# Encouraging High-Pressure Slurry Ablation Test Results at Myriad's Copper Mountain Uranium Project Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/encouraging-high-pressure-slurry-ablation-test-results-at-myriad-s-copper-mounta--a169215a-21c1-49aa-af54-5ac9ee1b5fa7 Original source: https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/315372/Encouraging-HighPressure-Slurry-Ablation-Test-Results-at-Myriads-Copper-Mountain-Uranium-Project Publisher: newsfile Original announcement: 2026-09-22T09:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-22T09:18:26.463Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-22T09:18:26.463Z - Company: Myriad Uranium Corp. - Ticker: M - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Wyoming, USA - Primary commodity: Uranium - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Metallurgy - Extracted: 2026-09-22 09:18:27 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Myriad Uranium Corp. announced encouraging results from initial High-Pressure Slurry Ablation \(HPSA\) testing at its Copper Mountain Uranium Project. The technology successfully concentrated uranium into a fines fraction, achieving recoveries between 83.9% and 90.6% while significantly reducing the mass of material requiring further processing. Reasoning: Initial HPSA technology testing demonstrates successful pre-concentration of uranium with high recovery and significant mass reduction, potentially lowering beneficiation costs. - Positive factor: High uranium recovery in fines concentrate \(up to 90.6%\) - Positive factor: Significant mass reduction \(up to 87.9%\) - Positive factor: Successful liberation of uranium from coarse waste - Positive factor: Reduction in radionuclide activity \(Ra-226 and Th-230\) - Negative factor: Batch-scale testing only - Negative factor: Requires further scale-up testing Facts used in scoring: 3 ## Classification and evidence **High Recovery** Polarity: positive Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route. Why it applies: Uranium recovery in fines concentrate reached 90.6%, which is exceptional for this type of pre-concentration test. Evidence · text > total percent recovery to the fines concentrate ranged from 83.9% to 90.6% **Bench Scale Only** Polarity: negative Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work. Why it applies: Testing was conducted in a batch-style HPSA unit at a laboratory scale. Evidence · text > conducted by DISA Uranium™ Corporation... in a batch-style HPSA™ unit **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("concentrate"\) **Multi-Domain Tested** Polarity: positive Definition: Variability across ore domains \(oxide, transition, fresh\) has been addressed. Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Metallurgical Results (3) ### batch-style HPSA [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/encouraging-high-pressure-slurry-ablation-test-results-at-myriad-s-copper-mounta--a169215a-21c1-49aa-af54-5ac9ee1b5fa7#fact-metallurgical-facts-0) Copper Mountain Uranium Project · uranium #### Identity - Project: Copper Mountain Uranium Project - Commodity: uranium - Region: wyoming, usa - Reported Region: Wyoming, USA - Ticker: M #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: batch-style HPSA - Sample: Bulk Feed #### Recovery - Recovery: 67.5 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 306 - Head Grade Unit: ppm #### Lab - Laboratory: Energy Labs #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Baseline head grade for the bulk feed. Evidence · table > 306 Context: Bulk Feed ### batch-style HPSA [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/encouraging-high-pressure-slurry-ablation-test-results-at-myriad-s-copper-mounta--a169215a-21c1-49aa-af54-5ac9ee1b5fa7#fact-metallurgical-facts-1) Copper Mountain Uranium Project · uranium #### Identity - Project: Copper Mountain Uranium Project - Commodity: uranium - Region: wyoming, usa - Reported Region: Wyoming, USA - Ticker: M #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: batch-style HPSA - Sample: Time Sample 1 \(fines concentrate\) #### Recovery - Recovery: 83.9 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 306 - Head Grade Unit: ppm #### Lab - Laboratory: Energy Labs #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong recovery in the first time interval sample. - Positive factor: High recovery of 83.9% Evidence · table > 83.9 Context: Time Sample 1 ### batch-style HPSA [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/encouraging-high-pressure-slurry-ablation-test-results-at-myriad-s-copper-mounta--a169215a-21c1-49aa-af54-5ac9ee1b5fa7#fact-metallurgical-facts-2) Copper Mountain Uranium Project · uranium #### Identity - Project: Copper Mountain Uranium Project - Commodity: uranium - Region: wyoming, usa - Reported Region: Wyoming, USA - Ticker: M #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: batch-style HPSA - Sample: Time Sample 2 \(fines concentrate\) #### Recovery - Recovery: 90.6 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Head Grade: 306 - Head Grade Unit: ppm #### Lab - Laboratory: Energy Labs #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Excellent recovery in the second time interval sample. - Positive factor: High recovery of 90.6% Evidence · table > 90.6 Context: Time Sample 2 ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.