Epic Gold Announces 440,000 Ounce Inferred Mineral Resource Grading 0.98 g/t at the Hawkins Gold Project, Ontario

Original announcement by jmn on

Company
Epic Gold Corp.
Ticker
EPG
Exchange
CSE
Region
Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-08 12:25:10 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Epic Gold has announced its first current Mineral Resource Estimate for the McKinnon Deposit at the Hawkins Gold Project, totaling 440,000 ounces of gold. The resource is entirely in the Inferred category, comprising 14.0 Mt at 0.98 g/t Au, split between pit-constrained and underground components.

Reasoning: The announcement of a new 440koz Inferred resource represents significant scale growth for the project, though the low confidence category and reliance on historical data limit immediate bankability.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage increase vs prior estimate
  • First current MRE for the project
  • Covers both pit-constrained and underground components

Negative factors

  • 100% Inferred classification (low geological confidence)
  • Relies on historical drill data (1983-1986)
  • No modern metallurgical testwork completed

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · text

“The entire Mineral Resource is classified as Inferred.”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: MRE prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

“prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Total tonnage increased from 6.2 Mt to 14.0 Mt.

Evidence · text

“14.0 Mt at an average grade of 0.98 g/t Au”

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: Average grade dropped from 1.65 g/t to 0.98 g/t.

Evidence · text

“grading 0.98 g/t”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., is named as the supervising Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“completed under the supervision of Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (3)

inferredHawkins Gold Project · goldTonnes: 12645000Grade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 360Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Hawkins Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
EPG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Eugene Puritch
Resource group id
resource:a589a1986a67cc3197d8
Deposit or zone
McKinnon Deposit
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
12645000
Grade
0.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
360
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.24
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Pit-constrained portion of the new resource.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage

Negative factors

  • Inferred category

Evidence · table

“0.89”

Context: 12,645

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredHawkins Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1371000Grade: 1.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 80.4Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Hawkins Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
EPG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Eugene Puritch
Resource group id
resource:3dd6acb2e3b92e375bf6
Deposit or zone
McKinnon Deposit
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1371000
Grade
1.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
80.4
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Underground component of the new resource.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade component

Negative factors

  • Inferred category

Evidence · table

“1.82”

Context: 1,371

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredHawkins Gold Project · goldTonnes: 14016000Grade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 440.4Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Hawkins Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
EPG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Eugene Puritch
Resource group id
resource:1a9cd4f1644b24f65c7c
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14016000
Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
440.4
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-11
Prior Tonnes
6200000
Prior Grade
1.65
Prior Contained Metal
328800

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Total Inferred resource for the McKinnon Deposit.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage growth

Negative factors

  • Grade decline vs prior estimate

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 14,016

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 14016000 against 6200000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.98 against 1.65 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 440.4 against 328800 previously

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 440.4 from 328800

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.