FUN: Outstanding Deeper Rutile Results
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Fortuna Metals Limited
- Ticker
- FUN
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Titanium
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-07 22:20:21 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Fortuna Metals has reported outstanding rutile drill results from its maiden aircore program at the Mlongo prospect within the Mkanda Project in Malawi. The program successfully extended high-grade mineralization below the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate, including the project's highest recorded rutile grade of 3.43% over 2m within a broader 7m interval at 2.27% rutile. These results demonstrate a world-class, high-grade rutile system with significant potential for resource growth.
Reasoning: The maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivered exceptional, high-grade rutile results, including the highest grade recorded for the project, extending mineralization below the existing MRE and indicating significant potential for resource growth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade rutile intercepts
- Highest grade rutile recorded for the project (3.43%)
- Significant widths of mineralization
- Extension of mineralization below the current Inferred MRE
- Maiden aircore drill program success
- Potential for significant resource growth
Facts used in scoring: 28
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 28. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (28)
MAC26_047Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_047
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 24 m
- Hole Depth
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_047:0-24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556999
- Northing
- 8442996
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a high grade over a significant width, exceeding the project's average grade and extending mineralization below the current MRE, indicating strong potential.
Positive factors
- High grade (1.5% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Significant width (24m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: 24.00m @ 1.50 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_019Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_019
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 25 m
- Hole Depth
- 25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_019:0-25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556001
- Northing
- 8443394
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good width (25m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: 25.00m @ 1.17 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_036Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_036
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 21 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_036:0-21
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556403
- Northing
- 8443199
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good width (21m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 21.00m @ 1.07 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_046Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_046
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 30 m
- Hole Depth
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_046:0-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556998
- Northing
- 8443206
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a very good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Very good width (30m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 30.00m @ 0.62 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_016Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_016
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_016:26-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556401
- Northing
- 8443601
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional high grade, significantly above the project average, and extends mineralization below the current MRE, with the hole ending in mineralization, indicating strong potential at depth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high grade (2.27% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
- Remained in mineralisation at EOH
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: 7.00m @ 2.27 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 2.27% rutile is significantly higher than the project's average grade of 1.438% and is part of the 'highest grade rutile for the project recorded to date'.
Evidence · text
“7m @ 2.27% rutile (MAC26_016) from 26m to 33m EOH”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_016Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_016
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 32 m
- Hole Depth
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_016:30-32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556401
- Northing
- 8443601
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept represents the highest grade rutile recorded for the project to date, significantly exceeding the project average and extending mineralization below the current MRE, indicating exceptional potential at depth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high grade (3.43% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Highest grade rutile for the project recorded to date
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · text
“3.43% rutile – the highest grade rutile for the project recorded to date from 30-32m depth within a broader zone of 7m @ 2.27% rutile (MAC26_016)”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 3.43% rutile is explicitly stated as 'the highest grade rutile for the project recorded to date'.
Evidence · text
“3.43% rutile – the highest grade rutile for the project recorded to date”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_035Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_035
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 16 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_035:0-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556399
- Northing
- 8443003
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (16m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 16.00m @ 0.72 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_037Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_037
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 8 m
- Hole Depth
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_037:0-8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556399
- Northing
- 8443396
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good grade of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good grade (1.13% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: 8.00m @ 1.13 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_030Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_030
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 10 m
- Hole Depth
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_030:0-10
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 555998
- Northing
- 8443008
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (10m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 10.00m @ 0.66 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_016Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_016
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6 m
- Hole Depth
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_016:0-6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556401
- Northing
- 8443601
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good grade of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good grade (1.01% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 6.00m @ 1.01 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_031Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_031
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 21 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_031:14-21
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 555997
- Northing
- 8443201
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (7m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 7.00m @ 0.81 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_040Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_040
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 8 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_040:0-8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556594
- Northing
- 8442996
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (8m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 8.00m @ 0.68 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_043Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_043
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6 m
- Hole Depth
- 18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_043:0-6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556796
- Northing
- 8443194
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (6m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 6.00m @ 0.85 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_031Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_031
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_031:0-6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 555997
- Northing
- 8443201
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (6m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 6.00m @ 0.77 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_018Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_018
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 20 m
- Hole Depth
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_018:16-20
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 555994
- Northing
- 8443602
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good grade of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good grade (1.01% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 4.00m @ 1.01 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_041Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_041
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_041:0-2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556593
- Northing
- 8442996
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a high grade of mineralization, significantly above the project average, and extends below the current MRE, indicating strong potential.
Positive factors
- High grade (2.0% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“2.00”
Context: 2.00m @ 2.00 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 2.0% rutile is significantly higher than the project's average grade of 1.438%.
Evidence · text
“2.00 %”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_040Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_040
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 20 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_040:16-20
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556594
- Northing
- 8442996
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the project average.
Positive factors
- Good width (4m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 4.00m @ 0.98 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_034Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_034
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4 m
- Hole Depth
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_034:0-4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556200
- Northing
- 8443002
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the project average.
Positive factors
- Good width (4m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: 4.00m @ 0.90 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_044Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_044
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 16 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_044:12-16
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556801
- Northing
- 8443395
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the project average.
Positive factors
- Good width (4m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 4.00m @ 0.85 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_034Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_034
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 22 m
- To
- 27 m
- Hole Depth
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_034:22-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556200
- Northing
- 8443002
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (5m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 5.00m @ 0.66 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_039Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_039
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4 m
- Hole Depth
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_039:0-4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556611
- Northing
- 8443213
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (4m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: 4.00m @ 0.76 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_016Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_016
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 14 m
- Hole Depth
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_016:10-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556401
- Northing
- 8443601
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the cut-off.
Positive factors
- Good width (4m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 4.00m @ 0.65 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_033Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_033
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_033:0-2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556197
- Northing
- 8443199
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good grade of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good grade (1.28% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: 2.00m @ 1.28 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_044Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_044
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_044:0-2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556801
- Northing
- 8443395
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good grade of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good grade (1.21% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.21”
Context: 2.00m @ 1.21 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_018Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_018
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_018:0-2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 555994
- Northing
- 8443602
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good grade of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Good grade (1.11% rutile vs 1.438% project average)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 2.00m @ 1.11 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_038Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_038
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_038:0-2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556599
- Northing
- 8443402
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width of mineralization, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential, although the grade is closer to the project average.
Positive factors
- Good width (2m)
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 2.00m @ 0.98 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_018Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_018
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Hole Depth
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_018:8-10
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 555994
- Northing
- 8443602
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows mineralization above the cut-off grade, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Above cut-off grade
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 2.00m @ 0.56 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
MAC26_044Mkanda · titaniumGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MAC26_044
- Project
- Mkanda
- Commodity
- titanium
- Region
- malawi, africa
- Reported Region
- malawi, africa
- Ticker
- FUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 21 m
- Hole Depth
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- eluvial
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MAC26_044:20-21
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 556801
- Northing
- 8443395
- CRS
- WGS84 Zone 36S
- EPSG
- 32736
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Scientific Services
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows mineralization above the cut-off grade, extending below the current MRE, which is a positive indicator for resource potential.
Positive factors
- Above cut-off grade
- Extension of mineralization below MRE
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: 1.00m @ 0.97 %
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The results are from a maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect and are described as 'below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)'.
Evidence · text
“Mkanda maiden aircore drill program at Mlongo prospect delivers exceptional results below the base of the current Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE)”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with detailed commentary on sampling techniques, quality control procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory processes.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'Intercepts are length-weighted averages of 2m composite samples... with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied.'
Evidence · text
“Intercepts are length-weighted averages above a 0.5% rutile cut-off, with no internal dilution. No top cut has been applied”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: A cut-off grade of 0.5% rutile has been explicitly applied for reporting intercepts.
Evidence · text
“A cut-off of 0.5% rutile has been applied.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Mr Thomas Langley, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM), is named as the Competent Person responsible for the information.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Thomas Langley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG) and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM).”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.