GBM: High Grade Gold Extends Beyond Twin Hills Resources
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- GBM Resources Limited
- Ticker
- GBM
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Queensland
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-10-04 23:04:42 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
GBM Resources Limited announced high-grade gold drill results from its Stage 2 drilling program at the Twin Hills Gold Project in Queensland, Australia. Significant intercepts, including 18m at 12.01 g/t Au (with 2m at 104.61 g/t Au) at the 309 Deposit and 37m at 2.40 g/t Au (with 4m at 7.77 g/t Au) at Lone Sister, extend mineralization beyond current resource boundaries. These results strengthen the case for resource growth ahead of a planned Mineral Resource Estimate update.
Reasoning: The announcement reports multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades up to 104.61 g/t Au, that significantly extend mineralization beyond the current resource boundaries at both the 309 and Lone Sister deposits. These results strongly support potential resource growth and an upcoming MRE update.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
- qaqc_disclosed
- compositing_transparent
- jorc_compliant
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Facts used in scoring: 21
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes detailed QA/QC procedures, including the use of blanks, standards, duplicates, and certified laboratories (ALS and Intertek), with sign-off by a Competent Person.
Evidence · text
“Laboratory analysis is undertaken at ALS and Intertek in Townsville... GBM quality control procedures for sampling were implemented systematically; blanks (coarse and pulp), standards (Certified Reference Materials) and field duplicates (quarter core) were inserted; focused in mineralised zones... Mr Daniel Hastings, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM)... to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The document clearly states the cut-off grades (0.4 g/t Au and 2.0 g/t Au) and allowable internal dilution (4m and 2m) used for reporting intervals.
Evidence · text
“Significant assay results have been calculated using an Au cutoff grade of 0.4g/t Au... Allowable internal dilution is 4m. Where a significant assay result is referred to as being included as part of a larger interval, an Au cutoff grade of 2.0g/t Au has been used, and allowable internal dilution is 2m.”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Competent Person's Statement confirms that the report is based on information compiled by a Member of the AusIMM and is compliant with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“Mr Hastings has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr Daniel Hastings, Chief Executive Officer and a Member of the AusIMM, is named as the Competent Person responsible for the Exploration Results.
Evidence · text
“The information in this report announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Daniel Hastings, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM).”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 21. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (21)
TNDH048Twin Hills · goldGrade: 12.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH048
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 247 m
- To
- 265 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH048:247-265
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade intercept of 12.01 g/t Au over 18m extends mineralization beyond the current resource boundary at the 309 Deposit, indicating strong potential for resource growth.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“18m @ 12.01g/t Au from 247m (TNDH048)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 12.01 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, and 18m width makes it a significant intercept (GT = 216.18 g/t·m).
Evidence · text
“18m @ 12.01g/t Au from 247m (TNDH048)”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The intersection is approximately 85m from a previously reported intercept, indicating an extension of mineralization beyond the current resource.
Evidence · text
“Intersection is ~85m from the previously reported 37m @ 5.00g/t Au (TNDH012) identifying a compelling area for further drilling and potential resource growth.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH048Twin Hills · goldGrade: 104.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH048
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 104.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 247 m
- To
- 249 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH048:247-249
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza-grade intercept of 104.61 g/t Au over 2m, indicating very high-grade mineralization within a larger zone and contributing significantly to resource growth potential.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“2m @ 104.61g/t Au from 247m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 104.61 g/t Au is an exceptionally high grade for underground gold, well above the 15 g/t Au exceptional threshold.
Evidence · text
“2m @ 104.61g/t Au from 247m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH048Twin Hills · goldGrade: 6.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH048
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 189 m
- To
- 194 m
- Intercept Depth
- 189 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH048:189-194
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade intercept of 6.66 g/t Au over 5m, further extending mineralization outside the current resource at 309.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 6.66g/t Au from 189m (TNDH048)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 6.66 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 4 g/t Au moderate threshold.
Evidence · text
“5m @ 6.66g/t Au from 189m (TNDH048)”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH048Twin Hills · goldGrade: 16.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH048
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 189 m
- To
- 191 m
- Intercept Depth
- 189 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH048:189-191
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade intercept of 16.20 g/t Au over 2m, contributing to the overall strong result and indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“2m @ 16.20g/t Au from 189m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 16.20 g/t Au is an exceptionally high grade for underground gold, exceeding the 15 g/t Au exceptional threshold.
Evidence · text
“2m @ 16.20g/t Au from 189m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH050Twin Hills · goldGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH050
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 118 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 118 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH050:118-123
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade intercept of 5.80 g/t Au over 5m, further extending mineralization outside the current resource at 309.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 5.80g/t Au from 118m in TNDH050”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 5.80 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 4 g/t Au moderate threshold.
Evidence · text
“5m @ 5.80g/t Au from 118m in TNDH050”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH050Twin Hills · goldGrade: 9.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH050
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH050:120-123
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade intercept of 9.44 g/t Au over 3m, contributing to the overall strong result and indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“3m @ 9.44g/t Au from 120m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 9.44 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 7 g/t Au strong threshold.
Evidence · text
“3m @ 9.44g/t Au from 120m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH050Twin Hills · goldGrade: 2.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH050
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 169 m
- To
- 174 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH050:169-174
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate-grade intercept of 2.02 g/t Au over 5m, contributing to the extension of mineralization outside the current resource at 309.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 2.02g/t Au from 169m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH050Twin Hills · goldGrade: 7.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH050
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 169 m
- To
- 170 m
- Intercept Depth
- 169 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH050:169-170
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval of 7.32 g/t Au over 1m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 7.32g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 7.32 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 7 g/t Au strong threshold.
Evidence · text
“1m @ 7.32g/t Au”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH021Twin Hills · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH021
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 242 m
- Intercept Depth
- 221 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH021:221-242
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate-grade intercept of 1.29 g/t Au over 21m, contributing to the extension of mineralization outside the current resource at 309.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“21m @ 1.29g/t Au from 221m in TNDH021”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH021Twin Hills · goldGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH021
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 238 m
- To
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 238 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH021:238-241
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate-grade sub-interval of 2.35 g/t Au over 3m within a broader mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“3m @ 2.35g/t Au from 238m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH040Twin Hills · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH040
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 327 m
- To
- 337 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH040:327-337
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate-grade intercept of 1.26 g/t Au over 10m, contributing to the extension of mineralization outside the current resource at 309.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“10m @ 1.26g/t Au from 327m in TNDH040”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH040Twin Hills · goldGrade: 9.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH040
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 327 m
- To
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 327 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH040:327-328
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval of 9.18 g/t Au over 1m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 9.18g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 9.18 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 7 g/t Au strong threshold.
Evidence · text
“1m @ 9.18g/t Au”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH063Twin Hills · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH063
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 299 m
- Intercept Depth
- 277 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH063:277-299
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak-grade intercept of 0.78 g/t Au over 22m, contributing to the extension of mineralization outside the current resource at 309, but at a lower grade.
Positive factors
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- weak_grade_intercept
Evidence · text
“22m @ 0.78g/t Au from 277m in TNDH063”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
TNDH063Twin Hills · goldGrade: 8.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TNDH063
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 278 m
- Intercept Depth
- 277 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TNDH063:277-278
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 309 Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval of 8.68 g/t Au over 1m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 8.68g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 8.68 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 7 g/t Au strong threshold.
Evidence · text
“1m @ 8.68g/t Au”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37 m
- From
- 285 m
- To
- 322 m
- Intercept Depth
- 285 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:285-322
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong intercept of 2.40 g/t Au over 37m, extending mineralization outside the current resource at Lone Sister, indicating good continuity and potential for resource growth.
Positive factors
- strong_continuity
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“37m @ 2.40g/t Au from 285m (LSDH011)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The 37m intersection lies outside the current Lone Sister MRE in the same area as a previously reported intercept, indicating an extension of mineralization.
Evidence · text
“The 37m intersection lies outside the current Lone Sister MRE in the same area as the previously reported 52m @ 2.77g/t Au from 299m in LSDH002.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 6.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 286 m
- To
- 288 m
- Intercept Depth
- 286 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:286-288
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval of 6.75 g/t Au over 2m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“2m @ 6.75g/t Au from 286m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 6.75 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 4 g/t Au moderate threshold.
Evidence · text
“2m @ 6.75g/t Au from 286m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 16.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 302 m
- To
- 303 m
- Intercept Depth
- 302 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:302-303
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval of 16.65 g/t Au over 1m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 16.65g/t Au from 302m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 16.65 g/t Au is an exceptionally high grade for underground gold, exceeding the 15 g/t Au exceptional threshold.
Evidence · text
“1m @ 16.65g/t Au from 302m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 9.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 308 m
- To
- 309 m
- Intercept Depth
- 308 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:308-309
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval of 9.53 g/t Au over 1m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 9.53g/t Au from 308m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 9.53 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 7 g/t Au strong threshold.
Evidence · text
“1m @ 9.53g/t Au from 308m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 7.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 314 m
- To
- 318 m
- Intercept Depth
- 314 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:314-318
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade sub-interval of 7.77 g/t Au over 4m within a broader mineralized zone, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- bonanza_intercept
- high_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“4m @ 7.77g/t Au from 314m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 7.77 g/t Au is a strong grade for underground gold, exceeding the 7 g/t Au strong threshold.
Evidence · text
“4m @ 7.77g/t Au from 314m”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 328 m
- To
- 346 m
- Intercept Depth
- 328 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:328-346
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate-grade intercept of 1.40 g/t Au over 18m, further extending mineralization outside the current resource at Lone Sister.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- step_out_extension
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“18m @ 1.40g/t Au from 328m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
LSDH011Twin Hills · goldGrade: 2.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LSDH011
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- GBM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 338 m
- To
- 346 m
- Intercept Depth
- 338 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LSDH011:338-346
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lone Sister Deposit
- CRS
- MGA Zone 55
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate-grade sub-interval of 2.43 g/t Au over 8m within a broader mineralized zone.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · text
“8m @ 2.43g/t Au from 338m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "For personal use only ASX: GBM GBM RESOURCES LIMITED 3 309 Deposit At 309, drilling continues to identify high-grade min"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are downhole lengths and true widths are not known.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.