COPPER QUEST RECIEVES KITIMAT COPPER-GOLD PROJECT EXPLORATION PERMIT
Original announcement by cse on
- Company
- Copper Quest Exploration Inc.
- Ticker
- CQX
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Molybdenum
- Document categories
- Drill results, Permitting
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 01:40:57 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Copper Quest has received an exploration permit for its 100% owned Kitimat Copper-Gold Project in British Columbia. The project features exceptional infrastructure proximity and is supported by historical drilling results in the Jeannette Cu-Au Zone.
Reasoning: The receipt of an exploration permit is a key milestone for project advancement, supported by strong historical data and excellent infrastructure, though the primary drill results are historical and unverified.
Positive factors
- exploration permit received
- exceptional infrastructure proximity
- historical high-grade intercepts
Negative factors
- historical drill results not confirmed by company
Facts used in scoring: 8
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions the presence of a Qualified Person (Brian G. Thurston, P.Geo.) who has reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“Brian G. Thurston, P.Geo., the Company’s President and CEO and a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The primary drill results highlighted are historical from 2010 and have not been confirmed by the company.
Evidence · text
“The drill results are historical in nature and have not been confirmed by the Company.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 8. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (8)
J-7Kitimat · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.07 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-7
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 117.07 m
- From
- 1.52 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.52 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-7:1.52-118.6
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 1.03 g/t over 117m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-7: 117.07 m grading 1.03 g/t Au, 0.54% Cu, from 1.52 m to 118.60 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-7Kitimat · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 117.07 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-7
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 117.07 m
- From
- 1.52 m
- To
- 118.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.52 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-7:1.52-118.6
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.54% over 117m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-7: 117.07 m grading 1.03 g/t Au, 0.54% Cu, from 1.52 m to 118.60 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-1Kitimat · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 103.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-1
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 103.65 m
- From
- 9.15 m
- To
- 112.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-1:9.15-112.8
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 1.00 g/t over 103m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-1: 103.65 m grading 1.00 g/t Au, 0.55% Cu, from 9.15 m to 112.80 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-1Kitimat · copperGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 103.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-1
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 103.65 m
- From
- 9.15 m
- To
- 112.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-1:9.15-112.8
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.55% over 103m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-1: 103.65 m grading 1.00 g/t Au, 0.55% Cu, from 9.15 m to 112.80 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-2Kitimat · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 107.01 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-2
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 107.01 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 113.11 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-2:6.1-113.11
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.80 g/t over 107m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-2: 107.01 m grading 0.80 g/t Au, 0.45% Cu, from 6.10 m to 113.11 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-2Kitimat · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 107.01 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-2
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 107.01 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 113.11 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-2:6.1-113.11
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.45% over 107m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-2: 107.01 m grading 0.80 g/t Au, 0.45% Cu, from 6.10 m to 113.11 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-8Kitimat · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-8
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 11.89 m
- To
- 124.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.89 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-8:11.89-124.09
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold intercept of 0.41 g/t over 112m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-8: 112.20 m grading 0.41 g/t Au, 0.33% Cu, from 11.89 m to 124.09 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
J-8Kitimat · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 112.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- J-8
- Project
- Kitimat
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- CQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 11.89 m
- To
- 124.09 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.89 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- J-8:11.89-124.09
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept of 0.33% over 112m.
Positive factors
- significant width
Negative factors
- unverified historical data
Evidence · text
“Hole J-8: 112.20 m grading 0.41 g/t Au, 0.33% Cu, from 11.89 m to 124.09 m.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Located just 10 kilometers from the city within a stable, mining- friendly jurisdiction, the project is exceptionally we"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.