FG1: Bulk Sample Sent to Henty Gold Mine for Processing Testwork
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Flynn Gold Limited
- Ticker
- FG1
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Tasmania
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Metallurgy, Agreement transaction, Resource update, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-05 23:03:54 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Flynn Gold has delivered a 3.7-tonne bulk sample from its Golden Ridge Project to the Henty Gold Mine for processing testwork, following an Ore Purchase Agreement signed in August 2026. This initiative aims to simulate Henty's processing plant conditions to determine expected gold recoveries, building on historical sighter testwork that yielded 94.9% gold extraction from 10.5 g/t Au material. The company views this as a significant step towards future gold production, potentially reducing upfront capital requirements.
Reasoning: Flynn Gold has taken a concrete step towards de-risking its Golden Ridge project by delivering a bulk sample to an operating gold mine for processing testwork, supported by a prior Ore Purchase Agreement. This provides a potential pathway to production and reduces future capital requirements, building on positive historical sighter test results. While current testwork results are pending and some information is historical, the strategic move is positive.
Positive factors
- Bulk sample delivered to operating mine for testwork
- Ore Purchase Agreement in place with Henty Gold Mine provides processing pathway
- Historical sighter test showed high gold extraction (94.9% at 10.5 g/t Au)
- Potential to significantly reduce upfront capital requirements and accelerate pathway to production
- QP/CP signed off on exploration results and resource estimates
Negative factors
- Current testwork results are pending
- Historical sighter test conditions were more intensive than conventional processing (LeachWELLTM, fine grind)
- Exploration Target is conceptual and not a Mineral Resource
- Historical drill results and exploration target are being re-reported, not new information
Facts used in scoring: 44
Classification and evidence
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The Competent Person, Mr Sean Westbrook, is named and consents to the inclusion of information in the announcement, fulfilling JORC requirements.
Evidence · text
“The information in this ASX Announcement that relates to Exploration Results, including historical Exploration Results, is based on information compiled and reviewed by Mr Sean Westbrook, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Westbrook is a consultant to Flynn Gold and is a shareholder in Flynn Gold Limited. Mr Westbrook has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Westbrook consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appear.”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Exploration Target is explicitly stated as JORC compliant, and the Competent Person statement refers to the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“The Exploration Target has been prepared and reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the JORC Code.”
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: The Exploration Target was announced in November 2024 and is explicitly stated as conceptual and not a Mineral Resource, and has not been updated with recent drilling.
Evidence · text
“In November 2024, the Company announced a JORC compliant Exploration Target for the Trafalgar, Brilliant and Link Zone prospects at Golden Ridge”
All Inferrednegative
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Why it applies: The Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and explicitly states 'There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource', implying it is entirely in the inferred category or less.
Evidence · text
“The size and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and therefore is an approximation. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document re-reports historical drill results from March 2025 and metallurgical sighter test results from June 2025, and an exploration target from November 2024, without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Sighter testing of the bulk sample material in 2025 averaged 10.5g/t Au with 94.9% gold extraction from cyanide leach testwork.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document re-reports historical drill results from March 2025 and metallurgical sighter test results from June 2025, and an exploration target from November 2024, without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Previously reported drilling results from the Trafalgar Prospect included multiple intersections grading >100g/t Au5, is listed in Table 3 below:”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document re-reports historical drill results from March 2025 and metallurgical sighter test results from June 2025, and an exploration target from November 2024, without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“In November 2024, the Company announced a JORC compliant Exploration Target for the Trafalgar, Brilliant and Link Zone prospects at Golden Ridge”
Bench Scale Onlynegative
Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.
Why it applies: The sighter testwork was conducted using a bottle roll leach (LeachWELLTM) test, which is a bench-scale method.
Evidence · text
“The samples were also tested for gold extraction by cyanide using a bottle roll leach (LeachWELLTM) test, achieving an average gold extraction of 94.9%.”
Refractory Orenegative
Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.
Why it applies: The document notes that LeachWELLTM test conditions are more intensive than conventional CIL/CIP processing and require a fine grind, suggesting potential processing challenges.
Evidence · text
“It should be noted that LeachWELLTM test conditions are more intensive than those typically used in conventional Carbon-in-Pulp (CIP) or Carbon-in-Leach (CIL) processing and the samples were tested at a fine (85% passing 75 micron) grind size. Accordingly, while the results provided a positive indication of gold leachability, further testwork is required to establish recoveries under potential commercial processing conditions.”
Bonanza Interceptpositive · Story-specific tag
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The historical drill results include multiple intercepts with gold grades significantly above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (e.g., 152.5 g/t Au, 169.8 g/t Au, 143.0 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“152.5”
Context: 0.7
Bonanza Interceptpositive · Story-specific tag
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The historical drill results include multiple intercepts with gold grades significantly above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (e.g., 152.5 g/t Au, 169.8 g/t Au, 143.0 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“169.8”
Context: 0.5
Bonanza Interceptpositive · Story-specific tag
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The historical drill results include multiple intercepts with gold grades significantly above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (e.g., 152.5 g/t Au, 169.8 g/t Au, 143.0 g/t Au).
Evidence · table
“143.0”
Context: 0.5
Apparent Width Onlynegative · Story-specific tag
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The drill intercepts are given as downhole widths without any mention of true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“12.3”
Context: 108.7
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIL")
Gravity Routeneutral
Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.
Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 44. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (42)
TFDD005Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.3 m
- From
- 108.7 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:108.7-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization at the Trafalgar Prospect, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (16.8 g/t)
- Significant intercept length (12.3 m)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“16.8”
Context: 12.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 27.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.3 m
- From
- 108.7 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:108.7-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a good width, indicating polymetallic mineralization, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (27.6 g/t)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“27.6”
Context: 12.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.3 m
- From
- 108.7 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:108.7-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.01%)
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 12.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.3 m
- From
- 108.7 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:108.7-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a trace lead grade, contributing to polymetallic potential, though not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Trace lead grade (0.58%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 12.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.3 m
- From
- 108.7 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:108.7-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a trace zinc grade, contributing to polymetallic potential, though not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Trace zinc grade (0.25%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 12.3
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 152.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 152.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 120.3 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:120.3-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical bonanza-grade gold intercept, though narrow, highlights exceptional high-grade mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade (152.5 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.7 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“152.5”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 277Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 277
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 120.3 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:120.3-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical strong silver grade, though narrow, indicates significant polymetallic mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (277.0 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.7 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“277.0”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 120.3 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:120.3-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.1%)
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 6.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 120.3 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:120.3-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over a narrow width, contributing to polymetallic potential, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Strong lead grade (6.84%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.7 m)
Evidence · table
“6.84”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD005Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 2.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD005
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 120.3 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 108.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD005:120.3-121
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over a narrow width, contributing to polymetallic potential, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (2.68%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.7 m)
Evidence · table
“2.68”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 23.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:23-27
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization at the Trafalgar Prospect, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (23.7 g/t)
- Good intercept length (4.0 m)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“23.7”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 13.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:23-27
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a trace silver grade, contributing to polymetallic potential, though not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Trace silver grade (13.21 g/t)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“13.21”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:23-27
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.01%)
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:23-27
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low lead grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low lead grade (0.18%)
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:23-27
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low zinc grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low zinc grade (0.02%)
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 169.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 169.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 26.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:25.9-26.4
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical bonanza-grade gold intercept, though narrow, highlights exceptional high-grade mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade (169.8 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.5 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“169.8”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 95.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 95.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 26.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:25.9-26.4
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical moderate silver grade, though narrow, indicates significant polymetallic mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (95.9 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.5 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“95.9”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 26.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:25.9-26.4
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.05%)
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 26.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:25.9-26.4
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a trace lead grade over a narrow width, contributing to polymetallic potential, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Trace lead grade (1.37%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD013Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD013
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 26.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD013:25.9-26.4
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low zinc grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low zinc grade (0.13%)
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFD001Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 12.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFD001
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 204 m
- Intercept Depth
- 202 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFD001:202-204
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high gold grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization at the Trafalgar Prospect, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (12.56 g/t)
- Moderate intercept length (2.0 m)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.56”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFD001Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 150Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFD001
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 150
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 202.7 m
- To
- 203.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 202 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFD001:202.7-203.1
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical bonanza-grade gold intercept, though very narrow, highlights exceptional high-grade mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade (150.0 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.4 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“150.0”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 65.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 65.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58.7
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization at the Trafalgar Prospect, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (65.9 g/t)
- Moderate intercept length (1.2 m)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“65.9”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 58.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58.7
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, indicating polymetallic potential, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (58.27 g/t)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“58.27”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58.7
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.02%)
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 1.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58.7
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate lead grade over a moderate width, contributing to polymetallic potential, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (1.97%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
Evidence · table
“1.97”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58.7
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a trace zinc grade over a moderate width, contributing to polymetallic potential, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Trace zinc grade (1.32%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
Evidence · table
“1.32”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 143Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 143
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical bonanza-grade gold intercept, though very narrow, highlights exceptional high-grade mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade (143.0 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.5 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“143.0”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 133Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 133
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical strong silver grade, though very narrow, indicates significant polymetallic mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (133.0 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.5 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“133.0”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.04%)
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate lead grade over a very narrow width, contributing to polymetallic potential, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (4.5%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.5 m)
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD003Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 3.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD003
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 57.5 m
- To
- 58 m
- Intercept Depth
- 57.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD003:57.5-58
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over a very narrow width, contributing to polymetallic potential, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (3.09%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.5 m)
Evidence · table
“3.09”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 51.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 353.2 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.2-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization at the Trafalgar Prospect, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (51.3 g/t)
- Moderate intercept length (1.1 m)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“51.3”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 36.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 353.2 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.2-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a moderate width, indicating polymetallic potential, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (36.06 g/t)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“36.06”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 353.2 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.2-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.01%)
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 353.2 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.2-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a trace lead grade over a moderate width, contributing to polymetallic potential, though it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Trace lead grade (1.18%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 353.2 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.2-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low zinc grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low zinc grade (0.15%)
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · goldGrade: 137.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 137.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 353.9 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.9-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical bonanza-grade gold intercept, though very narrow, highlights exceptional high-grade mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade (137.8 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.4 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“137.8”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · silverGrade: 97.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 97.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 353.9 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.9-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical moderate silver grade, though very narrow, indicates significant polymetallic mineralization within the Trafalgar Prospect, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade (97.9 g/t)
- High-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.4 m)
- No true width disclosed
Evidence · table
“97.9”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 353.9 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.9-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low copper grade (0.04%)
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · leadGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 353.9 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.9-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate lead grade over a very narrow width, contributing to polymetallic potential, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (3.23%)
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very narrow intercept length (0.4 m)
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TFDD015Golden Ridge · zincGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TFDD015
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- FG1
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 353.9 m
- To
- 354.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 353.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TFDD015:353.9-354.3
Location
- Location
- Trafalgar Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-03-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low zinc grade, likely a trace element, and is not material.
Negative factors
- Results are historical (2025)
- Very low zinc grade (0.38%)
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 0.4
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (1)
inferredGolden Ridge · goldTonnes: 900000Grade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 83000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- FG1
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Sean Westbrook
- Resource group id
- resource:7b852a3c81213bf9bcc7
- Deposit or zone
- Link Zone
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 900000
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 83000
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-11-14
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The historical JORC-compliant Exploration Target provides a conceptual estimate of gold potential for the Link Zone prospect, but its conceptual nature and age limit its current materiality and confidence.
Positive factors
- Establishes a conceptual target for gold mineralisation at Link Zone
- JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, not a Mineral Resource
- Estimate is historical (2024) and not updated with recent drilling
- Uncertainty if further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“3.5”
Context: 0.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Metallurgical Results (1)
Fact 1Golden RidgeView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Golden Ridge
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- FG1
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The non-binding Ore Purchase Agreement with Henty Gold Mine is a significant positive step, providing a potential processing solution that could reduce capital costs and accelerate production, although it is contingent on successful testwork.
Positive factors
- Provides a potential processing pathway for Golden Ridge ore
- Opportunity to process ore through existing Henty plant reduces upfront capital
- Accelerates pathway towards production
Negative factors
- Agreement is non-binding
- Requires successful testwork and government approval for larger quantities
Evidence · text
“Follows the Ore Purchase Agreement signed with Henty Gold Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Kaiser Reef Limited (ASX: KAU), on 6 August, opening a potential processing pathway.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.