Essex Samples up to 14.45 g/t Gold Extending Gold Mineralization Along Drummer Fault, Mt Turner Gold Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Essex Minerals Inc.
Ticker
OPTG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Queensland, Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-26 03:24:58 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Essex Minerals announced high-grade gold and silver rock sample results up to 15.3 g/t Au and 35.0 g/t Ag from its Mt Turner Gold Project in North Queensland, extending known mineralization along the Drummer Fault. The company also re-analyzed historical shallow drilling data from the 1990s, which included intercepts up to 6.0m at 10.05 g/t Au, confirming high-grade zones. These results will guide upcoming drilling targeting sulphide mineralization below the oxide zone.

Reasoning: The announcement reports new high-grade rock samples that extend known gold mineralization and re-highlights strong historical drill intercepts, providing positive indications for future drilling at the Mt Turner Gold Project. The results are material for an exploration-stage project, confirming the prospectivity of the Drummer Fault.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold rock samples confirm and extend mineralization along the Drummer Fault.
  • Re-analysis of historical drilling highlights significant gold intercepts, providing further confidence in the target.
  • New samples extend mineralization under cover and identify new high-grade zones.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results are shallow and from the 1990s, limiting their immediate impact on resource definition.
  • Rock samples are grab samples, which may not be representative of the broader mineralization.

Facts used in scoring: 81

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The rock sample DGN 4 returned 15.3 g/t Au, which is an exceptional grade for gold.

Evidence · table

“15.300”

Context: DGN 4

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The rock sample DGS 1 returned 13.85 g/t Au, which is an exceptional grade for gold.

Evidence · table

“13.850”

Context: DGS 1

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The rock sample NA 1 returned 14.45 g/t Au, which is an exceptional grade for gold.

Evidence · table

“14.450”

Context: NA 1

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The historical drill intercept UMDT95_D06 included 6.0m at 10.05 g/t Au, which is a bonanza grade for gold in an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“10.05”

Context: 6.0

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The historical drill intercept UMDTS96_D03 included 2.0m at 9.70 g/t Au, which is a bonanza grade for gold in an open pit scenario.

Evidence · table

“9.70”

Context: 2.0

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Sample DG West 1 was taken 200 metres west of the Drummer Girl pit, demonstrating that the mineralization continues to the west under cover.

Evidence · text

“DG West 1, which contained 1.17 g/t Au and 11.00 g/t Ag and was taken 200 metres west of the Drummer Girl pit, demonstrating that the mineralization continues to the west under cover”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Sample NA 1 was located 300 metres northeast of the Drummer Toy pit and NA 2 was located 200 metres east of the Drummer Toy pit, extending the known mineralization.

Evidence · text

“NA 1 and NA 2, which contained 14.45 g/t Au and 11.60 g/t Ag and 1.49 g/t Au and 4.90 g/t Ag respectively. NA 1 was located 300 metres northeast of the Drummer Toy pit in an oxidized quartz veined rhyolite. NA 2 was located 200 metres east of the Drummer Toy pit and consisted of a fractured quartz vein with pyrite in the extension of the Drummer Fault”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The news release states that all scientific and technical information has been reviewed and/or prepared by a 'Qualified Person' within the meaning of NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“All of the scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and/or prepared by Mr Lee K. Spencer, BSc (Hons), MSc, MAusIMM, a "Qualified Person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Minerals Projects.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The document re-analyzes and highlights drill results from Union Mining NL from the 1990s.

Evidence · text

“The Company's exploration team has plotted and further analysed the 44 air-core holes drilled by Union Mining NL in the 1990s (see Table 2).”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The historical drill results report downhole intercept lengths without stating true widths or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

“This drilling was only to a maximum of 20-metres depth and was almost entirely within the mined pits.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 81. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (81)

Fact 1Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
3.41
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756347
Northing
7983236
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“3.410”

Context: BC 1

Fact 2Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 25.4Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
25.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756347
Northing
7983236
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“25.400”

Context: BC 1

Fact 3Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.28
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756315
Northing
7983232
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“2.280”

Context: BC 2

Fact 4Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 13.4Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
13.4
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756315
Northing
7983232
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“13.400”

Context: BC 2

Fact 5Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.07
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755852
Northing
7983194
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“2.070”

Context: DGN 1

Fact 6Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755852
Northing
7983194
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“16.300”

Context: DGN 1

Fact 7Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.02Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
4.02
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755857
Northing
7983186
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“4.020”

Context: DGN 2

Fact 8Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 14.2Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
14.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755857
Northing
7983186
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“14.200”

Context: DGN 2

Fact 9Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755890
Northing
7983126
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak gold grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.150”

Context: DGN 3

Fact 10Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755890
Northing
7983126
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“3.200”

Context: DGN 3

Fact 11Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 15.3Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
15.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755892
Northing
7983167
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample returned an exceptional gold grade, significantly enhancing the prospectivity of the area.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“15.300”

Context: DGN 4

Fact 12Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 34.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
34.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755892
Northing
7983167
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“34.700”

Context: DGN 4

Fact 13Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 13.85Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
13.85
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756943
Northing
7983284
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample returned an exceptional gold grade, significantly enhancing the prospectivity of the area.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“13.850”

Context: DGS 1

Fact 14Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
22.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756943
Northing
7983284
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“22.800”

Context: DGS 1

Fact 15Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755662
Northing
7983106
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate gold grade and is significant for extending mineralization under cover, indicating potential for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is moderate for a surface sample.
  • Sample extends mineralization under cover.

Evidence · table

“1.170”

Context: DG West 1

Fact 16Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
755662
Northing
7983106
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“11.000”

Context: DG West 1

Fact 17Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
750825
Northing
7982812
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak gold grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.260”

Context: RR 1

Fact 18Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
6.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
750825
Northing
7982812
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“6.300”

Context: RR 1

Fact 19Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 7.99Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
7.99
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
750875
Northing
7982807
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample returned an exceptional gold grade, significantly enhancing the prospectivity of the area.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“7.990”

Context: RR 2

Fact 20Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 35Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
35
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
750875
Northing
7982807
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“35.000”

Context: RR 2

Fact 21Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
751087
Northing
7982800
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“2.300”

Context: RR 3

Fact 22Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
7.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
751087
Northing
7982800
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“7.800”

Context: RR 3

Fact 23Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 14.45Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
14.45
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757659
Northing
7983757
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample returned an exceptional gold grade, significantly enhancing the prospectivity of the area and extending mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade for a surface sample.
  • Sample extends mineralization northeast of Drummer Toy pit.

Evidence · table

“14.450”

Context: NA 1

Fact 24Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
11.6
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757659
Northing
7983757
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“11.600”

Context: NA 1

Fact 25Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757804
Northing
7983421
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate gold grade and is significant for extending mineralization, indicating potential for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is moderate for a surface sample.
  • Sample extends mineralization east of Drummer Toy pit.

Evidence · table

“1.490”

Context: NA 2

Fact 26Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757804
Northing
7983421
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“4.900”

Context: NA 2

Fact 27Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757231
Northing
7983388
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak gold grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.100”

Context: DE 1

Fact 28Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 7.7Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
7.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757231
Northing
7983388
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“7.700”

Context: DE 1

Fact 29Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757137
Northing
7983355
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak gold grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.180”

Context: DE 2

Fact 30Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757137
Northing
7983355
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Evidence · table

“1.600”

Context: DE 2

Fact 31Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.78Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
4.78
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757134
Northing
7983350
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“4.780”

Context: DE 3

Fact 32Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
757134
Northing
7983350
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a weak silver grade, but still indicates the presence of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“8.000”

Context: DE 3

Fact 33Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.66
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756962
Northing
7983293
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a strong grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is strong for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“2.660”

Context: DW 1

Fact 34Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 30.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
30.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756962
Northing
7983293
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“30.800”

Context: DW 1

Fact 35Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756964
Northing
7983291
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample confirms gold mineralization with a moderate grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade is moderate for a surface sample.

Evidence · table

“1.110”

Context: DW 2

Fact 36Mt Turner Gold Project · silverGrade: 26.6Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
26.6
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Easting
756964
Northing
7983291
CRS
UTM
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new surface sample shows a moderate silver grade, indicating polymetallic potential alongside gold.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade is present as a byproduct.

Evidence · table

“26.600”

Context: DW 2

UMDG95_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
14 m
To
17 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 3.0

UMDG95_D02Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D02
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
14 m
To
17 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 3.0

UMDG95_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
2 m
To
6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 4.0

UMDG95_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
8 m
To
12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“2.42”

Context: 4.0

UMDG95_D04Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D04
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
12 m
To
14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: 2.0

UMDG95_D10Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D10
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
2 m
To
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: 2.0

UMDG95_D10Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D10
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
6 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: 4.0

UMDG95_D11Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDG95_D11
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
4 m
To
6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 2.0

UMDB95_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDB95_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
8 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 2.0

UMDB95_D02Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDB95_D02
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
0 m
To
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.79”

Context: 8.0

UMDB95_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDB95_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
0 m
To
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 2.0

UMDB95_D07Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDB95_D07
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
0 m
To
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a reasonable width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a reasonable width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“2.72”

Context: 4.0

UMDB95_D08Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDB95_D08
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
8 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 2.0

UMDB95_D10Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDB95_D10
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
4.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
6 m
To
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“4.12”

Context: 2.0

UMDT95_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
4 m
To
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“2.24”

Context: 4.0

UMDT95_D02Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D02
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
12 m
To
14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 2.0

UMDT95_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
4.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
2 m
To
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“4.91”

Context: 6.0

UMDT95_D04Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D04
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
3.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
0 m
To
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a significant width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“3.56”

Context: 16.0

UMDT95_D05Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D05
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
0 m
To
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: 2.0

UMDT95_D05Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 5.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D05
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
5.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
12 m
To
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“5.21”

Context: 4.0

UMDT95_D06Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D06
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
6.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
6 m
To
18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant width, contributing strongly to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade over a significant width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“6.45”

Context: 12.0

UMDT95_D06Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 10.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDT95_D06
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
10.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
12 m
To
18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a bonanza gold grade over a good width, significantly enhancing the prospectivity of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“10.05”

Context: 6.0

UMDE96_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
6 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 14.0

UMDE96_D02Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D02
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 20.0

UMDE96_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
2 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 18.0

UMDE96_D04Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D04
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 20.0

UMDE96_D05Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D05
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
2 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 18.0

UMDE96_D06Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D06
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
0 m
To
18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a good width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 18.0

UMDE96_D07Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D07
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
2.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
2 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a reasonable width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“2.15”

Context: 8.0

UMDE96_D07Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D07
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
10 m
To
18 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a good width.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 8.0

UMDE96_D08Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D08
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
0 m
To
12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 12.0

UMDE96_D09Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDE96_D09
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
2 m
To
14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 12.0

UMDTE96_D02Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTE96_D02
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
8 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 2.0

UMDTE96_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTE96_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 20.0

UMDTE96_D04Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTE96_D04
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 20.0

UMDTS96_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a significant width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 20.0

UMDTS96_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 4.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
4.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
12 m
To
14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“4.52”

Context: 2.0

UMDTS96_D01Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D01
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a significant width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 20.0

UMDTS96_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
0 m
To
20 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a significant width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: 20.0

UMDTS96_D03Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D03
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
8 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a bonanza gold grade, significantly enhancing the prospectivity of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“9.70”

Context: 2.0

UMDTS96_D04Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D04
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a good width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 10.0

UMDTS96_D04Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D04
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
3.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
6 m
To
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“3.06”

Context: 2.0

UMDTS96_D05Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D05
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 10.0

UMDTS96_D06Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D06
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width from surface, contributing to the overall understanding of the shallow mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of true width reduce its novelty and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade over a good width from surface.

Negative factors

  • Data is historical and shallow.
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 10.0

UMDTS96_D07Mt Turner Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
UMDTS96_D07
Project
Mt Turner Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland, Australia
Ticker
OPTG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
0 m
To
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low gold grade, indicating sub-economic mineralization in this section, which is a negative factor.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade, below economic thresholds.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 10.0

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.