# Drilling Approval Received & High Priority Targets Finalised                                                                                                                  24 										                                             pages                                                                                       									                                                                                                                          2.0MB

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03091308

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-01T00:56:59.545Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-01T00:56:59.545Z

- Company: Exultant Mining Limited

- Ticker: 10X

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: New South Wales

- Primary commodity: Zinc

- Secondary commodities: Lead, Silver, Copper, Gold

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-10-01 00:57:00 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Exultant Mining Limited has received drilling approval and finalized a 12-hole RC drill program at its Balerion Prospect within the Peak View Project, New South Wales. The program is designed to test high-priority targets identified through integrated geochemical and geophysical surveys, as well as extensions to known high-grade historical mineralization. The company has secured contractors and expects rapid mobilization to commence drilling, with the current announcement being JORC 2012 compliant.

Reasoning: Exultant Mining has received approval and finalized a 12-hole RC drill program at its Balerion Prospect, targeting undrilled anomalies and extensions to known high-grade historical mineralization, which is a positive step towards advancing exploration on the project.

- Positive factor: Drilling approval received

- Positive factor: Contractors secured for rapid mobilisation

- Positive factor: High-priority targets finalized for 12-hole RC program

- Positive factor: Integrated exploration approach \(geochem, geophysics, historical drilling\) used for target definition

- Positive factor: Historical high-grade intercepts provide strong targets for follow-up

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant reporting for the current announcement

- Negative factor: Drill results presented are historical, not new assays

- Negative factor: True width not known for historical intercepts

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

- Negative factor: Data spacing insufficient for resource estimation

- Negative factor: Interpretations are conceptual only, requiring drilling to confirm

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 58

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 58. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (58)

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-0)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 114
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a very narrow width, which is below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade silver \(114 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept \(0.5 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 114.0

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-1)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.17
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade below the stated cut-off and below the weak threshold for VMS gold, over a very narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade gold \(0.17 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept \(0.5 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.17

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-2)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.08
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, providing a high-priority target for future drilling, despite the very narrow width.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade copper \(3.08% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept \(0.5 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.08

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-3)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 8.28
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.5 m
- From: 78.7 m
- To: 79.2 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 78.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over a very narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade lead \(8.28% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept \(0.5 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 8.28

Context: 0.5

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-4)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 36
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 79.2 m
- To: 80 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 79.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(36 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 36.0

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-5)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.46
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 79.2 m
- To: 80 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 79.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade, just below the stated cut-off, over a narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade gold \(0.46 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.46

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

### PV001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-6)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV001
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 79.2 m
- To: 80 m
- Hole Depth: 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 79.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713372
- Northing: 6007277
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade copper \(1.1% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.10

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-7)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 31
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.2 m
- From: 25 m
- To: 25.2 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:25-25.2
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a very narrow width, just above the stated cut-off, but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(31 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept \(0.2 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 31.0

Context: 0.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-8)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.25
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.2 m
- From: 25 m
- To: 25.2 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 25 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:25-25.2
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade below the stated cut-off and below the weak threshold for VMS gold, over a very narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade gold \(0.25 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Very narrow intercept \(0.2 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.25

Context: 0.2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-9)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 95
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.7 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 164.8 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(95 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.7 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 95.0

Context: 0.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-10)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.7 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 164.8 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over a narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade copper \(2.6% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.7 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.60

Context: 0.7

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-11)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 269
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver grade over a narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade silver \(269 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 269.0

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-12)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.75
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold.

- Positive factor: Weak grade gold \(0.75 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.75

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-13)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.82
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over a narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade copper \(3.82% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.82

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-14)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.74
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 164.8 m
- To: 165.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over a narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade zinc \(7.74% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(0.8 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.74

Context: 0.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-15)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 63
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 165.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(63 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(1.0 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 63.0

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-16)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.12
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 165.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade below the stated cut-off and below the weak threshold for VMS gold, over a narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade gold \(0.12 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(1.0 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.12

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-17)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.63
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 165.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS copper.

- Positive factor: Weak grade copper \(0.63% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(1.0 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.63

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-18)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.51
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 165.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over a narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade lead \(1.51% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(1.0 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.51

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PV002

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-19)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV002
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.51
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1 m
- From: 165.5 m
- To: 166.5 m
- Hole Depth: 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 165.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713368
- Northing: 6007269
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 998 m
- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS zinc, over a narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade zinc \(1.51% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept \(1.0 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.51

Context: 1.0

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.

Evidence · text

> Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-20)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 90
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(90 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 90.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-21)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.05 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-22)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade copper \(3.4% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.40

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-23)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.39
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade lead \(1.39% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.39

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-24)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 32.3 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade zinc \(3.6% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 3.60

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-25)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 70
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(70 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 70.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-26)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.05 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-27)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.55
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade copper \(1.55% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.55

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-28)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.61
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade lead \(1.61% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.61

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-29)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.3 m
- To: 32.4 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade zinc \(4.5% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.50

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-30)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 70
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(70 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 70.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-31)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade gold \(2.3 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.30

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-32)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.56
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade copper \(1.56% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.56

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-33)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.2
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.4 m
- To: 32.5 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade zinc \(4.2% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.20

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-34)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 80
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade silver \(80 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 80.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-35)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.05
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.05 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.05

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-36)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.53
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade copper \(1.53% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.53

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-37)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.83
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade lead \(1.83% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.83

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-38)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.5 m
- To: 32.6 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade zinc \(4.9% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-39)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 100
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade silver \(100 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 100.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-40)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.15
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.15 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.15

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-41)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.79
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade copper \(1.79% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.79

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-42)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade lead \(7.4% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.40

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-43)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.9
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.6 m
- To: 32.7 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade zinc \(6.9% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 6.90

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-44)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 110
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade silver \(110 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 110.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-45)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.1 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-46)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.76
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade copper \(1.76% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 1.76

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-47)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.5
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Weak grade lead \(4.5% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 4.50

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-48)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.3
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.7 m
- To: 32.8 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade zinc \(10.3% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 10.30

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-49)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 140
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade silver \(140 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 140.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-50)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.1 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-51)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade copper \(2.8% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.80

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-52)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.2
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Weak grade lead \(2.2% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.20

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-53)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.8 m
- To: 32.9 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade zinc \(6.1% Zn\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 6.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-54)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 100
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 30
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.

- Positive factor: Moderate grade silver \(100 g/t Ag\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 100.0

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-55)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.

- Negative factor: Very weak grade gold \(0.1 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-56)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.5
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade copper \(2.6% Cu\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 2.60

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/drilling-approval-received-high-priority-targets-finalised-24-pages-2-0mb--9cb58a4c-9040-4e67-a372-be2cbe53f1cb#fact-drill-facts-57)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.8
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.1 m
- From: 32.9 m
- To: 33 m
- Hole Depth: 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Location

- Easting: 713351
- Northing: 6007164
- CRS: MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation: 988 m
- Azimuth: 255 °
- Dip: -75 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: No

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 3
- Cutoff Unit: %
- Max Dilution: 0.2 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.

- Positive factor: Strong grade lead \(7.8% Pb\)

- Negative factor: Extremely narrow intercept \(0.1 m\)

- Negative factor: Historical data, not new results

- Negative factor: True width not known

- Negative factor: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented

Evidence · table

> 7.80

Context: 0.1

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine \(Pb-Zn soil anomaly\) o 10km of h"

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.

Evidence · text

> WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.

Evidence · text

> True width is not known.

**No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling \(1975-1995\) are not consistently documented.

Evidence · text

> QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.