EMP: Approval of Judith2 Appraisal Well Drilling Environment Plan
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Emperor Energy
- Ticker
- EMP
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Natural gas
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Resource update, Permitting
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 00:19:54 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Emperor Energy has received approval from NOPSEMA for its Judith-2 Appraisal Well Drilling Environment Plan, a major milestone for the offshore Gippsland Basin project in Victoria, Australia. This approval aligns with the recent securing of the VALARIS 107 drilling rig, with drilling targeted for April 2027. The well aims to appraise a 166 Bcf 2C Contingent gas resource and explore a 142 Bcf P50 Prospective gas resource in the deeper Longtom sands.
Reasoning: Emperor Energy has achieved a major milestone with the NOPSEMA approval of its Judith-2 Appraisal Well Drilling Environment Plan, which is critical for advancing the project. This approval, coupled with the secured drilling rig, significantly de-risks the upcoming drilling campaign for substantial gas resources.
Positive factors
- Key drilling permit approved by NOPSEMA
- Approval aligns with securing drilling rig for April 2027
- Progress towards appraising and exploring significant gas resources
Negative factors
- Resource estimates are historical and not new information in this release
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 40
Classification and evidence
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The resource information is based on data prepared and managed by Mr Keven Asquith, who is a qualified Petroleum Reserves and Resources Evaluator and has consented to the release.
Evidence · text
“The Resources information in this ASX release is based on, and fairly represents, data and supporting documentation prepared and supplied to Gaffney Cline by 3D-GEO Pty Ltd. The preparation of this data and supporting documentation has been managed by Mr Keven Asquith who is Chairman and Director of 3D-GEO Pty Ltd. ... Mr Asquith is a qualified Petroleum Reserves and Resources Evaluator as defined by ASX listing rules. The Resources information in this ASX announcement was issued with the prior written consent of Mr Asquith in the form and context in which it appears.”
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: The resource estimates are dated June 20, 2025, making them historical relative to the September 30, 2026 announcement date.
Evidence · text
“Gaffney Cline, as of 20 June 2025”
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: The effective date of the resource estimates is June 20, 2025, which is over a year old compared to the announcement date of September 30, 2026.
Evidence · text
“Gaffney Cline, as of 20 June 2025”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 39. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (39)
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 7.8Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:a8656e1593a209367d19
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 1
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 7.8
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 1C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 1, representing a low confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Low confidence category (1C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“7.8”
Context: Emperor Sand 1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 23.4Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:215c4968b10916f1ea6c
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 1
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 23.4
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 2C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 1, representing a best estimate confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
Evidence · table
“23.4”
Context: Emperor Sand 1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 41.6Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:a8656e1593a209367d19
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 1
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 41.6
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 3C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 1, representing a high uncertainty level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- High uncertainty category (3C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“41.6”
Context: Emperor Sand 1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 12.6Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:faba469606bb31257748
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 2
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 12.6
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 1C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 2, representing a low confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Low confidence category (1C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“12.6”
Context: Emperor Sand 2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 41.8Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:acf67f13f3f539859e12
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 2
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 41.8
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 2C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 2, representing a best estimate confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
Evidence · table
“41.8”
Context: Emperor Sand 2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 66.4Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:faba469606bb31257748
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 2
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 66.4
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 3C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 2, representing a high uncertainty level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- High uncertainty category (3C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“66.4”
Context: Emperor Sand 2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 23.7Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:4562d3bf38eea8318609
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 3
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 23.7
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 1C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 3, representing a low confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Low confidence category (1C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“23.7”
Context: Emperor Sand 3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 85.2Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:292d83a83ff6472825bc
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 3
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 85.2
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 2C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 3, representing a best estimate confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
Evidence · table
“85.2”
Context: Emperor Sand 3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 117Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:4562d3bf38eea8318609
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 3
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 117
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 3C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 3, representing a high uncertainty level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- High uncertainty category (3C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“117”
Context: Emperor Sand 3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 5.6Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:0c8472265ae9485d5c37
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 4
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 5.6
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 1C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 4, representing a low confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Low confidence category (1C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“5.6”
Context: Emperor Sand 4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 15.4Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:3424ab5da4b14f1926c1
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 4
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 15.4
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 2C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 4, representing a best estimate confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
Evidence · table
“15.4”
Context: Emperor Sand 4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 34.8Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:0c8472265ae9485d5c37
- Deposit or zone
- Emperor Sand 4
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 34.8
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical 3C Contingent Resource estimate for Emperor Sand 4, representing a high uncertainty level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- High uncertainty category (3C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“34.8”
Context: Emperor Sand 4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 49.6Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:b602eb4f36520abb3f54
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL Contingent Resources
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 49.6
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical total 1C Contingent Resource estimate, representing a low confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Low confidence category (1C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“49.6”
Context: TOTAL
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 165.7Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:6f23cad62a6e0d533fcf
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL Contingent Resources
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 165.7
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical total 2C Contingent Resource estimate, representing a best estimate confidence level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
Evidence · table
“165.7”
Context: TOTAL
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 259.8Contained Unit: bscfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:b602eb4f36520abb3f54
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL Contingent Resources
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 259.8
- Contained Unit
- bscf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical total 3C Contingent Resource estimate, representing a high uncertainty level within the resource classification.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- High uncertainty category (3C Contingent Resource)
Evidence · table
“259.8”
Context: TOTAL
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 89Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:c525639037d405c4183a
- Deposit or zone
- Judith Deep
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 89
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for Judith Deep, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: Judith Deep
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 142Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:1aa6433afd573b9fff06
- Deposit or zone
- Judith Deep
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 142
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for Judith Deep, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“142”
Context: Judith Deep
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 209Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:c525639037d405c4183a
- Deposit or zone
- Judith Deep
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 209
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for Judith Deep, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“209”
Context: Judith Deep
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 88Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:72a13004c5003148dda9
- Deposit or zone
- West
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 88
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for West, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“88”
Context: West
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 135Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:5789ea99e604201ea0de
- Deposit or zone
- West
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 135
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for West, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“135”
Context: West
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 192Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:72a13004c5003148dda9
- Deposit or zone
- West
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 192
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for West, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“192”
Context: West
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 40Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:dc90134c6c5888b43e45
- Deposit or zone
- Central
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 40
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for Central, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: Central
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 364Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:07185694ac55241c94f9
- Deposit or zone
- Central
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 364
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for Central, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“364”
Context: Central
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 872Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:dc90134c6c5888b43e45
- Deposit or zone
- Central
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 872
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for Central, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“872”
Context: Central
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 64Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:740060ba94870352cb08
- Deposit or zone
- North
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 64
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for North, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“64”
Context: North
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 252Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:811246db057ebbae69b3
- Deposit or zone
- North
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 252
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for North, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“252”
Context: North
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 455Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:740060ba94870352cb08
- Deposit or zone
- North
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 455
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for North, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“455”
Context: North
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 51Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:182e8103d957cd69840e
- Deposit or zone
- North-East
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 51
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for North-East, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“51”
Context: North-East
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 379Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:b629c3dff1a6abc7c3f3
- Deposit or zone
- North-East
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 379
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for North-East, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“379”
Context: North-East
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 688Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:182e8103d957cd69840e
- Deposit or zone
- North-East
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 688
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for North-East, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“688”
Context: North-East
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 13Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:6993748aba0a6fd379bb
- Deposit or zone
- North-West
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 13
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for North-West, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: North-West
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 118Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:f261d6c3c7246f1ff183
- Deposit or zone
- North-West
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 118
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for North-West, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“118”
Context: North-West
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 281Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:6993748aba0a6fd379bb
- Deposit or zone
- North-West
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 281
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for North-West, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“281”
Context: North-West
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 102Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:fab2e3578bb9369fb2a5
- Deposit or zone
- South
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 102
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P90 Prospective Resource estimate for South, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“102”
Context: South
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 469Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:eb6031b4fc7ad502c381
- Deposit or zone
- South
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 469
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P50 Prospective Resource estimate for South, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“469”
Context: South
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 919Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:fab2e3578bb9369fb2a5
- Deposit or zone
- South
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 919
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical P10 Prospective Resource estimate for South, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“919”
Context: South
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 447Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:3cd8002d843cd8c9353f
- Deposit or zone
- Total Prospective Resources
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 447
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical total P90 Prospective Resource estimate, representing a low confidence level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P90)
Evidence · table
“447”
Context: Total
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
indicatedJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 1859Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:55af8f48af551ec756cb
- Deposit or zone
- Total Prospective Resources
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 1859
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical total P50 Prospective Resource estimate, representing a best estimate for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource
Evidence · table
“1,859”
Context: Total
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
inferredJudith Gas Field · natural gasContained Metal: 3616Contained Unit: bcfHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Judith Gas Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- australia_vic
- Reported Region
- Victoria, Australia
- Ticker
- EMP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Keven Asquith
- Resource group id
- resource:3cd8002d843cd8c9353f
- Deposit or zone
- Total Prospective Resources
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 3616
- Contained Unit
- bcf
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-20
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical total P10 Prospective Resource estimate, representing a high uncertainty level for undiscovered accumulations.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical
- Prospective resource (P10)
Evidence · table
“3,616”
Context: Total
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.