Fortitude Gold Drills 1.52 Meters Grading 13.20 g/t Gold Within 28.96 Meters Grading 2.07 g/t Gold at East Camp Douglas

Original announcement by accesswire on

Company
Fortitude Gold Corp.
Ticker
FTCO
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-15 13:33:45 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Fortitude Gold reported multiple wide and high-grade gold drill intercepts from its East Camp Douglas property in Nevada. Highlights include 1.52 meters grading 13.20 g/t gold within 28.96 meters grading 2.07 g/t gold, and 4.57 meters grading 4.79 g/t gold within 18.29 meters grading 1.48 g/t gold. These results from the Roosevelt target are aimed at building towards an initial resource and expanding known mineralization.

Reasoning: Fortitude Gold announced strong drill results from its East Camp Douglas property, including high-grade gold intercepts such as 1.52 meters grading 13.20 g/t gold within a broader 28.96-meter interval at 2.07 g/t gold, which significantly advances the exploration and resource definition potential at the Roosevelt target.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts including 1.52m at 13.20 g/t Au
  • Significant widths up to 28.96m at 2.07 g/t Au
  • Results support ongoing exploration and resource definition goals
  • Multiple drills operating at the project

Negative factors

  • True width of intercepts not reported

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 26

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release states that assays were performed by American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada, USA.

Evidence · text

“Assays by American Assay Laboratories, Sparks, Nevada, USA.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that reported intervals are 'Meters downhole, not true width'.

Evidence · text

“Meters downhole, not true width.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The company mentions 'northern expansion potential beyond our White Rock targets' and plans to 'aggressively drill to expand known areas of gold mineralization as well as drill additional highly prospective areas'.

Evidence · text

“It is exciting to see the northern expansion potential beyond our White Rock targets in the district. I am optimistic that we will receive the Plan of Operation for Exploration in the fourth quarter of 2026, which would allow us additional drill pad disturbance to further delineate the gold-bearing structural corridor in this highly prospective area.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 26. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (26)

ECDRC-238East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-238
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
6.1 m
To
19.82 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-238:6.1-19.82
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width with a weak gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralized zone but not standing out as a high-grade highlight.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 13.72

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-238East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-238
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
7.62 m
To
10.67 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-238:7.62-10.67
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow interval provides a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, indicating localized mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: 3.05

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-238East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-238
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
2.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
13.72 m
To
15.24 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-238:13.72-15.24
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept with a strong gold grade indicates another localized zone of higher-grade mineralization within the broader interval.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.08”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32 m
From
18.29 m
To
50.29 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:18.29-50.29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A significant width with a weak gold grade indicates broad, lower-grade mineralization, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept width

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: 32.00

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
25.91 m
To
28.96 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:25.91-28.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow interval provides a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, indicating some internal variability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: 3.05

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
42.67 m
To
45.72 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:42.67-45.72
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade, further detailing the internal variability of the broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.76”

Context: 3.05

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
73.15 m
To
74.67 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:73.15-74.67
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade, indicating discrete zones of mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
80.77 m
To
82.29 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:80.77-82.29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade, further defining the presence of mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
89.92 m
To
94.49 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:89.92-94.49
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, indicating lower-grade mineralization at this depth.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 4.57

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
91.44 m
To
92.96 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:91.44-92.96
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade, providing a higher-grade zone within the broader, weaker interval.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.28”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-239East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-239
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
109.73 m
To
111.25 m
Intercept Depth
18.29 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-239:109.73-111.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, indicating minor mineralization at this depth.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-267East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-267
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
10.67 m
To
12.19 m
Intercept Depth
10.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-267:10.67-12.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, indicating minor mineralization near surface.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-267East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-267
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
19.81 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
10.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-267:19.81-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width with a moderate gold grade represents a good intercept, contributing positively to the mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.48”

Context: 18.29

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-267East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 4.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-267
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
4.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
25.91 m
To
30.48 m
Intercept Depth
10.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-267:25.91-30.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold grade over a moderate width represents a significant high-grade zone within the broader intercept, enhancing the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“4.79”

Context: 4.57

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-267East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-267
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
45.72 m
To
50.29 m
Intercept Depth
10.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-267:45.72-50.29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, indicating minor mineralization at this depth.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 4.57

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-313East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-313
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.19 m
From
7.62 m
To
19.81 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-313:7.62-19.81
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a moderate width represents a very good intercept, indicating significant mineralization near surface.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 12.19

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-313East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 5.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-313
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
5.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
15.24 m
To
16.76 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-313:15.24-16.76
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold grade over a narrow interval represents a high-grade core within the broader intercept, significantly enhancing its value.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“5.94”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-371East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-371
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
2.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.96 m
From
7.62 m
To
36.58 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-371:7.62-36.58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is highly material due to its strong gold grade over a significant width, resulting in a high grade-thickness product, indicating a substantial mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • Strong intercept width
  • High grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.07”

Context: 28.96

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-371East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-371
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
10.67 m
To
12.19 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-371:10.67-12.19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptionally high (bonanza) gold grade over a narrow interval represents a very significant high-grade core within the broader intercept, making it a key highlight of the program.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (bonanza)
  • High grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“13.20”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-371East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 5.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-371
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
5.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.52 m
From
19.81 m
To
21.33 m
Intercept Depth
7.62 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-371:19.81-21.33
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold grade over a narrow interval represents another high-grade core within the broader intercept, further enhancing its overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“5.86”

Context: 1.52

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-372East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-372
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.24 m
From
12.19 m
To
27.43 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-372:12.19-27.43
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a moderate width represents a good intercept, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 15.24

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-372East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-372
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
33.53 m
To
38.1 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-372:33.53-38.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a weak gold grade, indicating minor mineralization at this depth.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 4.57

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-374East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-374
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.14 m
From
12.19 m
To
21.33 m
Intercept Depth
12.19 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-374:12.19-21.33
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a moderate width represents a good intercept, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 9.14

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-375East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-375
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.14 m
From
21.34 m
To
30.48 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-375:21.34-30.48
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width with a weak gold grade indicates broad, lower-grade mineralization, contributing to the overall mineralized footprint.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 9.14

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-375East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-375
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
24.38 m
To
28.95 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-375:24.38-28.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow interval provides a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, indicating some internal variability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 4.57

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ECDRC-375East Camp Douglas · goldGrade: 2.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ECDRC-375
Project
East Camp Douglas
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
FTCO

Geometry

Grade
2.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
39.62 m
To
42.67 m
Intercept Depth
21.34 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ECDRC-375:39.62-42.67
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Roosevelt target
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Laboratories
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow interval indicates a discrete zone of higher-grade mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.06”

Context: 3.05

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.