Drilling Campaign Doubles Target Size of the Cate-8 Discovery Target
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Bunker Hill Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- BNKR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Idaho
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-08-23 02:29:43 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bunker Hill Mining announced high-grade assay results from its underground exploration drilling at the Cate-8 Target, including 2.47m at 719.46 g/t AgEq (20.98 oz/ton AgEq) in hole BHE26-16. The drilling has doubled the target size, demonstrating continuity over 680 feet along strike and 880 feet down dip, with an updated conceptual model showing 337k tons at 211.53 g/t AgEq (6.17 oz/ton AgEq) at a 50 g/t AgEq cut-off. The company aims to deliver an initial resource estimate by year-end 2026, with potential for inclusion in near-term mine plans and production plans.
Reasoning: The drilling campaign has yielded exceptional high-grade silver-lead-zinc intercepts, significantly expanded the conceptual target size of the Cate-8 discovery, and demonstrated strong continuity, positioning it for an initial resource estimate and potential integration into future production plans.
Positive factors
- Bonanza intercept (BHE26-16 with 719.46 g/t AgEq over 2.47m)
- Step-out extension beyond existing resource footprint
- QA/QC disclosed with certified lab and QP sign-off
- Metal equivalent assumptions fully disclosed
- Conceptual target size doubled with significant tonnage and grade
- Demonstrated continuity of mineralization along strike and down dip
- Potential for inclusion in near-term mine plans and future production guidance
Negative factors
- True width is estimated as a range, not precisely stated for each intercept
- Target estimate is conceptual and does not constitute a mineral resource estimate
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 85
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Hole BHE26-16 returned 2.47m at 719.46 g/t AgEq, which is well above the exceptional threshold for underground silver equivalent grades.
Evidence · text
“8.1 feet at 18.82 oz/ton Ag, 8.87% Pb, 0.25% Zn (20.98 oz/ton AgEq) (2.47m at 719.5 g/t AgEq) in BHE26-16”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states that intercepts are drilled length and true thickness is unknown, with estimates provided as ranges (e.g., 50-60% of drilled length) rather than precise true widths.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated at 50-60% of drilled length for BHE26-14, 15, 16; 75% for BHE26-11, 12, 13; and 85-95% for BHE26-7, 8, 9, 10.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a detailed QA/QC section mentioning insertion of blanks and standards, sample preparation, and analysis at an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The company states that the mineralization encountered is beyond the boundaries of the existing resource footprint, indicating an extension of known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“The continuity and scale of mineralization encountered is beyond the boundaries of the existing resource footprint”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The target estimate table clearly lists various AgEq cut-off grades used for tonnage and grade calculations.
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: 211.53
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 85. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (85)
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 109.87Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 109.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.22 m
- From
- 96.92 m
- To
- 98.14 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:96.92-98.14
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 109.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall positive results of the exploration program, though its narrow width and estimated true width temper its individual impact.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Part of an ongoing successful exploration program
Negative factors
- Relatively narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“109.87”
Context: 1.22
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 170.59Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 170.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.21 m
- From
- 100.49 m
- To
- 100.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:100.49-100.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 170.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Despite a high silver equivalent grade, the very narrow intercept length limits the overall materiality of this result, though it confirms mineralization.
Positive factors
- High silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“170.59”
Context: 0.21
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 79.88Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 79.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.29 m
- From
- 103.02 m
- To
- 105.31 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:103.02-105.31
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 79.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralized zone but not standing out as a highlight.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade for underground
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“79.88”
Context: 2.29
BHE26-07Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 71.17Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 4.11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-07
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 71.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 4.11 m
- From
- 51.97 m
- To
- 56.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-07:51.97-56.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 71.17
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept provides a good width of mineralization at a moderate silver equivalent grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the target's extent.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade for underground
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“71.17”
Context: 4.11
BHE26-07Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 83.12Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-07
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.07 m
- From
- 68.18 m
- To
- 69.25 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-07:68.18-69.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 83.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept with a moderate silver equivalent grade confirms mineralization but has limited individual materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“83.12”
Context: 1.07
BHE26-08Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 108.73Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 3.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-08
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 108.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 3.05 m
- From
- 75.29 m
- To
- 78.34 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-08:75.29-78.34
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 108.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of the mineralized zone's potential.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“108.73”
Context: 3.05
BHE26-09Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 66.39Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-09
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 66.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.44 m
- From
- 85.65 m
- To
- 88.09 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-09:85.65-88.09
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 66.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, providing continuity but not exceptional results.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade for underground
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“66.39”
Context: 2.44
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 80.29Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 80.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.37 m
- From
- 55.32 m
- To
- 56.69 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:55.32-56.69
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 80.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept with a moderate silver equivalent grade confirms mineralization but has limited individual materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“80.29”
Context: 1.37
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 248.21Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 248.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 55.81 m
- To
- 56.11 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:55.81-56.11
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 248.21
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows a strong silver equivalent grade, highlighting a high-grade zone within a broader intercept, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“248.21”
Context: 0.30
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 221.3Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 221.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
- From
- 80.47 m
- To
- 81.08 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:80.47-81.08
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 221.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, confirming high-grade mineralization but with limited overall impact due to its width.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“221.30”
Context: 0.61
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · silverGrade: 280.61Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.76 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 280.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.76 m
- From
- 56.45 m
- To
- 57.21 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:56.45-57.21
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 280.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, indicating high-grade mineralization, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“280.61”
Context: 0.76
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · silverGrade: 212.6Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 212.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.37 m
- From
- 70.65 m
- To
- 71.02 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:70.65-71.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 212.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, confirming high-grade mineralization but with limited overall impact due to its width.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“212.60”
Context: 0.37
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · silverGrade: 112.92Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 112.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 73.43 m
- To
- 73.73 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:73.43-73.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, confirming mineralization but with limited overall impact due to its width.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“112.92”
Context: 0.30
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · silverGrade: 113.41Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 113.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.24 m
- From
- 89.58 m
- To
- 89.82 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:89.58-89.82
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 113.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, confirming mineralization but with limited overall impact due to its width.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“113.41”
Context: 0.24
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · silverGrade: 169.6Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 169.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.18 m
- From
- 104.67 m
- To
- 104.85 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:104.67-104.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 169.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, confirming high-grade mineralization but with limited overall impact due to its width.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“169.60”
Context: 0.18
BHE26-12Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 141.15Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-12
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 141.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 76.93 m
- To
- 77.84 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-12:76.93-77.84
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 141.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, confirming mineralization but with limited overall impact due to its width.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“141.15”
Context: 0.91
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 112.12Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 6.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 112.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 6.89 m
- From
- 77.84 m
- To
- 84.73 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:77.84-84.73
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a good width, making it a significant positive result for the exploration program.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“112.12”
Context: 6.89
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 169.95Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 169.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.07 m
- From
- 77.84 m
- To
- 79.91 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:77.84-79.91
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 169.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, highlighting a higher-grade zone within a broader intercept and contributing significantly to the overall positive results.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“169.95”
Context: 2.07
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 193.07Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.56 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 193.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.56 m
- From
- 87.39 m
- To
- 89.95 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:87.39-89.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 193.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing significantly to the positive results of the exploration program.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“193.07”
Context: 2.56
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 220.79Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 220.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.22 m
- From
- 97.44 m
- To
- 98.66 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:97.44-98.66
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 220.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, indicating high-grade mineralization, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“220.79”
Context: 1.22
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 72.97Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.93 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 72.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.93 m
- From
- 104.82 m
- To
- 107.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:104.82-107.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 72.97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, providing continuity but not exceptional results.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade for underground
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“72.97”
Context: 2.93
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 198.69Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 0.67 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 198.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 0.67 m
- From
- 104.82 m
- To
- 105.49 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:104.82-105.49
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 198.69
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows a strong silver equivalent grade, highlighting a high-grade zone within a broader intercept, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“198.69”
Context: 0.67
BHE26-15Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 77.94Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-15
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 77.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 90.52 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-15:89.0-90.52
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 77.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept with a moderate silver equivalent grade confirms mineralization but has limited individual materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“77.94”
Context: 1.52
BHE26-15Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 141.85Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-15
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 141.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.92 m
- From
- 99.67 m
- To
- 101.59 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-15:99.67-101.59
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 141.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of the mineralized zone's potential.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“141.85”
Context: 1.92
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 131.87Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.23 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 131.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.23 m
- From
- 100.79 m
- To
- 103.02 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:100.79-103.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 131.87
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, contributing positively to the understanding of the mineralized zone's potential.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“131.87”
Context: 2.23
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 210.09Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 210.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 107.5 m
- To
- 109.02 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:107.5-109.02
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 210.09
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows a strong silver equivalent grade, indicating high-grade mineralization, but its limited width reduces overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade for underground mining
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“210.09”
Context: 1.52
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 314.23Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 1.92 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 314.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 1.92 m
- From
- 110.28 m
- To
- 112.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:110.28-112.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 314.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, making it a very strong positive result for the exploration program.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“314.23”
Context: 1.92
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · silverGrade: 719.46Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 2.47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 719.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 2.47 m
- From
- 113.69 m
- To
- 116.16 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:113.69-116.16
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 719.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept represents a bonanza-grade silver equivalent over a moderate width, marking it as the highest-grade result to date and a highly material positive outcome for the project.
Positive factors
- Bonanza silver equivalent grade for underground mining
- Moderate intercept length
- Highest grades yet reported in the program
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not precisely stated
Evidence · table
“719.46”
Context: 2.47
Fact 29Cate-8 Target · silverGrade Unit: g/t AgEqView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 500
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This conceptual target estimate at a 500 g/t AgEq cut-off still shows significant contained metal, indicating a very high-grade core, though the average grade for this specific cut-off is not provided.
Positive factors
- Significant contained metal at a very high cut-off grade
Negative factors
- This is a conceptual target estimate, not a mineral resource estimate
- Grade not reported for this cut-off
Evidence · table
No evidence quote provided.
Context: 33,416.45
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 318 m
- To
- 322 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:318-322
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.09 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.09”
Context: BHE26-06
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 4.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 318 m
- To
- 322 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:318-322
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.99 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 20.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.99”
Context: BHE26-06
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 329.7 m
- To
- 330.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:329.7-330.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: BHE26-06
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 10.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 329.7 m
- To
- 330.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:329.7-330.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.4 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.4 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.40”
Context: BHE26-06
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 338 m
- To
- 345.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:338-345.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.22 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: BHE26-06
BHE26-06Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-06
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 338 m
- To
- 345.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-06:338-345.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 27.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.70”
Context: BHE26-06
BHE26-07Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-07
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 170.7 m
- To
- 184.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-07:170.7-184.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.57 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 21.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.57”
Context: BHE26-07
BHE26-07Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-07
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 170.7 m
- To
- 184.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-07:170.7-184.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.36 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 31.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.36”
Context: BHE26-07
BHE26-07Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-07
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 223.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-07:223.5-227
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.28 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.28”
Context: BHE26-07
BHE26-07Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-07
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.5 m
- From
- 223.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-07:223.5-227
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: BHE26-07
BHE26-08Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 5.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-08
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 247 m
- To
- 257 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-08:247-257
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.04 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 50.4 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.04”
Context: BHE26-08
BHE26-08Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-08
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 247 m
- To
- 257 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-08:247-257
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.23 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 22.3 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.23”
Context: BHE26-08
BHE26-09Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-09
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 281 m
- To
- 289 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-09:281-289
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.94 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: BHE26-09
BHE26-09Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-09
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 281 m
- To
- 289 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-09:281-289
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.53 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 20.2 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: BHE26-09
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 181.5 m
- To
- 186 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:181.5-186
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.64 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: BHE26-10
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 181.5 m
- To
- 186 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:181.5-186
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.4 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 37.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.4 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.40”
Context: BHE26-10
IncludingCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 183.1 m
- To
- 184.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183.1-184.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.65 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: Including
IncludingCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 29.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 183.1 m
- To
- 184.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183.1-184.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.4 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 29.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 29.4 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“29.40”
Context: Including
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 10.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 264 m
- To
- 266 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:264-266
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.43 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 20.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.43 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.43”
Context: BHE26-10
BHE26-10Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-10
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 264 m
- To
- 266 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-10:264-266
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.57 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.1 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.57”
Context: BHE26-10
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 185.2 m
- To
- 187.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:185.2-187.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.91 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.91 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.91”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 12.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 185.2 m
- To
- 187.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:185.2-187.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.7 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 31.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.7 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.70”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 231.8 m
- To
- 233 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:231.8-233
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 231.8 m
- To
- 233 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:231.8-233
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.6 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.6 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.60”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 241.1 m
- To
- 242.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:241.1-242.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 5.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 241.1 m
- To
- 242.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:241.1-242.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.72 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.72”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 293.9 m
- To
- 294.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:293.9-294.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.60”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 293.9 m
- To
- 294.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:293.9-294.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.79 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.79 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 343.4 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:343.4-344
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.1 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 11.1 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.10”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-11BCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-11B
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 343.4 m
- To
- 344 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-11B:343.4-344
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.35 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: BHE26-11B
BHE26-12Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-12
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 252.4 m
- To
- 255.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-12:252.4-255.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.63 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: BHE26-12
BHE26-12Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-12
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 252.4 m
- To
- 255.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-12:252.4-255.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.23 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.23 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.23”
Context: BHE26-12
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.6 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 278 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:255.4-278
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.19 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 26.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: BHE26-13
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.6 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 278 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:255.4-278
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 115.3 %·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.1 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.10”
Context: BHE26-13
IncludingCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 262.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.4-262.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: Including
IncludingCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 8.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 262.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.4-262.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.49 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 57.7 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.49 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.49”
Context: Including
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 286.7 m
- To
- 295.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:286.7-295.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.64 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: BHE26-13
BHE26-13Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 3.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-13
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 286.7 m
- To
- 295.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-13:286.7-295.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.09 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 26.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.09”
Context: BHE26-13
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 319.7 m
- To
- 323.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:319.7-323.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 20.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.10”
Context: BHE26-14
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 7.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 319.7 m
- To
- 323.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:319.7-323.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.28 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 29.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.28 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.28”
Context: BHE26-14
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 343.9 m
- To
- 353.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:343.9-353.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.44 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.44 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.44”
Context: BHE26-14
BHE26-14Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-14
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 343.9 m
- To
- 353.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-14:343.9-353.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.53 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 24.3 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: BHE26-14
includingCate-8 Target · zincGrade: 4.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 343.9 m
- To
- 346.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:343.9-346.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.35 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.35”
Context: including
includingCate-8 Target · leadGrade: 6.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 343.9 m
- To
- 346.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:343.9-346.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.26 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.26 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.26”
Context: including
BHE26-15Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-15
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 292 m
- To
- 297 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-15:292-297
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.78 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: BHE26-15
BHE26-15Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-15
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 292 m
- To
- 297 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-15:292-297
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.28 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 16.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.28”
Context: BHE26-15
BHE26-15Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-15
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 327 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-15:327-337
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: BHE26-15
BHE26-15Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-15
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 327 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-15:327-337
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.9 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 37.2 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.90”
Context: BHE26-15
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 330.7 m
- To
- 338 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:330.7-338
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.20”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 5.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.3 m
- From
- 330.7 m
- To
- 338 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:330.7-338
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.39 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 39.3 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.39”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 353 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:353-358
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.38 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.38 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 8.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 353 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:353-358
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.96 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 44.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.96 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.96”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 361.6 m
- To
- 367.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:361.6-367.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.87 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 15.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.3 m
- From
- 361.6 m
- To
- 367.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:361.6-367.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.23 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 95.9 %·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 15.23 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.23”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · zincGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.1 m
- From
- 373 m
- To
- 381.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:373-381.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.25 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: BHE26-16
BHE26-16Cate-8 Target · leadGrade: 8.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHE26-16
- Project
- Cate-8 Target
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.1 m
- From
- 373 m
- To
- 381.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHE26-16:373-381.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.87 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 71.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.87 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.87”
Context: BHE26-16
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.