GAL: Galileo Mining Investor Presentation September 2026
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Galileo Mining
- Ticker
- GAL
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Palladium
- Secondary commodities
- Platinum, Gold, Rhodium, Nickel, Copper
- Document categories
- Resource update, Metallurgy, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-22 23:12:13 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Galileo Mining presented its September 2026 investor update, highlighting the 17.5Mt Callisto PGE resource and excellent sulphide flotation metallurgical results. The company is transitioning into new drill campaigns at North Callisto and Mission Sill to expand its footprint.
Reasoning: Investor presentation summarizing a large existing PGE resource, excellent metallurgical results, and upcoming exploration programs.
Positive factors
- Large existing resource base
- Excellent metallurgical recovery results
- Strong shareholder support from Mark Creasy and IGO
- Significant exploration upside in North Callisto and Mission Sill
Negative factors
- Resource data is historical (2023)
- Exploration targets are early-stage
Facts used in scoring: 15
Classification and evidence
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The presentation summarizes the existing Callisto Mineral Resource Estimate.
Evidence · text
“Callisto Mineral Resource Estimate*”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Paul Hetherington is named as the Competent Person for the resource estimate.
Evidence · text
“information complied by Paul Hetherington, a Competent Person”
JorC Compliantpositive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The resource estimate is prepared in compliance with the JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“based on information complied by Paul Hetherington... (JORC Code)”
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: Metallurgical results indicate a conventional crushing, milling and flotation process.
Evidence · text
“amenable to concentration using a conventional crushing, milling and flotation process”
Gravity Routeneutral
Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.
Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")
Single Domain Onlynegative
Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.
Why it applies: only one composite was tested
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 15. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (9)
indicatedNorseman Project · palladiumTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.92Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.92 ppm Pd is strong for an indicated resource.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · platinumTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.16Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- platinum
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.16 ppm Pt is moderate.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · rhodiumTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.048Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- rhodium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.048
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.048 ppm Rh is low.
Evidence · table
“0.048”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · nickelTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.22% Ni is moderate.
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · copperTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.19% Cu is moderate.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · palladiumTonnes: 7960000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- ppm
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 2.5 ppm PdEq is strong for an indicated resource.
Positive factors
- Strong PdEq grade
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · nickelTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 1.16% NiEq is strong.
Positive factors
- Strong NiEq grade
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · palladiumTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.92Grade Unit: ppmContained Metal: 235.3Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Contained Metal
- 235.3
- Contained Unit
- koz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 235.3 Koz Pd is significant.
Positive factors
- Significant contained metal
Evidence · table
“235.3”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
indicatedNorseman Project · copperTonnes: 7960000Grade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 14.9Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Paul Hetherington
- Resource group id
- resource:ada7ae90578b2c863c0b
- Deposit or zone
- Above 60mRL and cut-off > 0.5g/t PdEq
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7960000
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 14.9
- Contained Unit
- kt
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-10-02
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-10-02T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 17.3 Koz Cu is moderate.
Evidence · table
“17.3”
Context: 7.96
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.0 years before this release
Metallurgical Results (6)
flotationNorseman Project · copperRecovery: 94 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- sulphide flotation
- Sample
- Callisto sample from NRCD337, sulphide flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 94 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 94% copper recovery is exceptional for flotation.
Positive factors
- Exceptional recovery
Evidence · text
“94% copper recovery”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 94% is at or above the exceptional band (92%)
flotationNorseman Project · palladiumRecovery: 82 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- sulphide flotation
- Sample
- Callisto sample from NRCD337, sulphide flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 82 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 82% palladium recovery is strong for flotation.
Positive factors
- Strong recovery
Evidence · text
“82% palladium recovery”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationNorseman Project · nickelRecovery: 77 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- sulphide flotation
- Sample
- Callisto sample from NRCD337, sulphide flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 77 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 77% nickel recovery is strong for flotation.
Positive factors
- Strong recovery
Evidence · text
“77% nickel recovery”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationNorseman Project · goldRecovery: 79 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- sulphide flotation
- Sample
- Callisto sample from NRCD337, sulphide flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 79 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 79% gold recovery is moderate for flotation.
Positive factors
- Moderate recovery
Evidence · text
“79% gold recovery”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
Low Recoverynegative
Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 79% is below the weak band (80%)
flotationNorseman Project · platinumRecovery: 78 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- platinum
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- sulphide flotation
- Sample
- Callisto sample from NRCD337, sulphide flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 78 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 78% platinum recovery is moderate for flotation.
Positive factors
- Moderate recovery
Evidence · text
“78% platinum recovery”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationNorseman Project · rhodiumRecovery: 63 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Norseman Project
- Commodity
- rhodium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- GAL
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- sulphide flotation
- Sample
- Callisto sample from NRCD337, sulphide flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 63 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 63% rhodium recovery is weak for flotation.
Negative factors
- Weak recovery
Evidence · text
“63% rhodium recovery”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.