CZR: High-grade results extend Top Camp gold discovery
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- CZR Resources Ltd
- Ticker
- CZR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Iron ore
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-19 04:12:05 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
CZR Resources Ltd reported exceptional diamond drill results from its Top Camp Prospect at the Croydon Gold Project, including bonanza grades of 0.70m at 67.2 g/t gold and 0.99m at 19.95 g/t gold, which successfully extended known mineralization down-dip and at depth. Concurrently, the company announced high-grade iron rock chip assays from its Yarrie and Yarraloola projects in Western Australia, with results up to 67.91% Fe, confirming significant potential for direct shipping ore and widespread channel iron mineralization. These new results enhance the prospectivity of both gold and iron assets, with further drilling planned.
Reasoning: The announcement delivers exceptional gold grades that significantly extend the known mineralization at the Croydon Gold Project, alongside strong iron rock chip results that expand the prospectivity of the Yarrie and Yarraloola projects.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grades (67.2 g/t Au and 20.0 g/t Au) significantly exceed prior best grades for the project.
- Successful extension of gold mineralization down-dip and at depth, confirming shoot geometry.
- Discovery of a second high-grade gold lode.
- High-grade iron rock chip results (up to 67.91% Fe) from Yarrie, indicating DSO potential.
- Confirmation of widespread CID-style iron mineralization at Yarraloola with grades up to 58.3% Fe.
- Expansion of prospective iron target areas at both Yarrie and Yarraloola.
- Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and JORC 2012 compliance.
Negative factors
- True widths for gold intercepts are estimated, not precisely stated.
- Some gold intercepts returned low grades, indicating variability.
- Iron results are from surface rock chip sampling, requiring follow-up drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 70
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 70. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (70)
26TCDD001Croydon · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD001
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 91.6 m
- To
- 92.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 368.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD001:91.6-92.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569701
- Northing
- 7658213
- Elevation
- 107 m
- Azimuth
- 290 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 1.20
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD001Croydon · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD001
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 254.45 m
- To
- 254.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 368.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD001:254.45-254.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569701
- Northing
- 7658213
- Elevation
- 107 m
- Azimuth
- 290 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 0.25
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD001Croydon · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD001
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- From
- 282.4 m
- To
- 286.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 368.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD001:282.4-286.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569701
- Northing
- 7658213
- Elevation
- 107 m
- Azimuth
- 290 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 3.90
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD001Croydon · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD001
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 294.65 m
- To
- 295.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 368.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD001:294.65-295.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569701
- Northing
- 7658213
- Elevation
- 107 m
- Azimuth
- 290 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD001Croydon · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD001
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 337.6 m
- To
- 338.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 368.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD001:337.6-338.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569701
- Northing
- 7658213
- Elevation
- 107 m
- Azimuth
- 290 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 0.45
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 115.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:114-115.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 1.05
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.85 m
- From
- 148.6 m
- To
- 149.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:148.6-149.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 0.85
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.66 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.66 m
- From
- 151.8 m
- To
- 155.46 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:151.8-155.46
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept represents a significant high-grade extension of the gold mineralization at Top Camp, with a strong grade and grade-width product, indicating high materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (13.6 g/t Au exceeds 7 g/t strong threshold for underground gold).
- Strong grade-width product (49.78 g/t*m exceeds 30 g/t*m moderate threshold).
- New drill intercept extending mineralization at depth.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“13.60”
Context: 3.66
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 13.6 g/t Au is well above the strong threshold of 7 g/t for underground gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“13.60”
Context: 3.66
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling was designed to test depth extensions of the known gold system.
Evidence · text
“Diamond drilling has extended the known mineralisation down-dip and at depth below the RC-defined mineralisation.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 67.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 151.8 m
- To
- 151.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:151.8-151.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval is the highest grade reported from the Top Camp Prospect to date, significantly enhancing the project's potential and demonstrating very high materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (67.2 g/t Au exceeds 15 g/t exceptional threshold for underground gold).
- Strong grade-width product (47.04 g/t*m exceeds 30 g/t*m moderate threshold).
- New drill intercept representing the best result from the prospect to date.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“67.20”
Context: 0.70
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 67.2 g/t Au is well above the exceptional threshold of 15 g/t for underground gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“67.20”
Context: 0.70
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling was designed to test depth extensions of the known gold system.
Evidence · text
“Diamond drilling has extended the known mineralisation down-dip and at depth below the RC-defined mineralisation.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.27 m
- From
- 166.4 m
- To
- 171.67 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:166.4-171.67
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is below the stated cut-off grade, indicating it is not considered significant mineralization, despite being a new result.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Below stated cut-off grade.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 5.27
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.61 m
- From
- 177.15 m
- To
- 181.76 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:177.15-181.76
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 4.61
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 222.64 m
- To
- 223.54 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:222.64-223.54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 0.90
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 228.4 m
- To
- 229.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:228.4-229.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 1.25
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 5.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.97 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.97 m
- From
- 264.23 m
- To
- 268.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:264.23-268.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms a second high-grade gold lode at depth, representing a significant new discovery with strong grade and grade-width product.
Positive factors
- Strong grade (5.11 g/t Au exceeds 4 g/t moderate threshold for underground gold).
- Strong grade-width product (20.29 g/t*m exceeds 10 g/t*m weak threshold).
- New drill intercept confirming a second high-grade gold lode.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“5.11”
Context: 3.97
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 5.11 g/t Au is well above the moderate threshold of 4 g/t for underground gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“5.11”
Context: 3.97
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling was designed to test depth extensions of the known gold system and confirmed a second high-grade lode.
Evidence · text
“The results also confirm a second high-grade gold lode from surface to over 250m deep”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 19.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.99 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.99 m
- From
- 267.21 m
- To
- 268.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:267.21-268.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms a second high-grade gold lode at depth, representing a significant new discovery with exceptional grade and strong grade-width product.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (19.95 g/t Au exceeds 15 g/t exceptional threshold for underground gold).
- Strong grade-width product (19.75 g/t*m exceeds 10 g/t*m weak threshold).
- New drill intercept confirming a second high-grade gold lode.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“19.95”
Context: 0.99
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The grade of 19.95 g/t Au is well above the exceptional threshold of 15 g/t for underground gold deposits.
Evidence · table
“19.95”
Context: 0.99
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling was designed to test depth extensions of the known gold system and confirmed a second high-grade lode.
Evidence · text
“The results also confirm a second high-grade gold lode from surface to over 250m deep”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.73 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.73 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 277.73 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:277-277.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 0.73
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 285.6 m
- To
- 291.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:285.6-291.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 5.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.72 m
- From
- 295.46 m
- To
- 298.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:295.46-298.18
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: 2.72
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.58 m
- From
- 310.87 m
- To
- 311.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:310.87-311.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 0.58
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.07 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.07 m
- From
- 318 m
- To
- 319.07 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:318-319.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 1.07
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD002Croydon · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD002
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 321.47 m
- To
- 322.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 338.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD002:321.47-322.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569538
- Northing
- 7658204
- Elevation
- 108 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 0.63
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 65 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:64-65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 69 m
- To
- 70 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:69-70
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 77.8 m
- To
- 78.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:77.8-78.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 0.90
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 100.5 m
- To
- 101.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:100.5-101.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.45 m
- From
- 114.15 m
- To
- 115.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:114.15-115.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: 1.45
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:120.4-121
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 0.60
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 157.8 m
- To
- 158.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:157.8-158.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 0.90
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.65 m
- From
- 194.35 m
- To
- 198 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:194.35-198
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 3.65
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 238 m
- To
- 239.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:238-239.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 1.80
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD003Croydon · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD003
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 247 m
- To
- 248 m
- Hole Depth
- 269.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD003:247-248
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569652
- Northing
- 7658332
- Elevation
- 110 m
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- -52 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a new, low-grade intercept from the diamond drilling program, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit but not individually significant.
Positive factors
- New drill intercept.
Negative factors
- Low grade.
- Narrow intercept.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
26TCDD004Croydon · goldGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26TCDD004
- Project
- Croydon
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.7 m
- From
- 205.3 m
- To
- 213 m
- Hole Depth
- 254.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 205.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26TCDD004:205.3-213
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Top Camp Prospect
- Easting
- 569469
- Northing
- 7658027
- Elevation
- 112 m
- Azimuth
- 325 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a previously reported intercept, re-released for context. While the grade is moderate, its novelty is low as it's not new information.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (2.09 g/t Au exceeds 1 g/t moderate threshold for underground gold).
- Moderate grade-width product (16.09 g/t*m exceeds 10 g/t*m weak threshold).
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release.
- Apparent width only.
Evidence · text
“7.7m @2.09g/t Au from 205.3m”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept was previously reported on 17 September 2026, indicating low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Results for 26TCDD004 were previously reported on 17 September 2026 (ASX: CZR) including 7.7m @2.09g/t Au from 205.3m.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True widths are estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths, not precisely stated.
Evidence · text
“All widths are downhole. True widths estimated at 70–90% of downhole widths.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: Cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and maximum internal dilution of 2 metres are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Evidence · text
“All intercepts reported are generated by using a 0.3g/t cut-off and 2 metres minimum width. 2m of internal dilution (<0.3g/t) has been allowed in intercepts.”
Fact 33Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 67.91Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.91
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214105
- Northing
- 7706100
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the DeGrey prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (67.91% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“67.91”
Context: 214105
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 67.91% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“67.91”
Context: 214105
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 34Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 66.58Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 66.58
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Cabbage Tree
- Easting
- 226408
- Northing
- 7721678
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Cabbage Tree prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (66.58% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“66.58”
Context: 226408
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 66.58% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“66.58”
Context: 226408
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 35Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 66.33Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 66.33
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Kennedy Gap
- Easting
- 221511
- Northing
- 7722597
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Kennedy Gap prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (66.33% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“66.33”
Context: 221511
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 66.33% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“66.33”
Context: 221511
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 36Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 65.65Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 65.65
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Kennedy Gap
- Easting
- 221911
- Northing
- 7722550
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Kennedy Gap prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (65.65% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“65.65”
Context: 221911
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 65.65% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“65.65”
Context: 221911
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 37Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 65.54Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 65.54
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Kennedy Gap
- Easting
- 222072
- Northing
- 7722604
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Kennedy Gap prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (65.54% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“65.54”
Context: 222072
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 65.54% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“65.54”
Context: 222072
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 38Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 65.92Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 65.92
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Kennedy Gap
- Easting
- 222047
- Northing
- 7722641
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Kennedy Gap prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (65.92% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“65.92”
Context: 222047
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 65.92% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“65.92”
Context: 222047
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 39Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 62.63Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 62.63
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Kennedy Gap
- Easting
- 221771
- Northing
- 7722581
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Kennedy Gap prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (62.63% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“62.63”
Context: 221771
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 62.63% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“62.63”
Context: 221771
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 40Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 63.76Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 63.76
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Cabbage Tree
- Easting
- 226343
- Northing
- 7721805
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned an exceptional iron grade, indicating significant potential for high-grade DSO mineralization at the Cabbage Tree prospect, making it a highly material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade (63.76% Fe exceeds 62% exceptional threshold for iron).
- Indicates potential for high-grade DSO mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“63.76”
Context: 226343
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
High RecoveryRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Reason: The iron grade of 63.76% Fe is well above the exceptional threshold of 62% Fe for iron ore.
Evidence · table
“63.76”
Context: 226343
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 41Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 56.12Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.12
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214189
- Northing
- 7705371
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually highly significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (56.12% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“56.12”
Context: 214189
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 42Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 50.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214244
- Northing
- 7706145
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually highly significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (50.1% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“50.10”
Context: 214244
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 43Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 54.79Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 54.79
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Cabbage Tree
- Easting
- 226191
- Northing
- 7721855
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually highly significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (54.79% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“54.79”
Context: 226191
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 44Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 45.63Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 45.63
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214133
- Northing
- 7706098
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (45.63% Fe is below 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“45.63”
Context: 214133
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 45Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 38.98Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.98
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214176
- Northing
- 7706488
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (38.98% Fe is below 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“38.98”
Context: 214176
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 46Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 40.52Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.52
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214058
- Northing
- 7706504
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (40.52% Fe is below 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“40.52”
Context: 214058
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 47Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 34.7Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 213908
- Northing
- 7706460
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (34.7% Fe is below 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“34.70”
Context: 213908
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 48Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 37.19Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.19
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 213891
- Northing
- 7706347
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (37.19% Fe is below 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“37.19”
Context: 213891
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 49Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 36.52Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.52
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 213937
- Northing
- 7705706
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (36.52% Fe is below 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“36.52”
Context: 213937
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 50Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 28.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Cabbage Tree
- Easting
- 226421
- Northing
- 7721435
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (28.1% Fe is below 30% weak threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“28.10”
Context: 226421
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 51Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 20.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- DeGrey
- Easting
- 214117
- Northing
- 7705571
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a low iron grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect but not individually significant for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Low grade (20.21% Fe is below 30% weak threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“20.21”
Context: 214117
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 52Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 224681
- Northing
- 7723541
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a very low iron grade, indicating it is not significant mineralization and contributing negatively to the prospect's overall potential.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Very low grade (7.6% Fe is well below 30% weak threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“7.60”
Context: 224681
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 53Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 7.38Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.38
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 225216
- Northing
- 7723195
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a very low iron grade, indicating it is not significant mineralization and contributing negatively to the prospect's overall potential.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Very low grade (7.38% Fe is well below 30% weak threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“7.38”
Context: 225216
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 54Yarrie Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarrie Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.96
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 226271
- Northing
- 7721367
- CRS
- GDA94 Zone 51
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a very low iron grade, indicating it is not significant mineralization and contributing negatively to the prospect's overall potential.
Positive factors
- New surface sample.
Negative factors
- Very low grade (2.96% Fe is well below 30% weak threshold for iron).
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“2.96”
Context: 226271
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 55Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 58.27Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.27
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378587
- Northing
- 7584096
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a strong iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating significant potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade (58.27% Fe exceeds 58% strong threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“58.27”
Context: 378587
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 56Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 57.71Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 57.71
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 377996
- Northing
- 7585071
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a strong iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating significant potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Strong grade (57.71% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“57.71”
Context: 377996
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 57Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 56.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378076
- Northing
- 7580895
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (56.1% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“56.10”
Context: 378076
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 58Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 55.37Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 55.37
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 377920
- Northing
- 7584571
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (55.37% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“55.37”
Context: 377920
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 59Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 54.88Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 54.88
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 377846
- Northing
- 7584817
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (54.88% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“54.88”
Context: 377846
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 60Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 50.98Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.98
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 380537
- Northing
- 7584429
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (50.98% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“50.98”
Context: 380537
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 61Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 50.94Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.94
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 377619
- Northing
- 7580849
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (50.94% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“50.94”
Context: 377619
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 62Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 52.39Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.39
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 379157
- Northing
- 7584300
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (52.39% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“52.39”
Context: 379157
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 63Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 52.89Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.89
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378216
- Northing
- 7581325
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (52.89% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“52.89”
Context: 378216
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 64Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 53.62Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.62
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378019
- Northing
- 7581224
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (53.62% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“53.62”
Context: 378019
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 65Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 53.69Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.69
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 380556
- Northing
- 7584463
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (53.69% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“53.69”
Context: 380556
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 66Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 53.46Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.46
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 377948
- Northing
- 7584526
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (53.46% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“53.46”
Context: 377948
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 67Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 53.39Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.39
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 380496
- Northing
- 7589690
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (53.39% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“53.39”
Context: 380496
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 68Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 51.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378267
- Northing
- 7584575
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (51.2% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“51.20”
Context: 378267
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 69Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 51.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378064
- Northing
- 7585202
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (51.1% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“51.10”
Context: 378064
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
Fact 70Yarraloola Iron Ore Project · iron_oreGrade: 50.18Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Yarraloola Iron Ore Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CZR
Geometry
- Grade
- 50.18
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Darnells
- Easting
- 378708
- Northing
- 7582649
- CRS
- GDA2020 Zone 50
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Laboratories in Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This rock chip sample returned a moderate iron grade, confirming widespread CID-style mineralization and indicating potential, making it a material and novel result for surface sampling.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade (50.18% Fe exceeds 50% moderate threshold for iron).
- Confirms widespread CID-style iron mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample only, requires drilling to confirm continuity and depth.
Evidence · table
“50.18”
Context: 378708
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure, mentioning ALS Laboratories, standards, blanks, and duplicates, and is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.
Evidence · text
“All preparation and analytical work were undertaken in controlled conditions at ALS Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.