are presented using a 0.20 g/t Au cut-off and as drilled length with a minimum 1 gram-metre product . Composites include internal dilution of up to 3 m at grades less than 0.2 0 g/t Au.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that true width is estimated as a percentage of drilled length rather than providing specific true width values for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“True width is estimated to be 30 to 90 % drilled length.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 105. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (105)

ALJ-25-037Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-037
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
132 m
To
148 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-037:132.0-148.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept extends mineralization 150m east of the historic mine, confirming continuity in a new area.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: 16.0

ALJ-25-037Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 7.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-037
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
7.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
142 m
To
144 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-037:142.0-144.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept significantly expands the known mineralization 150m east, exceeding the 75th percentile for orogenic gold.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“7.23”

Context: 2.0

ALJ-25-037Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-037
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
156.2 m
To
158.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-037:156.2-158.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept further confirms mineralization continuity in the eastern step-out area.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 2.0

ALJ-25-037Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-037
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
170.9 m
To
172.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-037:170.9-172.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept further confirms mineralization continuity in the eastern step-out area.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.40”

Context: 1.8

ALJ-25-037Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-037
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
171.9 m
To
172.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-037:171.9-172.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“5.00”

Context: 0.8

ALJ-25-038Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-038
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
5.2 m
To
8.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-038:5.2-8.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This near-surface intercept extends the Main Zone 125m east of historical workings.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 3.0

ALJ-25-038Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-038
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.1 m
From
65.2 m
To
72.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-038:65.2-72.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept further confirms mineralization continuity in the eastern step-out area.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: 7.1

ALJ-25-038Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-038
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
93.8 m
To
96.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-038:93.8-96.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows good grade in the eastern step-out area.

Positive factors

  • High Grade
  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: 2.4

ALJ-25-038Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-038
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
From
123 m
To
128.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-038:123.0-128.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept further confirms mineralization continuity in the eastern step-out area.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: 5.3

ALJ-25-038Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-038
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
124.9 m
To
125.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-038:124.9-125.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval significantly contributes to the overall positive extension of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • Step-Out Extension
  • Continuity

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“13.30”

Context: 0.5

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.3 m
From
7.7 m
To
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:7.7-22.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 14.3

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 9.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
9.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
19.5 m
To
20.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:19.5-20.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“9.36”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.5 m
From
30.5 m
To
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:30.5-45.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 14.5

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.3 m
From
50.5 m
To
58.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:50.5-58.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 8.3

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
127.8 m
To
128.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:127.8-128.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
131.5 m
To
132.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:131.5-132.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“6.65”

Context: 0.7

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
190 m
To
199 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:190.0-199.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 9.0

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
197 m
To
198 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:197.0-198.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“3.55”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
335 m
To
341.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:335.0-341.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 6.5

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
339.3 m
To
340 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:339.3-340.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.13”

Context: 0.7

ALJ-25-029Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-029
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
389 m
To
390.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-029:389.0-390.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.22”

Context: 1.5

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
71 m
From
11.5 m
To
82.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:11.5-82.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 71.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 7.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
7.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
15.5 m
To
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:15.5-18.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“7.51”

Context: 3.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
26 m
To
27 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:26.0-27.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“3.26”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
31.5 m
To
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:31.5-32.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.97”

Context: 1.3

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
46.5 m
To
47.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:46.5-47.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.09”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
70.5 m
To
72.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:70.5-72.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“6.39”

Context: 2.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
77.5 m
To
78.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:77.5-78.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“5.00”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:97.5-99.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.83”

Context: 1.5

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
113.4 m
To
114.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:113.4-114.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 1.1

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
176 m
To
177 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:176.0-177.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
209.5 m
To
212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:209.5-212.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: 2.5

ALJ-25-030Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-030
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
224 m
To
225 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-030:224.0-225.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.88”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-018extAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-018ext
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
568 m
To
570 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-018ext:568.0-570.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.57”

Context: 2.0

ALJ-25-018extAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-018ext
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
569 m
To
570 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-018ext:569.0-570.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.63”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-031Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-031
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
124.8 m
To
126.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-031:124.8-126.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 1.5

ALJ-25-031Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-031
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
133.1 m
To
134.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-031:133.1-134.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.67”

Context: 1.5

ALJ-25-031Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-031
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
251.9 m
To
252.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-031:251.9-252.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: 0.8

ALJ-25-031Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-031
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
268.9 m
To
270.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-031:268.9-270.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.51”

Context: 1.5

ALJ-25-031Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-031
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
297.6 m
To
298.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-031:297.6-298.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 0.5

ALJ-25-031Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-031
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
11.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
325.6 m
To
326.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-031:325.6-326.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“11.40”

Context: 0.8

ALJ-25-032Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-032
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
29.5 m
To
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-032:29.5-34.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“3.68”

Context: 4.5

ALJ-25-032Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 17.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-032
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
17.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
29.5 m
To
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-032:29.5-30.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released bonanza-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“17.40”

Context: 0.5

ALJ-25-032Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-032
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
89.3 m
To
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-032:89.3-92.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 2.7

ALJ-25-032Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-032
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
130 m
To
131 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-032:130.0-131.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.86”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-032Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-032
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
146.9 m
To
147.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-032:146.9-147.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“4.92”

Context: 0.8

ALJ-25-032Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-032
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
167 m
To
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-032:167.0-168.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-033Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-033
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.8 m
From
25.2 m
To
31 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-033:25.2-31.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: 5.8

ALJ-25-033Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-033
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
27.2 m
To
27.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-033:27.2-27.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“10.40”

Context: 0.5

ALJ-25-034Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-034
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
62.4 m
To
63.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-034:62.4-63.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 1.2

ALJ-25-034Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-034
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
74 m
To
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-034:74.0-75.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 1.0

ALJ-25-035Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-035
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
147.3 m
To
150.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-035:147.3-150.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 3.1

ALJ-25-035Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 10.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-035
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
10.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
159.9 m
To
162 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-035:159.9-162.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“10.45”

Context: 2.1

ALJ-25-035Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-035
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
22.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
159.9 m
To
160.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-035:159.9-160.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released bonanza-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“22.90”

Context: 0.9

ALJ-25-035Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-035
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
171.2 m
To
186.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-035:171.2-186.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 15.3

ALJ-25-035Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-035
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
175 m
To
175.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-035:175.0-175.9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“6.98”

Context: 0.9

ALJ-25-036Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-036
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.5 m
From
291.3 m
To
342.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-036:291.3-342.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released intercept, providing context but not new information.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 51.5

ALJ-25-036Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ALJ-25-036
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
321 m
To
326 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ALJ-25-036:321.0-326.0
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a previously released high-grade intercept, providing context but not new information.

Positive factors

  • High Grade

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“6.36”

Context: 5.0

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 7.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
7.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
142 m
To
144 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:142-144
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.23 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.23 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.23”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
156.2 m
To
158.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:156.2-158.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
From
170.9 m
To
172.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:170.9-172.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.40”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
171.9 m
To
172.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:171.9-172.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.00”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.1 m
From
65.2 m
To
72.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:65.2-72.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.28 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
93.8 m
To
96.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:93.8-96.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
From
123 m
To
128.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:123-128.3
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.23 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
13.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
124.9 m
To
125.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:124.9-125.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.3 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.30”

Context: incl.

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 9.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
9.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
19.5 m
To
20.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:19.5-20.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.36 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.36 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.36”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.5 m
From
30.5 m
To
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:30.5-45
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.58 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.3 m
From
50.5 m
To
58.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:50.5-58.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.52 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
127.8 m
To
128.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:127.8-128.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.74 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
131.5 m
To
132.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:131.5-132.2
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.65 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.65”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
190 m
To
199 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:190-199
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.15 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
197 m
To
198 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:197-198
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.55 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.55”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
335 m
To
341.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:335-341.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
339.3 m
To
340 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:339.3-340
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.13 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.13”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
389 m
To
390.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:389-390.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.22 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.22”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 7.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
7.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
15.5 m
To
18.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:15.5-18.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.51 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 22.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.51 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.51”

Context: incl.

also incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
also incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
3.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
26 m
To
27 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
also incl.:26-27
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.26 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.26”

Context: also incl.

also incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
also incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
31.5 m
To
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
also incl.:31.5-32.8
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.97 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.97”

Context: also incl.

also incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
also incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
46.5 m
To
47.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
also incl.:46.5-47.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.09 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.09”

Context: also incl.

also incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
also incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
70.5 m
To
72.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
also incl.:70.5-72.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.39 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.39”

Context: also incl.

also incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
also incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
77.5 m
To
78.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
also incl.:77.5-78.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.00”

Context: also incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
97.5 m
To
99 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:97.5-99
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.83 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.83”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
113.4 m
To
114.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:113.4-114.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.01 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
176 m
To
177 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:176-177
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
209.5 m
To
212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:209.5-212
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.28 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
224 m
To
225 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:224-225
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.88 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.88”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
569 m
To
570 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:569-570
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.63 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.63”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
133.1 m
To
134.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:133.1-134.6
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.67 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.67”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
251.9 m
To
252.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:251.9-252.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.97 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.97 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.97”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
268.9 m
To
270.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:268.9-270.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.51 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.51”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
297.6 m
To
298.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:297.6-298.1
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 11.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
11.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
325.6 m
To
326.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:325.6-326.4
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.40”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 17.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
17.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
29.5 m
To
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:29.5-30
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 17.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“17.40”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
89.3 m
To
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:89.3-92
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
130 m
To
131 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:130-131
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.86 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.86”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
4.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
146.9 m
To
147.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:146.9-147.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.92 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.92”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
167 m
To
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:167-168
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.40”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
10.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
27.2 m
To
27.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:27.2-27.7
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.40”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
74 m
To
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:74-75
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.08 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: and

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 10.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
10.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
159.9 m
To
162 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:159.9-162
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.45 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 21.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.45 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.45”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
22.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
159.9 m
To
160.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:159.9-160.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 22.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.90”

Context: incl.

andAljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
171.2 m
To
186.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:171.2-186.5
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.51 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 23.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: and

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
175 m
To
175.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:175-175.9
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.98 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.98”

Context: incl.

incl.Aljo Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Aljo Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GFG

Geometry

Grade
6.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
321 m
To
326 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:321-326
Mining Method
underground

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.36 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 31.8 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.36”

Context: incl.

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.