Fitzroy Minerals Reports Copper Recoveries of up to 82.6% from Mini-Column Testing, with Preliminary Larger-Scale Results Trending Higher, at the Buen Retiro Copper Project, Chile

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Fitzroy Minerals Inc.
Ticker
FTZ.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Chile
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-23 11:49:28 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Fitzroy Minerals has reported successful initial metallurgical test results for the Buen Retiro Copper Project in Chile, with mini-column copper recoveries reaching up to 82.6%. Ongoing larger-scale 1-metre column tests are showing even higher recovery trends, supporting the project's heap-leach development plan.

Reasoning: The metallurgical results confirm a strong heap-leach case with high recoveries and low acid consumption across multiple geometallurgical units.

Positive factors

  • High copper recoveries (up to 82.6%) in mini-column tests
  • Low acid consumption (3.4 to 11.2 kg/kg)
  • Favourable rock hardness (8 kWh/t)
  • Preliminary 1m column results trending higher than mini-columns
  • Chloride addition identified as optimization opportunity

Negative factors

  • Low-grade oxide unit shows higher acid consumption (11.2 kg/kg) which may limit leach extension

Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Mixed unit achieved 82.6% recovery in mini-column testing.

Evidence · text

“total copper (“CuT”) recovery of ... 82.6% (mixed)”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The testing is specifically for a heap-leach processing route.

Evidence · text

“evaluating the response of the Project’s three principal geometallurgical units (“UGM” or “Units”) to heap-leach processing”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release details SGS laboratory accreditation and specific QA/QC protocols.

Evidence · text

“carried out under a documented quality assurance and quality control ("QA/QC") protocol”

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: the document describes a heap_leach route ("heap leach")

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 3 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (3)

mini-columnBuen Retiro Copper Project · copperRecovery: 71.8 %Head Grade: 0.95Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Buen Retiro Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
chile
Reported Region
Chile
Ticker
FTZ.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
mini-column
Processing Route
heap leach
Sample
High-grade oxide composite (1,349 kg)
Leach Time
504 hours

Recovery

Recovery
71.8 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.95
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Acid
4.9 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 71.8% recovery is a solid result for a high-grade oxide heap leach test.

Positive factors

  • Strong recovery for oxide

Evidence · text

“total copper (“CuT”) recovery of 71.8% (high-grade oxide)”

Tags used in scoring

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the heap_leach signal

mini-columnBuen Retiro Copper Project · copperRecovery: 59.9 %Head Grade: 0.35Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Buen Retiro Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
chile
Reported Region
Chile
Ticker
FTZ.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
mini-column
Processing Route
heap leach
Sample
Low-grade oxide composite (1,566 kg)
Leach Time
504 hours

Recovery

Recovery
59.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.35
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Acid
11.2 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Recovery is lower and acid consumption is higher for this unit.

Negative factors

  • Higher acid consumption

Evidence · text

“59.9% (low-grade oxide)”

Tags used in scoring

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the heap_leach signal

mini-columnBuen Retiro Copper Project · copperRecovery: 82.6 %Head Grade: 1.24Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Buen Retiro Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
chile
Reported Region
Chile
Ticker
FTZ.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
mini-column
Processing Route
heap leach
Sample
Mixed material composite (426 kg)
Leach Time
504 hours

Recovery

Recovery
82.6 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.24
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Acid
3.4 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 82.6% recovery is an exceptional result for the mixed unit.

Positive factors

  • Excellent recovery
  • Low acid consumption

Evidence · text

“82.6% (mixed)”

Tags used in scoring

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the heap_leach signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 82.6% is at or above the exceptional band (80%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.