CRI: October 2026 Ignite Investment Summit Investor Presentation
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Critica Limited
- Ticker
- CRI
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Rare earths
- Secondary commodities
- Tungsten, Tin, Yttrium, Gallium, Scandium, Iron ore, Praseodymium oxide, Neodymium oxide, Terbium oxide, Dysprosium oxide
- Document categories
- Resource update, Other, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-10-13 22:39:33 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Critica Limited presented strong economic results from a Scoping Study for its Mt Lindsay Tungsten-Tin Project, demonstrating a post-tax NPV of A$1.01 billion and an IRR of 55.6%. Concurrently, the company announced a significant Mineral Resource Estimate update for its Jupiter Rare Earths Project, including a maiden Indicated Resource of 160 Mt at 1,700 ppm TREO within a total 1.7 Bt resource. Metallurgical testwork for Jupiter also showed promising results with high TREO content in commercial-grade products and significant grade uplift.
Reasoning: The presentation showcases strong economic results for the Mt Lindsay project and a significant resource upgrade for the Jupiter Rare Earths project, including the first Indicated Mineral Resource and positive metallurgical testwork, positioning the company well in the critical minerals sector.
Positive factors
- strong_economic_study_results
- significant_resource_upgrade
- positive_metallurgical_results
- strategic_importance_of_commodities
- jorc_compliant_reporting
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 47
Classification and evidence
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study has been delivered.
Evidence · text
“Scoping Study delivered”
NPV Positivepositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The after-tax NPV is A$1.01 billion.
Evidence · text
“A$1.01bn After-tax NPV₈”
High IRRpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The after-tax IRR is 55.6%.
Evidence · text
“55.6% After-tax IRR”
Rapid Paybackpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The project has an estimated payback period of ~1.9 years.
Evidence · text
“~1.9 yrs Payback”
Preliminary Studynegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The Scoping Study is a preliminary technical and economic study not sufficient to support Ore Reserves.
Evidence · text
“The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study is a preliminary technical and economic study that is not sufficient to support the estimation of Ore Reserves”
Funding Requirednegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Critica has not secured any of the funding required to develop the Project.
Evidence · text
“Critica has not secured any of the funding required to develop the Project.”
Inferred in Production Targetnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Approximately 8% of the production target is derived from Inferred Mineral Resources.
Evidence · text
“approximately 8% is derived from Inferred Mineral Resources”
Recovery Not Fully Demonstratednegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: Base Case processing recoveries have not all been demonstrated simultaneously in a single integrated locked-cycle test program.
Evidence · text
“Base Case processing recoveries of 75% tin, 85% WO₃ and 98% magnetite are modestly above recoveries demonstrated or estimated in individual historical testwork programs and have not all been demonstrated simultaneously in a single integrated locked-cycle test program.”
Maiden Resourceneutral
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.
Why it applies: The document announces the first 160 Mt Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter.
Evidence · text
“Jupiter Delivers First 160 Mt Indicated Mineral Resource”
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: The estimate includes 160 Mt of Indicated Mineral Resources.
Evidence · text
“160 Mt Indicated Resource”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The total resource includes 1.5 Bt of Inferred Mineral Resources.
Evidence · text
“1.5 Bt Inferred”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate is compliant with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“JORC Code”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The estimate is signed off by Mr Rodney Brown of SRK Consulting, Dr Stuart Owen, and Dr Natalee Bonnici as Competent Persons.
Evidence · text
“The Competent Person for the Mineral Resource Estimate is Mr Rodney Brown of SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd, with Dr Stuart Owen and Dr Natalee Bonnici as Competent Persons for exploration results, data compilation and data quality.”
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: Commercial-grade MREO product achieved 97% TREO.
Evidence · text
“MREO 97% TREO”
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: The company has produced commercial-grade products from pilot plant testwork.
Evidence · text
“Commercial-grade products produced: MREC 58% TREO • MREO 97% TREO”
Bench Scale Onlynegative
Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.
Why it applies: Applicability of metallurgical results across the deposit and at commercial scale remains to be demonstrated.
Evidence · text
“Metallurgical results are from testwork to date; applicability across the deposit and at commercial scale remains to be demonstrated.”
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("locked-cycle")
Single Domain Onlynegative
Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.
Why it applies: only one composite was tested
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 47. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (37)
Fact 1Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“A$1.01bn After-tax NPV₈”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 2Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“55.6% After-tax IRR”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 3Mt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: yearsView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- years
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“~1.9 yrs Payback”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 4Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“A$244.5m Pre-production capital”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 5Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“A$3.11bn LOM EBITDA”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 6Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“A$5.20bn LOM sales revenue”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 7Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“A$1.92bn After-tax LOM free cash flow”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 8Mt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: US$/mtuView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- US$/mtu
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“US$314/mtu Indicative tungsten operating cost*”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 9Mt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: tonnesView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- tonnes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“10.9 Mt Material processed”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedMt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:f5a0c220cff60af3d79d
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“approximately 92% is derived from Indicated Mineral Resources”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredMt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:f5d4acf4d8201b821738
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“approximately 8% is derived from Inferred Mineral Resources”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 12Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Capital and operating cost estimates carry an overall accuracy range of approximately -25% to +50%.”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 13Mt Lindsay · tinGrade Unit: US$/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- US$/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Tin price US$45,000/t”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 14Mt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: US$/mtuView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- US$/mtu
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Tungsten APT price US$2,500/mtu”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 15Mt Lindsay · iron_oreGrade Unit: US$/dmtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- US$/dmt
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Magnetite concentrate (65% Fe) US$115/dmt”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 16Mt Lindsay · tungstenView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Exchange rate (AUD:USD) 0.65”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 17Mt Lindsay · tungstenGrade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:c6d5a24cb393b4feb989
Resource Data
- Grade Unit
- %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Corporate tax rate 30%”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · rare_earthsTonnes: 160000000Grade: 1700Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 1700
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“1,700”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · rare_earthsTonnes: 160000000Grade: 420Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 420
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“420”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · praseodymium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 84Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- praseodymium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 84
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“84”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · neodymium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 310Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- neodymium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 310
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“310”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · terbium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 4Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- terbium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · dysprosium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 18Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- dysprosium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · yttrium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 89Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- yttrium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · scandium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 45Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- scandium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · gallium_oxideTonnes: 160000000Grade: 40Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- gallium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedJupiter · iron_oreTonnes: 160000000Grade: 11Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:3b99a873f2f8a6e5f33f
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The maiden Indicated Mineral Resource for Jupiter significantly de-risks the project and provides a strong foundation for future studies, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- maiden_indicated_resource
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · rare_earthsTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 1700Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 1700
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“1,700”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · rare_earthsTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 380Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 380
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“380”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · praseodymium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 82Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- praseodymium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · neodymium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 280Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- neodymium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 280
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“280”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · terbium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 3Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- terbium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · dysprosium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 14Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- dysprosium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · yttrium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 72Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- yttrium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 72
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“72”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · scandium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 36Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- scandium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“36”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · gallium_oxideTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 40Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- gallium_oxide
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredJupiter · iron_oreTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 7.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr Rodney Brown, Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici
- Resource group id
- resource:cef42186b7406c0b3713
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 7.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-10-12
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The large Inferred Mineral Resource demonstrates significant scale potential for Jupiter, though further drilling is required to upgrade confidence, reported under JORC 2012 with QP sign-off.
Positive factors
- large_resource_scale
- jorc_compliant
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- high_inferred_proportion
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Metallurgical Results (10)
Fact 1Mt Lindsay · tinRecovery: 75 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Recovery
- Recovery
- 75 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“75% tin”
Fact 2Mt Lindsay · tungstenRecovery: 85 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Recovery
- Recovery
- 85 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“85% WO₃”
Fact 3Mt Lindsay · iron_oreRecovery: 98 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Lindsay
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania
- Ticker
- CRI
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Mt Lindsay Scoping Study demonstrates strong economic viability with a high NPV, IRR, and rapid payback, despite being a preliminary study with some funding and recovery uncertainties.
Positive factors
- strong_npv
- high_irr
- rapid_payback
Negative factors
- preliminary_study_limitations
- funding_not_secured
- inferred_in_production_target
- processing_recovery_not_fully_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“98% magnetite”
pilot plantJupiter · rare_earthsView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Recovery
- Mass Pull
- 95 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“~95%+ mass rejection”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
pilot plantJupiter · rare_earthsView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“Up to 14x Grade uplift”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
pilot plantJupiter · rare_earthsView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“MREC 58% TREO”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
pilot plantJupiter · rare_earthsView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“MREO 97% TREO”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
pilot plantJupiter · galliumView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- gallium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“~63% leach extraction”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
pilot plantJupiter · yttriumView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- yttrium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“>30,000% upgrade”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
pilot plantJupiter · yttriumView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter
- Commodity
- yttrium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation
- Sample
- multiple Jupiter ore types
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot plant testwork for Jupiter demonstrates high recoveries and significant grade uplift for rare earths, gallium, and yttrium, although commercial scale applicability still needs to be fully demonstrated.
Positive factors
- high_recovery
- pilot_scale_testwork
- significant_grade_uplift
Negative factors
- applicability_to_commercial_scale_to_be_demonstrated
Evidence · text
“~2.4% in product”
Tags used in scoring
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.