CAE: Southern Porphyry Exploration Update

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Cannindah Resources Ltd
Ticker
CAE
Exchange
ASX
Region
Queensland
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Molybdenum
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-23 23:20:08 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Cannindah Resources Ltd announced an exploration update for its Southern Porphyry Target at the Appletree Prospect, confirming a high-priority target with multi-element copper, gold, and silver mineralization. Recent RC pre-collar drilling and historical diamond drilling returned broad intervals of anomalous grades, providing vectors towards a potential buried porphyry center. The company is awaiting assays from additional diamond holes before planning the next phase of drilling, while two rigs are currently focused on resource growth at the Cannindah Breccia. The document also includes a historical Mineral Resource Estimate for the Mt Cannindah project, effective July 2024.

Reasoning: New reconnaissance drilling at Appletree confirms a high-priority porphyry target with multi-element mineralization and vectors towards higher grades, but reported grades are generally low and true widths are not provided. The included resource estimate is historical and not updated.

Positive factors

  • Confirmation of porphyry target
  • Clear vectors for future drilling
  • Multi-element mineralization
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosed

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only
  • Grades are low for a porphyry
  • Stale Estimate

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 57

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states 'All results are not true widths' and 'All intervals are downhole lengths and are apparent width.'

Evidence · text

“All intervals are downhole lengths and are apparent width.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes detailed QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, mentioning certified lab (Intertek Townsville), QP sign-off (Mr Cameron Switzer), and methods (standards, blanks, duplicates, check assays).

Evidence · text

“Samples were collected, loaded into bulka bags, labelled and transported to logistics facility in Monto for safe storage before being sent by an independent contractor to appropriate commercial laboratories (Intertek Townsville) for sample preparation and analysis.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: The metal equivalent calculation formula and assumptions (metal prices, recoveries) are clearly disclosed in Appendix 1.

Evidence · text

“Appendix 1 Formula for Copper Equivalent calculations”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The cut-off grades used for reporting intervals (0.1% CuEq and 1.0% CuEq) are clearly stated in Appendix 3.

Evidence · text

“Results are reported at greater than 10m @ 0.1 CuEq% with 4m internal dilution and greater than 2m @ 1.0 CuEq% using a minimum 2m length with a 2m dilution.”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is stated to be prepared in compliance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ('JORC Code').

Evidence · text

“Competent Person within the definition of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (“JORC Code).”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mr Simon Tear is named as the Competent Person responsible for the Mineral Resource estimates and consents to the inclusion of the information.

Evidence · text

“The information and data in this report that relates to Mineral Resource estimates for the Mt Cannindah copper gold silver deposit and the Monument Exploration Target is based on information evaluated by Mr Simon Tear who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM) and who has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person within the definition of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (“JORC Code).”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of 3 July 2024, which is over two years old relative to the announcement date of 24 September 2026, and the company states no new material information has affected it.

Evidence · text

“On 3 July 2024 Cannindah Resources Limited announced a significant upgrade of the Mineral Resource estimate (MRE) for the Mt Cannindah project”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 57. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (54)

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
170 m
To
172 m
Hole Depth
317.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:170-172
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Easting
326969
Northing
7268723
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
33 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.71
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new, narrow intercept shows a moderate copper grade, indicating a potential higher-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54 m
From
88 m
To
142 m
Hole Depth
317 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:88-142
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Easting
327103
Northing
7268589
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows low gold grades over a broad length, indicating halo mineralization rather than a high-grade core.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“54m @ 0.25% CuEq (0.02% Cu, 0.30gt Au, 0.64gt Ag) from 88m (26CRD048)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54 m
From
88 m
To
142 m
Hole Depth
317 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:88-142
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Easting
327103
Northing
7268589
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows low silver grades over a broad length, indicating halo mineralization rather than a high-grade core.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · text

“54m @ 0.25% CuEq (0.02% Cu, 0.30gt Au, 0.64gt Ag) from 88m (26CRD048)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

25CRC0132Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25CRC0132
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
90 m
From
184 m
To
274 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25CRC0132:184-274
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows broad, low-grade multi-element mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the target.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“90m @ 0.33% CuEq (0.22% Cu, 0.09gt Au, 2.23gt Ag) from 184m (25CRC0132)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

25CRC0132Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25CRC0132
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
90 m
From
184 m
To
274 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25CRC0132:184-274
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows broad, low-grade multi-element mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the target.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“90m @ 0.33% CuEq (0.22% Cu, 0.09gt Au, 2.23gt Ag) from 184m (25CRC0132)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

25CRC0132Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25CRC0132
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
90 m
From
184 m
To
274 m
Intercept Depth
18 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25CRC0132:184-274
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows broad, low-grade multi-element mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the target.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“90m @ 0.33% CuEq (0.22% Cu, 0.09gt Au, 2.23gt Ag) from 184m (25CRC0132)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

25CRD0203Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 172 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25CRD0203
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
172 m
From
118 m
To
290 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25CRD0203:118-290
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows very broad, low-grade multi-element mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the target.

Positive factors

  • Very broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“172m @ 0.18% CuEq (0.10% Cu, 0.04gt Au, 0.97gt Ag) from 118m (25CRD0203)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

25CRD0203Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 172 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25CRD0203
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
172 m
From
118 m
To
290 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25CRD0203:118-290
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows very broad, low-grade multi-element mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the target.

Positive factors

  • Very broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“172m @ 0.18% CuEq (0.10% Cu, 0.04gt Au, 0.97gt Ag) from 118m (25CRD0203)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

25CRD0203Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 172 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
25CRD0203
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
172 m
From
118 m
To
290 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
25CRD0203:118-290
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Appletree Prospect
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
% CuEq
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows very broad, low-grade multi-element mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the target.

Positive factors

  • Very broad intercept length
  • Multi-element mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Stale Data Re-release

Evidence · text

“172m @ 0.18% CuEq (0.10% Cu, 0.04gt Au, 0.97gt Ag) from 118m (25CRD0203)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
72 m
From
0 m
To
72 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:0-72
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326936
Northing
7268630
Elevation
362 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
72 m
From
0 m
To
72 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:0-72
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326936
Northing
7268630
Elevation
362 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.06 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
72 m
From
0 m
To
72 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:0-72
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326936
Northing
7268630
Elevation
362 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.21 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 9.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
9.2
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
72 m
From
0 m
To
72 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:0-72
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326936
Northing
7268630
Elevation
362 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.2 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.2”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
62 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:62-64
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.6 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.6”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
62 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:62-64
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.54 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
62 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:62-64
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.85 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
62 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:62-64
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.8 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“10.8”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
42 m
From
196 m
To
238 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-238
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 13.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
42 m
From
196 m
To
238 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-238
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.37 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
3.52
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
42 m
From
196 m
To
238 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-238
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.52 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“3.52”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 22.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
22.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
42 m
From
196 m
To
238 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-238
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.65
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22.7 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“22.7”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
196 m
To
200 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-200
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.11 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
196 m
To
200 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-200
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.09 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 7.41Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
7.41
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
196 m
To
200 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-200
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.41 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.41”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
196 m
To
200 m
Intercept Depth
196 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:196-200
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.5 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
212 m
To
222 m
Intercept Depth
212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:212-222
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.41 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10 m
From
212 m
To
222 m
Intercept Depth
212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:212-222
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.72 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 6.86Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
6.86
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10 m
From
212 m
To
222 m
Intercept Depth
212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:212-222
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.86 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“6.86”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
7.3
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10 m
From
212 m
To
222 m
Intercept Depth
212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:212-222
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.03
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.3 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“7.3”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
234 m
To
236 m
Intercept Depth
234 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:234-236
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.41 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
234 m
To
236 m
Intercept Depth
234 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:234-236
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 4.96Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
4.96
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
234 m
To
236 m
Intercept Depth
234 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:234-236
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.96 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.96”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD047Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 12.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD047
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
12.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
234 m
To
236 m
Intercept Depth
234 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD047:234-236
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 12.5 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“12.5”

Context: 26CRD047

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
54 m
From
88 m
To
142 m
Intercept Depth
88 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:88-142
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
327103
Northing
7268589
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
54 m
From
88 m
To
142 m
Intercept Depth
88 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:88-142
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
327103
Northing
7268589
Elevation
361 m
Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.5 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.5”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
126 m
To
128 m
Intercept Depth
126 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:126-128
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
126 m
To
128 m
Intercept Depth
126 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:126-128
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.62 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“4.62”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.66
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
126 m
To
128 m
Intercept Depth
126 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:126-128
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.66 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
126 m
To
128 m
Intercept Depth
126 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:126-128
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.1 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
278 m
To
288 m
Intercept Depth
278 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:278-288
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10 m
From
278 m
To
288 m
Intercept Depth
278 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:278-288
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.06 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10 m
From
278 m
To
288 m
Intercept Depth
278 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:278-288
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.11 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD048Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD048
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
5.4
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
10 m
From
278 m
To
288 m
Intercept Depth
278 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD048:278-288
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5.4 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“5.4”

Context: 26CRD048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32 m
From
0 m
To
32 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:0-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326969
Northing
7268723
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
33 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
32 m
From
0 m
To
32 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:0-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326969
Northing
7268723
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
33 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.04 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
32 m
From
0 m
To
32 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:0-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326969
Northing
7268723
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
33 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.1 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 25.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
25.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
32 m
From
0 m
To
32 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:0-32
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
326969
Northing
7268723
Elevation
359 m
Azimuth
33 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25.8 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“25.8”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
88 m
From
166 m
To
254 m
Intercept Depth
166 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:166-254
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
88 m
From
166 m
To
254 m
Intercept Depth
166 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:166-254
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.06 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
88 m
From
166 m
To
254 m
Intercept Depth
166 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:166-254
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.93 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 41.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 88 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
41.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
88 m
From
166 m
To
254 m
Intercept Depth
166 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:166-254
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41.7 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“41.7”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
170 m
To
172 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:170-172
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.71
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.04 ppm gold, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the gold rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · silverGrade: 8.82Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
8.82
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
170 m
To
172 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:170-172
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.71
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.82 ppm silver, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (g/t).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the silver rubric unit g/t; not scored.

Evidence · table

“8.82”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

26CRD049Southern Porphyry Target · molybdenumGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26CRD049
Project
Southern Porphyry Target
Commodity
molybdenum
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
australia_qld
Ticker
CAE

Geometry

Grade
9.7
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
170 m
To
172 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26CRD049:170-172
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Townsville
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.71
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.7 ppm molybdenum. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.

Negative factors

  • No grade rubric for molybdenum; intercept not scored.

Evidence · table

“9.7”

Context: 26CRD049

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (3)

Fact 1Mt Cannindah · copperTonnes: 14500000Grade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 104.8Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Cannindah
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland
Ticker
CAE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Simon Tear
Resource group id
resource:c047a52f4cf499372f89

Resource Data

Tonnes
14500000
Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
104.8
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-07-03

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical total resource for copper, providing an overall scale but lacking novelty as it's not a new estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 14.5

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

Fact 2Mt Cannindah · goldTonnes: 14500000Grade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 197.3Contained Unit: kozsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Cannindah
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland
Ticker
CAE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Simon Tear
Resource group id
resource:c047a52f4cf499372f89

Resource Data

Tonnes
14500000
Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
197.3
Contained Unit
kozs

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-07-03

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical total resource for gold, providing an overall scale but lacking novelty as it's not a new estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 14.5

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

Fact 3Mt Cannindah · silverTonnes: 14500000Grade: 13.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6.4Contained Unit: mozsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Mt Cannindah
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_qld
Reported Region
Queensland
Ticker
CAE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Simon Tear
Resource group id
resource:c047a52f4cf499372f89

Resource Data

Tonnes
14500000
Grade
13.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6.4
Contained Unit
mozs

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-07-03

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical total resource for silver, providing an overall scale but lacking novelty as it's not a new estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC Compliant
  • QP/CP Signed

Negative factors

  • Stale Estimate

Evidence · table

“13.7”

Context: 14.5

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.