# Capella Receives Drill Permits for Hessj&\#xF8;gruva Copper Project, Central Norway, and Provides Update on T&\#xFC;mad Joint Venture Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/capella-receives-drill-permits-for-hessj-xf8-gruva-copper-project-central-norway--248856f7-d7d5-431d-8ca7-3395b9199416 Original source: https://orestocks.com/company/CMIL.V/press-releases/4844604523274954 Publisher: orestocks Original announcement: 2026-09-29T13:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-29T14:15:04.181Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-29T14:15:04.181Z - Company: Capella Minerals Ltd. - Ticker: CMIL.V - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Central Norway - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Cobalt, Zinc, Gold - Document categories: Drill results, Permitting, Agreement transaction - Extracted: 2026-09-29 14:15:04 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.30 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Capella Minerals has received diamond drill permits for its Hessjøgruva Cu-Co-Zn VMS project in Norway, enabling drilling in 2027 and 2028. The company also reported the completion of a 669.2m drill program at the Killerö W project in Finland, which returned a maximum copper grade of 0.98% Cu over 1.0m. Reasoning: The company secured key permits for its primary VMS project and completed a drill program in Finland, though the JV partner is scaling back in the latter region. - Positive factor: Drill permits granted for Hessjøgruva project - Positive factor: Successful completion of Killerö W drilling - Positive factor: Strategic importance of Cu-Co in EU/Norway - Negative factor: Tümad JV electing not to proceed to Phase II in Northern Finland due to low gold values - Negative factor: Delays in obtaining permits required extension of investment milestone Facts used in scoring: 3 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: Release details specific QA/QC protocols including standards, duplicates, and blanks used at ALS Laboratories. Evidence · text > Internal controls of analytical results were provided through a mix of Certified Reference Materials \(standards\), duplicates, and blanks **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: Eric Roth, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, approved the technical information. Evidence · text > approved by Eric Roth, the Company's President & CEO, a Director, and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101 ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (3) ### KW-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/capella-receives-drill-permits-for-hessj-xf8-gruva-copper-project-central-norway--248856f7-d7d5-431d-8ca7-3395b9199416#fact-drill-facts-0) Killerö W · copper #### Identity - Hole ID: KW-002 - Project: Killerö W - Commodity: copper - Region: finland - Reported Region: finland - Ticker: CMIL.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.98 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 1 m - From: 211.4 m - To: 212.4 m - Intercept Depth: 211.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: KW-002:211.4-212.4 #### Location - CRS: WGS84/UTM Zone 35N #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Laboratories - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: A specific copper intercept was reported in the Killerö W drill program. - Positive factor: Copper grade of 0.98% is a notable intercept for this target - Negative factor: Interval is relatively narrow \(1.0m\) Evidence · text > Maximum copper grades returned were 0.98% Cu over 1.0m \(211.4-212.4m in KW-002\) #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "\*\*\_Hessjøgruva \(Norway\)\_\*\*\*\*\_Project Highlights\_\*\* - Hessjøgruva is an advanced exploration-stage Cu-Co-Zn VMS project " ### KW-001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/capella-receives-drill-permits-for-hessj-xf8-gruva-copper-project-central-norway--248856f7-d7d5-431d-8ca7-3395b9199416#fact-drill-facts-1) Killerö W #### Identity - Hole ID: KW-001 - Project: Killerö W - Region: finland - Reported Region: finland - Ticker: CMIL.V #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - CRS: WGS84/UTM Zone 35N #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Laboratories - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The drill hole failed to return significant gold mineralization. - Negative factor: No significant gold values returned Evidence · text > no significant values were returned for gold #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "\*\*\_Hessjøgruva \(Norway\)\_\*\*\*\*\_Project Highlights\_\*\* - Hessjøgruva is an advanced exploration-stage Cu-Co-Zn VMS project " ### KW-002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/capella-receives-drill-permits-for-hessj-xf8-gruva-copper-project-central-norway--248856f7-d7d5-431d-8ca7-3395b9199416#fact-drill-facts-2) Killerö W #### Identity - Hole ID: KW-002 - Project: Killerö W - Region: finland - Reported Region: finland - Ticker: CMIL.V #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - CRS: WGS84/UTM Zone 35N #### QA/QC - Laboratory: ALS Laboratories - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The drill hole failed to return significant gold mineralization. - Negative factor: No significant gold values returned Evidence · text > no significant values were returned for gold #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "\*\*\_Hessjøgruva \(Norway\)\_\*\*\*\*\_Project Highlights\_\*\* - Hessjøgruva is an advanced exploration-stage Cu-Co-Zn VMS project " ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.