Drilling Approval Received & High Priority Targets Finalised 24 pages 2.0MB
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Exultant Mining Limited
- Ticker
- 10X
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- New South Wales
- Primary commodity
- Zinc
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Silver, Copper, Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 00:57:00 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Exultant Mining Limited has received drilling approval and finalized a 12-hole RC drill program at its Balerion Prospect within the Peak View Project, New South Wales. The program is designed to test high-priority targets identified through integrated geochemical and geophysical surveys, as well as extensions to known high-grade historical mineralization. The company has secured contractors and expects rapid mobilization to commence drilling, with the current announcement being JORC 2012 compliant.
Reasoning: Exultant Mining has received approval and finalized a 12-hole RC drill program at its Balerion Prospect, targeting undrilled anomalies and extensions to known high-grade historical mineralization, which is a positive step towards advancing exploration on the project.
Positive factors
- Drilling approval received
- Contractors secured for rapid mobilisation
- High-priority targets finalized for 12-hole RC program
- Integrated exploration approach (geochem, geophysics, historical drilling) used for target definition
- Historical high-grade intercepts provide strong targets for follow-up
- JORC 2012 compliant reporting for the current announcement
Negative factors
- Drill results presented are historical, not new assays
- True width not known for historical intercepts
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
- Data spacing insufficient for resource estimation
- Interpretations are conceptual only, requiring drilling to confirm
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 58
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 58. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (58)
PV001Peak View · silverGrade: 114Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 114
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 78.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a very narrow width, which is below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade silver (114 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept (0.5 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“114.0”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV001Peak View · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 78.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade below the stated cut-off and below the weak threshold for VMS gold, over a very narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade gold (0.17 g/t Au)
- Very narrow intercept (0.5 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV001Peak View · copperGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 78.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade, providing a high-priority target for future drilling, despite the very narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade copper (3.08% Cu)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept (0.5 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“3.08”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV001Peak View · leadGrade: 8.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 78.7 m
- To
- 79.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 78.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:78.7-79.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over a very narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade lead (8.28% Pb)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept (0.5 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“8.28”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV001Peak View · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 79.2 m
- To
- 80 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (36 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“36.0”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV001Peak View · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 79.2 m
- To
- 80 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade, just below the stated cut-off, over a narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade gold (0.46 g/t Au)
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
PV001Peak View · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV001
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 79.2 m
- To
- 80 m
- Hole Depth
- 109.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 79.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV001:79.2-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713372
- Northing
- 6007277
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade copper (1.1% Cu)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 25.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:25-25.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a very narrow width, just above the stated cut-off, but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (31 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept (0.2 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“31.0”
Context: 0.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 25.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:25-25.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade below the stated cut-off and below the weak threshold for VMS gold, over a very narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade gold (0.25 g/t Au)
- Very narrow intercept (0.2 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 0.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 164.1 m
- To
- 164.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (95 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.7 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“95.0”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 164.1 m
- To
- 164.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:164.1-164.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over a narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade copper (2.6% Cu)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.7 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“2.60”
Context: 0.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 269Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 269
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 164.8 m
- To
- 165.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver grade over a narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade silver (269 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“269.0”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 164.8 m
- To
- 165.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold.
Positive factors
- Weak grade gold (0.75 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 164.8 m
- To
- 165.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over a narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade copper (3.82% Cu)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“3.82”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · zincGrade: 7.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 164.8 m
- To
- 165.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:164.8-165.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over a narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade zinc (7.74% Zn)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (0.8 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“7.74”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 165.5 m
- To
- 166.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (63 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (1.0 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“63.0”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 165.5 m
- To
- 166.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak gold grade below the stated cut-off and below the weak threshold for VMS gold, over a narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade gold (0.12 g/t Au)
- Narrow intercept (1.0 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 165.5 m
- To
- 166.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak copper grade over a narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS copper.
Positive factors
- Weak grade copper (0.63% Cu)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept (1.0 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 165.5 m
- To
- 166.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over a narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade lead (1.51% Pb)
- Narrow intercept (1.0 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PV002Peak View · zincGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV002
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 165.5 m
- To
- 166.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 181.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 165.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV002:165.5-166.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713368
- Northing
- 6007269
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 998 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS zinc, over a narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade zinc (1.51% Zn)
- Narrow intercept (1.0 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Denehurst in 1995-1996.
Evidence · text
“Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 90
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 32.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (90 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“90.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 32.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.05 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 32.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade copper (3.4% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“3.40”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 32.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade lead (1.39% Pb)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 32.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-32.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade zinc (3.6% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“3.60”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 32.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (70 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“70.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 32.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.05 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 32.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade copper (1.55% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 32.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade lead (1.61% Pb)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.61”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.3 m
- To
- 32.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.3-32.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade zinc (4.5% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“4.50”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.4 m
- To
- 32.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (70 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“70.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.4 m
- To
- 32.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade gold (2.3 g/t Au)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“2.30”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.4 m
- To
- 32.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade copper (1.56% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.56”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.4 m
- To
- 32.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.4-32.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade zinc (4.2% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“4.20”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 80Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 80
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 32.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade silver (80 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“80.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 32.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.05 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 32.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade copper (1.53% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.53”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 32.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade lead (1.83% Pb)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 32.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.5-32.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade zinc (4.9% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“4.90”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 32.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade silver (100 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“100.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 32.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.15 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 32.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade copper (1.79% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.79”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 32.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade lead (7.4% Pb)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“7.40”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.6 m
- To
- 32.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.6-32.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade zinc (6.9% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“6.90”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 110
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.7 m
- To
- 32.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade silver (110 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“110.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.7 m
- To
- 32.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.1 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.7 m
- To
- 32.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade copper (1.76% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“1.76”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.7 m
- To
- 32.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Weak grade lead (4.5% Pb)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“4.50”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.7 m
- To
- 32.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.7-32.8
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade zinc (10.3% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“10.30”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 140Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 140
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.8 m
- To
- 32.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade silver (140 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“140.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.8 m
- To
- 32.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.1 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.8 m
- To
- 32.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade copper (2.8% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“2.80”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.8 m
- To
- 32.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak lead grade below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS lead, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Weak grade lead (2.2% Pb)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“2.20”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.8 m
- To
- 32.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.8-32.9
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade zinc (6.1% Zn)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“6.10”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 30
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over an extremely narrow width, which is above the stated cut-off but below the weak GT product threshold for VMS deposits.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade silver (100 g/t Ag)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“100.0”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very weak gold grade, significantly below the stated cut-off and weak threshold for VMS gold, over an extremely narrow width.
Negative factors
- Very weak grade gold (0.1 g/t Au)
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional copper grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a high-priority target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade copper (2.6% Cu)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“2.60”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.1 m
- From
- 32.9 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 118.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.9-33
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 713351
- Northing
- 6007164
- CRS
- MGA94 Zone 55
- Elevation
- 988 m
- Azimuth
- 255 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Max Dilution
- 0.2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1978-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong lead grade over an extremely narrow width, providing a target for future drilling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade lead (7.8% Pb)
Negative factors
- Extremely narrow intercept (0.1 m)
- Historical data, not new results
- True width not known
- QAQC protocols for early historical drilling not consistently documented
Evidence · table
“7.80”
Context: 0.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: The drill result is from historical drilling by Western Mining Corporation in 1978-1982.
Evidence · text
“WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true width is not known for historical results.
Evidence · text
“True width is not known.”
No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Reason: QAQC protocols for early historical drilling (1975-1995) are not consistently documented.
Evidence · text
“QAQC protocols from 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.