Discovery-Corp Files Updated 43-101 Technical Report on Galaxy Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Discovery-Corp Enterprises Inc.
- Ticker
- DCY
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver, Palladium
- Document categories
- Drill results, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-08-23 07:03:17 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Discovery-Corp has filed an updated 43-101 Technical Report for its Galaxy Project, explicitly stating that no mineral resource or preliminary economic assessment exists. The report highlights previously announced 2012 drill intercepts showing copper-gold mineralization and re-states 2013 metallurgical test results indicating recoveries for copper, gold, and silver into a concentrate. The technical information was approved by a Qualified Person.
Reasoning: The company filed an updated 43-101 Technical Report which re-presents previously announced drill results from 2012 and metallurgical results from 2013, confirming copper-gold mineralization but providing no new data or resource estimate.
Positive factors
- QP/CP sign-off on technical information
- Confirmation of copper-gold mineralization
Negative factors
- Data is a re-release of previously announced results
- No new mineral resource or economic assessment
Facts used in scoring: 40
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that drill intercepts are from '2012 drilling and announced in a November 26, 2012 news release' and metallurgical results were 'announced in a September 27, 2013 news release'.
Evidence · text
“Selected significant drill hole intercepts from the 2012 drilling and announced in a November 26, 2012 news release are in table below”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The news release states that the technical information was approved by Christopher Naas, P.Geo, a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“The technical information in this news release was approved by Christopher Naas, P.Geo, a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 40. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (40)
GX12-04Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-04
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 33.63 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 76.25 m
Classification
- Group ID
- GX12-04:42.62-76.25
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate copper intercept from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 33.63
GX12-04Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-04
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.08 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 50.7 m
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper sub-interval from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 8.08
GX12-04Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-04
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.7 m
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper sub-interval from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.18”
Context: 2.00
GX12-05Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-05
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 48.28 m
- From
- 69.06 m
- To
- 117.34 m
Classification
- Group ID
- GX12-05:69.06-117.34
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate copper intercept from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: 48.28
GX12-05Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-05
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 90.06 m
- To
- 101.06 m
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong copper sub-interval from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 11.00
GX12-05Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 2.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-05
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 106.06 m
- To
- 107.06 m
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a high-grade copper sub-interval from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“2.72”
Context: 1.00
GX12-06Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.78 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-06
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32.78 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 39.28 m
Classification
- Group ID
- GX12-06:6.5-39.28
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate copper intercept from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 32.78
GX12-06Galaxy Project · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-06
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.52 m
- From
- 7.62 m
- To
- 22.14 m
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-11-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate copper sub-interval from 2012, re-released in this technical report.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 14.52
Fact 9Galaxy Project · copperHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Good copper recovery and concentrate grade from previously announced metallurgical test results.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
Evidence · text
“81% of the copper, 59% of the gold and 40% of the silver could be recovered into a concentrate grading 26% copper, 4.7 g/t gold and 45 g/t silver.”
Fact 10Galaxy Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold recovery from previously announced metallurgical test results.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Moderate gold recovery
Evidence · text
“81% of the copper, 59% of the gold and 40% of the silver could be recovered into a concentrate grading 26% copper, 4.7 g/t gold and 45 g/t silver.”
Fact 11Galaxy Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver recovery from previously announced metallurgical test results.
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Low silver recovery
Evidence · text
“81% of the copper, 59% of the gold and 40% of the silver could be recovered into a concentrate grading 26% copper, 4.7 g/t gold and 45 g/t silver.”
GX12-04Galaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 33.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-04
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 33.63 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 76.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.13 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: GX12-04
GX12-04Galaxy Project · silverGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 33.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-04
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 33.63 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 76.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.9 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: GX12-04
GX12-04Galaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 33.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-04
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 33.63 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 76.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-04:42.62-76.25
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.02 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: GX12-04
inclGalaxy Project · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.08 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.08 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 50.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:42.62-50.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.07 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.08 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.08 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 50.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:42.62-50.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.3 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.08 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.08 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 50.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:42.62-50.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.08 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.08 m
- From
- 42.62 m
- To
- 50.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:42.62-50.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.023 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · copperGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:45.7-47.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.18 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.4 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.18 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.18”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:45.7-47.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.65 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:45.7-47.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.4 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.025Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.025
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:45.7-47.7
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.025 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.025”
Context: incl
GX12-05Galaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-05
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48.28 m
- From
- 69.06 m
- To
- 117.34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.14 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: GX12-05
GX12-05Galaxy Project · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-05
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48.28 m
- From
- 69.06 m
- To
- 117.34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: GX12-05
GX12-05Galaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-05
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48.28 m
- From
- 69.06 m
- To
- 117.34 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-05:69.06-117.34
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.011 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: GX12-05
inclGalaxy Project · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 90.06 m
- To
- 101.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:90.06-101.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.07 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 90.06 m
- To
- 101.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:90.06-101.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.21 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 90.06 m
- To
- 101.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:90.06-101.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.5 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 90.06 m
- To
- 101.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:90.06-101.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.008 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: incl
andGalaxy Project · copperGrade: 2.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 106.06 m
- To
- 107.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:106.06-107.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.72 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.72 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.72”
Context: and
andGalaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 106.06 m
- To
- 107.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:106.06-107.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.49 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: and
andGalaxy Project · silverGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 106.06 m
- To
- 107.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:106.06-107.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.3 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: and
andGalaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 106.06 m
- To
- 107.06 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:106.06-107.06
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.015 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: and
GX12-06Galaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32.78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-06
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32.78 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 39.28 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.11 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: GX12-06
GX12-06Galaxy Project · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32.78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-06
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32.78 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 39.28 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: GX12-06
GX12-06Galaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32.78 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GX12-06
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32.78 m
- From
- 6.5 m
- To
- 39.28 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GX12-06:6.5-39.28
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.019 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: GX12-06
inclGalaxy Project · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.52 m
- From
- 7.62 m
- To
- 22.14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:7.62-22.14
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · goldGrade: 0.124Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.124
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.52 m
- From
- 7.62 m
- To
- 22.14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:7.62-22.14
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.124 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.124”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.52 m
- From
- 7.62 m
- To
- 22.14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:7.62-22.14
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.7 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: incl
inclGalaxy Project · palladiumGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl
- Project
- Galaxy Project
- Commodity
- palladium
- Ticker
- DCY
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.52 m
- From
- 7.62 m
- To
- 22.14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl:7.62-22.14
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2013-10-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.023 ppm palladium. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for palladium; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: incl
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.