CHW: Drilling Confirms 17 Square Kilometres at Mpyupyu West
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Chilwa Minerals Limited
- Ticker
- CHW
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Southern Malawi
- Primary commodity
- Heavy mineral sands
- Secondary commodities
- Ilmenite, Zircon, Leucoxene, Rutile, Garnet, Monazite, Heavy mineral concentrate
- Document categories
- Other, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-10-08 22:29:32 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Chilwa Minerals Limited has provided an update on Phase I resource drilling at its Mpyupyu West heavy mineral sands discovery, confirming the geological outline and consistent stratigraphy over a 17 km² area. While 218 holes have been completed, no assay results are reported, with initial heavy mineral content results expected in late October. The announcement also includes a restatement of the JORC 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate for other deposits, last updated in June 2026.
Reasoning: The announcement provides an update on drilling progress at Mpyupyu West, confirming geological understanding and scale, but lacks new assay results. It also includes a restated historical resource estimate for other deposits.
Positive factors
- Drilling confirms geological outline and consistent stratigraphy over a large area (17km2) at Mpyupyu West, setting the stage for future resource definition.
Negative factors
- No assay results for the Mpyupyu West drilling are reported, limiting immediate impact.
- The resource estimate presented is a restatement of prior information.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 123
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 123. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (123)
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 21300000Grade: 4.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 21.3 Mt at 4.4% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 21300000Contained Metal: 950000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Contained Metal
- 950000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.95 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 21300000Grade: 3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 3.00% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 21300000Grade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.39% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 21300000Grade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.40% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 21300000Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.04% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 21300000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.12% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 21300000Grade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:664ddebf7be6eb7ee56a
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 21300000
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.02% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 21.3
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 3100000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 3.1 Mt at 2.8% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.8”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 3100000Contained Metal: 90000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Contained Metal
- 90000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.09 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 3100000Grade: 1.85Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 1.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 1.85% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“1.85”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 3100000Grade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.26% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 3100000Grade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.25% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 3100000Grade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.02% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 3100000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.08% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 3100000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:a06542acfe3c14b11168
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (Main)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 3100000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (Main) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 3.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 1200000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 1.2 Mt at 2.3% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 1200000Contained Metal: 30000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Contained Metal
- 30000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.03 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.88% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.18% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.14% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.03% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.22% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 1200000Grade: 0Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:005d863be60ce9115233
- Deposit or zone
- Mposa (North)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1200000
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mposa (North) with 0.00% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 5100000Grade: 4.55Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:c0b69d5c17f8b3736a7d
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5100000
- Grade
- 4.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Bimbi with 5.1 Mt at 4.55% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“4.55”
Context: 5.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 5100000Contained Metal: 230000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:c0b69d5c17f8b3736a7d
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5100000
- Contained Metal
- 230000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Bimbi with 0.23 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 5.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 5100000Grade: 3.85Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:c0b69d5c17f8b3736a7d
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5100000
- Grade
- 3.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Bimbi with 3.85% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.85”
Context: 5.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 5100000Grade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:c0b69d5c17f8b3736a7d
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5100000
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Bimbi with 0.25% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 5.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 5100000Grade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:c0b69d5c17f8b3736a7d
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5100000
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Bimbi with 0.11% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 5.1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 2400000Grade: 3.79Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:4e01ea20633206a9ecec
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 3.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi with 2.4 Mt at 3.79% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.79”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 2400000Contained Metal: 90000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:4e01ea20633206a9ecec
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Contained Metal
- 90000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi with 0.09 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 2400000Grade: 3.21Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:4e01ea20633206a9ecec
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi with 3.21% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 2400000Grade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:4e01ea20633206a9ecec
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi with 0.21% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 2400000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:4e01ea20633206a9ecec
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi with 0.09% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 12500000Grade: 2.57Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:12579d1f6758d1a48ebd
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi NE
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12500000
- Grade
- 2.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi NE with 12.5 Mt at 2.57% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.57”
Context: 12.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 12500000Contained Metal: 320000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:12579d1f6758d1a48ebd
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi NE
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12500000
- Contained Metal
- 320000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi NE with 0.32 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 12.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 12500000Grade: 2.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:12579d1f6758d1a48ebd
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi NE
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12500000
- Grade
- 2.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi NE with 2.18% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.18”
Context: 12.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 12500000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:12579d1f6758d1a48ebd
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi NE
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12500000
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi NE with 0.14% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 12.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 12500000Grade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:12579d1f6758d1a48ebd
- Deposit or zone
- Bimbi NE
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12500000
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Bimbi NE with 0.06% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 12.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 12800000Grade: 5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 12.8 Mt at 5.0% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 12800000Contained Metal: 640000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Contained Metal
- 640000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.64 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 12800000Grade: 4.36Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 4.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 4.36% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“4.36”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 12800000Grade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.18% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 12800000Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.03% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 12800000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.01% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 12800000Grade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.16% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 12800000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:0efcfadcf57f7862a05f
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 12800000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 12.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 4200000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 4.2 Mt at 3.1% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 4200000Contained Metal: 130000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Contained Metal
- 130000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.13 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 4200000Grade: 2.58Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 2.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 2.58% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.58”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 4200000Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.13% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 4200000Grade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.02% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 4200000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.01% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 4200000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.09% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 4200000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:2c4b98263f45c7c756d2
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4200000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 4.2
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 500000Grade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.5 Mt at 3.6% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 500000Contained Metal: 20000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Contained Metal
- 20000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.02 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 500000Grade: 2.96Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 2.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 2.96% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.96”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 500000Grade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.15% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 500000Grade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.02% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 500000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.01% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 500000Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:00bca177837a09227ede
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Dune)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.13% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 500000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:f9a5ef53e4a1b5b2c2f4
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 500000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Dune) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 11600000Grade: 3.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 11.6 Mt at 3.9% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 11600000Contained Metal: 460000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Contained Metal
- 460000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.46 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 11600000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 3.20% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.20”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 11600000Grade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.19% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 11600000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.05% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 11600000Grade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.02% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 11600000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.08% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 11600000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:cb5039503a27396fb447
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 11600000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 11.6
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 69400000Grade: 3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 69.4 Mt at 3.0% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 69400000Contained Metal: 2100000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Contained Metal
- 2100000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 2.10 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.10”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 69400000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 2.50% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 69400000Grade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.15% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 69400000Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.03% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 69400000Grade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.02% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 69400000Grade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.07% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 69400000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:7c31d4f1206e987c1e7c
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 69400000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 69.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 11100000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 11.1 Mt at 2.3% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 11100000Contained Metal: 250000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Contained Metal
- 250000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.25 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 11100000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 1.90% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“1.90”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 11100000Grade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.11% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · leucoxeneTonnes: 11100000Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.03% leucoxene, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 11100000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.01% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · garnetTonnes: 11100000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- garnet
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.05% garnet, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · monaziteTonnes: 11100000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- monazite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:9b75fda5d8e25fd9d7d0
- Deposit or zone
- Mpyupyu (Flat)
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11100000
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource for Mpyupyu (Flat) with 0.01% monazite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 11.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 2400000Grade: 3.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:ca610347ac1e53514671
- Deposit or zone
- Nkotamo
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Nkotamo with 2.4 Mt at 3.70% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.70”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 2400000Contained Metal: 90000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:ca610347ac1e53514671
- Deposit or zone
- Nkotamo
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Contained Metal
- 90000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Nkotamo with 0.09 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 2400000Grade: 2.23Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:ca610347ac1e53514671
- Deposit or zone
- Nkotamo
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Nkotamo with 2.23% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.23”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 2400000Grade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:ca610347ac1e53514671
- Deposit or zone
- Nkotamo
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Nkotamo with 0.23% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 2400000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:ca610347ac1e53514671
- Deposit or zone
- Nkotamo
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2400000
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Nkotamo with 0.10% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.4
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 8700000Grade: 3.79Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:225da79071c89ba7c035
- Deposit or zone
- Halala
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 8700000
- Grade
- 3.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Halala with 8.7 Mt at 3.79% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.79”
Context: 8.7
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 8700000Contained Metal: 330000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:225da79071c89ba7c035
- Deposit or zone
- Halala
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 8700000
- Contained Metal
- 330000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Halala with 0.33 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 8.7
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 8700000Grade: 2.28Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:225da79071c89ba7c035
- Deposit or zone
- Halala
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 8700000
- Grade
- 2.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Halala with 2.28% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.28”
Context: 8.7
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 8700000Grade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:225da79071c89ba7c035
- Deposit or zone
- Halala
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 8700000
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Halala with 0.19% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 8.7
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 8700000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:225da79071c89ba7c035
- Deposit or zone
- Halala
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 8700000
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Halala with 0.09% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 8.7
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 1000000Grade: 2.63Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:1e3ee0bf98c17ca107f0
- Deposit or zone
- Beacon
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 2.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Beacon with 1.0 Mt at 2.63% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.63”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 1000000Contained Metal: 30000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:1e3ee0bf98c17ca107f0
- Deposit or zone
- Beacon
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Contained Metal
- 30000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Beacon with 0.03 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 1000000Grade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:1e3ee0bf98c17ca107f0
- Deposit or zone
- Beacon
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 1.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Beacon with 1.82% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“1.82”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 1000000Grade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:1e3ee0bf98c17ca107f0
- Deposit or zone
- Beacon
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Beacon with 0.16% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 1000000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:1e3ee0bf98c17ca107f0
- Deposit or zone
- Beacon
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Beacon with 0.08% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 4500000Grade: 3.66Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:b952a0d67b5bc464519e
- Deposit or zone
- Namanja West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4500000
- Grade
- 3.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Namanja West with 4.5 Mt at 3.66% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.66”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 4500000Contained Metal: 160000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:b952a0d67b5bc464519e
- Deposit or zone
- Namanja West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4500000
- Contained Metal
- 160000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Namanja West with 0.16 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 4500000Grade: 2.63Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:b952a0d67b5bc464519e
- Deposit or zone
- Namanja West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4500000
- Grade
- 2.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Namanja West with 2.63% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.63”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 4500000Grade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:b952a0d67b5bc464519e
- Deposit or zone
- Namanja West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4500000
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Namanja West with 0.25% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 4500000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:b952a0d67b5bc464519e
- Deposit or zone
- Namanja West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4500000
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource for Namanja West with 0.10% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 45800000Grade: 4.48Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:db06393867b8cfb07107
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 45800000
- Grade
- 4.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured resource with 45.8 Mt at 4.48% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“4.48”
Context: 45.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 45800000Contained Metal: 2000000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:db06393867b8cfb07107
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 45800000
- Contained Metal
- 2000000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured resource with 2.0 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 45.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 45800000Grade: 3.43Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:db06393867b8cfb07107
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 45800000
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured resource with 3.43% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.43”
Context: 45.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 45800000Grade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:db06393867b8cfb07107
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 45800000
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured resource with 0.28% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 45.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 45800000Grade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:db06393867b8cfb07107
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 45800000
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured resource with 0.03% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 45.8
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 99500000Grade: 3.19Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:17b420d6be43b1a264fd
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 99500000
- Grade
- 3.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with 99.5 Mt at 3.19% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.19”
Context: 99.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 99500000Contained Metal: 3200000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:17b420d6be43b1a264fd
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 99500000
- Contained Metal
- 3200000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with 3.2 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 99.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 99500000Grade: 2.51Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:17b420d6be43b1a264fd
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 99500000
- Grade
- 2.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with 2.51% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.51”
Context: 99.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 99500000Grade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:17b420d6be43b1a264fd
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 99500000
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with 0.17% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 99.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 99500000Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:17b420d6be43b1a264fd
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 99500000
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Indicated resource with 0.04% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- Indicated Resource
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 99.5
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 26500000Grade: 2.58Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:fa71e5600264360e4130
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 26500000
- Grade
- 2.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with 26.5 Mt at 2.58% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.58”
Context: 26.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral concentrateTonnes: 26500000Contained Metal: 700000Contained Unit: tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral concentrate
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:fa71e5600264360e4130
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 26500000
- Contained Metal
- 700000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with 0.7 Mt of heavy mineral concentrate, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 26.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · ilmeniteTonnes: 26500000Grade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:fa71e5600264360e4130
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 26500000
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with 2.17% ilmenite, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: 26.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · zirconTonnes: 26500000Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- zircon
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:fa71e5600264360e4130
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 26500000
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with 0.13% zircon, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 26.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · rutileTonnes: 26500000Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- rutile
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:fa71e5600264360e4130
- Deposit or zone
- Total
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 26500000
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Inferred resource with 0.04% rutile, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 26.5
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Grand TotalChilwa Heavy Mineral Sands · heavy mineral sandsTonnes: 171800000Grade: 3.44Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Chilwa Heavy Mineral Sands
- Commodity
- heavy mineral sands
- Region
- southern malawi
- Reported Region
- Southern Malawi
- Ticker
- CHW
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Bernhard Siebrits, Bertus Cilliers
- Resource group id
- resource:3d2be97035b669ac7675
- Deposit or zone
- Grand Total
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 171800000
- Grade
- 3.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- % THM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-19
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-06-19T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Grand Total resource with 171.8 Mt at 3.44% THM, reported under JORC, but is a restatement of a prior estimate.
Positive factors
- JORC Compliant
- QP/CP Signed
- Cut-off Disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical Estimate Only
Evidence · table
“3.44”
Context: 171.8
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.