Collective Mining Discovers a Significant Extension to the Apollo Breccia by Drilling 38.00m @ 15.46 g/t AuEq Within 141.40m at 4.88 g/t AuEq
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Collective Mining Ltd.
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Caldas, Colombia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-01 11:28:03 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Collective Mining has reported exceptional drill results from its Guayabales Project in Colombia, highlighted by a significant northern and vertical extension of the Apollo breccia body. Hole APC172-D2 intersected 141.40m at 4.88 g/t AuEq, including a high-grade sub-interval of 38.00m at 15.46 g/t AuEq, representing the deepest mineralization found to date. Additionally, infill drilling confirmed continuity within the main Apollo breccia body, with several holes returning bulk tonnage gold equivalent grades.
Reasoning: Collective Mining announced exceptional high-grade drill results, including a significant northern and vertical extension of the Apollo breccia body with bonanza gold equivalent grades. Infill drilling also confirmed continuity within the existing model, indicating strong potential for resource growth and de-risking the project.
Positive factors
- Significant extension of mineralization
- High-grade intercepts, including bonanza grades
- Deepest holes to date extending the system vertically
- Confirmation of internal geological model continuity
- Strong financial position to fund further drilling
Facts used in scoring: 168
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 38.00m @ 15.46 g/t AuEq (APC172-D2) is exceptionally high-grade, well above the typical thresholds for gold equivalent in an underground mining context.
Evidence · text
“38.00m @ 15.46 g/t AuEq”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drill holes APC172-D1 and APC172-D2 outlined a 100-meter northern extension to the Apollo breccia body and a 170-meter vertical extension, indicating mineralization extended beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“outlined a 100-meter northern extension to the Apollo breccia body with results as follows: ... These intercepts have resulted in a 170-meter vertical extension to the Apollo system.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release explicitly mentions a Qualified Person sign-off, an accredited laboratory (ALS), and QA/QC methods including blanks, duplicates, and certified reference standards.
Evidence · text
“David J Reading, Independent Consultant, is the designated Qualified Person for this news release... ALS is an accredited laboratory... Blanks, duplicates, and certified reference standards are inserted into the sample stream to monitor laboratory performance.”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the technical information is reviewed and verified within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101.
Evidence · text
“David J Reading, Independent Consultant, is the designated Qualified Person for this news release within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101")”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: The metal equivalent calculation is fully disclosed, including metal prices and recovery rates.
Evidence · text
“AuEq (g/t) is calculated as follows: ((Au (g/t) x 0.95) + (Ag (g/t) x 0.020 x 0.92) + (Cu (%) x 1.20 x 0.85) + (Zn (%) x 0.31 x 0.85))/0.95 utilizing metal prices of Au – US$3,000/oz, Ag – US$60/oz, Cu – US$5.25/lb and Zn – US$1.35/lb, and recovery rates of 95% for Au, 92% for Ag ,85% for Cu and 85% for Zn.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Seven holes were designed to test various gaps within the Company's internal block model for the main Apollo breccia body, which is characteristic of infill drilling to confirm continuity.
Evidence · text
“Seven holes designed to test various gaps within the Company's internal block model for the main Apollo breccia body over the top 1,000 meters from surface have cut bulk tonnage mineralization”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 168. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (168)
APC-172DgoldGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 793.45 m
- To
- 806.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 793.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:793.45-806.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept from a mother hole shows good gold grades and contributes to the overall positive results from the new northern extension.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Good intercept length
- Part of a new discovery
Evidence · table
“3.40”
Context: 13.00
APC-172DsilverGrade: 41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 793.45 m
- To
- 806.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 793.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:793.45-806.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This silver intercept contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“41”
Context: 13.00
APC-172DcopperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 793.45 m
- To
- 806.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 793.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:793.45-806.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is present but not particularly high, contributing to the overall metal equivalent.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 13.00
APC-172DzincGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 793.45 m
- To
- 806.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 793.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:793.45-806.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is present but not particularly high, contributing to the overall metal equivalent.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 13.00
APC-172DgoldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.56
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept from the mother hole, contributing to the overall exploration success.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: 1.15
APC-172DsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver grades are present in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 1.15
APC-172DcopperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper grades are present in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.15
APC-172DzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC-172D
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 879.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC-172D:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grades are present in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.15
APC172-D1goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 15.45 m
- To
- 22.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:15.45-22.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is part of the new northern extension discovery, showing good gold grades over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Part of a new discovery
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: 7.25
APC172-D1silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 15.45 m
- To
- 22.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:15.45-22.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 7.25
APC172-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 15.45 m
- To
- 22.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:15.45-22.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 7.25
APC172-D1zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 15.45 m
- To
- 22.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:15.45-22.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 7.25
APC172-D1goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:39.0-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This significant intercept is part of the new northern extension discovery, showing good bulk tonnage gold equivalent grades.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
- Part of a new discovery
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: 97.15
APC172-D1silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:39.0-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 97.15
APC172-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:39.0-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 97.15
APC172-D1zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D1:39.0-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 97.15
APC172-D2goldGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 8.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:0.0-8.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.68
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept is part of the new northern extension discovery, showing good gold grades over a moderate width.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Part of a new discovery
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: 8.45
APC172-D2silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 8.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:0.0-8.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 8.45
APC172-D2copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 8.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:0.0-8.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 8.45
APC172-D2zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 8.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:0.0-8.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grades are present in this intercept from the new northern extension.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 8.45
APC172-D2goldGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a highly significant intercept, representing a major extension of the Apollo system with excellent gold grades over a substantial width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade
- Continuous intercept length
- Significant extension of mineralization
- Deepest hole to date
Evidence · table
“4.75”
Context: 141.40
APC172-D2silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this significant extension.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 141.40
APC172-D2copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this significant extension.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 141.40
APC172-D2zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this significant extension.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 141.40
APC172-D2goldGrade: 15.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This bonanza-grade gold intercept within the larger interval is an exceptional result, significantly enhancing the value of the new northern extension.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade
- Good intercept length
- Significant extension of mineralization
Evidence · table
“15.25”
Context: 38.00
APC172-D2silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this bonanza intercept.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 38.00
APC172-D2copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this bonanza intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 38.00
APC172-D2zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC172-D2
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC172-D2:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this bonanza intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 38.00
APC160-D3goldGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 171.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 171.65 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 478.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:307.0-478.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This long intercept confirms the continuity of bulk tonnage mineralization within the internal block model, supporting resource confidence.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Exceptional intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: 171.65
APC160-D3silverGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 171.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 171.65 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 478.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:307.0-478.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“15”
Context: 171.65
APC160-D3copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 171.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 171.65 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 478.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:307.0-478.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 171.65
APC160-D3zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 171.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 171.65 m
- From
- 307 m
- To
- 478.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 307 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:307.0-478.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 171.65
APC160-D3goldGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 335.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.98
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within the infill drilling further confirms the quality and continuity of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“4.66”
Context: 44.90
APC160-D3silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 335.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this high-grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: 44.90
APC160-D3copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 335.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this high-grade sub-interval.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 44.90
APC160-D3zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D3
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 335.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D3:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this high-grade sub-interval.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 44.90
APC160-D4goldGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 83 m
- From
- 237.3 m
- To
- 320.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:237.3-320.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of bulk tonnage mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“1.66”
Context: 83.00
APC160-D4silverGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 83 m
- From
- 237.3 m
- To
- 320.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:237.3-320.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“16”
Context: 83.00
APC160-D4copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 83 m
- From
- 237.3 m
- To
- 320.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:237.3-320.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 83.00
APC160-D4zincGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 83 m
- From
- 237.3 m
- To
- 320.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:237.3-320.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 83.00
APC160-D4goldGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.37
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within the infill drilling further confirms the quality and continuity of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“3.64”
Context: 15.30
APC160-D4silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this high-grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“28”
Context: 15.30
APC160-D4copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this high-grade sub-interval.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 15.30
APC160-D4zincGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D4
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 292.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D4:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this high-grade sub-interval.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 15.30
APC160-D5goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.95 m
- From
- 300.85 m
- To
- 329.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:300.85-329.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 28.95
APC160-D5silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.95 m
- From
- 300.85 m
- To
- 329.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:300.85-329.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“20”
Context: 28.95
APC160-D5copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28.95 m
- From
- 300.85 m
- To
- 329.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:300.85-329.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 28.95
APC160-D5zincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28.95 m
- From
- 300.85 m
- To
- 329.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 300.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:300.85-329.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 28.95
APC160-D5goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 369.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.09
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of bulk tonnage mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: 80.60
APC160-D5silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 369.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 80.60
APC160-D5copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 369.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 80.60
APC160-D5zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC160-D5
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 369.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC160-D5:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 80.60
APC161-D1goldGrade: 2.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 219.35 m
- To
- 229.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:219.35-229.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.38
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“2.01”
Context: 10.60
APC161-D1silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 219.35 m
- To
- 229.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:219.35-229.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: 10.60
APC161-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 219.35 m
- To
- 229.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:219.35-229.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 10.60
APC161-D1zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.6 m
- From
- 219.35 m
- To
- 229.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 219.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:219.35-229.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 10.60
APC161-D1goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 378.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.44
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 15.95
APC161-D1silverGrade: 30Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 30
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 378.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“30”
Context: 15.95
APC161-D1copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 378.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 15.95
APC161-D1zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 378.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 15.95
APC161-D1goldGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 406.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“3.55”
Context: 1.05
APC161-D1silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 406.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 1.05
APC161-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 406.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.05
APC161-D1zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 406.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.05
APC161-D1goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 506.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.21
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 25.10
APC161-D1silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 506.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 25.10
APC161-D1copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 506.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 25.10
APC161-D1zincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 506.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 25.10
APC161-D1goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 618.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This infill intercept confirms the continuity of mineralization within the internal block model.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Evidence · table
“1.14”
Context: 32.00
APC161-D1silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 618.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 32.00
APC161-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 618.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 32.00
APC161-D1zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 618.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent and confirm continuity.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 32.00
APC161-D1goldGrade: 3.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 717 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:717.0-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.23
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“3.96”
Context: 1.25
APC161-D1silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 717 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:717.0-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: 1.25
APC161-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 717 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:717.0-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.25
APC161-D1zincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC161-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 717 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC161-D1:717.0-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 1.25
APC167-D1goldGrade: 4.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 180.85 m
- To
- 183.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:180.85-183.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.11
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“4.54”
Context: 2.65
APC167-D1silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 180.85 m
- To
- 183.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:180.85-183.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“26”
Context: 2.65
APC167-D1copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 180.85 m
- To
- 183.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:180.85-183.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 2.65
APC167-D1zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 180.85 m
- To
- 183.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 180.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:180.85-183.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 2.65
APC167-D1goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.9
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but good-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“2.80”
Context: 2.00
APC167-D1silverGrade: 45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: 2.00
APC167-D1copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 2.00
APC167-D1zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 273.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 2.00
APC167-D1goldGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but good-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: 3.60
APC167-D1silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 3.60
APC167-D1copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 3.60
APC167-D1zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 320.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 3.60
APC167-D1goldGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.09
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“3.53”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1silverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
Evidence · table
“23”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 341.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1goldGrade: 9.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but high-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- High gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“9.88”
Context: 1.20
APC167-D1silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 1.20
APC167-D1copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.20
APC167-D1zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 450.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 1.20
APC167-D1goldGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 488.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow but good-grade gold intercept from the infill drilling, confirming continuity.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
- Confirms continuity of mineralization
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 488.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 488.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 1.00
APC167-D1zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- APC167-D1
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 488.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- APC167-D1:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grades contribute to the overall metal equivalent in this narrow intercept.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 1.00
andgoldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.51 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 879.7 m
- To
- 880.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:879.7-880.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:39-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 92.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:39-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 388.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:39-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 97.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 97.15 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 136.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:39-136.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.75 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 671.6 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.75 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.75”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 707.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 141.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 141.4 m
- From
- 19.65 m
- To
- 161.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:19.65-161.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: and
Incl.goldGrade: 15.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.25 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 579.5 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 15.25 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“15.25”
Context: Incl.
Incl.silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 304.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: Incl.
Incl.copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: Incl.
Incl.zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 27.8 m
- To
- 65.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:27.8-65.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: Incl.
Incl.goldGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.66 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 209.2 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.66 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.66”
Context: Incl.
Incl.silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 583.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: Incl.
Incl.copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Incl.
Incl.zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44.9 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:335.6-380.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: Incl.
Incl.goldGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.64 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 55.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.64”
Context: Incl.
Incl.silverGrade: 28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 428.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28”
Context: Incl.
Incl.copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: Incl.
Incl.zincGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Incl.
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.3 m
- From
- 292.45 m
- To
- 307.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Incl.:292.45-307.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.44 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: Incl.
andgoldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 72.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 644.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 80.6 m
- From
- 369.8 m
- To
- 450.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:369.8-450.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 30Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 30
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 478.5 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“30”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.95 m
- From
- 378.7 m
- To
- 394.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:378.7-394.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.55 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.55”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 406.45 m
- To
- 407.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:406.45-407.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.98 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 24.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 225.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25.1 m
- From
- 506.15 m
- To
- 531.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:506.15-531.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.14 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.14”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 160.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 618.4 m
- To
- 650.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:618.4-650.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 3.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:717-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.96 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.96”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:717-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:717-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- From
- 717 m
- To
- 718.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:717-718.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.80”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 45 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 90.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.21 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 273.4 m
- To
- 275.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:273.4-275.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.78 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.6 m
- From
- 320.9 m
- To
- 324.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:320.9-324.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.53 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.53”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 23 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 23 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“23”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 341.95 m
- To
- 342.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:341.95-342.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 9.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.88 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 9.88 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.88”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 450.1 m
- To
- 451.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:450.1-451.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andgoldGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.22 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: and
andsilverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: and
andcopperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: and
andzincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CNL.TO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 488.1 m
- To
- 489.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:488.1-489.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: and
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.