Fortune Announces Successful Tests to Produce Upgraded and Clean Cobalt Concentrate From the Nico Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Fortune Minerals Limited
Ticker
FTMDF
Exchange
TSX
Region
Northwest Territories
Primary commodity
Cobalt
Secondary commodities
Gold, Bismuth, Copper, Arsenic, Sulfur
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-08-25 10:55:04 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Fortune Minerals has successfully completed metallurgical test work using DST technology to produce upgraded, arsenic-free cobalt concentrate at the NICO Project. The process removes 99% of arsenic and increases metal grades by 20-30%, offering a lower-CAPEX development pathway.

Reasoning: Successful metallurgical test work demonstrated the ability to produce clean, high-grade cobalt concentrate by removing arsenic, significantly de-risking the project's commercial viability and reducing capital requirements.

Positive factors

  • Successful arsenic removal (99%)
  • Concentrate grade increase (20-30%)
  • Lower CAPEX/OPEX potential
  • Proven technology (DST)
  • No cobalt/gold/copper losses

Negative factors

  • Lower revenue compared to vertically integrated model
  • Greater dependence on third party processors

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The release notes that gold can be successfully recovered by cyanidation of the bulk concentrate.

Evidence · text

“Gold can be successfully recovered by cyanidation of the bulk concentrate”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The technology is applied to metal concentrates produced from the mine to be processed in existing circuits.

Evidence · text

“create metal concentrates that are more attractive to the market and can be processed in existing metal recovery circuits”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (4)

Fact 1arsenicRecovery: 99 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
arsenic
Ticker
FTMDF

Test Work

Sample
NICO bulk concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
99 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Successful removal of arsenic from bulk concentrate to below 0.2%.

Positive factors

  • 99% removal achieved

Evidence · text

“Successful removal of 99% of the arsenic in NICO bulk concentrate to lower than 0.2%”
Fact 2cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
cobalt
Ticker
FTMDF

Test Work

Sample
NICO bulk concentrate after pyrolysis

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Mass reduction from selective removal of arsenic and sulphur increases metal grades by 20-30%.

Positive factors

  • 20-30% grade increase

Evidence · text

“Metal grades in the concentrate increased by 20-30% due to mass reduction”
Fact 3goldRecovery: 100 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
FTMDF

Test Work

Sample
NICO bulk concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
100 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Pyrolysis process demonstrated zero gold loss, with recovery via cyanidation.

Positive factors

  • No gold losses during pyrolysis

Evidence · text

“No cobalt, gold, or copper losses from pyrolysis”
Fact 4copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
copper
Ticker
FTMDF

Test Work

Sample
NICO bulk concentrate

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Pyrolysis process demonstrated zero copper loss.

Positive factors

  • No copper losses during pyrolysis

Evidence · text

“No cobalt, gold, or copper losses from pyrolysis”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.