Getchell Gold Corp. Files $1 Billion NPV Preliminary Economic Assessment Fondaway Canyon Gold Project, NV

Original announcement by cse on

Company
Getchell Gold Corp.
Ticker
GTCH
Exchange
CSE
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy, Other
Extracted
2026-10-01 01:52:31 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Getchell Gold Corp. has filed a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for its Fondaway Canyon Gold Project in Nevada, outlining robust economics with a pre-tax NPV8% of $1 billion and a 58.8% IRR at a $3,200/oz gold price. The PEA contemplates an open pit mining operation producing 150,000 ounces of gold annually over a 10-year mine life, incorporating an updated Mineral Resource Estimate and refined metallurgical test work. This represents a substantial increase in project value and production compared to the previous 2025 PEA.

Reasoning: The Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Fondaway Canyon Gold Project demonstrates highly positive economics, including a pre-tax NPV8% of $1 billion and a 58.8% IRR, representing a significant improvement over the previous PEA and indicating strong potential for the project. The study incorporates an updated resource estimate with increased Indicated resources and refined metallurgy, providing a robust foundation for future development.

Positive factors

  • Strong project economics with a pre-tax NPV8% of $1 billion and 58.8% IRR at $3,200/oz gold price.
  • Significant increase in project value and production compared to the previous 2025 PEA.
  • Robust operational profile with 150,000 oz/year gold production over a 10-year mine life.
  • Incorporation of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate showing a 54% increase in Indicated resources.
  • Refined metallurgical test work demonstrating amenability to conventional flotation and high-grade concentrate production.
  • NI 43-101 compliant study with multiple Qualified Persons overseeing different aspects.

Negative factors

  • The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources, which are considered speculative.
  • No certainty that PEA results will be realized, as stated in the cautionary notes.
  • Additional metallurgical test work is recommended to optimize grind size and flotation process, indicating further de-risking is needed.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 9

Classification and evidence

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The document is a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Fondaway Canyon gold project.

Evidence · text

“Getchell Gold Corp. Files $1 Billion NPV Preliminary Economic Assessment Fondaway Canyon Gold Project, NV”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: The PEA reports a 28% increase in contained ounces of gold for the minable resource compared to the 2025 PEA, and the underlying MRE shows a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources and an 8% increase in Inferred resources.

Evidence · text

“28% increase in both contained ounces of gold and average annual gold production; and The PEA incorporated the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate completed in April 2026 that reported a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources and an 8% increase in Inferred relative to the previous 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate”

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: The PEA reports a 28% increase in contained ounces of gold for the minable resource compared to the 2025 PEA, and the underlying MRE shows a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources and an 8% increase in Inferred resources, implying contained metal growth.

Evidence · text

“28% increase in both contained ounces of gold and average annual gold production; and The PEA incorporated the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate completed in April 2026 that reported a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources and an 8% increase in Inferred relative to the previous 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The PEA, metallurgical testing, and mineral resource estimate were overseen by multiple Qualified Persons (Jonathan R. Heiner, Deepak Malhotra, Donald E. Hulse, Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne) as defined by NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The Qualified Person overseeing the minable resource estimate used for the economic analysis is Jonathan R. Heiner, SME-RM, from SLR Consulting, Inc. The Qualified Person overseeing the metallurgical testing and mineral processing is Deepak Malhotra, SME-RM, from DM Consulting, LLC. The Qualified Person overseeing the overall Preliminary Economic Assessment report and the economic analysis is Donald E. Hulse, SME-RM, from SLR Consulting, Inc. The independent and Qualified Person for the mineral resource estimate, as defined by NI 43-101, is Kevin Hon, B.Sc., P.Geo., Senior Resource Geologist from APEX Geoscience Ltd. Michael Dufresne, M.Sc., P.Geo., President & CEO of APEX, an independent and Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, completed a peer review of the estimate.”

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate incorporated into the PEA reported a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources relative to the previous 2024 estimate.

Evidence · text

“The PEA incorporated the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate completed in April 2026 that reported a 54% increase in Indicated Mineral Resources”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, and the mineral resource estimate is also NI 43-101 compliant.

Evidence · text

“The PEA was prepared by SLR Consulting, of Fort Collins, Colorado (“SLR”) as the lead consultant in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a significant portion of Inferred Mineral Resources (45,583 Ktonnes global Inferred), which are considered speculative.

Evidence · table

“45,583”

Context: Inferred

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the conceptual underground extraction scenario.

Evidence · text

“The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the conceptual underground extraction scenario.”

Moderate Recoverypositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The average gold recovery to concentrate is 84%, which falls within the moderate band for flotation (85% lower bound).

Evidence · text

“average gold recovery to concentrate of 84%”

Weak Recoverynegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The estimated gold recovery to sold metal is 80%, which is at the lower end of the weak band for flotation (80% lower bound).

Evidence · text

“with 80% recovery to sold metal.”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The PEA contemplates a conventional milling operation and a conceptual flotation plant.

Evidence · text

“conventional 12,000 tonne per day (“tpd”) milling operation”

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: The process flowsheet includes gravity concentration, with cleaner flotation tailings fed to gravity concentration.

Evidence · text

“The cleaner flotation tailings will be combined and fed to gravity concentration.”

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: Additional metallurgical test work is recommended to optimize grind size and the open circuit flotation process, suggesting the current work is not yet at pilot scale.

Evidence · text

“Additional metallurgical test work is recommended for Fondaway Canyon to optimize the grind size, the open circuit flotation process”

POX/BIOX Routeneutral

Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: the document describes a pox_biox route ("pressure oxidation")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 9. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (7)

indicatedFondaway Canyon · goldTonnes: 22092000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 998000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne
Resource group id
resource:c8a32512fd8efac0d556
Deposit or zone
Central

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
22092000
Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
998000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for the Central Open Pit zone represents a substantial and high-confidence portion of the project's gold endowment, contributing significantly to the positive PEA economics and demonstrating successful resource growth.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage and contained metal in the Indicated category, providing a strong foundation for economic studies.
  • Part of an updated MRE showing a 54% increase in Indicated resources, indicating successful de-risking and resource conversion.
  • Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by Qualified Persons.

Evidence · table

“22,092”

Context: Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedFondaway Canyon · goldTonnes: 16000Grade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne
Resource group id
resource:0dfdd8401a707bc052b3
Deposit or zone
Central

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
16000
Grade
2.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated underground resource, while smaller in scale, provides a high-grade component to the overall resource, offering potential for selective mining and contributing to the project's flexibility.

Positive factors

  • High-grade Indicated resource for potential underground extraction.
  • Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by Qualified Persons.

Negative factors

  • Relatively small tonnage compared to the open pit resources.

Evidence · table

“16”

Context: Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredFondaway Canyon · goldTonnes: 37619000Grade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1476000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne
Resource group id
resource:26cd0cec6a7353131d56
Deposit or zone
Central

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
37619000
Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1476000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This large Inferred resource for the Central Open Pit zone highlights the significant growth potential of the project, although its speculative nature means further work is needed to convert it to higher confidence categories.

Positive factors

  • Substantial tonnage and contained metal in the Inferred category, indicating significant exploration upside.
  • Part of an updated MRE showing an 8% increase in Inferred resources, suggesting continued growth potential.
  • Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by Qualified Persons.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources are considered speculative and have lower geological confidence, requiring further drilling for upgrade.

Evidence · table

“37,619”

Context: Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredFondaway Canyon · goldTonnes: 3248000Grade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 90000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne
Resource group id
resource:cfee9392437004e93a0c
Deposit or zone
West

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3248000
Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
90000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred resource in the West Open Pit zone contributes to the project's overall scale and exploration potential, though its lower grade and speculative category suggest it requires further investigation.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall Inferred resource base, indicating potential for expansion beyond the Central zone.
  • Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by Qualified Persons.

Negative factors

  • Lower grade compared to other zones.
  • Inferred resources are considered speculative and have lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“3,248”

Context: Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredFondaway Canyon · goldTonnes: 3687000Grade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 160000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne
Resource group id
resource:cc3e1c397765aef9d07a
Deposit or zone
East

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3687000
Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
160000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred resource in the East Open Pit zone contributes to the project's overall scale and exploration potential, with a grade comparable to the main Central zone, suggesting consistent mineralization along strike.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall Inferred resource base, indicating potential for expansion beyond the Central zone.
  • Grade is comparable to the Central Open Pit Inferred resource.
  • Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by Qualified Persons.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources are considered speculative and have lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“3,687”

Context: Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredFondaway Canyon · goldTonnes: 1029000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 86000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Kevin Hon, Michael Dufresne
Resource group id
resource:e1e3edc853863f7e9628
Deposit or zone
Central

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1029000
Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
86000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-13

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred underground resource provides a high-grade component, indicating potential for future underground mining scenarios, though its speculative nature requires further definition.

Positive factors

  • High-grade Inferred resource for potential underground extraction, adding to project flexibility.
  • Estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by Qualified Persons.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resources are considered speculative and have lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“1,029”

Context: Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Fact 7EdmontonView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Edmonton
Region
canada_ab
Reported Region
Alberta
Ticker
GTCH

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:27b46714dbf19d95642e

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Explicit resource disclosure recovered from source prose.

Evidence · text

“The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the”

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade significantly reduced vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the

Evidence · text

“The mineral resource is reported at a lower cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au for the conceptual open pit and 1.5 g/t Au for the”

Context: Edmonton, Alberta

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Metallurgical Results (2)

flotationFondaway Canyon · goldRecovery: 84 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
three stages of crushing followed by ball mill grinding, rougher flotation, and three stages of cleaner flotation in open circuit to produce high-value concentrate. The cleaner flotation tailings will be combined and fed to gravity concentration. The gravity concentrate will be combined with the flotation concentrate and gravity tailings will be combined with rougher tailings, filtered, and dry stacked.

Recovery

Recovery
84 %
Recovery Basis
to_concentrate
Conc. Grade
20
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Reagent Notes
The reagents, namely xanthate, AP 404 and AF 65 will be added to the mill.

Lab

Laboratory
DM Consulting LLC.
Consultant
DM Consulting, LLC.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The metallurgical test work demonstrates moderate gold recovery to a high-grade concentrate via a conventional flotation and gravity flowsheet, providing a solid basis for the PEA, though further optimization is planned.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold recovery to concentrate (84%) for a flotation process, indicating good amenability.
  • Production of a high-grade concentrate (±20 g/t Au) is favorable for downstream processing.
  • Flowsheet includes conventional flotation and gravity, suggesting a standard and proven approach.
  • Metallurgical work overseen by a Qualified Person.

Negative factors

  • Additional test work is recommended to optimize grind size and the open circuit flotation process, indicating the current work is not fully optimized or at pilot scale.

Evidence · text

“average gold recovery to concentrate of 84%”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

flotationFondaway Canyon · goldRecovery: 80 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Fondaway Canyon
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
GTCH

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
three stages of crushing followed by ball mill grinding, rougher flotation, and three stages of cleaner flotation in open circuit to produce high-value concentrate. The cleaner flotation tailings will be combined and fed to gravity concentration. The gravity concentrate will be combined with the flotation concentrate and gravity tailings will be combined with rougher tailings, filtered, and dry stacked.

Recovery

Recovery
80 %
Recovery Basis
to_payable_metal
Conc. Grade
20
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Reagent Notes
The reagents, namely xanthate, AP 404 and AF 65 will be added to the mill.

Lab

Laboratory
DM Consulting LLC.
Consultant
DM Consulting, LLC.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The 80% gold recovery to sold metal, while acceptable for a preliminary study, is at the lower end of expectations for a flotation circuit, highlighting the need for further optimization to potentially improve project economics.

Positive factors

  • Achieved 80% recovery to sold metal, which is a reasonable outcome for a preliminary study.
  • Metallurgical work overseen by a Qualified Person.

Negative factors

  • 80% recovery to sold metal is at the lower end of the 'weak' band for flotation, suggesting potential for improvement.
  • Additional test work is recommended to optimize grind size and the open circuit flotation process, indicating the current work is not fully optimized or at pilot scale.

Evidence · text

“with 80% recovery to sold metal.”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.