Further High-Grade Copper and Gold Mineralisation Identified at Chanach

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
RTG Mining Inc.
Ticker
RTG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Kyrgyz Republic
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 11:03:02 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

RTG Mining has reported high-grade gold and copper results from trench sampling at the Chanach Project in the Kyrgyz Republic. The results include a notable 17m intercept at 5.13 g/t Au and 0.78% Cu, supporting the potential for a large porphyry skarn and epithermal gold system.

Reasoning: The announcement reports significant high-grade trench sampling results for both gold and copper, confirming multiple mineralization styles across a large area.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold and copper intercepts
  • Multiple mineralization styles (skarn and epithermal)
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • True width stated for trench samples

Facts used in scoring: 8

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions use of internal lab standards, certified reference material, blanks, splits, and replicates.

Evidence · text

“Laboratory QAQC involves the use of internal lab standards using certified reference material, blanks, splits and replicates”

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: Trench samples are stated to represent true widths of the mineralisation.

Evidence · text

“The 2023 trench samples were taken from meter length samples taken at right angles across the mapped vein and represent true widths of the mineralisation.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 8. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (8)

Cut 6goldGrade: 5.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 6
Commodity
gold
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
5.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 6:0-17

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 17m at 5.13 g/t Au is a strong intercept for an exploration target.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Evidence · text

“17m @ 5.13g/t Au and 0.78% Cu from Cut 6”
Cut 6copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 6
Commodity
copper
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 6:0-17

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 0.78% Cu accompanies high gold grades in a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade

Evidence · text

“17m @ 5.13g/t Au and 0.78% Cu from Cut 6”
Cut 7goldGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 7
Commodity
gold
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
2.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 7:0-3

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 2.52 g/t Au is a strong grade for a 3m intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Evidence · text

“3m @ 2.52g/tAu and 10.48% Cu from Cut 7”
Cut 7copperGrade: 10.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 7
Commodity
copper
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
10.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 7:0-3

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 10.48% Cu is an exceptionally high grade.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade

Evidence · text

“3m @ 2.52g/tAu and 10.48% Cu from Cut 7”
Cut 8goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 8
Commodity
gold
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 8:0-11

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 11m at 1.29 g/t Au provides good continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Evidence · text

“11m @ 1.29g/tAu (including 1m @ 3.13g/tAu and 1.03% Cu) from Cut 8”
Cut 8goldGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 8
Commodity
gold
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
3.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 8:0-1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade sub-interval within Cut 8.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Evidence · text

“1m @ 3.13g/tAu”
Cut 8copperGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 8
Commodity
copper
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 8:0-1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade sub-interval within Cut 8.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade

Evidence · text

“1m @ 3.13g/tAu and 1.03% Cu”
Cut 8copperGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Cut 8
Commodity
copper
Ticker
RTG

Geometry

Grade
4.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Cut 8:0-3

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 3m at 4.15% Cu is a high-grade intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade

Evidence · text

“3m @ 4.15% Cu from Cut 8”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.