Freegold Intersects 3.10 g/t Au over 102.8 m including 5.18 g/t Au over 55.9 m as it advances Golden Summit PFS

Original announcement by cnw on

Company
Freegold Limited
Ticker
FVL
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Alaska
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Metallurgy, Other
Extracted
2026-09-16 11:38:16 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Freegold Limited announced significant drill results from its Golden Summit project in Alaska, including a bonanza intercept of 71.46 g/t Au over 5.8 m and 183.4 g/t Au over 1.2 m. These high-grade results, alongside broad zones of moderate-grade gold, are part of a mixed drill program aimed at infill, condemnation, and exploration, all contributing to an upcoming Preliminary Feasibility Study. The company also reported progress on geotechnical and metallurgical test work, and the exploration camp is now connected to grid power, further de-risking the project.

Reasoning: The announcement reports several high-grade and bonanza gold intercepts, notably 71.46 g/t Au over 5.8 m and 183.4 g/t Au over 1.2 m, which are significantly above the project's historical average and peer group. These results, combined with broad zones of moderate-grade mineralization, confirm continuity and support the ongoing PFS. The comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and progress on de-risking technical studies further bolster confidence, despite the lack of true width disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, significantly exceed the project's average grade and peer comparisons, indicating strong mineralization.
  • Broad zones of moderate-grade gold mineralization confirm continuity and support resource conversion efforts for the PFS.
  • The drill program is advancing key technical work (geotechnical, metallurgical) for a Preliminary Feasibility Study, de-risking the project.
  • QA/QC procedures are well-documented, including certified labs and QP sign-off, enhancing confidence in the results.
  • The company is evaluating advanced metallurgical processes to achieve high gold recoveries, which could significantly improve project economics.

Negative factors

  • True width of intercepts cannot be determined due to uncertain geometry, which may overstate actual thickness.
  • Some intercepts, while broad, are below the project's historical average grade, indicating variability.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 44

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization' for all reported drill hole intercepts.

Evidence · text

“The widths refer to drill hole intercepts; true width cannot be determined due to the uncertain geometry of mineralization .”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details the core logging, cutting, and sampling procedures, names ALS as the analytical facility, and specifies the assay methods (PhotonAssay, ICP-AES, Fire Assay) and QA/QC protocols (standards, blanks, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Analytical Program and QA/QC HQ core is logged, photographed and cut in half using a diamond saw. One-half is placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS facilities in Vancouver and Thunder Bay. Core samples were delivered to ALS's facility in Vancouver, Canada, where each sample was crushed to 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. In Thunder Bay, a representative ~500 g subsample was obtained by riffle splitting (SPL-32a) and analyzed for gold using the ALS method Au-PA01 (PhotonAssay), which provides a detection range of 0.03 to 350 ppm. In Vancouver, a subsample was also analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using the ALS method ME-ICP61 (34-element, four-acid ICP-AES). Occasionally, samples are smaller than 500 g and are then assayed by Fire Assay with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30 g sample size); samples over 10 g/t Au are then automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening may be performed using ALS's Au-SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50 g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and the entire oversize fraction is assayed. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. The QA/QC program includes laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of each submittal, and at least one blank is inserted every 25 standards.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is named as the Qualified Person who approved the scientific and technical disclosure.

Evidence · text

“Alvin Jackson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, is the Qualified Person who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this release.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Tighter-spaced infill drilling is improving the geological model' and 'infill drilling is increasing resource confidence and demonstrating grade continuity'.

Evidence · text

“Tighter-spaced infill drilling is improving the geological model and defining a structural framework for targeting extensions beyond the Dolphin/Cleary area.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The program is described as 'advancing exploration' and 'targeting extensions beyond the Dolphin/Cleary area' and 'increase the potential to discover additional mineralized centres'.

Evidence · text

“Freegold's property extends over 13 kilometres, while the main resource is currently concentrated within 1.5 kilometres; applying the structural and geological insights identified around the resource across this sizeable, underexplored land package could unlock a pipeline of high-priority discovery targets and increase the potential to discover additional mineralized centres elsewhere at Golden Summit.”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 71.46 g/t Au over 5.8 m in GS2641 and 183.4 g/t Au over 1.2 m in GS2634 are exceptionally high-grade, well above the deposit-type norm for porphyry gold.

Evidence · table

“71.46”

Context: 5.8

PFS-Supportingneutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: The entire program is explicitly stated to be 'advancing the technical work required for a Preliminary Feasibility Study (PFS)' and 'advancing the targeted PFS'.

Evidence · text

“Freegold Intersects 3.10 g/t Au over 102.8 m including 5.18 g/t Au over 55.9 m as it advances Golden Summit PFS”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIL")

POX/BIOX Routeneutral

Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: the document describes a pox_biox route ("POX")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 44. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (44)

GS2631Golden Summit · goldGrade: 7.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2631
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
7.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m
From
46.9 m
To
47.2 m
Hole Depth
260.9 m
Intercept Depth
46.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2631:46.9-47.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479702
Northing
7215398
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow intercept with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“7.82”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2631Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2631
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.4 m
From
163.3 m
To
184.7 m
Hole Depth
260.9 m
Intercept Depth
46.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2631:163.3-184.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479702
Northing
7215398
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good continuity of mineralization at a moderate grade and width, supporting resource conversion.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade contribute to resource confidence.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 21.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.3 m
From
178.3 m
To
188.6 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:178.3-188.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a grade below the project average, but still contributing to the overall geological model.

Evidence · table

“0.89”

Context: 10.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.6 m
From
352.6 m
To
386.2 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:352.6-386.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept, while lower grade, adds to the overall mineralized footprint and continuity, which is important for resource definition.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length, contributing to overall resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 33.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 102.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
102.8 m
From
460.2 m
To
563 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:460.2-563
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly material intercept with excellent width and a strong grade, indicating significant mineralization and supporting resource growth. The grade is strong for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length and strong grade, significantly contributing to resource potential.
  • Grade is well above the peer average for porphyry gold deposits.

Negative factors

  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“3.10”

Context: 102.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55.9 m
From
502.9 m
To
558.8 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:502.9-558.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval represents a very high-grade zone within a significant intercept, demonstrating excellent gold mineralization and potential for economic extraction. The grade is exceptional for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade and strong intercept length, indicating a high-grade zone within the broader mineralization.
  • Grade is well above the project average and peer average.

Negative factors

  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: 55.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2634Golden Summit · goldGrade: 183.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2634
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
183.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
555.6 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
576.8 m
Intercept Depth
178.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2634:555.6-556.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479795
Northing
7215352
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept, while narrow, is highly material and novel, demonstrating exceptional gold grades within the system and indicating potential for very high-grade pockets. The grade is exceptional for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade, significantly exceeding the project's best historical grade and peer comparisons, indicating very high-grade mineralization.
  • Associated with a fault structure, suggesting potential for structural controls on high-grade zones.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“183.4”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.1 m
From
14.3 m
To
41.4 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:14.3-41.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This near-surface intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting the potential for shallow mineralization amenable to open-pit methods.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length at near-surface depths, potentially favorable for open-pit mining.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 27.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
66.1 m
To
75.3 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:66.1-75.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 9.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.6 m
From
99.2 m
To
108.8 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:99.2-108.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding but not highly material on its own.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 9.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.5 m
From
188.1 m
To
224.6 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:188.1-224.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length, contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 36.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.9 m
From
188.1 m
To
206 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:188.1-206
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a higher grade within a broader zone, contributing positively to the overall resource model.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length and moderate grade, improving confidence in mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 17.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 2.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
2.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
371.9 m
To
377 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:371.9-377
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but strong intercept highlights the presence of higher-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for a narrow intercept, indicating higher-grade zones.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“2.42”

Context: 5.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2636Golden Summit · goldGrade: 4.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2636
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
4.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
From
422.5 m
To
428.9 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
14.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2636:422.5-428.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479999
Northing
7215602
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but strong intercept further highlights the presence of higher-grade mineralization within the system, which is positive for resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for a narrow intercept, indicating higher-grade zones.
  • Grade is strong for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“4.04”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 71.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
71.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.8 m
From
154.5 m
To
160.3 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:154.5-160.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept is highly material and novel, demonstrating exceptional gold grades and reinforcing the high-grade potential of the Cleary area. The grade is exceptional for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade, significantly exceeding the project's average grade and peer comparisons, indicating very high-grade mineralization.
  • Reinforces Cleary upside, suggesting potential for further high-grade discoveries.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“71.46”

Context: 5.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78 m
From
206.4 m
To
284.4 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:206.4-284.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while moderate grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 78.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.7 m
From
206.4 m
To
269.1 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:206.4-269.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval maintains a good grade over a very broad width, reinforcing the continuity of mineralization within the larger intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 62.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.4 m
From
206.4 m
To
254.8 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:206.4-254.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval continues to demonstrate significant width and a moderate grade, contributing to the overall resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length and moderate grade, further supporting resource continuity.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 48.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
4.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
From
278.9 m
To
284.4 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:278.9-284.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but strong intercept highlights the presence of higher-grade mineralization within the system, which is positive for resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for a narrow intercept, indicating higher-grade zones.
  • Grade is strong for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“4.64”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 2.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
2.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
337.4 m
To
345 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:337.4-345
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but strong intercept highlights the presence of higher-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for a narrow intercept, indicating higher-grade zones.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“2.77”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2641Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2641
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
381 m
To
390.8 m
Hole Depth
462.3 m
Intercept Depth
154.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2641:381-390.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479951
Northing
7215539
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-67 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
291.7 m
To
303.9 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:291.7-303.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.7 m
From
328.3 m
To
377 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:328.3-377
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept, while lower grade, adds to the overall mineralized footprint and continuity, which is important for resource definition.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length, contributing to overall resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 48.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 283.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
283.8 m
From
431.6 m
To
715.4 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:431.6-715.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while lower grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume and continuity.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 283.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
456.3 m
To
480.7 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:456.3-480.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval, while lower grade, adds to the overall mineralized footprint and continuity, which is important for resource definition.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length, contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 24.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
64 m
From
529.4 m
To
593.4 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:529.4-593.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while lower grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 64.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
42.6 m
From
620.9 m
To
663.5 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:620.9-663.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while lower grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 42.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2632Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2632
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.1 m
From
687.3 m
To
715.4 m
Hole Depth
913.5 m
Intercept Depth
291.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2632:687.3-715.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479347
Northing
7215252
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length, contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.78”

Context: 28.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
32.6 m
To
50.9 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:32.6-50.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 18.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88 m
From
246 m
To
334.4 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:246-334.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while moderate grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 88.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
3.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
246 m
To
258.2 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:246-258.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the overall resource model and highlighting higher-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for a moderate intercept length, indicating higher-grade zones.
  • Grade is strong for an open-pit porphyry gold deposit.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“3.88”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
112.8 m
From
480.7 m
To
593.5 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:480.7-593.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while lower grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume and continuity.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.
  • True width not determined.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 112.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
611.7 m
To
620.9 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:611.7-620.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow but strong intercept highlights the presence of higher-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for a narrow intercept, indicating higher-grade zones.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.98”

Context: 9.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
61 m
From
687.9 m
To
748.9 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:687.9-748.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very broad intercept, while lower grade, is highly material for demonstrating continuity and increasing the overall resource footprint, supporting the PFS.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept length, significantly contributing to resource volume.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 61.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2635Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2635
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
770.2 m
To
782.4 m
Hole Depth
880 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2635:770.2-782.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479046
Northing
7215055
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2637Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2637
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.5 m
From
166.5 m
To
182 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
166.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2637:166.5-182
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479151
Northing
7215662
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: 15.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2637Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2637
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.9 m
From
225.1 m
To
236 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
166.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2637:225.1-236
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479151
Northing
7215662
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 10.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GS2637Golden Summit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GS2637
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.3 m
From
244.6 m
To
257.9 m
Hole Depth
462.4 m
Intercept Depth
166.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GS2637:244.6-257.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
479151
Northing
7215662
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides good width at a moderate grade, supporting resource definition and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length and grade, contributing to resource confidence.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below the project average.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 13.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55.9 m
From
502.9 m
To
558.8 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
502.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:502.9-558.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.18 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 289.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.18 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 183.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
183.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
555.6 m
To
556.8 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
555.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:555.6-556.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 183.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 220.1 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 183.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“183.4”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.9 m
From
188.1 m
To
206 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
188.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:188.1-206
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
62.7 m
From
206.4 m
To
269.1 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
206.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:206.4-269.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.15 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 72.1 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.4 m
From
206.4 m
To
254.8 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
206.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:206.4-254.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.39 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 67.3 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inclGolden Summit · goldGrade: 4.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Golden Summit
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ak
Reported Region
usa_ak
Ticker
FVL

Geometry

Grade
4.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
From
278.9 m
To
284.4 m
Hole Depth
700 m
Intercept Depth
278.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:278.9-284.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.64 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 25.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.64 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.64”

Context: incl

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.