# CRI: Jupiter Scoping Study Defines Pathway to Development Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03154309 Publisher: asx Original announcement: 2026-10-19T21:18:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-19T22:31:40.468Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-19T22:31:40.468Z - Company: Critica Limited - Ticker: CRI - Exchange: ASX - Region: Western Australia - Primary commodity: Rare earths - Secondary commodities: Neodymium, Praseodymium, Dysprosium, Terbium, Yttrium, Iron ore, Gallium, Scandium - Document categories: Other, Resource update, Metallurgy - Extracted: 2026-10-19 22:31:41 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Critica Limited announced positive results from a Scoping Study for its Jupiter Rare Earth Elements Project in Western Australia, outlining a development pathway with strong economics. The study projects an after-tax NPV of A$2.0 billion, an IRR of 48.4%, and a 2.0-year payback period, based on an 8.0 Mtpa open-pit operation producing mixed rare earth carbonate. The production target is overwhelmingly supported by Indicated Mineral Resources, though the study is preliminary and pre-production capital of A$556 million is not yet secured. Reasoning: The Scoping Study for the Jupiter Rare Earth Elements Project outlines a compelling development pathway with strong preliminary economics \(A$2.0 billion after-tax NPV, 48.4% IRR, 2.0-year payback\) and a high-confidence resource base, though it is a preliminary study and funding remains to be secured. - Positive factor: Strong after-tax NPV of A$2.0 billion and IRR of 48.4% demonstrate robust project economics. - Positive factor: Short after-tax payback period of 2.0 years indicates rapid capital recovery. - Positive factor: Production target is overwhelmingly underpinned by Indicated Mineral Resources \(97%\), providing high confidence. - Positive factor: Large resource base of 1.7 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO offers significant potential for future expansion. - Positive factor: Conventional open-pit mining with a favorable strip ratio of 1.4:1 supports efficient operations. - Positive factor: Project benefits from established infrastructure in Western Australia's Mid-West. - Positive factor: Potential upside from iron, gallium, and scandium, which are excluded from current economics. - Negative factor: The study is preliminary \(Scoping Study level\) with an accuracy range of ±35% for capital costs. - Negative factor: Pre-production capital of A$556 million is not yet secured, posing a funding risk. - Negative factor: MREC pricing assumptions are modelled and not based on binding offtake agreements or quoted market prices. - Negative factor: Modelled overall TREO recovery of 58% is lower than the Scoping Study process design basis of 63%. Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 42 ## Classification and evidence **Scoping Study** Polarity: neutral Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The document explicitly states it is a 'Scoping Study' and details its preliminary nature. Evidence · text > Jupiter Scoping Study Defines Pathway to Development **High IRR** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The after-tax IRR of 48.4% is exceptionally strong for a mining project. Evidence · text > After-tax NPV₈ of approximately A$2.0 billion & IRR of approximately 48.4% **Strong NPV** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The after-tax NPV of A$2.0 billion is a substantial valuation for the project. Evidence · text > After-tax NPV₈ of approximately A$2.0 billion & IRR of approximately 48.4% **Short Payback** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: An after-tax payback period of 2.0 years is very rapid for a mining development. Evidence · text > Estimated after-tax payback period of approximately 2.0 years from commencement of operations **Funding Required** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The company explicitly states that the A$556 million pre-production capital is not yet secured. Evidence · text > The Company does not currently have this funding in place. **Preliminary Study** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The Scoping Study is described as a 'preliminary technical and economic study' and not sufficient to support Ore Reserves. Evidence · text > The Scoping Study is a preliminary technical and economic study based on low-level technical and economic assessments that are not sufficient to support the estimation of Ore Reserves or to provide assurance of an economic development case at this stage. **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: The resource is explicitly classified as 'Indicated Resources', representing a higher confidence category. Evidence · text > Jupiter’s first Indicated Mineral Resource **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The resource estimate is stated to be 'JORC 2012 compliant'. Evidence · text > JORC 2012 compliant Mineral Resource Estimate **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr Rodney Brown of SRK Consulting \(Australasia\) Pty Ltd, a Competent Person. Evidence · text > The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr Rodney Brown of SRK Consulting \(Australasia\) Pty Ltd, a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code. **Maiden Resource** Polarity: neutral Definition: First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component. Why it applies: This represents 'Jupiter’s first Indicated Mineral Resource', establishing a new confidence level for the project. Evidence · text > Jupiter’s first Indicated Mineral Resource **Pilot Scale Complete** Polarity: positive Definition: Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation. Why it applies: Pilot-scale beneficiation testwork has been conducted, indicating a higher level of testwork maturity. Evidence · text > Pilot-scale beneficiation testwork was subsequently conducted at GAVAQ using bulk composites representative of Jupiter mineralisation. **Refractory Ore** Polarity: negative Definition: Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk. Why it applies: The document notes that 'Jupiter mineralisation differs from conventional ionic adsorption clay deposits, with rare earths predominantly associated with fine-grained phosphate minerals', implying a more complex processing approach than typical clay deposits. Evidence · text > Jupiter mineralisation differs from conventional ionic adsorption clay deposits, with rare earths predominantly associated with fine-grained phosphate minerals. **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: The processing strategy involves 'beneficiation-first approach followed by hydrometallurgical treatment', which includes milling/grinding and chemical processing. Evidence · text > The processing flowsheet evaluated in the Scoping Study has been developed from metallurgical testwork undertaken on Jupiter mineralisation and is based on a beneficiation-first approach followed by hydrometallurgical treatment to produce a mixed rare earth carbonate \(“MREC”\). **Low Recovery** Polarity: negative Definition: Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route. Why it applies: The modelled overall TREO recovery of 58% is lower than the Scoping Study process design basis of 63%, indicating a gap between target and current financial model assumptions. Evidence · text > The financial model adopts an overall TREO recovery of approximately 58%, compared with the Scoping Study process design basis of approximately 63%. **Gravity Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet. Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route \("gravity"\) **Single Domain Only** Polarity: negative Definition: Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established. Why it applies: only one composite was tested ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 41. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (40) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-1) Jupiter · rare\_earths #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 1700 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The establishment of a 160 Mt Indicated Mineral Resource at 1,700 ppm TREO marks a significant de-risking milestone for the Jupiter project, providing a robust foundation for economic studies. - Positive factor: This is the project's first Indicated Mineral Resource, significantly de-risking the project. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Positive factor: The Indicated resource provides a high-confidence foundation for the Scoping Study. Evidence · table > 1,700 Context: 160 Mt #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: The resource is explicitly classified as 'Indicated Resources', representing a higher confidence category. Evidence · table > Indicated Resources Context: 160 Mt **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-2) Jupiter · mreo #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: mreo - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 420 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported MREO grade of 420 ppm within the new Indicated Mineral Resource provides specific detail on the valuable magnet rare earth content, enhancing the project's economic potential. - Positive factor: The MREO grade is reported within the first Indicated Mineral Resource, adding confidence to the magnet rare earth component. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 420 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-3) Jupiter · pr6o11 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: pr6o11 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 84 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Pr6O11 within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides valuable detail on the magnet rare earth composition, supporting the project's economic potential. - Positive factor: Praseodymium is a key magnet rare earth, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 84 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-4) Jupiter · nd2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: nd2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 310 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Nd2O3 grade of 310 ppm within the Indicated Mineral Resource highlights a significant component of the most valuable magnet rare earth, enhancing the project's economic attractiveness. - Positive factor: Neodymium is a critical magnet rare earth, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 310 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-5) Jupiter · tb4o7 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: tb4o7 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Tb4O7 within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides comprehensive detail on the heavy rare earth content, contributing to the overall basket value. - Positive factor: Terbium is a valuable heavy rare earth, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 4 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-6) Jupiter · dy2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: dy2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 18 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Dy2O3 within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides comprehensive detail on the heavy rare earth content, contributing to the overall basket value. - Positive factor: Dysprosium is a valuable heavy rare earth, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 18 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-7) Jupiter · y2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: y2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 89 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Y2O3 grade within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides specific detail on a valued component of the rare earth basket, contributing to the project's overall economics. - Positive factor: Yttrium is a valued component of the MREC basket, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 89 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-8) Jupiter · sc2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: sc2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 45 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Sc2O3 grade within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides data for a potential future upside commodity, adding to the project's overall prospectivity. - Positive factor: Scandium is a potential future upside commodity, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 45 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-9) Jupiter · ga2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: ga2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 40 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Ga2O3 grade within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides data for a potential future upside commodity, adding to the project's overall prospectivity. - Positive factor: Gallium is a potential future upside commodity, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 40 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-10) Jupiter · iron\_ore #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: iron\_ore - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:6b341f1ca9f7af3d809c - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 160000000 - Grade: 11 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported iron grade within the Indicated Mineral Resource provides data for a potential future upside commodity, adding to the project's overall prospectivity. - Positive factor: Iron is a potential future upside commodity, and its grade is reported within the new Indicated Mineral Resource. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 11 Context: 160 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-11) Jupiter · rare\_earths #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 1700 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A substantial Inferred Mineral Resource of 1.5 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO highlights the project's significant scale and future growth potential, though it carries lower geological confidence. - Positive factor: The large tonnage of Inferred resources indicates significant exploration potential for future conversion. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence and cannot solely support economic studies. Evidence · table > 1,700 Context: 1,500 Mt #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: The resource is explicitly classified as 'Inferred Resources', indicating a lower confidence category. Evidence · table > Inferred Resources Context: 1,500 Mt **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-12) Jupiter · mreo #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: mreo - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 380 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported MREO grade of 380 ppm within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates significant potential for magnet rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The MREO grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for magnet rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 380 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-13) Jupiter · pr6o11 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: pr6o11 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 82 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Pr6O11 within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for magnet rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Praseodymium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for magnet rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 82 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-14) Jupiter · nd2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: nd2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 280 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Nd2O3 grade of 280 ppm within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates significant potential for magnet rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Neodymium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating significant potential for magnet rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 280 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-15) Jupiter · tb4o7 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: tb4o7 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Tb4O7 within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for heavy rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Terbium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for heavy rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 3 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-16) Jupiter · dy2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: dy2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 14 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Dy2O3 within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for heavy rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Dysprosium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for heavy rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 14 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-17) Jupiter · y2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: y2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 72 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Y2O3 grade within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this valued component, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Yttrium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this valued component. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 72 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-18) Jupiter · sc2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: sc2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 36 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Sc2O3 grade within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this future upside commodity, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Scandium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this future upside commodity. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 36 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-19) Jupiter · ga2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: ga2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 40 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Ga2O3 grade within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this future upside commodity, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Gallium grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this future upside commodity. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 40 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-20) Jupiter · iron\_ore #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: iron\_ore - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:3095a24ba41f8b0063dc - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1500000000 - Grade: 7.5 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1000 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported iron grade within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this future upside commodity, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: Iron grade is reported within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this future upside commodity. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 7.5 Context: 1,500 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-21) Jupiter · rare\_earths #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 1900 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource of 100 Mt at 1,900 ppm TREO at a 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off provides a high-grade, high-confidence foundation for the project's mine plan. - Positive factor: This Indicated resource at a higher cut-off grade shows a higher TREO grade, which is positive for project economics. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Positive factor: This portion of the resource underpins the Scoping Study mine plan. Evidence · table > 1,900 Context: 100 Mt #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-22) Jupiter · mreo #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: mreo - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 460 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported MREO grade of 460 ppm at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a higher concentration of valuable magnet rare earths for the planned production. - Positive factor: The MREO grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer magnet rare earth component for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 460 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-23) Jupiter · pr6o11 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: pr6o11 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 94 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Pr6O11 at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a higher concentration of this magnet rare earth for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Pr6O11 grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer magnet rare earth component for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 94 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-24) Jupiter · nd2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: nd2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 340 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Nd2O3 grade of 340 ppm at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off highlights a higher concentration of this critical magnet rare earth for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Nd2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer magnet rare earth component for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 340 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-25) Jupiter · tb4o7 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: tb4o7 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Tb4O7 at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off provides comprehensive detail on the heavy rare earth content for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Tb4O7 grade is reported at this cut-off, providing comprehensive detail on heavy rare earth content for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 4 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-26) Jupiter · dy2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: dy2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 19 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Dy2O3 at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a higher concentration of this heavy rare earth for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Dy2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer heavy rare earth component for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 19 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-27) Jupiter · y2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: y2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 94 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Y2O3 grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a higher concentration of this valued component for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Y2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer component for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 94 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-28) Jupiter · sc2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: sc2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 49 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Sc2O3 grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a higher concentration of this potential upside commodity for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Sc2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer component for this potential upside commodity for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 49 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-29) Jupiter · ga2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: ga2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 42 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Ga2O3 grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a higher concentration of this potential upside commodity for the planned production. - Positive factor: The Ga2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off, indicating a richer component for this potential upside commodity for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 42 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-30) Jupiter · iron\_ore #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: iron\_ore - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:0242549a32b89fc4d22f - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 100000000 - Grade: 11 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported iron grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off indicates a component for this potential upside commodity for the planned production. - Positive factor: The iron grade is reported at this cut-off, indicating a component for this potential upside commodity for the mine plan. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. Evidence · table > 11 Context: 100 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-31) Jupiter · rare\_earths #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 1900 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A substantial Inferred Mineral Resource of 900 Mt at 1,900 ppm TREO at a 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off highlights significant scale and future growth potential for higher-grade material, though it carries lower geological confidence. - Positive factor: A large tonnage of Inferred resources at a higher cut-off grade indicates significant potential for future conversion to higher confidence categories. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence and cannot solely support economic studies. Evidence · table > 1,900 Context: 900 Mt #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-32) Jupiter · mreo #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: mreo - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 440 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported MREO grade of 440 ppm at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for richer magnet rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The MREO grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for richer magnet rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 440 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-33) Jupiter · pr6o11 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: pr6o11 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 94 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Pr6O11 at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for richer magnet rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Pr6O11 grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for richer magnet rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 94 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-34) Jupiter · nd2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: nd2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 330 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Nd2O3 grade of 330 ppm at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates significant potential for richer magnet rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Nd2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating significant potential for richer magnet rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 330 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-35) Jupiter · tb4o7 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: tb4o7 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 3 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Tb4O7 at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for heavy rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Tb4O7 grade is reported at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for heavy rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 3 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-36) Jupiter · dy2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: dy2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 16 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The specific grade for Dy2O3 at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for richer heavy rare earths, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Dy2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for richer heavy rare earths. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 16 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-37) Jupiter · y2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: y2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 80 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Y2O3 grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this valued component, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Y2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this valued component. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 80 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-38) Jupiter · sc2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: sc2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 39 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Sc2O3 grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this future upside commodity, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Sc2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this future upside commodity. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 39 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-39) Jupiter · ga2o3 #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: ga2o3 - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 41 - Grade Unit: ppm - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported Ga2O3 grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this future upside commodity, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The Ga2O3 grade is higher at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this future upside commodity. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 41 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-resource-facts-40) Jupiter · iron\_ore #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: iron\_ore - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: jorc - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Rodney Brown - Resource group id: resource:b1a6dd5328433b7c646a - Mining method: open\_pit - Ownership percent: 100 % #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 900000000 - Grade: 7.9 - Grade Unit: % - Cutoff Grade: 1500 - Cutoff Unit: ppm TREO #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-10-12 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The reported iron grade at the 1,500 ppm TREO cut-off within the large Inferred Mineral Resource indicates potential for this future upside commodity, subject to further drilling to upgrade confidence. - Positive factor: The iron grade is reported at this cut-off within a large Inferred resource, indicating potential for this future upside commodity. - Positive factor: The resource is JORC 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person. - Negative factor: Inferred resources have a low level of geological confidence. Evidence · table > 7.9 Context: 900 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **JORC Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## Metallurgical Results (1) ### pilot plant [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cri-jupiter-scoping-study-defines-pathway-to-development--e1dd3aac-a957-4b02-a709-b975db0b4aeb#fact-metallurgical-facts-41) Jupiter · rare\_earths #### Identity - Project: Jupiter - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: australia\_wa - Reported Region: Western Australia - Ticker: CRI #### Test Work - Program Status: scoping - Test Type: pilot plant - Processing Route: Beneficiation \(magnetic separation, flotation\) followed by hydrometallurgical processing \(sulphuric acid bake, water leaching, impurity removal, MREC precipitation\) - Sample: Jupiter mineralisation, bulk composites representative of Jupiter mineralisation #### Recovery - Recovery: 71 % - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 3 - Conc. Grade Unit: % TREO #### Reagents - Acid: 1000 kg/t #### Lab - Laboratory: GAVAQ, Specialised Metallurgical Services, Independent Metallurgy, NAGROM, Australian Minmet Metallurgical Laboratories \(AMML\), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation \(ANSTO\) #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-19T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Pilot-scale beneficiation achieved a 71% TREO recovery and 14-fold upgrading, demonstrating a viable front-end process, while downstream testwork successfully produced 58% TREO MREC, supporting the proposed flowsheet. - Positive factor: Pilot-scale beneficiation testwork demonstrates good TREO recovery \(71%\) and significant upgrading \(14-fold\) with high mass rejection \(95%\). - Positive factor: Successful production of MREC grading 58% TREO has been demonstrated. - Positive factor: Optimisation reduced sulphuric acid consumption by 30%. - Negative factor: Modelled overall TREO recovery of 58% is lower than the process design basis of 63%. - Negative factor: Jupiter mineralisation differs from conventional ionic adsorption clay deposits, implying some processing complexity. Evidence · text > Pilot-scale beneficiation testwork was subsequently conducted at GAVAQ using bulk composites representative of Jupiter mineralisation. Optimisation of the beneficiation circuit achieved approximately 71% TREO recovery and 81% MagREO recovery, as announced on 14 April 2026. Further optimisation produced an intermediate concentrate grading approximately 3% TREO, representing an approximately 14-fold upgrade from feed while rejecting approximately 95% of the original feed mass, as announced on 27 May 2026. ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.