CTN: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Catalina Resources Ltd
- Ticker
- CTN
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Rare earth elements, Silver, Tungsten, Zinc, Lead
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 09:34:57 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Catalina Resources Ltd's annual report for 2026 highlights a year of significant exploration activity and portfolio expansion, despite reporting a net loss and a going concern warning. The company advanced its gold projects, established new copper exposure, and expanded its Western Australian gold portfolio through acquisitions. Key exploration results include a high-grade gold intercept of 48m @ 2.61 g/t Au at Chicken Little and an expanded mineralized strike at the Breakaway Dam Copper and Lithium Project.
Reasoning: The annual report highlights significant exploration successes, including high-grade gold and expanded copper mineralization, and details strategic portfolio growth through acquisitions. However, it also reports a net loss and a going concern warning, and many drill results are historical, limiting overall novelty.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept at Chicken Little
- Expanded copper mineralized strike at Breakaway Dam
- Strategic portfolio growth through acquisitions
- EIS co-funding secured for future drilling
Negative factors
- Company reported a net loss for the year
- Material uncertainty regarding going concern
- Many reported drill results are historical, reducing novelty
- No specific QA/QC methods (blanks, standards, duplicates) disclosed for drill results
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 66
Classification and evidence
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The document states that Dr Nishka Piechocka, a Competent Person as defined by JORC Code, compiled the information related to exploration activities and the exploration target.
Evidence · text
“Dr Nishka Piechocka, PhD, Vice President of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and a full-time employee of Catalina Resources Limited. Dr Piechocka has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code).”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The document does not disclose specific QA/QC methods such as blanks, standards, or duplicates for the reported drill results.
Evidence · text
“Reported information in this announcement that relates to exploration activities, including the exploration target, within the Central Yilgarn Project is based on information compiled by Dr Nishka Piechocka”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The sub-interval of 20 m @ 5.64 g/t Au at Chicken Little is an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“including 20 m @ 5.64 g/t Au1”
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: The copper intercepts at Breakaway Dam are reported with 'ETW' (Estimated True Width).
Evidence · text
“1.9 m ETW @ 2.17% Cu from 198 m; (BDCRC26016)”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling at Snowflake extended the interpreted mineralisation by approximately 50 m to both the north and south.
Evidence · text
“The drilling extended the interpreted mineralisation by approximately 50 m to both the north and south, with the system remaining open along strike.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Several drill results are explicitly stated as 'Historical drilling identified through the review' or 'Historical results reviewed by Catalina', indicating they are not new assays.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling identified through the review included:”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 66. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (66)
26YGRC022Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC022
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48 m
- From
- 15 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC022:15-63
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A very high-grade and wide gold intercept, confirming significant mineralisation in a key project area.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
- Significant width
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“48 m @ 2.61 g/t Au from 15 m, including 20 m @ 5.64 g/t Au1”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC022Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 5.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC022
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 40 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC022:40-60
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade gold sub-interval, indicating a bonanza zone within the broader mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade gold within a broader intercept
- Confirms high-grade zone
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 20 m @ 5.64 g/t Au1”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
STKAC0118Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- STKAC0118
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- STKAC0118:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drilling identified significant gold mineralisation, but this is not new information.
Positive factors
- Significant gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“16 m @ 1.9 g/t Au, including 4 m @ 8.5 g/t Au (STKAC0118)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
STKAC0118Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- STKAC0118
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- STKAC0118:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling, confirming strong mineralisation.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 4 m @ 8.5 g/t Au (STKAC0118)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
26YGRC014Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC014
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC014:12-14
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but moderate-grade gold intercept that extends the interpreted mineralisation at Snowflake.
Positive factors
- Extends interpreted mineralisation
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 1.70 g/t Au from 12 m; (26YGRC014)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC015Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC015
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC015:13-14
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow gold intercept that extends the interpreted mineralisation at Snowflake, but with limited width.
Positive factors
- Extends interpreted mineralisation
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 1.67 g/t Au from 13 m; (26YGRC015)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC016Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC016
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC016:39-43
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept that extends the interpreted mineralisation at Snowflake, but with limited economic significance.
Positive factors
- Extends interpreted mineralisation
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“4 m @ 0.69 g/t Au from 39 m. (26YGRC016)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC007Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC007
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 97 m
- To
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC007:97-102
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept supporting the exploration model at T8.
Positive factors
- Significant gold mineralisation
- Supports exploration model
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“5 m @ 1.38 g/t Au from 97 m, including 2 m @ 2.95 g/t Au and 1 m @ 4.65 g/t Au; (26YGRC007)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC007Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC007
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 97 m
- To
- 99 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC007:97-99
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval within a broader intercept, further supporting the exploration model at T8.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
- Supports exploration model
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 2 m @ 2.95 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC007Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 4.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC007
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 97 m
- To
- 98 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC007:97-98
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval within a broader intercept, indicating strong mineralization at T8.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
- Supports exploration model
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“and 1 m @ 4.65 g/t Au; (26YGRC007)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC005Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC005
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 117 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC005:109-117
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept confirming mineralisation and supporting the exploration model at T8.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
- Supports exploration model
Negative factors
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“8 m @ 0.59 g/t Au from 109 m, including 3 m @ 0.95 g/t Au; (26YGRC005)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC005Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC005
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 112 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC005:109-112
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A low-grade gold sub-interval confirming mineralisation and supporting the exploration model at T8.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
- Supports exploration model
Negative factors
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 3 m @ 0.95 g/t Au; (26YGRC005)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
26YGRC008Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26YGRC008
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26YGRC008:33-36
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept confirming mineralisation and supporting the exploration model at T8.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
- Supports exploration model
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“3 m @ 1.23 g/t Au from 33 m. (26YGRC008)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
STKAC0154Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- STKAC0154
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- STKAC0154:23-32
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drilling demonstrates significant gold mineralisation along the broader corridor at Megatron.
Positive factors
- Significant gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“9 m @ 2.6 g/t Au from 23 m, including 3 m @ 7.1 g/t Au from 26 m (STKAC0154)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
STKAC0154Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- STKAC0154
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- STKAC0154:26-29
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Megatron, indicating strong mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 3 m @ 7.1 g/t Au from 26 m (STKAC0154)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
25EVR009Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25EVR009
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 159 m
- To
- 160 m
- Intercept Depth
- 159 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25EVR009:159-160
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept at Leghorn, confirming mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 2.93 g/t Au from 159 m at end of hole; (25EVR009)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25EVR007Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25EVR007
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 163 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25EVR007:161-163
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold intercept at Leghorn, confirming mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 1.01 g/t Au from 161 m. (25EVR007)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25EVRC002Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25EVRC002
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 77 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25EVRC002:77-78
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept at Viper, confirming mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 2.45 g/t Au from 77 m; (25EVRC002)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25EVRC020Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25EVRC020
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 28 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25EVRC020:28-30
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold intercept at Viper, confirming mineralisation.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 1.16 g/t Au from 28 m. (25EVRC020)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 20Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Chicken Little
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.54
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Chicken Little, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Chicken Little
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“5,000”
Context: Chicken Little
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 21Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Chicken Little
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.54
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Chicken Little, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Chicken Little
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“30,000”
Context: Chicken Little
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 22Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Snowflake
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.05
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Snowflake, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Snowflake
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“800”
Context: Snowflake
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 23Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Snowflake
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.05
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Snowflake, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Snowflake
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“5,000”
Context: Snowflake
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 24Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- T8
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.8
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for T8, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for T8
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“13,000”
Context: T8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 25Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- T8
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.8
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for T8, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for T8
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“80,000”
Context: T8
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 26Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Leghorn
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.76
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Leghorn, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Leghorn
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“14,300”
Context: Leghorn
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 27Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Leghorn
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.76
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Leghorn, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Leghorn
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“76,000”
Context: Leghorn
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 28Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Viper South
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.42
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Viper South, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Viper South
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“27,300”
Context: Viper South
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 29Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 2.85Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Location
- Location
- Viper South
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 1.42
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conceptual exploration target has been defined for Viper South, indicating potential for gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exploration target defined for Viper South
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“143,000”
Context: Viper South
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 30Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.76
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A large aggregate conceptual exploration target has been defined for the Central Yilgarn Project, indicating significant potential for gold mineralization, though it is early stage and not yet a resource.
Positive factors
- Significant aggregate exploration target defined
- Indicates potential for substantial gold resource
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“~60,400”
Context: Total (aggregate)
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 31Central Yilgarn · goldGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Central Yilgarn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.76
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A large aggregate conceptual exploration target has been defined for the Central Yilgarn Project, indicating significant potential for gold mineralization, though it is early stage and not yet a resource.
Positive factors
- Significant aggregate exploration target defined
- Indicates potential for substantial gold resource
Negative factors
- Conceptual in nature
- Uncertain whether further exploration will result in a Mineral Resource
Evidence · table
“~334,000”
Context: Total (aggregate)
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
BDCRC26016Breakaway Dam · copperGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BDCRC26016
- Project
- Breakaway Dam
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- True Width
- 1.9 m
- From
- 198 m
- To
- 199.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BDCRC26016:198-199.9
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade copper intercept with true width disclosed, contributing to the expanded mineralised strike of the VMS system.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
- True width disclosed
- Expands mineralised strike
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1.9 m ETW @ 2.17% Cu from 198 m; (BDCRC26016)”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.9
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BDCRC26014Breakaway Dam · copperGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BDCRC26014
- Project
- Breakaway Dam
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- True Width
- 2.9 m
- From
- 204 m
- To
- 206.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BDCRC26014:204-206.9
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade copper intercept with true width disclosed, contributing to the expanded mineralised strike of the VMS system.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade copper intercept
- True width disclosed
- Expands mineralised strike
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2.9 m ETW @ 0.57% Cu from 204 m; (BDCRC26014)”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.9
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BDCRC26016Breakaway Dam · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BDCRC26016
- Project
- Breakaway Dam
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- True Width
- 3.8 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 127.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BDCRC26016:124-127.8
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A low-grade copper intercept with true width disclosed, contributing to the expanded mineralised strike of the VMS system.
Positive factors
- Copper intercept
- True width disclosed
- Expands mineralised strike
Negative factors
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“3.8 m ETW @ 0.31% Cu from 124 m. (BDCRC26016)”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.8
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RRC15with a dismembered Archean copper-dominant VMS · goldGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RRC15
- Project
- with a dismembered Archean copper-dominant VMS
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RRC15:20-24
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drilling at Beasley Creek identified a high-grade gold intercept, but this is not new information.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“4 m @ 11.5 g/t Au from 20m (RRC15)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
LVRC02Laverton · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC02
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 127 m
- To
- 145 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC02:127-145
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant gold intersection with good width from drilling at the Halo Project.
Positive factors
- Significant gold intersection
- Good width
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“18 m @ 1.16 g/t Au from 127 m, including 5 m @ 2.30 g/t Au; (LVRC02)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC02Laverton · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC02
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 127 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC02:127-132
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval within a broader intersection at the Halo Project.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 5 m @ 2.30 g/t Au; (LVRC02)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC06Laverton · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC06
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 61 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC06:44-61
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant gold intersection with good width from drilling at the Halo Project.
Positive factors
- Significant gold intersection
- Good width
Negative factors
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“17 m @ 0.90 g/t Au from 44 m; (LVRC06)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC10Laverton · goldGrade: 11.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC10
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 115 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC10:114-115
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold intersection from drilling at the Halo Project, though narrow.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intersection
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 11.50 g/t Au from 114 m; (LVRC10)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC12Laverton · goldGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC12
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 48 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 48 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC12:48-50
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold intersection from drilling at the Halo Project, though narrow.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intersection
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 3.13 g/t Au from 48 m; (LVRC12)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC07Laverton · goldGrade: 2.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC07
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 217 m
- To
- 222 m
- Intercept Depth
- 217 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC07:217-222
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold intersection from drilling at the Halo Project.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intersection
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“5 m @ 2.62 g/t Au from 217 m. (LVRC07)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC04Laverton · rare earth elementsGrade: 5828Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC04
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5828
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 76 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC04:64-76
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant TREO intersection with good width from drilling at the Halo Project.
Positive factors
- Significant TREO intersection
- Good width
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“12 m @ 5,828 ppm TREO from 64 m, including 4 m @ 1.19% TREO (LVRC04)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LVRC04Laverton · rare earth elementsGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LVRC04
- Project
- Laverton
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 68 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LVRC04:64-68
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade TREO sub-interval within a broader intersection at the Halo Project.
Positive factors
- High-grade TREO sub-interval
Negative factors
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 4 m @ 1.19% TREO (LVRC04)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
08KLRC033Kirkalocka · goldGrade: 23.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 08KLRC033
- Project
- Kirkalocka
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 08KLRC033:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Kirkalocka, confirming known mineralization but with low novelty.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 23.08 g/t Au; (08KLRC033)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
KKA795Kirkalocka · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KKA795
- Project
- Kirkalocka
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KKA795:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Kirkalocka, confirming known mineralization but with low novelty.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“6 m @ 1.38 g/t Au; (KKA795)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
KKA796Kirkalocka · goldGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KKA796
- Project
- Kirkalocka
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KKA796:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Kirkalocka, confirming known mineralization but with low novelty.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“6 m @ 1.79 g/t Au, including 3 m @ 3.02 g/t Au; and (KKA796)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
KKA796Kirkalocka · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- KKA796
- Project
- Kirkalocka
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- KKA796:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Kirkalocka, adding detail to known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 3 m @ 3.02 g/t Au; and (KKA796)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
08-WE-RC-002Kirkalocka · goldGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 08-WE-RC-002
- Project
- Kirkalocka
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 08-WE-RC-002:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Kirkalocka, adding to the known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 2.12 g/t Au, including 1 m @ 2.23 g/t Au. (08-WE-RC-002)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
08-WE-RC-002Kirkalocka · goldGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 08-WE-RC-002
- Project
- Kirkalocka
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 08-WE-RC-002:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Kirkalocka, adding to the known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 1 m @ 2.23 g/t Au. (08-WE-RC-002)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SRC006Tallering · silverGrade: 90.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SRC006
- Project
- Tallering
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SRC006:66-67
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade silver intercept from historical drilling, indicating polymetallic potential at Tallering.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver intercept
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Historical data
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 90.3 g/t Ag, 2.03% Cu and 0.89 g/t Au from 66 m (SRC006)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SRC006Tallering · copperGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SRC006
- Project
- Tallering
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SRC006:66-67
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade copper intercept from historical drilling, indicating strong polymetallic potential at Tallering.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Historical data
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 90.3 g/t Ag, 2.03% Cu and 0.89 g/t Au from 66 m (SRC006)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SRC006Tallering · goldGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SRC006
- Project
- Tallering
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SRC006:66-67
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A low-grade gold intercept from historical drilling, part of polymetallic mineralization at Tallering.
Positive factors
- Gold intercept
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Historical data
- Narrow intercept
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“1 m @ 90.3 g/t Ag, 2.03% Cu and 0.89 g/t Au from 66 m (SRC006)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PTRC008Pithara · goldGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PTRC008
- Project
- Pithara
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 96 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PTRC008:89-96
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Pithara, confirming known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“7 m @ 1.76 g/t Au from 89 m; (PTRC008)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DTR949Pithara · goldGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DTR949
- Project
- Pithara
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 34 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DTR949:29-34
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Pithara, confirming known mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“5 m @ 2.70 g/t Au from 29 m, including 1 m @ 8.53 g/t Au; and (DTR949)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DTR949Pithara · goldGrade: 8.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DTR949
- Project
- Pithara
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DTR949:29-30
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Pithara, indicating strong mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 1 m @ 8.53 g/t Au; and (DTR949)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DTR1176Pithara · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DTR1176
- Project
- Pithara
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DTR1176:8-10
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Pithara, confirming known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 2.45 g/t Au from 8 m, including 1 m @ 3.51 g/t Au. (DTR1176)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DTR1176Pithara · goldGrade: 3.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DTR1176
- Project
- Pithara
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DTR1176:8-9
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Pithara, indicating strong mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 1 m @ 3.51 g/t Au. (DTR1176)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PHAC0184Peak Hill · goldGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PHAC0184
- Project
- Peak Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 65 m
- To
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PHAC0184:65-75
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Peak Hill, confirming known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“10 m @ 1.43 g/t Au from 65 m, including 5 m @ 2.70 g/t Au (PHAC0184)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PHAC0184Peak Hill · goldGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PHAC0184
- Project
- Peak Hill
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 65 m
- To
- 70 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PHAC0184:65-70
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Peak Hill, indicating stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold sub-interval
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 5 m @ 2.70 g/t Au (PHAC0184)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
AC2014-2Deflector North · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AC2014-2
- Project
- Deflector North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AC2014-2:0-10
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade gold intercept from surface from historical drilling at Deflector North, indicating shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold from surface
- Significant width
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“10 m @ 3.21 g/t Au from surface (AC2014-2)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
AC2014-3Deflector North · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AC2014-3
- Project
- Deflector North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 50 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AC2014-3:10-50
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A wide but low-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Deflector North, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- Significant width
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“40 m @ 0.28 g/t Au from 10 m, including 10 m @ 0.47 g/t Au (AC2014-3)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
AC2014-3Deflector North · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AC2014-3
- Project
- Deflector North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 20 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AC2014-3:10-20
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2014-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A low-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Deflector North, confirming mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Low-grade intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 10 m @ 0.47 g/t Au (AC2014-3)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
22BDAC002Boodanoo · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 22BDAC002
- Project
- Boodanoo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 22BDAC002:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, low-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Boodanoo, confirming shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms shallow gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Low-grade intercept
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“3 m @ 0.50 g/t Au including 1 m @ 1.19 g/t Au (22BDAC002)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
22BDAC002Boodanoo · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 22BDAC002
- Project
- Boodanoo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 22BDAC002:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Boodanoo, confirming shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms shallow gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 1 m @ 1.19 g/t Au (22BDAC002)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
22BDAC006Boodanoo · goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 22BDAC006
- Project
- Boodanoo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 22BDAC006:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, low-grade gold intercept from historical drilling at Boodanoo, confirming shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms shallow gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Low-grade intercept
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“2 m @ 0.67 g/t Au including 1 m @ 1.22 g/t Au (22BDAC006)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
22BDAC006Boodanoo · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 22BDAC006
- Project
- Boodanoo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- CTN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 22BDAC006:null-null
Location
- Location
- Central Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow, moderate-grade gold sub-interval from historical drilling at Boodanoo, confirming shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- Confirms shallow gold mineralisation
Negative factors
- Historical data, low novelty
- Narrow intercept
- No QA/QC methods disclosed
Evidence · text
“including 1 m @ 1.22 g/t Au (22BDAC006)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.