CORRECTION FROM SOURCE: SLAM Reports 1.60% Copper Equivalent Over 14.45 Meters in Hole GW26-33; Trenching Gold-Antimony Targets on Moose Lake Project
Original announcement by accesswire on
- Company
- SLAM Exploration Ltd.
- Ticker
- SXL
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- New Brunswick
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Nickel, Cobalt, Gold, Antimony
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 15:34:25 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
SLAM Exploration reports a 14.45m copper-equivalent intercept of 1.60% in hole GW26-33 at the Goodwin Project. The company also notes new massive sulphide discoveries and ongoing trenching for gold-antimony targets at the Moose Lake Project.
Reasoning: The release reports significant copper-equivalent intercepts in GW26-33 and highlights a new sulphide discovery, though it is primarily a correction of a previous release's numerical error.
Positive factors
- Strong copper equivalent grades reported in GW26-33
- Discovery of massive sulphides 2,000m from Logan Zone
- QA/QC protocols disclosed including blanks and standards
- Successful VTEM target testing
Negative factors
- Correction required for previous silver ppm values
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions blanks, standards, and use of ALS laboratory.
Evidence · text
“A series of blanks and standards samples are included at specific intervals for quality assurance.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: New discovery of massive sulphides 2,000m northwest of the Logan Zone.
Evidence · text
“new discovery of massive sulphides 2,000 meters northwest of the Logan Zone”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
GW26-33GoodwinIntercept: 14.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GW26-33
- Project
- Goodwin
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- SXL
Geometry
- Intercept
- 14.45 m
- From
- 33.15 m
- To
- 47.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GW26-33:33.15-47.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Granges zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.6
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Cu-Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 1.60% Cu-Eq over 14.45m is a strong intercept for a copper-nickel-cobalt project.
Positive factors
- Solid Cu-Eq grade over significant width
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
GW26-33Goodwin · copperGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GW26-33
- Project
- Goodwin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- SXL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.9 m
- From
- 33.15 m
- To
- 35.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GW26-33:33.15-35.05
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Granges zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade 3.48% CuEq intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
GW26-33Goodwin · copperGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GW26-33
- Project
- Goodwin
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- SXL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 47.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GW26-33:42.7-47.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Granges zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant 2.61% CuEq sub-zone.
Positive factors
- Strong grade sub-interval
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.