G11: Beatrice Prospect now part of summer drill program
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- G11 Resources Limited
- Ticker
- G11
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Tasmania
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Other, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-15 23:15:30 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
G11 Resources Limited announced a planned five-hole diamond drill program at its Beatrice Prospect in Tasmania, targeting polymetallic mineralization. The program is justified by historical drilling, including an intercept of 5.5m at 2.13 g/t Au, 28 g/t Ag, 0.21% Cu, 2.13% Pb, and 2.08% Zn from 58m in drillhole MS11. However, the company cautions that these historical results are not JORC 2012 compliant and have not been independently verified.
Reasoning: G11 Resources announced a planned drill program at the Beatrice Prospect, justified by historical polymetallic drill intercepts, but the data is old and not compliant with modern reporting standards, leading to low confidence in the results.
Positive factors
- Planned drill program
- Polymetallic target
- Historical high-grade intercept (MS11)
- Proximity to known deposits
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- Lack of modern QA/QC records for historical drilling
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 95
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 95. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (95)
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 1.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.07% over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 38 m
- To
- 40 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:38-40
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 1.5% over 2.0m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 56 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:54-56
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 4.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 56 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:54-56
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.02% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 56 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:54-56
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 1.5% over 2.0m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 54 m
- To
- 56 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:54-56
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.24% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 68 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:60-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.28 g/t over 8.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 68 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:60-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 5.2 g/t over 8.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 68 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:60-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 8.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 68 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:60-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.94% over 8.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 68 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:60-68
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 1.61% over 8.0m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.61”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111 m
- To
- 113 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:111-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.20 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111 m
- To
- 113 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:111-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 22.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“22.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111 m
- To
- 113 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:111-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.14% over 2.0m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 2.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111 m
- To
- 113 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:111-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 2.65% over 2.0m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“2.65”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS1Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 5.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS1
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111 m
- To
- 113 m
- Hole Depth
- 329.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS1:111-113
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385602
- Northing
- 5347844
- Elevation
- 755 m
- Azimuth
- 304 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 5.05% over 2.0m is moderate grade for VMS but lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“5.05”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 63.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:60-63.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 8.5 g/t over 3.9m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 63.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:60-63.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 3.9m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 63.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:60-63.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.59% over 3.9m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 63.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:60-63.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.78% over 3.9m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 3.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 74 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:72-74
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 7.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 74 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:72-74
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 74 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:72-74
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.38% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 74 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:72-74
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.77% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 78 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:78-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 6.0 g/t over 1.2m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 78 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:78-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.52% over 1.2m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS2Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS2
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 78 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 301 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS2:78-79.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385362
- Northing
- 5347624
- Elevation
- 655 m
- Azimuth
- 65 °
- Dip
- -61 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.80% over 1.2m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111.6 m
- To
- 113.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:111.6-113.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.07 g/t over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111.6 m
- To
- 113.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:111.6-113.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 6.5 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111.6 m
- To
- 113.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:111.6-113.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.04% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111.6 m
- To
- 113.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:111.6-113.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.63% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 111.6 m
- To
- 113.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:111.6-113.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 1.14% over 2.0m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.14”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 116.6 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:116.6-118.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.10 g/t over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 116.6 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:116.6-118.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 4.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 116.6 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:116.6-118.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 116.6 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:116.6-118.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.55% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 116.6 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:116.6-118.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.48% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 126.6 m
- To
- 128.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:126.6-128.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 8.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“8.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 126.6 m
- To
- 128.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:126.6-128.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.02% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 126.6 m
- To
- 128.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:126.6-128.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.35% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 126.6 m
- To
- 128.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:126.6-128.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.70% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:134-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 4.2 g/t over 12.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 12.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:134-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 12.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 12.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:134-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.47% over 12.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 12.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 134 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:134-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.67% over 12.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 12.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 185 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:175-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 3.5 g/t over 10.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 185 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:175-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 10.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 185 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:175-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.41% over 10.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS3Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS3
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 185 m
- Hole Depth
- 328 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS3:175-185
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385432
- Northing
- 5347734
- Elevation
- 675 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -56 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.72% over 10.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 28.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:26-28.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 3.0 g/t over 2.8m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 28.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:26-28.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 2.8m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 28.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:26-28.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.27% over 2.8m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 28.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:26-28.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.95% over 2.8m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: 2.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 117.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:116-117.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 2.0 g/t over 1.7m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 1.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 117.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:116-117.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.02% over 1.7m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 117.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:116-117.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.13% over 1.7m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 1.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.7 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 117.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:116-117.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 1.65% over 1.7m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 1.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:144-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 3.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:144-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.03% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:144-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.16% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 144 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:144-146
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.90% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 150 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:148-150
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 3.0 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 150 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:148-150
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 150 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:148-150
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.38% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS4Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS4
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 148 m
- To
- 150 m
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS4:148-150
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385642
- Northing
- 5348004
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 306 °
- Dip
- -59 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1980-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.78% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS7Sedgewick Bluff · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS7
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 550 m
- Intercept Depth
- 388 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS7:388-390
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385200
- Northing
- 5347693
- Elevation
- 706 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.60 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS7Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS7
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 550 m
- Intercept Depth
- 388 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS7:388-390
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385200
- Northing
- 5347693
- Elevation
- 706 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 0.4 g/t over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS7Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS7
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 550 m
- Intercept Depth
- 388 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS7:388-390
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385200
- Northing
- 5347693
- Elevation
- 706 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.02% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS7Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS7
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 388 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 550 m
- Intercept Depth
- 388 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS7:388-390
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385200
- Northing
- 5347693
- Elevation
- 706 m
- Azimuth
- 60 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.02% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 18.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.1 m
- From
- 561.9 m
- To
- 569 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:561.9-569
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 18.4 g/t over 7.1m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“18.4”
Context: 7.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.1 m
- From
- 561.9 m
- To
- 569 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:561.9-569
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 7.1m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 7.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.1 m
- From
- 561.9 m
- To
- 569 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:561.9-569
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.42% over 7.1m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 7.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.1 m
- From
- 561.9 m
- To
- 569 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:561.9-569
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.98% over 7.1m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 7.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.9 m
- From
- 572.5 m
- To
- 583.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:572.5-583.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 11.6 g/t over 10.9m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“11.6”
Context: 10.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.9 m
- From
- 572.5 m
- To
- 583.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:572.5-583.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.01% over 10.9m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 10.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.9 m
- From
- 572.5 m
- To
- 583.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:572.5-583.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.50% over 10.9m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 10.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.9 m
- From
- 572.5 m
- To
- 583.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:572.5-583.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.98% over 10.9m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 10.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 653.2 m
- To
- 655.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:653.2-655.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 6.7 g/t over 2.4m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“6.7”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 653.2 m
- To
- 655.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:653.2-655.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.03% over 2.4m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 653.2 m
- To
- 655.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:653.2-655.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.33% over 2.4m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 653.2 m
- To
- 655.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:653.2-655.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.97% over 2.4m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 696.5 m
- To
- 697.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:696.5-697.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 6.0 g/t over 1.1m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 696.5 m
- To
- 697.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:696.5-697.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.03% over 1.1m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 696.5 m
- To
- 697.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:696.5-697.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.26% over 1.1m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 696.5 m
- To
- 697.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:696.5-697.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.91% over 1.1m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 735.2 m
- To
- 736.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:735.2-736.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 5.5 g/t over 1.3m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“5.5”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 735.2 m
- To
- 736.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:735.2-736.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.04% over 1.3m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 735.2 m
- To
- 736.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:735.2-736.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.29% over 1.3m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- From
- 735.2 m
- To
- 736.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:735.2-736.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 1.40% over 1.3m is low grade for VMS and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“1.40”
Context: 1.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · silverGrade: 7.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 772.8 m
- To
- 774.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:772.8-774.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver intercept of 7.7 g/t over 2.0m is low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“7.7”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 772.8 m
- To
- 774.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:772.8-774.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.02% over 2.0m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 772.8 m
- To
- 774.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:772.8-774.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept of 0.30% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · zincGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 772.8 m
- To
- 774.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:772.8-774.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Pb+Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept of 0.84% over 2.0m is below cutoff and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
MS8Sedgewick Bluff · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MS8
- Project
- Sedgewick Bluff
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- G11
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 779.7 m
- To
- 782.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 798.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 561.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MS8:779.7-782.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 385222
- Northing
- 5348443
- Elevation
- 955 m
- Azimuth
- 112 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- No
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1998-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.11 g/t over 2.7m is very low grade and lacks modern verification.
Negative factors
- Historical data not JORC 2012 compliant
- Not independently verified
- True width unknown
- No QA/QC disclosure for historical drilling
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 2.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.