DTM: Full Year Statutory Accounts

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Dart Mining NL
Ticker
DTM
Exchange
ASX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Antimony, Silver, Zinc, Tin, Tungsten
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update, Agreement transaction, Other
Extracted
2026-09-30 07:14:25 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Dart Mining NL reported its full-year statutory accounts for 2026, detailing a net loss of $4.01 million and a material uncertainty regarding its going concern status. Despite financial challenges, the company highlighted positive exploration progress, including high-grade rock chip samples at the Triumph Gold Project and significant antimony, gold, and silver drill intercepts at Coonambula. An Exploration Target of 5.1-7.6 Mt @ 1.72-2.52 g/t Au for 285,100-613,200 oz gold was announced for Triumph, building on a prior Inferred Mineral Resource. The company also completed strategic divestments of non-core assets and announced a post-period capital raise to fund ongoing exploration, including planned tin-tungsten drilling in Northeast Victoria.

Reasoning: Dart Mining NL reported a net loss and a going concern warning in its annual financial report, but also highlighted positive exploration results, a substantial gold exploration target, and strategic divestments, alongside a post-period capital raise to fund ongoing activities.

Positive factors

  • Significant exploration results reported across multiple projects
  • Substantial gold exploration target announced for flagship project
  • Strategic divestments of non-core assets completed
  • Post-period capital raise strengthens financial position

Negative factors

  • Company reported a net loss for the year
  • Auditor's report highlights material uncertainty regarding going concern
  • Significant exploration costs expensed
  • Lack of specific QA/QC disclosure for assay results

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 22

Classification and evidence

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: The document reports drill and surface sample results but does not disclose specific QA/QC procedures, certified laboratories, or QP/CP sign-off for the assay results.

Evidence · text

“Drilling intersected multiple new parallel lodes and the New Constitution deposit has been widened with the many new gold lodes discovered by Dart in our 2025 drilling (now up to 190m wide) (ASX:DTM September and December Quarterly Activity Reports).”

Going Concern Warningnegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The auditor's report highlights a material uncertainty regarding the Group's ability to continue as a going concern due to net loss and dependence on future funding.

Evidence · text

“Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern”

Strategic Divestmentpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company divested non-core projects (Buckland Gold Project, Mt Unicorn, Sandy Creek, Tallandoon, Corryong) to focus on core assets and raise capital.

Evidence · text

“In March 2026 the group it has entered into a binding sale and purchase term sheet with Daybreak Minerals Pty Ltd for the sale of a 100% legal and beneficial interest in the tenements... comprising the Buckland Gold Project”

Capital Raisepositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company announced a post-period placement to raise $2,000,000, providing funding for future activities.

Evidence · text

“On the same date the Company announced a placement of 235,294,118 shares to raise $2,000,000”

Exploration Targetneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company released an Exploration Target for the Triumph Gold Project, indicating significant potential for resource growth.

Evidence · text

“In November Dart Mining released the Triumph Gold Project Exploration Target of 5.1-7.6 Mt @ 1.72-2.52 g/t Au for 285,100-613,200oz gold”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The rock chip sample from Chandlers lode returned 109.0 g/t Au, which is well above the exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · text

“Chandlers lode (109.0 g/t Au & 105.0 g/t Ag)”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The rock chip sample from Spotted Gum returned 73.0 g/t Au, which is well above the exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · text

“Spotted Gum (73.0 g/t Au & 45.0 g/t Ag)”

Moderate Gradeneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The rock chip sample from Sailor Boy returned 2.11% Zn, which falls within the moderate grade band for zinc.

Evidence · text

“Sailor Boy (9.0 g/t Au, 13.5 g/t Ag & 2.11% Zn”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The grab sample returned up to 65.3% Sb, which is an exceptionally high grade for antimony.

Evidence · text

“grab samples up to 65.3% Sb, 15.03g/t gold and 97.9g/t silver”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The grab sample returned up to 15.03 g/t Au, which is well above the exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · text

“grab samples up to 65.3% Sb, 15.03g/t gold and 97.9g/t silver”

Moderate Gradeneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The grab sample returned up to 97.9 g/t Ag, which falls within the moderate grade band for silver.

Evidence · text

“grab samples up to 65.3% Sb, 15.03g/t gold and 97.9g/t silver”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 5.0m @ 4.33% Sb is reported as downhole length without true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

“5.0m @ 4.33% Sb, 1.69 g/t Au & 23.65 g/t Ag from 41.5m”

Moderate Gradeneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 5.0m @ 1.69 g/t Au falls within the moderate grade band for gold.

Evidence · text

“5.0m @ 4.33% Sb, 1.69 g/t Au & 23.65 g/t Ag from 41.5m”

Weak Gradenegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 5.0m @ 23.65 g/t Ag falls below the weak grade band for silver.

Evidence · text

“5.0m @ 4.33% Sb, 1.69 g/t Au & 23.65 g/t Ag from 41.5m”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 1.6m @ 9.47% Sb is an exceptionally high grade for antimony.

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 1.6m @ 9.47% Sb is reported as downhole length without true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Weak Gradenegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 1.6m @ 0.35 g/t Au falls within the weak grade band for gold.

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Weak Gradenegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 1.6m @ 4.09 g/t Ag falls below the weak grade band for silver.

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Moderate Gradeneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 12.8m @ 1.75 g/t Au falls within the moderate grade band for gold.

Evidence · text

“12.8m @ 1.75g/t Au from 36.7m downhole”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 12.8m @ 1.75g/t Au is reported as downhole length without true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

“12.8m @ 1.75g/t Au from 36.7m downhole”

Strong Gradepositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 1.7m @ 4.85 g/t Au falls within the strong grade band for gold.

Evidence · text

“1.7m @ 4.85 g/t Au from 42.5m”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The drill intercept of 1.7m @ 4.85 g/t Au is reported as downhole length without true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

“1.7m @ 4.85 g/t Au from 42.5m”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The reported resource is classified as Inferred, indicating a lower level of geological confidence.

Evidence · text

“March 2025 Inferred Mineral Resource of 2.16 Mt @ 2.17g/t Au for 150,000oz gold”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is from March 2025 and is presented as a historical figure that the current Exploration Target builds upon.

Evidence · text

“March 2025 Inferred Mineral Resource of 2.16 Mt @ 2.17g/t Au for 150,000oz gold (ASX: DTM 4 March 2025)”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 21. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (20)

Fact 1Triumph East · goldGrade: 109Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
109
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Chandlers lode
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold rock chip sample indicates strong mineralization at Chandlers lode.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold from surface sampling

Evidence · text

“Chandlers lode (109.0 g/t Au & 105.0 g/t Ag)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 2Triumph East · silverGrade: 105Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
105
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Chandlers lode
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade silver rock chip sample indicates associated mineralization at Chandlers lode.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade silver from surface sampling

Evidence · text

“Chandlers lode (109.0 g/t Au & 105.0 g/t Ag)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 3Triumph East · goldGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Sailor Boy
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade gold rock chip sample indicates mineralization at Sailor Boy.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade gold from surface sampling

Evidence · text

“Sailor Boy (9.0 g/t Au, 13.5 g/t Ag & 2.11% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 4Triumph East · silverGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
13.5
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Sailor Boy
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade silver rock chip sample indicates associated mineralization at Sailor Boy.

Evidence · text

“Sailor Boy (9.0 g/t Au, 13.5 g/t Ag & 2.11% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 5Triumph East · zincGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
2.11
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Sailor Boy
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade zinc rock chip sample indicates associated mineralization at Sailor Boy.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade zinc from surface sampling

Evidence · text

“Sailor Boy (9.0 g/t Au, 13.5 g/t Ag & 2.11% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 6Triumph East · goldGrade: 73Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
73
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Spotted Gum
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold rock chip sample indicates strong mineralization at Spotted Gum.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold from surface sampling

Evidence · text

“Spotted Gum (73.0 g/t Au & 45.0 g/t Ag)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 7Triumph East · silverGrade: 45Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph East
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
45
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Spotted Gum
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade silver rock chip sample indicates associated mineralization at Spotted Gum.

Evidence · text

“Spotted Gum (73.0 g/t Au & 45.0 g/t Ag)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 8Coonambula · antimonyGrade: 65.3Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
65.3
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional antimony grade from grab samples highlights significant prospectivity at Coonambula.

Positive factors

  • Extremely high-grade antimony from grab samples

Evidence · text

“grab samples up to 65.3% Sb, 15.03g/t gold and 97.9g/t silver”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 9Coonambula · goldGrade: 15.03Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
15.03
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade gold from grab samples indicates strong mineralization at Coonambula.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade gold from grab samples

Evidence · text

“grab samples up to 65.3% Sb, 15.03g/t gold and 97.9g/t silver”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 10Coonambula · silverGrade: 97.9Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
97.9
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade silver from grab samples indicates associated mineralization at Coonambula.

Evidence · text

“grab samples up to 65.3% Sb, 15.03g/t gold and 97.9g/t silver”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 11Coonambula · antimonyGrade: 4.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
4.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
41.5 m
To
46.5 m
Intercept Depth
41.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:41.5-46.5

Location

Location
Banshee historic mine
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant antimony intercept from the first diamond drillhole at Banshee, indicating strong mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade antimony intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“5.0m @ 4.33% Sb, 1.69 g/t Au & 23.65 g/t Ag from 41.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 12Coonambula · goldGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
1.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
41.5 m
To
46.5 m
Intercept Depth
41.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:41.5-46.5

Location

Location
Banshee historic mine
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate gold intercept associated with antimony mineralization at Banshee.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“5.0m @ 4.33% Sb, 1.69 g/t Au & 23.65 g/t Ag from 41.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 13Coonambula · silverGrade: 23.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
23.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
41.5 m
To
46.5 m
Intercept Depth
41.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:41.5-46.5

Location

Location
Banshee historic mine
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver intercept associated with antimony mineralization at Banshee.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“5.0m @ 4.33% Sb, 1.69 g/t Au & 23.65 g/t Ag from 41.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 14Coonambula · antimonyGrade: 9.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
antimony
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
9.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m
From
68.2 m
To
69.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:68.2-69.8

Location

Location
Banshee historic mine
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high-grade antimony intercept from the first diamond drillhole at Banshee, indicating strong mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade antimony intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 15Coonambula · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
68.2 m
To
69.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:68.2-69.8

Location

Location
Banshee historic mine
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak gold intercept associated with antimony mineralization at Banshee.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 16Coonambula · silverGrade: 4.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Coonambula
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
4.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
68.2 m
To
69.8 m
Intercept Depth
41.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
null:68.2-69.8

Location

Location
Banshee historic mine
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver intercept associated with antimony mineralization at Banshee.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 9.47% Sb, 0.35 g/t Au & 4.09 g/t Ag from 68.2m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 17Rushworth · goldGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.8 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Rushworth
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.8 m
From
36.7 m
To
49.5 m
Intercept Depth
36.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Rushworth:36.7-49.5

Location

Location
Phoenix prospect
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade gold intercept at Phoenix prospect, indicating mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade gold intercept
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · text

“12.8m @ 1.75g/t Au from 36.7m downhole”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 18Rushworth · goldGrade: 4.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Rushworth
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_vic
Reported Region
australia_vic
Ticker
DTM

Geometry

Grade
4.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
42.5 m
To
44.2 m
Intercept Depth
36.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Rushworth:42.5-44.2

Location

Location
Phoenix prospect
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade gold intercept at Phoenix prospect, though over a narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade gold intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

“1.7m @ 4.85 g/t Au from 42.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 19Buckland WestNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Buckland West
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Divestment of a non-core asset for cash, aligning with the company's strategy to focus on core projects.

Positive factors

  • Strategic Divestment
  • Cash consideration received

Evidence · text

“sale of a 100% legal and beneficial interest in the tenements, exploration licence EL006861, retention licence RL006615, associated mining information, and two general habitat units, comprising the Buckland Gold Project for Cash consideration of $300,000”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 20Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
DTM

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A post-period placement successfully raised $2 million, providing necessary capital but resulting in significant share dilution.

Positive factors

  • Capital Raise provides funding for operations and exploration

Negative factors

  • Significant share dilution

Evidence · text

“On the same date the Company announced a placement of 235,294,118 shares to raise $2,000,000”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (1)

inferredTriumph Gold Project · goldTonnes: 2160000Grade: 2.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 150000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Triumph Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Ticker
DTM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:de1b3db70deeb11a7eca

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2160000
Grade
2.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
150000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-03-04

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-04T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Inferred Mineral Resource, providing a baseline for the project's potential but with lower confidence due to its category and age.

Negative factors

  • Inferred Resource
  • Historical Estimate Only

Evidence · text

“March 2025 Inferred Mineral Resource of 2.16 Mt @ 2.17g/t Au for 150,000oz gold (ASX: DTM 4 March 2025)”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.