# Cambria Gold Reports First Results from Premier Underground Infill Drilling: Including 19.82 g/t Au over 5.0 meters and 483.0 g/t Au over 1.0 meters at Prew Zone

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cambria-gold-reports-first-results-from-premier-underground-infill-drilling-incl--8855348e-467f-417b-b8b6-5bea21122e50

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/cambria-gold-reports-first-results-113000451.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2026-06-09T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Cambria Gold Mines Inc.

- Ticker: CAMB

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: British Columbia

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-08-20 21:57:48 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.90 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Cambria Gold has released the first results from its underground infill drilling program at the Prew Zone of the Premier Gold Project. The results include high-grade intercepts of 19.82 g/t Au over 5.0m and a bonanza-grade 483.0 g/t Au over 1.0m.

Reasoning: The announcement reports exceptionally high-grade gold intercepts \(483 g/t Au\) from the first results of an underground infill program, indicating significant high-grade potential at the Prew Zone.

- Positive factor: Bonanza grade intercept

- Positive factor: Infill drilling success

- Positive factor: Underground high-grade continuity

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 483.0 g/t Au is exceptionally high-grade.

Evidence · text

> 483.0 g/t Au over 1.0 meters

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The results are from an underground infill program.

Evidence · text

> underground infill program

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cambria-gold-reports-first-results-from-premier-underground-infill-drilling-incl--8855348e-467f-417b-b8b6-5bea21122e50#fact-drill-facts-0)

Premier Gold Project · gold

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Premier Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: CAMB

#### Geometry

- Grade: 19.82
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 5 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 19.82 g/t Au over 5.0m is a strong intercept for an underground gold project.

- Positive factor: Strong grade for underground

Evidence · text

> 19.82 g/t Au over 5.0 meters

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/cambria-gold-reports-first-results-from-premier-underground-infill-drilling-incl--8855348e-467f-417b-b8b6-5bea21122e50#fact-drill-facts-1)

Premier Gold Project · gold

Needs review: ungrounded

#### Identity

- Project: Premier Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_bc
- Reported Region: British Columbia
- Ticker: CAMB

#### Geometry

- Grade: 483
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: ungrounded
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 483.0 g/t Au is an exceptional bonanza-grade intercept.

- Positive factor: Bonanza grade

Evidence · text

> 483.0 g/t Au over 1.0 meters

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.