CBLT Reports Results from Big Duck Lake
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- CBLT Inc.
- Ticker
- CBLT
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-08-25 03:07:19 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
CBLT reports results from a 2022 field program at Big Duck Lake, Ontario, including grab sampling at the North Gold showing. The release also restates high-grade historical drill results from 2017 at the Coco-Estelle Deposit.
Reasoning: The release primarily restates historical 2017 drill results (bonanza gold) and reports new, low-grade grab sampling from a 2022 field program.
Positive factors
- Bonanza intercept reported (823.1 g/t Au)
- QA/QC Disclosed (ActLabs, P.Geo sign-off)
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release (historical 2017 results)
- Grab samples are selective and unconfirmed
Facts used in scoring: 14
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 823.1 g/t gold is exceptionally high grade.
Evidence · text
“823.1 g/t (26.339 oz/ton) gold”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions ActLabs and supervision by a P.Geo.
Evidence · text
“submitted to ActLabs in Timmins... Jessica Daniel, P.Geo supervised the program”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The high-grade gold results are from a 2017/2018 drill program.
Evidence · text
“A prior owner carried out a drill program in 2017 at Coco-Estelle, reported in 2018”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 14. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (14)
BD17-01-5570390Big Duck Lake · goldGrade: 823.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BD17-01-5570390
- Project
- Big Duck Lake
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 823.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 88.7 m
- To
- 89.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BD17-01-5570390:88.7-89.2
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2018-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Extremely high grade (823.1 g/t Au) but is a restatement of 2017/2018 data.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
BD17-01-5570391Big Duck Lake · goldGrade: 5.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BD17-01-5570391
- Project
- Big Duck Lake
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 89.2 m
- To
- 90 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BD17-01-5570391:89.2-90
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2018-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept, but is a restatement of 2017/2018 data.
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
Fact 3goldGrade: 0.187Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.187
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade grab sample from North Gold area.
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective
Fact 4silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in grab sample.
Fact 5copperGrade: 170Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 170
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper in grab sample.
Fact 6zincGrade: 70Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc in grab sample.
Fact 7goldGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate grade grab sample from North Gold area.
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective
Fact 8silverGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in grab sample.
Fact 9copperGrade: 428Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 428
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper in grab sample.
Fact 10zincGrade: 1040Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1040
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc in grab sample.
Fact 11goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade grab sample from North Gold area.
Negative factors
- Grab samples are selective
Fact 12silverGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in grab sample.
Fact 13copperGrade: 180Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 180
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper in grab sample.
Fact 14zincGrade: 90Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- CBLT
Geometry
- Grade
- 90
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2023-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc in grab sample.
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.