Eagle Plains Reports Additional Results from Drilling at the Don Lake Uranium Project, Saskatchewan

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.
Ticker
EPL.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Saskatchewan
Primary commodity
Uranium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-17 08:48:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Eagle Plains Resources reported additional drill results from its Don Lake Uranium Project in Saskatchewan, with several holes intersecting multiple zones of anomalous radioactivity. Highlights include 0.2m averaging 21907 cps in DN26008 and 0.6m averaging 12473 cps in DN26009. Geochemical assays are pending, and true thicknesses have not yet been determined.

Reasoning: The drilling program at Don Lake intersected multiple zones of anomalous radioactivity with high CPS values, suggesting potential for uranium mineralization. However, the lack of geochemical assays and undetermined true widths temper the immediate economic implications.

Positive factors

  • Multiple zones of anomalous radioactivity intersected in several holes, indicating potential for uranium mineralization.
  • Several high CPS readings (up to 21907 cps) significantly exceed the defined threshold for anomalous radioactivity.
  • QP sign-off provides a level of technical assurance for the reported data.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on gamma probe readings (CPS) only; geochemical assays for U3O8 grades are pending, which introduces uncertainty regarding economic viability.
  • True widths of the intercepts cannot yet be determined, meaning reported lengths may overstate actual thickness.
  • Two holes (DN26004, DN26007) reported no significant anomalous radioactivity.
  • Specific QA/QC methods (e.g., blanks, standards, duplicates) and lab certification were not explicitly disclosed for the current results.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 32

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept in DN26008 of 0.2m averaging 21907 cps is exceptionally high, significantly exceeding the anomalous radioactivity threshold and representing a very strong localized uranium signal.

Evidence · table

“21907”

Context: 0.2

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'All depths and intervals are meters downhole, true thicknesses cannot yet be determined,' indicating that only apparent widths are reported.

Evidence · text

“All depths and intervals are meters downhole, true thicknesses cannot yet be determined.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The news release states that technical information has been reviewed and approved by C.C. Downie, P.Geo., a 'Qualified Person' under N.I. 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this News Release has been reviewed and approved by C.C. Downie, P.Geo., a director and officer of Eagle Plains, hereby identified as the "Qualified Person" under N.I. 43-101.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The results for holes DN26001, DN26002, and DN26003 are explicitly referenced as being from an 'August 26 news release', indicating they are not new results in this document.

Evidence · text

“DN26001 1.9m averaging 11571 cps DN26002 1.1m averaging 11753 cps DN26003 1.2m averaging 2700 cps ([see August 26 news release])”

Exploration Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The program is described as 'testing for structurally-controlled uranium mineralization' and targeting extensions and sources of anomalies, which aligns with exploration objectives.

Evidence · text

“The 1106m, 10-hole program is testing for structurally-controlled uranium mineralization”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (32)

DN26004Don LakeView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26004
Project
Don Lake
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
111 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main B Zone
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole DN26004 reported no significant anomalous radioactivity, suggesting it did not encounter significant uranium mineralization based on gamma readings.

Negative factors

  • Reported no significant anomalous radioactivity, indicating a barren or low-grade intercept.
  • Geochemical assays are pending, so the absence of radioactivity may not fully reflect the U3O8 content.

Evidence · table

“no significant anomalous radioactivity”

Context: 111

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26005Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2898Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26005
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
2898
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
1.3 m
From
68.03 m
To
69.33 m
Hole Depth
116 m
Intercept Depth
68.03 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26005:68.03-69.33
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main B Zone
Azimuth
256 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole DN26005 intersected a moderate width of anomalous radioactivity, indicating potential uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Intercept shows significant anomalous radioactivity (2898 cps) over a moderate width (1.3m), well above the 800/900 cps threshold.
  • This result contributes to the understanding of mineralization in the B Zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“2898”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2656Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26006
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
2656
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
5.5 m
From
13.5 m
To
19 m
Hole Depth
120 m
Intercept Depth
13.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26006:13.5-19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main B Zone
Azimuth
256 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole DN26006 intersected a significant width of anomalous radioactivity, including higher-grade sub-intervals, suggesting promising uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Intercept shows significant anomalous radioactivity (2656 cps) over a good width (5.5m), well above the 800/900 cps threshold.
  • Includes higher-grade sub-intervals (6252 cps over 0.6m and 4090 cps over 0.9m), indicating stronger mineralization within the broader zone.
  • This result contributes to the understanding of mineralization in the B Zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“2656”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 6252Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26006
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
6252
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.6 m
From
13.8 m
To
14.4 m
Hole Depth
120 m
Intercept Depth
13.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26006:13.8-14.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main B Zone
Azimuth
256 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within DN26006 shows high anomalous radioactivity over a narrow width, contributing positively to the overall prospectivity of the B Zone.

Positive factors

  • High anomalous radioactivity (6252 cps) over a narrow width (0.6m), indicating a strong localized uranium presence.
  • This sub-interval enhances the overall significance of the broader intercept in DN26006.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“6252”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 4090Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26006
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
4090
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.9 m
From
16.3 m
To
17.2 m
Hole Depth
120 m
Intercept Depth
13.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26006:16.3-17.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main B Zone
Azimuth
256 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within DN26006 shows high anomalous radioactivity over a narrow width, contributing positively to the overall prospectivity of the B Zone.

Positive factors

  • High anomalous radioactivity (4090 cps) over a narrow width (0.9m), indicating a strong localized uranium presence.
  • This sub-interval enhances the overall significance of the broader intercept in DN26006.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“4090”

Context: 0.9

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26006Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 3519Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26006
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
3519
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.2 m
From
91.1 m
To
91.3 m
Hole Depth
120 m
Intercept Depth
13.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26006:91.1-91.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main B Zone
Azimuth
256 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept in DN26006 shows anomalous radioactivity, suggesting localized uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous radioactivity (3519 cps) over a very narrow width (0.2m), indicating a localized uranium presence.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • Very narrow intercept width.

Evidence · table

“3519”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26007Don LakeView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26007
Project
Don Lake
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Hole Depth
108 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole DN26007 reported no significant anomalous radioactivity, suggesting it did not encounter significant uranium mineralization based on gamma readings.

Negative factors

  • Reported no significant anomalous radioactivity, indicating a barren or low-grade intercept.
  • Geochemical assays are pending, so the absence of radioactivity may not fully reflect the U3O8 content.

Evidence · table

“no significant anomalous radioactivity”

Context: 108

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 3518Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26008
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
3518
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
1.6 m
From
16.43 m
To
18.03 m
Hole Depth
75 m
Intercept Depth
16.43 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26008:16.43-18.03
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole DN26008 intersected a moderate width of anomalous radioactivity, including a higher-grade sub-interval, suggesting promising uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Intercept shows significant anomalous radioactivity (3518 cps) over a moderate width (1.6m), well above the 800/900 cps threshold.
  • Includes a higher-grade sub-interval (7854 cps over 0.3m), indicating stronger mineralization within the broader zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“3518”

Context: 1.6

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 7854Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26008
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
7854
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.3 m
From
17.63 m
To
17.93 m
Hole Depth
75 m
Intercept Depth
16.43 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26008:17.63-17.93
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within DN26008 shows high anomalous radioactivity over a narrow width, contributing positively to the overall prospectivity of the C Zone.

Positive factors

  • High anomalous radioactivity (7854 cps) over a narrow width (0.3m), indicating a strong localized uranium presence.
  • This sub-interval enhances the overall significance of the broader intercept in DN26008.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“7854”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 10403Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26008
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
10403
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.7 m
From
22.03 m
To
22.73 m
Hole Depth
75 m
Intercept Depth
16.43 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26008:22.03-22.73
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept in DN26008 shows very high anomalous radioactivity, including a bonanza sub-interval, indicating significant uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Very high anomalous radioactivity (10403 cps) over a narrow width (0.7m), indicating a strong localized uranium presence.
  • Includes an exceptionally high-grade sub-interval (21907 cps over 0.2m), which is a bonanza intercept for radioactivity.
  • This result significantly enhances the overall prospectivity of the C Zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“10403”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26008Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 21907Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26008
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
21907
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.2 m
From
22.33 m
To
22.53 m
Hole Depth
75 m
Intercept Depth
16.43 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26008:22.33-22.53
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within DN26008 shows exceptionally high anomalous radioactivity, indicating a bonanza uranium intercept, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional anomalous radioactivity (21907 cps) over a very narrow width (0.2m), representing a bonanza intercept for radioactivity.
  • This high-grade sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity of the C Zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • Very narrow intercept width.

Evidence · table

“21907”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26009Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 4517Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26009
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
4517
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
2.2 m
From
25.83 m
To
28.03 m
Hole Depth
114 m
Intercept Depth
25.83 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26009:25.83-28.03
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
280 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole DN26009 intersected a good width of anomalous radioactivity, including a very high-grade sub-interval, suggesting promising uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Intercept shows significant anomalous radioactivity (4517 cps) over a good width (2.2m), well above the 800/900 cps threshold.
  • Includes a very high-grade sub-interval (12473 cps over 0.6m), indicating stronger mineralization within the broader zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“4517”

Context: 2.2

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26009Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 12473Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26009
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
12473
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
0.6 m
From
27.03 m
To
27.63 m
Hole Depth
114 m
Intercept Depth
25.83 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DN26009:27.03-27.63
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Main C Zone
Azimuth
280 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within DN26009 shows very high anomalous radioactivity over a narrow width, indicating significant uranium mineralization, though assays are pending and true width is unknown.

Positive factors

  • Very high anomalous radioactivity (12473 cps) over a narrow width (0.6m), indicating a strong localized uranium presence.
  • This sub-interval significantly enhances the overall prospectivity of the C Zone.

Negative factors

  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · table

“12473”

Context: 0.6

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DN26001Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 11571Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26001
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
11571
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
1.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from DN26001 shows high anomalous radioactivity, but it is a re-release of previously announced results and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • High anomalous radioactivity (11571 cps) over a moderate width (1.9m), indicating strong uranium mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a re-release of previously announced results, reducing novelty.
  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · text

“DN26001 1.9m averaging 11571 cps”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DN26002Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 11753Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26002
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
11753
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from DN26002 shows high anomalous radioactivity, but it is a re-release of previously announced results and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • High anomalous radioactivity (11753 cps) over a narrow width (1.1m), indicating strong uranium mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a re-release of previously announced results, reducing novelty.
  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · text

“DN26002 1.1m averaging 11753 cps”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

DN26003Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2700Grade Unit: cpsIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DN26003
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
2700
Grade Unit
cps
Intercept
1.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from DN26003 shows anomalous radioactivity, but it is a re-release of previously announced results and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous radioactivity (2700 cps) over a narrow width (1.2m), indicating uranium mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a re-release of previously announced results, reducing novelty.
  • Results are based on CPS readings only; geochemical assays are pending.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · text

“DN26003 1.2m averaging 2700 cps”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

AF 74N10-0422Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AF 74N10-0422
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept from the A Zone shows very high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result with no specific date.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade uranium intercept (10.7% U3O8) over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“10.7% U3O8 over 0.3m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

AF 74N10-0422Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.67 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AF 74N10-0422
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
2.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept from the A Zone shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result with no specific date.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium intercept (2.14% U3O8) over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“2.14% U3O8 over 0.67m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 19Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: % U3O8Intercept: 1.98 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
% U3O8
Intercept
1.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical trench sample shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and not from drilling.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium (1.17% U3O8) over a moderate width from trench sampling, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • Trench samples may not be representative of subsurface mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“1.17% U3O8 over 1.98m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

D-1Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
D-1
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
49.7 m
To
50.3 m
Intercept Depth
49.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
D-1:49.7-50.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Don Lake Zone A
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept from 1950 shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is very low as it's a past result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium intercept (2.0% U3O8) over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result from 1950, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · text

“2.0% U3O8 over 0.6m from 49.7-50.3m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

23Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
23
Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone A
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept from 1969 shows very high-grade uranium, but its novelty is very low as it's a past result.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade uranium intercept (10.7% U3O8) over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result from 1969, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.

Evidence · text

“10.7% U3O8 over 0.3m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 22Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 8.57Grade Unit: % U3O8Intercept: 0.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
8.57
Grade Unit
% U3O8
Intercept
0.91 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical trench sample shows very high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and not from drilling.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade uranium (8.57% U3O8) over a narrow width from trench sampling, indicating strong surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result from 1969, reducing its novelty.
  • Trench samples may not be representative of subsurface mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“8.57% U3O8 over 0.91m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 23Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: % U3O8Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
% U3O8
Intercept
0.61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A Zone
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical trench sample shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and not from drilling.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium (2.86% U3O8) over a narrow width from trench sampling, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result from 1969, reducing its novelty.
  • Trench samples may not be representative of subsurface mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“2.86% U3O8 over 0.61m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 24Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: % U3O8Intercept: 1.98 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
% U3O8
Intercept
1.98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone B
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical trench sample shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and not from drilling.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium (1.17% U3O8) over a moderate width from trench sampling, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • Trench samples may not be representative of subsurface mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“1.17% U3O8 over 1.98m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 25Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.34 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.34 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone B
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows anomalous uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and very narrow.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous uranium grade (0.71% U3O8) over a very narrow width, indicating localized mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“0.71% U3O8 over 0.34m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 26Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone B
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows anomalous uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and very narrow.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous uranium grade (0.64% U3O8) over a very narrow width, indicating localized mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“0.64% U3O8 over 0.3m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 27Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: % U3O8Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
3.02
Grade Unit
% U3O8
Intercept
0.61 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone C
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical trench sample shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and not from drilling.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium (3.02% U3O8) over a narrow width from trench sampling, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • Trench samples may not be representative of subsurface mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“3.02% U3O8 over 0.61m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 28Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone C
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows anomalous uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and very narrow.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous uranium grade (0.80% U3O8) over a very narrow width, indicating localized mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“0.80% U3O8 over 0.3m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 29Don Lake · uraniumGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
canada_sk
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.52 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Zone C
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows anomalous uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and very narrow.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous uranium grade (0.85% U3O8) over a narrow width, indicating localized mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not determined, which may overstate the actual thickness.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“0.85% U3O8 over 0.52m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 30Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: % U3O8Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
% U3O8
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Townsend Fault Uranium Showings
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and very narrow.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium (1.63% U3O8) over a very narrow width from channel sampling, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • Channel samples may not be representative of subsurface mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“1.63% U3O8”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 31Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: % U3O8Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
% U3O8

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A.R. Hawker Trench ARH-2
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical grab sample shows high-grade uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and selective.

Positive factors

  • High-grade uranium (1.2% U3O8) from grab samples, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative of the overall mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“1.2% U3O8”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 32Don Lake Project · uraniumGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: % U3O8Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Don Lake Project
Commodity
uranium
Region
canada_sk
Reported Region
Saskatchewan
Ticker
EPL.V

Geometry

Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
% U3O8

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
A.R. Hawker Trench ARH-2
Loc. Confidence
low
Loc. Source
document

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical grab sample shows anomalous uranium, but its novelty is low as it's a past result and selective.

Positive factors

  • Anomalous uranium grade (0.78% U3O8) from grab samples, indicating surface mineralization.

Negative factors

  • This is a historical result, reducing its novelty.
  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative of the overall mineralization.
  • No specific date for the historical result is provided, limiting context.

Evidence · text

“0.78% U3O8”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.