# Centauri Minerals Mobilizes for First Drilling Program at Rio Grande Gold-Copper Project Since 2013 Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/centauri-minerals-mobilizes-for-first-drilling-program-at-rio-grande-gold-copper--d35f8685-4d32-4f2b-a010-8a528917dbc6 Original source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/10/13/3379837/0/en/centauri-minerals-mobilizes-for-first-drilling-program-at-rio-grande-gold-copper-project-since-2013.html Publisher: globenewswire Original announcement: 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-13T14:46:48.289Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-13T14:46:48.289Z - Company: Centauri Minerals Inc. - Ticker: CENT - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Salta province, Northern Argentina - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Copper, Silver - Document categories: Other, Drill results - Extracted: 2026-10-13 14:46:49 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Centauri Minerals is mobilizing for its first drilling program at the Rio Grande gold-copper project in Argentina since 2013. The Phase 1 program targets 12,000m of diamond drilling to expand known resources and test high-priority porphyry targets identified via a recent 3D Magneto-Telluric survey. Reasoning: The company is mobilizing for a significant 12,000m drilling program based on new geophysical targets, but no actual drill intercepts are provided. - Positive factor: Mobilization for first drilling program since 2013 - Positive factor: Completion of 3D Magneto-Telluric survey identifying new targets - Positive factor: Identification of potential large-scale porphyry-type system at depth - Positive factor: Established infrastructure and camp refurbishment underway - Negative factor: No new assay results reported in this release Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: The release mentions historical intercepts from 2012 and 2013 to provide context for new targets. Evidence · text > In 2012 to 2013, Regulus Resources Inc. completed a small four-hole, 1,200 m drill program ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (2) ### RGR-12-118 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/centauri-minerals-mobilizes-for-first-drilling-program-at-rio-grande-gold-copper--d35f8685-4d32-4f2b-a010-8a528917dbc6#fact-drill-facts-0) Rio Grande · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: RGR-12-118 - Project: Rio Grande - Commodity: gold - Region: argentina - Reported Region: argentina - Ticker: CENT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.36 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 297 m - From: 0 m - To: 297 m - Intercept Depth: 0 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: RGR-12-118:0-297 #### Location - Location: Central Zone - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2012-11-16T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical intercept from 2012/2013 mentioned as context for Area B. - Negative factor: Stale data re-release Evidence · text > 297 m at 0.36 g/t Au from surface \(hole RGR-12-118\) #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### RGR-13-126 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/centauri-minerals-mobilizes-for-first-drilling-program-at-rio-grande-gold-copper--d35f8685-4d32-4f2b-a010-8a528917dbc6#fact-drill-facts-1) Rio Grande · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: RGR-13-126 - Project: Rio Grande - Commodity: gold - Region: argentina - Reported Region: argentina - Ticker: CENT #### Geometry - Grade: 0.59 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 19 m - From: 0 m - To: 19 m - Intercept Depth: 0 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: RGR-13-126:0-19 #### Location - Location: Central Zone - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2013-06-27T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-13T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical intercept from 2012/2013 mentioned as context for Area B. - Negative factor: Stale data re-release Evidence · text > 19.0 m at 0.59 g/t Au \(hole RGR-13-126\) #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.