DRR: Corporate Presentation - October 2026

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Deterra Royalties Limited
Ticker
DRR
Exchange
ASX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Unavailable
Secondary commodities
Iron ore, Lithium, Copper, Mineral sands, Zinc, Gold, Silver, Molybdenum, Lead
Document categories
Other, Agreement transaction, Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-18 22:26:32 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Deterra Royalties presented a corporate overview highlighting its diversified portfolio of royalty assets, strong financial performance for FY26, and strategic growth initiatives. Key updates include the recent acquisition of a royalty over the Santa Cruz Copper Project for US$74.15 million and significant de-risking and expansion of the Thacker Pass Lithium Project, which saw its mine life and reserves double following an updated NI 43-101 technical report. The company emphasizes its low-risk royalty model, high margins, and commitment to shareholder returns through dividends.

Reasoning: The corporate presentation highlights robust financial results, strategic acquisitions, and significant growth and de-risking of core assets, positioning the company for continued expansion and strong shareholder returns, despite some non-JORC reporting standards and royalty buyback clauses.

Positive factors

  • Strong financial performance for FY26 with A$164m NPAT and 94% EBITDA margin.
  • Strategic acquisition of Santa Cruz Copper royalty for US$74.15 million, adding a new core asset.
  • Significant de-risking and expansion of Thacker Pass Lithium Project, with mine life and reserves doubling.
  • Diversified portfolio of long-life, low-cost assets in tier-one jurisdictions.
  • Strong balance sheet with A$250m undrawn credit facilities and 75% dividend payout ratio.

Negative factors

  • Some key resource estimates (Thacker Pass, Santa Cruz) are not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101 or S-K 1300.
  • Sonora Lithium Project concessions are under dispute, creating uncertainty.
  • Thacker Pass and Santa Cruz royalties include buyback options, which could reduce future revenue streams.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 96

Classification and evidence

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document details an updated NI 43-101 for Thacker Pass, doubling mine life, LCE pathway, and reserves/resources, and provides current resource/reserve figures for Santa Cruz.

Evidence · text

“Updated NI 43-101 (Technical Report) supporting: Doubling mine life to 85 years from 40 years; LCE Pathway to 160ktpa from 80ktpa; > doubling Reserve (to 14.3Mt LCE from 3.7Mt LCE) and Resource (to 44.5Mt LCE from 16.1Mt LCE)”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Thacker Pass reserves more than doubled to 14.3Mt LCE from 3.7Mt LCE, and resources more than doubled to 44.5Mt LCE from 16.1Mt LCE.

Evidence · text

“> doubling Reserve (to 14.3Mt LCE from 3.7Mt LCE) and Resource (to 44.5Mt LCE from 16.1Mt LCE)”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: Thacker Pass and Pukaqaqa resource estimates are prepared using NI 43-101 regulations.

Evidence · text

“The Mineral Reserve and Resource estimates have been prepared using the National Instrument 43-101 (Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects) of the Canadian Securities Administrators”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: Several resource estimates (Thacker Pass, Santa Cruz, Sonora, Wonnerup, Pukaqaqa) are explicitly stated as 'Non-JORC' and prepared using other standards like NI 43-101 or S-K 1300, indicating they are not compliant with JORC.

Evidence · text

“The Mineral Reserve and Resource estimates are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code. The Mineral Reserve and Resource estimates have been prepared using the National Instrument 43-101 (Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects) of the Canadian Securities Administrators and the S-K 1300 regulations for the US Securities Act of 1933. Accordingly, the Mineral Reserve and Resource estimates are not, and do not purport to be, compliant with the JORC Code”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Paradox DFS is from 2022, Antler PFS from 2024, Sonora FS from 2017, and Lincoln PEA from 2015, indicating these are not recent estimates.

Evidence · text

“Paradox DFS (2022)1 Utah Lithium 2.5% NSR”

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The Santa Cruz project reports its current Mineral Reserves and Resources, which are presented as new information in the context of the acquisition.

Evidence · text

“Current Mineral Reserves, including outside DRR royalty area: ~1.5 million tonnes contained copper at average grade of 1.08%Cu”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The Lincoln project's estimate is from a PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment) in 2015.

Evidence · text

“Lincoln PEA (2015) California Gold 0.75% NSR (net)”

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: The Antler project's estimate is from a PFS (Pre-Feasibility Study) in 2024.

Evidence · text

“Antler PFS (2024) Arizona Copper / Zinc 0.9% NSR + 0.45% AOI, with partial buyback”

Pilot Scale Completepositive · Story-specific tag

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: Thacker Pass is targeting mechanical completion and ramp-up, and Paradox is commencing operation of a demonstration plant, indicating advanced test work.

Evidence · text

“Mechanical completion / ramp up to capacity of 40ktpa LCE”

Refractory Orenegative · Story-specific tag

Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: The Sonora Lithium Project concessions are under dispute, indicating potential issues with project viability or permitting.

Evidence · text

“In August 2023, the General Directorate of Mines in Mexico issued a formal notice indicating nine of the lithium concessions underpinning the Sonora Lithium Project were cancelled. This matter remains under dispute”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 33. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (29)

indicatedSanta Cruz · copperTonnes: 1400000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:f963ff0df25ee1a3268d

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1400000
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Santa Cruz project reports a significant Indicated Mineral Resource of 1.4 million tonnes of contained copper at 0.79% Cu, providing a solid base for future studies, though it is not JORC compliant.

Positive factors

  • Indicated resource category provides reasonable geological confidence.

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Indicated: ~1.4 million tonnes contained copper @ 0.79% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredSanta Cruz · copperTonnes: 200000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:37e65f4d3cef2584cbe4

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
200000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Santa Cruz project reports an Inferred Mineral Resource of 0.2 million tonnes of contained copper at 0.73% Cu, which is a speculative category and not JORC compliant.

Negative factors

  • Inferred resource category has lower geological confidence.
  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Inferred: ~0.2 million tonnes contained copper @ 0.73% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenSanta Cruz · copperTonnes: 140000000Grade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1.5Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:dabcde9e0b0177c9a1e3

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
140000000
Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1.5
Contained Unit
mt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Santa Cruz project reports substantial Mineral Reserves of 1.5 million tonnes contained copper at an average grade of 1.08% Cu, supporting a 24-year mine life, though it is not JORC compliant.

Positive factors

  • Significant contained copper in Mineral Reserves indicates economic viability.
  • Average grade of 1.08% Cu is strong for a copper project.

Negative factors

  • Reserve estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Current Mineral Reserves, including outside DRR royalty area: ~1.5 million tonnes contained copper at average grade of 1.08%Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

provenThacker Pass · lithiumTonnes: 14300000Grade Unit: LCEView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Thacker Pass
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2024-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:9f19ce4ed32e73ed91ec

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
14300000
Grade Unit
LCE

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-12-31
Prior Tonnes
3700000

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thacker Pass Lithium Project's reserves more than doubled to 14.3 Mt LCE from 3.7 Mt LCE, a highly positive and material update from the NI 43-101 technical report, significantly de-risking the project.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in reserves, more than doubling the prior estimate.
  • Updated NI 43-101 technical report provides increased confidence.
  • Reserves are a high-confidence category, supporting economic studies.

Negative factors

  • Reserve estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“> doubling Reserve (to 14.3Mt LCE from 3.7Mt LCE)”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 14300000 against 3700000 previously

inferredThacker Pass · lithiumTonnes: 44500000Grade Unit: LCEView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Thacker Pass
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:0b972d6a8dd280132a97

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
44500000
Grade Unit
LCE

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-12-31
Prior Tonnes
16100000

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thacker Pass Lithium Project's resources more than doubled to 44.5 Mt LCE from 16.1 Mt LCE, a highly positive and material update from the NI 43-101 technical report, indicating significant growth potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in resources, more than doubling the prior estimate.
  • Updated NI 43-101 technical report provides increased confidence.

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“and Resource (to 44.5Mt LCE from 16.1Mt LCE)”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 44500000 against 16100000 previously

provenKwale · heavy mineralsTonnes: 7600000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kwale
Commodity
heavy minerals
Region
kenya
Reported Region
Kenya
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:34e9bee3da7c902a7bd6

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
7600000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Kwale project has JORC compliant reserves of 7.6 Mt at 1.8% Heavy Minerals, but mining is expected to cease in December 2024.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.

Negative factors

  • Mining expected to cease in December 2024, indicating limited future revenue.

Evidence · text

“JORC 7.6Mt @ 1.8% Heavy Minerals”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedKwale · heavy mineralsTonnes: 13500000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kwale
Commodity
heavy minerals
Region
kenya
Reported Region
Kenya
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:737fce898223678edd85

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
13500000
Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Kwale project has JORC compliant resources of 13.5 Mt at 1.6% Heavy Minerals, but mining is expected to cease in December 2024.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.

Negative factors

  • Mining expected to cease in December 2024, indicating limited future revenue.

Evidence · text

“JORC 13.5Mt @ 1.6% Heavy Minerals”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenYandanooka · heavy mineralsTonnes: 30000000Grade: 3.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Yandanooka
Commodity
heavy minerals
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:3beb9a79e9acc488c8b2

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
30000000
Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Yandanooka project has JORC compliant reserves of 30 Mt at 3.9% Heavy Minerals, indicating a significant resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.

Evidence · text

“JORC 30Mt @ 3.9% Heavy Minerals”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedYandanooka · heavy mineralsTonnes: 57000000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Yandanooka
Commodity
heavy minerals
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:173170f3396c2d905a10

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
57000000
Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Yandanooka project has JORC compliant resources of 57 Mt at 3.1% Heavy Minerals, indicating a significant resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.

Evidence · text

“JORC 57Mt @ 3.1% Heavy Minerals”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenWonnerup · heavy mineralsTonnes: 6000000Grade: 5.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Wonnerup
Commodity
heavy minerals
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:877b4a49bbc725e02d51

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
6000000
Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Wonnerup project has reserves of 6 Mt at 5.4% Heavy Minerals, but the estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Negative factors

  • Reserve estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC8 6Mt @ 5.4% Heavy Minerals9”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenThacker Pass · lithiumTonnes: 1056000000Grade: 0.254Grade Unit: % LiHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Thacker Pass
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:ae29f6e125ced2afcf8a

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
1056000000
Grade
0.254
Grade Unit
% Li

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thacker Pass project has non-JORC compliant reserves of 1,056 Mt at 0.254% Li, indicating a large lithium resource.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage of reserves indicates significant scale.

Negative factors

  • Reserve estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC2 1,056Mt @ 0.254% Li”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedThacker Pass · lithiumTonnes: 5767000000Grade: 0.217Grade Unit: % LiHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Thacker Pass
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:e0a83f136fa0e894bf71

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
5767000000
Grade
0.217
Grade Unit
% Li

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thacker Pass project has non-JORC compliant resources of 5,767 Mt at 0.217% Li, indicating a very large lithium resource.

Positive factors

  • Very large tonnage of resources indicates significant long-term potential.

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC2 5,767Mt @ 0.217% Li”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenSanta Cruz · copperTonnes: 140000000Grade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:825b6483cf8938431dbb

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
140000000
Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Santa Cruz project has non-JORC compliant reserves of 140 Mt at 1.08% Cu, indicating a substantial copper resource.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage and good grade for copper reserves.

Negative factors

  • Reserve estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC2 140Mt @ 1.08% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedSanta Cruz · copperTonnes: 326000000Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:b344b305064aca6f5da9

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
326000000
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Santa Cruz project has non-JORC compliant resources of 326 Mt at 0.95% Cu, indicating a large copper resource.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage of resources with good grade indicates significant potential.

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC2 326Mt @ 0.95% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenSonora · lithiumTonnes: 244000000Grade: 0.35Grade Unit: % LiHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Sonora
Commodity
lithium
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Mexico
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:2a4f23aef4931727618f

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
244000000
Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
% Li

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Sonora project has non-JORC compliant reserves of 244 Mt at 0.35% Li, but the concessions are under dispute, impacting project viability.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage and good grade for lithium reserves.

Negative factors

  • Reserve estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101.
  • Concessions are under dispute, creating uncertainty.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC6 244Mt @ 0.35% Li”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedSonora · lithiumTonnes: 559000000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: % LiHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Sonora
Commodity
lithium
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Mexico
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:73f695648ec9d86ed18b

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
559000000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
% Li

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Sonora project has non-JORC compliant resources of 559 Mt at 0.30% Li, but the concessions are under dispute, impacting project viability.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage of resources with good grade indicates significant potential.

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101.
  • Concessions are under dispute, creating uncertainty.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC6 559Mt @ 0.30% Li”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedParadox · lithiumTonnes: 2516000000Grade: 112Grade Unit: ppm LiHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Paradox
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:ac2c1d553468faa5b089
Deposit or zone
Paradox

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2516000000
Grade
112
Grade Unit
ppm Li

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Paradox project has JORC compliant resources of 2,516 Mt at 112 ppm Li, indicating a very large lithium resource.

Positive factors

  • Very large tonnage of JORC compliant resources indicates significant potential.

Evidence · text

“JORC Paradox: 2,516Mt @ 112ppm Li”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenAntler · copperTonnes: 11000000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:685e6e466220f19e3fb0

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
11000000
Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant reserves of 11 Mt at 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 26 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 11Mt @ 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 26g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenAntler · zincTonnes: 11000000Grade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:685e6e466220f19e3fb0

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
11000000
Grade
3.7
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant reserves of 11 Mt at 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 26 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 11Mt @ 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 26g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenAntler · leadTonnes: 11000000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:685e6e466220f19e3fb0

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
11000000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant reserves of 11 Mt at 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 26 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 11Mt @ 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 26g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenAntler · goldTonnes: 11000000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:685e6e466220f19e3fb0

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
11000000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant reserves of 11 Mt at 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 26 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 11Mt @ 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 26g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

provenAntler · silverTonnes: 11000000Grade: 26Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:685e6e466220f19e3fb0

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
11000000
Grade
26
Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant reserves of 11 Mt at 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 26 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant reserves provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 11Mt @ 1.6% Cu, 3.7% Zn, 0.6% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 26g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedAntler · copperTonnes: 14200000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:7233ff359a8c2d87d9a5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant resources of 14.2 Mt at 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 34 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 14.2Mt @ 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedAntler · zincTonnes: 14200000Grade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
zinc
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:7233ff359a8c2d87d9a5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
4.3
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant resources of 14.2 Mt at 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 34 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 14.2Mt @ 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedAntler · leadTonnes: 14200000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
lead
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:7233ff359a8c2d87d9a5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant resources of 14.2 Mt at 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 34 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 14.2Mt @ 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedAntler · goldTonnes: 14200000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:7233ff359a8c2d87d9a5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant resources of 14.2 Mt at 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 34 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 14.2Mt @ 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedAntler · silverTonnes: 14200000Grade: 34Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Antler
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona, USA
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:7233ff359a8c2d87d9a5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
34
Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Antler project has JORC compliant resources of 14.2 Mt at 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3 g/t Au, and 34 g/t Ag, indicating a significant polymetallic resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Polymetallic nature adds value.

Evidence · text

“JORC 14.2Mt @ 1.8% Cu, 4.3% Zn, 0.9% Pb, 0.3g/t Au, 34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedMimbula · copperTonnes: 76300000Grade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mimbula
Commodity
copper
Region
zambia
Reported Region
Zambia
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:e6fd75c8212166c23e53

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
76300000
Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Mimbula project has JORC compliant resources of 76.3 Mt at 1.07% Cu, indicating a significant copper resource.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant resources provide confidence in the estimate.
  • Good grade for copper resources.

Evidence · text

“JORC 76.3Mt @ 1.07% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedPukaqaqa · copperTonnes: 349100000Grade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pukaqaqa
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
Peru
Ticker
DRR

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:6173891e4c408084efe0

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
349100000
Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Pukaqaqa project has non-JORC compliant resources of 349.1 Mt at 0.40% Cu, indicating a large copper resource.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage of resources indicates significant potential.

Negative factors

  • Resource estimate is not JORC compliant, using NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Non-JORC6 349.1Mt @ 0.40% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Metallurgical Results (4)

pilot plantThacker Pass · lithiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Thacker Pass
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
DRR

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant

Lab

Consultant
Bechtel

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Targeting mechanical completion by late 2027 for the Thacker Pass Lithium Project is a positive development, indicating the project is advancing towards production.

Positive factors

  • Mechanical completion is a significant project milestone, indicating progress towards production.

Evidence · text

“Thacker Pass Lithium Project mechanical completion targeted end of 2027”

Tags used in scoring

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

pilot plantThacker Pass · lithiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Thacker Pass
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
DRR

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
pilot plant

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Thacker Pass Lithium Project is targeting mechanical completion and ramp-up to 40ktpa LCE capacity, indicating significant progress towards commercial production.

Positive factors

  • Mechanical completion and ramp-up to capacity are key milestones towards production.

Evidence · text

“Mechanical completion / ramp up to capacity of 40ktpa LCE”

Tags used in scoring

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

demonstration plantParadox · lithiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Paradox
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah, USA
Ticker
DRR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
demonstration plant

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Paradox project is commencing operation of a demonstration plant, which is a positive step towards validating its lithium extraction process.

Positive factors

  • Commencing demonstration plant operation is a key step in de-risking the project and validating the process.

Evidence · text

“Commence operation of demonstration plant”

Tags used in scoring

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

demonstration plantGreen River · lithiumView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Green River
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah, USA
Ticker
DRR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
demonstration plant

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Green River project is advancing to engineering and demonstration plant stages, which is a positive step for its lithium development.

Positive factors

  • Advancement to engineering and demonstration plant stage indicates progress in project development.

Evidence · text

“Green River engineering & demonstration plant”

Tags used in scoring

Pilot Scale Completepositive

Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.

Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.