CXO: September Quarterly Report Presentation

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Core Lithium Ltd
Ticker
CXO
Exchange
ASX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Other, Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-13 22:18:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Core Lithium's September Quarterly Report highlights significant operational progress at its Finniss Lithium Operation, including the achievement of first spodumene concentrate production and continued development of the BP33 underground mine. The company also reported high-grade lithium drill results from BP33, previously announced in August 2026, which reinforce confidence in the orebody's continuity and potential for resource growth. The report provides an overview of the company's strong financial position and includes detailed historical Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates.

Reasoning: The quarterly report highlights strong operational progress, including first concentrate production and on-schedule development. While the high-grade drill results are positive, they were previously announced, reducing their novelty in this document. The detailed resource and reserve tables are also historical, serving as background information.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lithium drill results reinforce confidence in resource growth potential
  • Plant commissioning and first concentrate production achieved
  • BP33 underground development progressing on schedule
  • Strong financial position with significant cash balance

Negative factors

  • Drill results are a re-statement of previously announced information, limiting novelty
  • Resource and reserve estimates are historical, not new updates

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 32

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

NMRD100BP33 · lithiumGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 34.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NMRD100
Project
BP33
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Geometry

Grade
2.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
34.08 m
From
578.7 m
To
612.78 m
Intercept Depth
578.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NMRD100:578.7-612.78

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade and continuous intercept from exploration drilling at BP33 is very positive, reinforcing confidence in the orebody's potential for growth. However, its novelty is low as it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (2.09% Li2O is exceptional for lithium)
  • Significant intercept length (34.08m is continuous)
  • Grade x width product (71.23 Li2O%*m) is exceptional
  • Extends mineralisation beyond current Mineral Resource Estimate

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, previously announced on 11 August 2026
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · text

“34.08m @ 2.09% Li₂O from 578.7m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Grade of 2.09% Li2O exceeds the exceptional threshold of 1.8% Li2O for lithium.

Evidence · text

“2.09% Li₂O”

Exceptional GTRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Grade-thickness product of 71.23 Li2O%*m exceeds the exceptional threshold of 40 Li2O%*m for lithium.

Evidence · text

“34.08m @ 2.09% Li₂O”

Continuous IntervalRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercept length of 34.08m exceeds the continuous threshold of 50m, indicating good width.

Evidence · text

“34.08m”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation disclosed.

Evidence · text

“34.08m”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill results were previously announced on 11 August 2026, indicating low genuine novelty in this document.

Evidence · text

“Refer to ASX announcement New High-Grade Lithium Drill Results at BP33” on 11 August 2026”
NMRD100BP33 · lithiumGrade: 2.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NMRD100
Project
BP33
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Geometry

Grade
2.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.43 m
From
616.5 m
To
619.93 m
Intercept Depth
616.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NMRD100:616.5-619.93

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very high-grade intercept, while narrow, further reinforces the quality of the BP33 orebody. Its novelty is low as it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade intercept (2.44% Li2O is exceptional for lithium)
  • Extends mineralisation beyond current Mineral Resource Estimate

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length (3.43m is narrow)
  • Result is historical, previously announced on 11 August 2026
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · text

“3.43m @ 2.44% Li₂O from 616.5m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: Grade of 2.44% Li2O exceeds the exceptional threshold of 1.8% Li2O for lithium.

Evidence · text

“2.44% Li₂O”

Weak GTRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Grade-thickness product of 8.37 Li2O%*m is below the weak threshold of 10 Li2O%*m for lithium.

Evidence · text

“3.43m @ 2.44% Li₂O”

Narrow IntervalRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercept length of 3.43m is below the moderate threshold of 8m, indicating a narrow interval.

Evidence · text

“3.43m”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation disclosed.

Evidence · text

“3.43m”

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: The drill results were previously announced on 11 August 2026, indicating low genuine novelty in this document.

Evidence · text

“Refer to ASX announcement New High-Grade Lithium Drill Results at BP33” on 11 August 2026”

Resource Estimates (30)

measuredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1340000Grade: 1.48Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 19.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:d84a74827098d472eeb7
Deposit or zone
Grants

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
1340000
Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
19.8
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for Grants provides a high-confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting project viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence category (Measured)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.48% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.48”

Context: 1.34

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 610000Grade: 1.49Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 9.1Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:076ea990253d787fae69
Deposit or zone
Grants

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
610000
Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
9.1
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Grants provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.49% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: 0.61

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 370000Grade: 1.27Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 4.7Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:72d1549a917d0f824170
Deposit or zone
Grants

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
370000
Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
4.7
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Grants provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.27% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 0.37

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

measuredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 2850000Grade: 1.44Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 41Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:a6c81a7f4c44859fdfbd
Deposit or zone
BP33

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
2850000
Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
41
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for BP33 provides a high-confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting project viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence category (Measured)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.44% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: 2.85

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 6510000Grade: 1.55Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 101Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:23fe263040c8fe497ede
Deposit or zone
BP33

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6510000
Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
101
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for BP33 provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.55% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: 6.51

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1140000Grade: 1.59Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 18.1Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:83b80a84c996969aea2d
Deposit or zone
BP33

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1140000
Grade
1.59
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
18.1
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for BP33 provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.59% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.59”

Context: 1.14

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

measuredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 2140000Grade: 1.33Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 28.5Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:0c324d490bbd9cd15021
Deposit or zone
Carlton

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
2140000
Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
28.5
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Measured resource for Carlton provides a high-confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting project viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence category (Measured)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.33% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 2.14

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 3430000Grade: 1.32Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 45.3Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:94270cd646c3ee35ab33
Deposit or zone
Carlton

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3430000
Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
45.3
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Carlton provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.32% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 3.43

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 780000Grade: 1.14Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 8.9Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:6a513cc5da5278ace86c
Deposit or zone
Carlton

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
780000
Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
8.9
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Carlton provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.14% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 0.78

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 4160000Grade: 1.18Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 49.1Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:82bb96199b41a0cbfb24
Deposit or zone
Lees

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4160000
Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
49.1
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Lees provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.18% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 4.16

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 7080000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 79.3Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:bdad71c14d96a2b80fa2
Deposit or zone
Lees

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
7080000
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
79.3
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Lees provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.12% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 7.08

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1710000Grade: 1.2Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 20.5Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:3a9dd263ce4b3dccbf4b
Deposit or zone
Ah Hoy

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1710000
Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
20.5
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Ah Hoy provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.20% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 1.71

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 2930000Grade: 1.38Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 40.4Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ac770b8eeaeb1dac7ccb
Deposit or zone
Ah Hoy

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2930000
Grade
1.38
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
40.4
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Ah Hoy provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.38% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: 2.93

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1840000Grade: 0.99Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 18.2Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:8e4b03e51e0767ed84ae
Deposit or zone
Booths

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1840000
Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
18.2
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Booths provides a good confidence estimate with a moderate lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (0.99% Li2O is moderate)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 1.84

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1400000Grade: 1.06Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 14.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:828d3ebc297379bcc320
Deposit or zone
Booths

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1400000
Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
14.8
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Booths provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.06% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 650000Grade: 1.25Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 8.1Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:83d64cc6736325b99fb5
Deposit or zone
Penfolds

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
650000
Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
8.1
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Penfolds provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.25% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 0.65

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 710000Grade: 1.24Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 8.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:4a983f8f339d63dae69d
Deposit or zone
Penfolds

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
710000
Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
8.8
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Penfolds provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.24% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 0.71

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1510000Grade: 1.18Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 17.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:8580f57ac477778c37ac
Deposit or zone
Hang Gong

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1510000
Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
17.8
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Hang Gong provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.18% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 1.51

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1950000Grade: 1.14Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 22.2Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:d7d9365eaa7308bf9954
Deposit or zone
Hang Gong

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1950000
Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
22.2
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Hang Gong provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.14% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 1.95

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1170000Grade: 0.92Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 10.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:04214930d887863f8748
Deposit or zone
Sandras

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1170000
Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
10.8
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Indicated resource for Sandras provides a good confidence estimate with a moderate lithium grade. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence category (Indicated)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (0.92% Li2O is moderate)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 1.17

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 570000Grade: 0.82Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 4.7Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:1edc6cd32d5a16463da3
Deposit or zone
Sandras

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
570000
Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
4.7
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Sandras provides an early-stage estimate with a moderate lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (0.82% Li2O is moderate)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 0.57

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1920000Grade: 1.03Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 19.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:74e9c1d2a18b2b7a8b62
Deposit or zone
Bilatos

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1920000
Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
19.8
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Bilatos provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.03% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: 1.92

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1410000Grade: 1.18Grade Unit: % Li2OContained Metal: 16.6Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ae2cf537ea47dac82046
Deposit or zone
Seadog

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1410000
Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Contained Metal
16.6
Contained Unit
kt

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Inferred resource for Seadog provides an early-stage estimate with a strong lithium grade, but its lower confidence category means it requires further drilling to upgrade. It is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.18% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lowest confidence category (Inferred)

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 1.41

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

provenFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 2600000Grade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 32Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:d5800850f0eab20f28a3
Deposit or zone
BP33 Underground

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
2600000
Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
32
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
110
Cutoff Unit
$/t NSR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Proven reserve for BP33 Underground provides a high-confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence reserve category (Proven)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.27% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

probableFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 6700000Grade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 89Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ec77db599a7e9528fc44
Deposit or zone
BP33 Underground

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
6700000
Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
89
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
110
Cutoff Unit
$/t NSR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Probable reserve for BP33 Underground provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence reserve category (Probable)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.32% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 6.7

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

provenFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1200000Grade: 1.43Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 17Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9528b9c8c8c98a04f1f7
Deposit or zone
Grants

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
1200000
Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
17
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.8
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-10-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Proven reserve for Grants provides a high-confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence reserve category (Proven)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.43% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

probableFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 300000Grade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 5Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:48cc2d69cbfc3b5fb775
Deposit or zone
Grants

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
300000
Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
5
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.8
Cutoff Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-10-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Probable reserve for Grants provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence reserve category (Probable)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Good grade for lithium (1.41% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

provenFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 1700000Grade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 20Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:7ba6149174cfe7fd5588
Deposit or zone
Carlton

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
1700000
Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
20
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
125
Cutoff Unit
$/t NSR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-05

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Proven reserve for Carlton provides a high-confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Highest confidence reserve category (Proven)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.19% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 1.7

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

probableFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 2800000Grade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 34Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:9f307ced128c00f0908b
Deposit or zone
Carlton

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
2800000
Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
34
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
125
Cutoff Unit
$/t NSR

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-09-05

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-09-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Probable reserve for Carlton provides a good confidence estimate with a strong lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence reserve category (Probable)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (1.19% Li2O is strong)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

probableFinniss Lithium Operation · lithiumTonnes: 300000Grade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Finniss Lithium Operation
Commodity
lithium
Ticker
CXO

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:ab487e08685ce4b35cb7
Deposit or zone
TSF/Stockpiles

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
300000
Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-04-30

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This Probable reserve for TSF/Stockpiles provides a good confidence estimate with a weak lithium grade, supporting economic viability. However, it is a historical estimate.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence reserve category (Probable)
  • JORC compliant and QP signed
  • Economic grade for lithium (0.68% Li2O is weak)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is historical, not a new update
  • Lower grade compared to other deposits

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 0.3

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.