# DEV: Investor Presentation - October 2026

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/dev-investor-presentation-october-2026--8c501663-8baf-4632-a3de-d359449feb36

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03148666

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-10-05T21:24:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-05T22:11:06.274Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-05T22:11:06.274Z

- Company: DevEx Resources Limited

- Ticker: DEV

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: Northern Territory

- Primary commodity: Uranium

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Other, Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-10-05 22:11:07 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

DevEx Resources Limited presented an investor update in October 2026, outlining its strategy to become a significant uranium producer. The presentation highlighted the positive market outlook for uranium and the company's focus on its Nabarlek Project in the Northern Territory, where it aims to find, build, and operate within a world-class mining region. The company also emphasized its disciplined M&amp;A approach and strong stakeholder relationships, while re-presenting historical drill intercepts from the Nabarlek North project.

Reasoning: The investor presentation outlines the company's uranium strategy and highlights positive market conditions, but the drill results presented are historical and no new material announcements are made.

- Positive factor: Positive uranium market outlook

- Positive factor: Strategic focus on uranium

- Positive factor: Historical high-grade intercepts re-highlighted

- Negative factor: No new material announcements

- Negative factor: Drill results are historical re-releases

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (3)

### RC13

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/dev-investor-presentation-october-2026--8c501663-8baf-4632-a3de-d359449feb36#fact-drill-facts-0)

Nabarlek North · uranium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RC13
- Project: Nabarlek North
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: DEV

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1116
- Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8
- Intercept: 1.7 m
- From: 168.8 m
- To: 170.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 168.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: unconformity
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RC13:168.8-170.5

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1116
- Metal Eq. Unit: ppm eU3O8
- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows very high-grade uranium equivalent mineralization, significantly exceeding prior best results for the project.

- Positive factor: High grade

- Positive factor: High grade-thickness product

- Negative factor: Historical data

- Negative factor: Uranium equivalent grade \(not direct assay\)

Evidence · text

> 1.7m @ 1,116ppm uranium equivalent \(eU₃O₈1\) from 168.8 metres down-hole \(RC13\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Establishment of a Strategic Pipeline in a Target Rich Environment Consolidation within a world-class uranium mining pro"

### RC12

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/dev-investor-presentation-october-2026--8c501663-8baf-4632-a3de-d359449feb36#fact-drill-facts-1)

Nabarlek North · uranium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RC12
- Project: Nabarlek North
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: DEV

#### Geometry

- Grade: 920
- Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8
- Intercept: 2.3 m
- From: 184 m
- To: 186.3 m
- Intercept Depth: 184 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: unconformity
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RC12:184-186.3

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 920
- Metal Eq. Unit: ppm eU3O8
- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade uranium equivalent mineralization, exceeding prior best results for the project.

- Positive factor: High grade

- Positive factor: High grade-thickness product

- Negative factor: Historical data

- Negative factor: Uranium equivalent grade \(not direct assay\)

Evidence · text

> 2.3m @ 920ppm eU₃O₈ from 184 metres, including 0.8m @ 1,361ppm eU₃O₈ \(RC12\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Establishment of a Strategic Pipeline in a Target Rich Environment Consolidation within a world-class uranium mining pro"

### RC12

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/dev-investor-presentation-october-2026--8c501663-8baf-4632-a3de-d359449feb36#fact-drill-facts-2)

Nabarlek North · uranium

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RC12
- Project: Nabarlek North
- Commodity: uranium
- Region: australia\_nt
- Reported Region: australia\_nt
- Ticker: DEV

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1361
- Grade Unit: ppm eU3O8
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 184 m
- To: 184.8 m
- Intercept Depth: 184 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: unconformity
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RC12:184-184.8

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1361
- Metal Eq. Unit: ppm eU3O8
- Assumptions Disclosed: No

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-intercept shows bonanza-grade uranium equivalent mineralization, representing a very high-grade zone within a broader intercept.

- Positive factor: Bonanza grade

- Positive factor: Very high grade-thickness product

- Negative factor: Historical data

- Negative factor: Uranium equivalent grade \(not direct assay\)

Evidence · text

> 0.8m @ 1,361ppm eU₃O₈ \(RC12\)

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Metal Equivalent Opaque**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Establishment of a Strategic Pipeline in a Target Rich Environment Consolidation within a world-class uranium mining pro"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
