DKM: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Duketon Mining Limited
- Ticker
- DKM
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Nickel, Copper, Cobalt, Pge
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-21 01:06:11 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Duketon Mining Limited reported new re-split gold assay results from its Barlee Project in Western Australia, confirming and refining previously identified mineralization with several intercepts above 1 g/t Au. The company also provided updates on ongoing exploration activities, including a completed RC drilling program with assays pending and a soil geochemical survey. Additionally, the report re-stated historical JORC-compliant nickel-copper-PGE resource estimates for the Rosie and C2 deposits within the Duketon Project, and noted a healthy cash balance of A$6.9 million.
Reasoning: The announcement provides new re-split gold assay results from the Barlee Project, confirming and refining previously identified mineralization, alongside updates on exploration activities and a healthy cash position. However, the detailed resource estimates for the Duketon Project are historical and not new to this release.
Positive factors
- New re-split gold intercepts confirm and refine mineralization at Barlee Project
- Healthy cash balance reported
- Historical resource estimates are JORC compliant with disclosed assumptions
Negative factors
- Main RC drill program assays are pending, not yet released
- Resource updates are historical and not new to this announcement
- No specific QA/QC methods or laboratory named for the re-split assays
Facts used in scoring: 46
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release states that exploration results are based on information compiled by Ms Kirsty Culver, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and an employee of Duketon Mining Limited, who qualifies as a competent person as defined in the JORC Code 2012.
Evidence · text
“The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Ms Kirsty Culver, Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and an employee of Duketon Mining Limited. Ms Culver has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that is being undertaken to qualify as a competent person as defined in the JORC Code 2012.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The drill results are explicitly stated as 'Re-split assay results returned from maiden program' and refer to previous ASX announcements from June and July 2026, indicating they are not new drilling results.
Evidence · text
“Re-split assay results returned from maiden program.”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: While a Competent Person is named for exploration results, the release does not disclose specific QA/QC methods such as blanks, standards, duplicates, or the name of the assay laboratory for the re-split samples.
Evidence · text
“Re-split assay results returned from maiden program. Significant gold intercepts include:”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Rosie and C2 Mineral Resource Estimates are reported in accordance with the 2012 JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“The Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for Rosie of 2.77 million tonnes at 3.27% nickel equivalent is reported in accordance with the 2012 JORC Code”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The Rosie Mineral Resource is reported at >1% NiEq and the C2 Mineral Resource is reported at >0.4% Ni grade.
Evidence · text
“The resource estimate is reported at >1% NiEq.”
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimates for Rosie and C2 are explicitly stated as being extracted from previous ASX announcements dated March 2022 and December 2023, respectively.
Evidence · text
“The information in the announcement that relates to Mineral Resources for Rosie is extracted from the ASX announcement 10 March 2022”
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: The effective date for the Rosie MRE is February 2022 and for C2 is December 2023, both being more than 2 years old relative to the October 2026 announcement date.
Evidence · text
“Rosie – Mineral Resource Estimate ... (February 2022)”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: Both Rosie and C2 deposits contain a component of Inferred Mineral Resources.
Evidence · text
“Over 72% of the Resource has been classified as Indicated with the remainder in the Inferred Category”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The document states that the company confirms the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements for the resource estimates, implying QP/CP sign-off on the original estimates.
Evidence · text
“The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 46. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (1)
Fact 1Barlee South · goldGrade: 3.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Barlee South
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- wa
- Ticker
- DKM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Barlee_South:120-121
Location
- Location
- Lost Bolt Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-23T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade re-split intercept at Lost Bolt Prospect provides valuable detail on gold distribution, confirming a higher-grade zone within historical drilling.
Positive factors
- High grade
- Grade significantly above project average
Negative factors
- Very narrow width
- Historical result
- No specific QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1m @ 3.11g/t Au from 120m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (45)
indicatedDuketon · nickelTonnes: 2012000Grade: 2.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:b6d547000929979760a1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012000
- Grade
- 2.11
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated nickel resource for the Rosie deposit, showing good grade and high confidence, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- High M&I confidence (72% Indicated)
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“2.11”
Context: 2,012
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · copperTonnes: 2012000Grade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:b6d547000929979760a1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012000
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated copper resource for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 2,012,553
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · cobaltTonnes: 2012000Grade: 0.0585Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:b6d547000929979760a1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012000
- Grade
- 0.0585
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated cobalt resource for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“585”
Context: 2,012,553
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · pgeTonnes: 2012000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- pge
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:b6d547000929979760a1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated PGE resource for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 2,012,553
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · nickelTonnes: 761000Grade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:1a3c20a7ab2a1c83ea86
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 761000
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred nickel resource for the Rosie deposit, providing geological potential but with lower confidence, and it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: 761
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · copperTonnes: 761000Grade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:1a3c20a7ab2a1c83ea86
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 761000
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred copper resource for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 760,930
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · cobaltTonnes: 761000Grade: 0.0568Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:1a3c20a7ab2a1c83ea86
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 761000
- Grade
- 0.0568
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred cobalt resource for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“568”
Context: 760,930
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · pgeTonnes: 761000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- pge
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:1a3c20a7ab2a1c83ea86
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 761000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % NiEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred PGE resource for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 760,930
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · nickelTonnes: 2012553Contained Metal: 42490Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:f47bfb741769a7e86ad3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012553
- Contained Metal
- 42490
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained nickel metal for the Rosie deposit, showing good scale and high confidence, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- High M&I confidence (72% Indicated)
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“42,490”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · copperTonnes: 2012553Contained Metal: 8208Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:f47bfb741769a7e86ad3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012553
- Contained Metal
- 8208
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained copper metal for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“8,208”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · cobaltTonnes: 2012553Contained Metal: 1178Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:f47bfb741769a7e86ad3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012553
- Contained Metal
- 1178
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained cobalt metal for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“1,178”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · pgeTonnes: 2012553Contained Metal: 169737Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- pge
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:f47bfb741769a7e86ad3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2012553
- Contained Metal
- 169737
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained PGE metal for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“169,737”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · nickelTonnes: 760930Contained Metal: 13774Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:049a5b5de8c60f1f1110
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 760930
- Contained Metal
- 13774
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained nickel metal for the Rosie deposit, providing geological potential but with lower confidence, and it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“13,774”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · copperTonnes: 760930Contained Metal: 3616Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:049a5b5de8c60f1f1110
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 760930
- Contained Metal
- 3616
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained copper metal for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“3,616”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · cobaltTonnes: 760930Contained Metal: 432Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:049a5b5de8c60f1f1110
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 760930
- Contained Metal
- 432
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained cobalt metal for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“432”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
inferredDuketon · pgeTonnes: 760930Contained Metal: 59291Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- pge
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:049a5b5de8c60f1f1110
- Deposit or zone
- Rosie
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 760930
- Contained Metal
- 59291
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2022-02-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained PGE metal for the Rosie deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“59,291”
Context: Sub-Total
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 4.7 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · nickelTonnes: 7955751Contained Metal: 45790Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Contained Metal
- 45790
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained nickel metal for the C2 deposit, showing good scale and high confidence, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- High M&I confidence (>99% Indicated)
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“45,790”
Context: Indicated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · copperTonnes: 7955751Contained Metal: 2325Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Contained Metal
- 2325
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained copper metal for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“2,325”
Context: Indicated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · palladiumTonnes: 7955751Grade: 0.0567Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- palladium
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 0.0567
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated palladium resource for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“56.7”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · platinumTonnes: 7955751Grade: 0.0428Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- platinum
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 0.0428
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated platinum resource for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“42.8”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · sulfurTonnes: 7955751Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated sulfur resource for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · nickelTonnes: 107790Contained Metal: 474Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Contained Metal
- 474
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained nickel metal for the C2 deposit, providing geological potential but with lower confidence, and it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“474”
Context: Inferred
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · copperTonnes: 107790Contained Metal: 15Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Contained Metal
- 15
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained copper metal for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“15”
Context: Inferred
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · palladiumTonnes: 107790Grade: 0.0347Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- palladium
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 0.0347
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred palladium resource for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“34.7”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · platinumTonnes: 107790Grade: 0.0314Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- platinum
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 0.0314
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred platinum resource for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“31.4”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · sulfurTonnes: 107790Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred sulfur resource for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · cobaltTonnes: 7955751Contained Metal: 1490Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Contained Metal
- 1490
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained cobalt metal for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“1,490”
Context: Indicated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedDuketon · pgeTonnes: 7955751Contained Metal: 25455Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- pge
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a14dffcaa1034df3667a
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Contained Metal
- 25455
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Indicated contained PGE metal for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
Evidence · table
“25,455”
Context: Indicated
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · cobaltTonnes: 107790Contained Metal: 14Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Contained Metal
- 14
- Contained Unit
- t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained cobalt metal for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: Inferred
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
inferredDuketon · pgeTonnes: 107790Contained Metal: 229Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Duketon
- Commodity
- pge
- Region
- wa
- Reported Region
- WA
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a8baddb40a5f1db88f0f
- Deposit or zone
- C2
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Contained Metal
- 229
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-01
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a re-statement of a JORC-compliant Inferred contained PGE metal for the C2 deposit, but it is not new information.
Positive factors
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Historical estimate
- Lower confidence category (Inferred)
Evidence · table
“229”
Context: Inferred
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.9 years before this release
indicatedC2 · nickelTonnes: 7955751Grade: 0.57Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- nickel
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:43c0bec7b770e0ee1559
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedC2 · copperTonnes: 7955751Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:43c0bec7b770e0ee1559
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedC2 · palladiumTonnes: 7955751Grade: 56.7Grade Unit: ppbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:43c0bec7b770e0ee1559
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 56.7
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“56.7”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedC2 · platinumTonnes: 7955751Grade: 42.8Grade Unit: ppbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- platinum
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:43c0bec7b770e0ee1559
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 42.8
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“42.8”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedC2 · sulfurTonnes: 7955751Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:43c0bec7b770e0ee1559
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 7955751
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 7,955,751
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · nickelTonnes: 107790Grade: 0.44Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- nickel
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:ad0c3b7cbd75994b898a
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · copperTonnes: 107790Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:ad0c3b7cbd75994b898a
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · palladiumTonnes: 107790Grade: 34.7Grade Unit: ppbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:ad0c3b7cbd75994b898a
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 34.7
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“34.7”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · platinumTonnes: 107790Grade: 31.4Grade Unit: ppbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- platinum
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:ad0c3b7cbd75994b898a
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 31.4
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“31.4”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · sulfurTonnes: 107790Grade: 0.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:ad0c3b7cbd75994b898a
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 107790
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 107,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · nickelTonnes: 8063541Grade: 0.57Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- nickel
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:1ed71c77a2f9ec6974d6
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8063541
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 8,063,541
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · copperTonnes: 8063541Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:1ed71c77a2f9ec6974d6
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8063541
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 8,063,541
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · palladiumTonnes: 8063541Grade: 56.5Grade Unit: ppbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:1ed71c77a2f9ec6974d6
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8063541
- Grade
- 56.5
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“56.5”
Context: 8,063,541
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · platinumTonnes: 8063541Grade: 42.7Grade Unit: ppbView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- platinum
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:1ed71c77a2f9ec6974d6
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8063541
- Grade
- 42.7
- Grade Unit
- ppb
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“42.7”
Context: 8,063,541
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredC2 · sulfurTonnes: 8063541Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- C2
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- DKM
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:1ed71c77a2f9ec6974d6
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8063541
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.
Negative factors
- Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 8,063,541
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.