Corvus Gold Announces Latest Exploration Results from Three New Target Areas on its North Bullfrog Project, NV

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.42 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (3.2 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.43 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (3.28 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.39 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (11.8 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.83 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (25.3 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.12 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (1.46 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.00 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (12.19 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.19 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (8.68 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.54 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (70.4 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.40 g/t Au) and moderate grade-thickness (32.92 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is near the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade (10.68 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (879.0 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept of 2.05 g/t Au is strong for an open-pit deposit and significantly above the project's average grade, representing a bonanza intercept. However, the narrow width, lack of true width disclosure, and presence of deleterious elements are negative factors.

Reasoning: This exceptional silver intercept of 178 g/t Ag is significantly above the project's average and prior best grades, representing a bonanza intercept and a new high for the project. However, the narrow width, lack of true width disclosure, and presence of deleterious elements are negative factors.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.13 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (0.79 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The hole ending in mineralization is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.80 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (4.88 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The hole ending in mineralization is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.36 g/t Au) and moderate grade-thickness (31.27 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is near the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.70 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (60.8 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.26 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (9.9 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The hole ending in mineralization is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.57 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (21.7 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The hole ending in mineralization is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.19 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (21.1 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.53 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (59.0 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.21 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (5.76 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.86 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (23.59 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.17 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (4.14 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.49 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (11.95 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.15 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (1.37 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.33 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (3.02 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.15 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (2.29 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.36 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (5.49 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.13 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (3.76 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.20 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (34.75 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.34 g/t Au) and moderate grade-thickness (41.97 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is near the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure and reported recovery problems reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade (3.68 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (454.3 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure and reported recovery problems reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade (1.06 g/t Au) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. However, the narrow width, weak grade-thickness (1.61 g/t*m), lack of true width disclosure, and reported recovery problems reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade (11.0 g/t Ag) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. However, the narrow width, weak grade-thickness (16.72 g/t*m), lack of true width disclosure, and reported recovery problems reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grade (1.87 g/t Au) and moderate grade-thickness (11.4 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is significantly above the project's average grade. However, the lack of true width disclosure and reported recovery problems reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade (9.62 g/t Ag) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. However, the lack of true width disclosure and reported recovery problems reduce confidence. The hole ending in mineralization is a positive.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.15 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (1.37 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (2.79 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (25.5 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.19 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (1.45 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.69 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (12.88 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak gold grade (0.19 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (1.16 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.87 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (5.3 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.49 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (2.99 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.99 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (6.04 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold grade (0.37 g/t Au) and weak grade-thickness (25.37 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, which is near the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (0.80 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (54.86 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The broad width is a positive, but the lack of true width disclosure reduces confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade (1.00 g/t Au) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. However, the narrow width, weak grade-thickness (1.52 g/t*m), and lack of true width disclosure reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.59 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (2.42 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The narrow width and lack of true width disclosure reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade (1.23 g/t Au) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. However, the narrow width, weak grade-thickness (1.87 g/t*m), and lack of true width disclosure reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.70 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (2.58 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The narrow width and lack of true width disclosure reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grade (1.25 g/t Au) for an open-pit deposit, which is above the project's average grade. However, the narrow width, weak grade-thickness (3.81 g/t*m), and lack of true width disclosure reduce confidence.

Reasoning: This intercept shows very weak silver grade (1.88 g/t Ag) and weak grade-thickness (5.73 g/t*m) for an open-pit deposit, falling significantly below the project's average grade. The narrow width and lack of true width disclosure reduce confidence.