CRI: Jupiter Delivers First 160Mt Indicated Rare Earth Resource
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- CRITICA LIMITED
- Ticker
- CRI
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Rare earths
- Secondary commodities
- Gallium, Scandium, Iron ore
- Document categories
- Resource update, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-10-11 22:26:02 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Critica Limited announced its first Indicated Mineral Resource for the Jupiter Rare Earths Project, delineating 160 million tonnes at 1,700 ppm TREO. This update represents a significant category upgrade, with approximately 10% of the total resource now classified as Indicated, following infill drilling. Pilot-scale metallurgical testwork achieved 81% MagREO and 71% TREO recoveries, supporting the project's economic viability despite a slight decrease in overall resource tonnage and contained metal compared to the previous estimate.
Reasoning: The company delivered its first Indicated Mineral Resource, representing a significant category upgrade and de-risking of the project, supported by pilot-scale metallurgical testwork. However, the overall resource tonnage and contained metal decreased, and the majority remains in the Inferred category, with recoveries below general rare earth thresholds for their complex ore type.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
- Pilot Scale Complete
- Multi-Domain Tested
- QP/CP Signed
- JORC Compliant
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
- Low Recovery
- Refractory Ore
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 43
Classification and evidence
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: The document reports a new Indicated Mineral Resource, which is a higher confidence category than Inferred.
Evidence · text
“JUPITER DELIVERS FIRST 160 MT INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCE”
Category Upgradepositive
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Why it applies: The announcement details the establishment of the first Indicated Mineral Resource, upgrading a portion of the previously Inferred resource.
Evidence · text
“The delivery of Jupiter’s first Indicated Mineral Resource is an important milestone for the Project”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The resource estimate is signed off by Mr Rodney Brown of SRK Consulting, Dr Stuart Owen, and Dr Natalee Bonnici, who are members of recognized professional associations.
Evidence · text
“Mr Rodney Brown of SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd. Mr Brown is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient relevant experience to qualify as a Competent Person under the JORC Code.”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The resource estimate clearly states a 1,000 ppm TREO lower cut-off grade.
Evidence · text
“Mineral Resources are reported at a 1,000 ppm TREO lower cut-off grade.”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The resource estimate was prepared in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition).
Evidence · text
“The updated Jupiter Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) was prepared independently by SRK Consulting following infill drilling on a 125 m x 125 m grid across approximately 3.3 km² of the 42 km² Jupiter Resource footprint.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The majority of the updated resource remains classified as Inferred.
Evidence · text
“the vast majority of the Jupiter Resource remains classified as Inferred.”
All Inferrednegative
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Why it applies: The majority of the resource (1.5 Bt out of 1.7 Bt total) is still in the Inferred category.
Evidence · text
“The balance of the Resource remains classified as Inferred, reflecting the broader drill spacing outside the infill-drilled area.”
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: The total resource tonnage decreased from 1.8 Bt to 1.7 Bt compared to the previous estimate.
Evidence · text
“The February 2025 MRE comprised 1.8 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO, entirely classified as Inferred. The updated MRE comprises 160 Mt at 1,700 ppm TREO Indicated and 1.5 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO Inferred, for a total of 1.7 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO.”
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: The total contained metal decreased from 3.06 Mt TREO to 2.89 Mt TREO due to the tonnage reduction.
Evidence · text
“The February 2025 MRE comprised 1.8 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO, entirely classified as Inferred. The updated MRE comprises 160 Mt at 1,700 ppm TREO Indicated and 1.5 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO Inferred, for a total of 1.7 Bt at 1,700 ppm TREO.”
Maiden Resourceneutral
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.
Why it applies: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, establishing a new baseline for confidence.
Evidence · text
“JUPITER DELIVERS FIRST 160 MT INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCE”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The announcement provides an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Jupiter project, superseding a previous estimate.
Evidence · text
“Critica is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for the Jupiter Rare Earths Project”
Low Recoverynegative
Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: The reported TREO recovery of 71% and MagREO recovery of 81% are below the weak threshold of 80% for general rare earth recovery, despite the company framing them positively for their ore type.
Evidence · text
“Pilot-scale closed-circuit optimisation test work achieved recoveries of 81% for MagREO and 71% for TREO”
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: Pilot-scale closed-circuit optimisation test work has been completed, representing a high level of metallurgical test maturity.
Evidence · text
“Pilot-scale closed-circuit optimisation test work achieved recoveries of 81% for MagREO and 71% for TREO”
Refractory Orenegative
Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.
Why it applies: The REE mineralisation is hosted by hydrated phosphate minerals and is described as unlikely to be amenable to weak-acid leaching, requiring a more complex process flowsheet including acid baking.
Evidence · text
“Microanalysis indicates that REE mineralisation at Jupiter is largely hosted by hydrated phosphate minerals... and is therefore unlikely to be amenable to the weak-acid leaching processes typically applied to ionic adsorption clay deposits.”
Multi-Domain Testedpositive
Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.
Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork included samples representing four main material types, indicating variability across ore domains has been addressed.
Evidence · text
“Bulk open-circuit test work completed on 100 kg samples representing the four main material types”
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")
Gravity Routeneutral
Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.
Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 43. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (41)
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · rare_earthsTonnes: 160000000Grade: 1700Grade Unit: ppmContained Metal: 272000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 1700
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Contained Metal
- 272000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
- Contained Metal Growth
Evidence · table
“1,700”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · rare_earthsTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 1700Grade Unit: ppmContained Metal: 2550000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 1700
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Contained Metal
- 2550000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“1,700”
Context: 1,500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · rare_earthsTonnes: 1800000000Grade: 1700Grade Unit: ppmContained Metal: 3060000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:9474e82fb4d4f7272c5f
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1800000000
- Grade
- 1700
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Contained Metal
- 3060000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-02-11
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-02-11T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of the prior resource estimate for comparison purposes, not new information.
Evidence · table
“1.8 Bt”
Context: 1.8 Bt
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · mreoTonnes: 160000000Grade: 420Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- mreo
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 420
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“420”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · mreoTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 380Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- mreo
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 380
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“380”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · la2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 320Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- la2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 320
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“320”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · la2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 350Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- la2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 350
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“350”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · ceo2Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 750Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- ceo2
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 750
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“750”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · ceo2Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 770Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- ceo2
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 770
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“770”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · pr6o11Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 84Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- pr6o11
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 84
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“84”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · pr6o11Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 82Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- pr6o11
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · nd2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 310Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- nd2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 310
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“310”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · nd2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 280Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- nd2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 280
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“280”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · sm2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 49Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- sm2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 49
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“49”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · sm2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 41Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- sm2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 41
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“41”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · eu2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 10Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- eu2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · eu2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 8Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- eu2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · gd2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 31Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- gd2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 31
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“31”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · gd2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 25Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- gd2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 25
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“25”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · tb4o7Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 4Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- tb4o7
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · tb4o7Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 3Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- tb4o7
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · dy2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 18Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- dy2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · dy2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 14Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- dy2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · ho2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 3Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- ho2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · ho2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 2Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- ho2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · er2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 8Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- er2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · er2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 6Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- er2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“6”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · tm2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- tm2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · tm2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- tm2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · yb2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 6Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- yb2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“6”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · yb2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 5Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- yb2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · lu2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- lu2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · lu2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 1Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- lu2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · y2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 89Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- y2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · y2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 72Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- y2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 72
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“72”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · sc2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 45Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- sc2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · sc2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 36Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- sc2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“36”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · ga2o3Tonnes: 160000000Grade: 40Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- ga2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · ga2o3Tonnes: 1500000000Grade: 40Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- ga2o3
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedJupiter Rare Earths Project · iron_oreTonnes: 160000000Grade: 11Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:7d3714c2d382dc0388a5
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 160000000
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is the first Indicated Mineral Resource for the project, representing a significant de-risking and category upgrade, with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- First Indicated Resource
- Category Upgrade
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: 160
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredJupiter Rare Earths Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1500000000Grade: 7.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Dr Stuart Owen, Dr Natalee Bonnici, Mr Rodney Brown
- Resource group id
- resource:bada39fef3881fd48fc3
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1500000000
- Grade
- 7.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1000
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm TREO
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-07-06
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While part of an updated MRE, this large portion remains in the Inferred category, and the overall inferred tonnage has decreased compared to the prior estimate.
Negative factors
- All Inferred
- Tonnage Decline
- Contained Metal Decline
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: 1500
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Metallurgical Results (2)
pilot plantJupiter Rare Earths Project · magreoRecovery: 81 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- magreo
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation to produce an REE phosphate mineral concentrate, followed by acid baking, water leaching, impurity removal and precipitation of rare earth oxide or carbonate products
Recovery
- Recovery
- 81 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 3
- Conc. Grade Unit
- % TREO
Lab
- Laboratory
- GAVAQ Solutions, Minutech, AMML, ANSTO
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot-scale testwork achieved 81% MagREO recovery, which the company views as positive for their complex ore type, demonstrating progress towards economic extraction.
Positive factors
- Pilot Scale Complete
- Multi-Domain Tested
Negative factors
- Low Recovery
- Refractory Ore
Evidence · text
“Pilot-scale closed-circuit optimisation test work achieved recoveries of 81% for MagREO”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
Byproduct Commodityneutral
The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.
Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit
pilot plantJupiter Rare Earths Project · treoRecovery: 71 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Jupiter Rare Earths Project
- Commodity
- treo
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- CRI
Test Work
- Program Status
- optimization
- Test Type
- pilot plant
- Processing Route
- beneficiation to produce an REE phosphate mineral concentrate, followed by acid baking, water leaching, impurity removal and precipitation of rare earth oxide or carbonate products
Recovery
- Recovery
- 71 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 3
- Conc. Grade Unit
- % TREO
Lab
- Laboratory
- GAVAQ Solutions, Minutech, AMML, ANSTO
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Pilot-scale testwork achieved 71% TREO recovery, which the company views as positive for their complex ore type, demonstrating progress towards economic extraction.
Positive factors
- Pilot Scale Complete
- Multi-Domain Tested
Negative factors
- Low Recovery
- Refractory Ore
Evidence · text
“and 71% for TREO, producing a concentrate grading approximately 3% TREO.”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: test_type names pilot-scale work
Byproduct Commodityneutral
The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.
Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.