Bunker Hill Intersects Additional High-Grade Silver in the Cate-8 Vein; Individual Drill Samples to 16.3 oz/ton Silver, 41.1% Lead, 7.41% Zinc; Underground Channel Sampling Returns 46 Feet of 8.19% Lead, 2.49 oz/ton Silver, 1.18% Zinc (4.83 oz/ton AgEq) (14.03M at 166 g/t AgEq)
Original announcement by globenewswire on
- Company
- Bunker Hill Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- BNKR
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Idaho
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Capital raise
- Extracted
- 2026-08-31 10:36:23 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. announced additional high-grade silver, lead, and zinc drill results from its Cate-8 Vein, with individual samples reaching up to 16.3 oz/ton silver and high lead/zinc percentages. These results confirm continuity and expand the mineralized system, supporting the company's goal of an initial resource estimate. An updated exploration target estimate for Cate-8 shows a 55% increase in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces, and the company has drawn an additional US$2 million from its standby credit facility to support mine ramp-up.
Reasoning: Bunker Hill reports high-grade polymetallic drill results that significantly expand the Cate-8 mineralized system, including bonanza silver-equivalent grades. The updated exploration target estimate shows substantial growth, and the company has secured additional funding for mine ramp-up. While true widths are estimated and the resource is an exploration target, the overall results are very positive for the project's potential.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver, lead, and zinc intercepts
- Significant expansion of mineralized system along strike and downdip
- Strong AgEq grades in drill results, including bonanza grades
- Exploration Target Estimate shows significant growth in tonnage and contained AgEq ounces
- Proximity to existing infrastructure for potential near-term production
- Rigorous QA/QC protocols and QP sign-off
- Additional funding secured for mine ramp-up
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not directly measured for drill intercepts
- Resource estimate is an 'Exploration Target Estimate' and not a formal mineral resource
- Some drill holes reported 'No Significant Intercepts'
- Some holes had poor core recovery in rubble zones
Facts used in scoring: 56
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Sam Bourque, Chief Geologist of Bunker Hill, is the designated Qualified Person for this news release and has reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“Sam Bourque (AIPG CPG #11775), Chief Geologist of Bunker Hill, is the Company's designated Qualified Person for this news release within the meaning of NI 43-101. Mr. Bourque has reviewed and approved the technical information contained herein.”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: The metal equivalent grade is reported with full disclosure of the metal prices and recovery assumptions used in its calculation.
Evidence · text
“Silver equivalent grade (AgEq) was calculated using long-term metal price forecasts of US$76.36/troy ounce silver, $0.89/lb lead and $1.41/lb zinc, with recovery rates of 91.6% for silver, 88.6% for lead and 86.8% for zinc (from Bunker Hill Mining 2022 PFS ).”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: New drill intercepts continue to expand the Cate-8 mineralized system to over 1100 feet along strike and 1250 feet downdip.
Evidence · text
“New silver-lead-zinc drill intercepts continue to expand the Cate-8 mineralized system to over 1100 feet along strike and 1250 feet downdip”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured for the drill intercepts.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The 'Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate' is explicitly stated as not being a formal mineral resource estimate, indicating a conceptual or inferred level of confidence.
Evidence · text
“no mineral resource estimate exists for the Cate-8 Target”
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: The Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows a 55% growth in tonnage from the prior calculation.
Evidence · text
“Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces from the prior calculation”
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: The Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces from the prior calculation.
Evidence · text
“Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate shows 55% growth in tonnage and a 34% increase in contained silver-equivalent ounces from the prior calculation”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 56. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (56)
BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 2.94Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 3.81 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHD26-17
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.94
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 3.81 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHD26-17:317.5-330.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 128.65
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a good silver grade and a strong silver equivalent grade over a reasonable length, indicating significant mineralization.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
- Good silver equivalent grade
- Solid intercept length for underground mining
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“2.94”
Context: 3.81
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 4.75Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 2.13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHD26-17
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.75
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 2.13 m
- From
- 323 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHD26-17:323.0-330.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 199.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a significantly higher silver grade and strong silver equivalent grade, indicating a high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Higher silver grade within a broader intercept
- Strong silver equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for underground mining
Negative factors
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“4.75”
Context: 2.13
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 1.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-19
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 208 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-19:203.0-208.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good silver equivalent grade, primarily driven by significant zinc content, over a narrow but economic length.
Positive factors
- Good silver equivalent grade
- Contains significant zinc (5.93%)
Negative factors
- Lower silver grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 1.52
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-19
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.15
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 237.5 m
- To
- 240.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 156.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows good silver and strong silver equivalent grades, primarily due to high lead content, indicating a high-grade vein.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
- Strong silver equivalent grade
- Significant lead content (5.93%)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“3.15”
Context: 0.91
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.58Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 2.68 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.58
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 2.68 m
- From
- 158.7 m
- To
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 108.24
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate length, supported by lead and zinc content.
Positive factors
- Good silver equivalent grade
- Contains significant lead (4.08%) and zinc (1.69%)
Negative factors
- Moderate silver grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.58”
Context: 2.68
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 3.29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 3.29 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 50.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a lower silver and silver equivalent grade, but still indicates mineralization over a moderate length.
Negative factors
- Lower silver grade
- Lower silver equivalent grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: 3.29
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.1
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.18 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 227.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:226.8-227.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 602.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows exceptional silver and bonanza silver equivalent grades, primarily driven by very high lead content, indicating a high-grade veinlet.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
- Bonanza silver equivalent grade
- Very high lead content (27.80%)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“11.10”
Context: 0.18
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 602.79 g/t AgEq is exceptionally high, well above the typical thresholds for polymetallic deposits.
Evidence · table
“602.79”
Context: 0.18
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 2.71Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.71
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.34 m
- From
- 236.5 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:236.5-237.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 124.72
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows good silver and strong silver equivalent grades, indicating a high-grade veinlet.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
- Strong silver equivalent grade
- Significant lead content (3.28%)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“2.71”
Context: 0.34
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 1.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 1.89 m
- From
- 320.5 m
- To
- 326.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 77.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver and silver equivalent grades over a narrow length, indicating some mineralization.
Negative factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Moderate silver equivalent grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 1.89
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 1.74 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 1.74 m
- From
- 337.3 m
- To
- 343 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:337.3-343.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 71.1
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver and silver equivalent grades over a narrow length, indicating some mineralization.
Negative factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Moderate silver equivalent grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: 1.74
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 3.84 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 3.84 m
- From
- 355.4 m
- To
- 368 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:355.4-368.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 68.88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver and silver equivalent grades over a moderate length, indicating some mineralization.
Negative factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Moderate silver equivalent grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 3.84
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.12
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 362.2 m
- To
- 365.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:362.2-365.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 137.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows good silver and strong silver equivalent grades, primarily due to high lead content, indicating a high-grade veinlet.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade
- Strong silver equivalent grade
- Significant lead content (6.18%)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“2.12”
Context: 0.91
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 2.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 2.38 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 209.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:202.0-209.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 111.12
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate length, supported by lead and zinc content.
Positive factors
- Good silver equivalent grade
- Significant lead (4.44%) and zinc (1.50%) content
Negative factors
- Moderate silver grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 2.38
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 13.8Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.8
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.21 m
- From
- 234.2 m
- To
- 234.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 837.74
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows exceptional silver and bonanza silver equivalent grades, primarily driven by very high lead content, representing a significant high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
- Bonanza silver equivalent grade
- Very high lead content (41.10%)
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“13.80”
Context: 0.21
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 837.74 g/t AgEq is exceptionally high, well above the typical thresholds for polymetallic deposits.
Evidence · table
“837.74”
Context: 0.21
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:245.8-255.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 96.21
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a good silver equivalent grade over a moderate length, supported by lead content.
Positive factors
- Good silver equivalent grade
- Significant lead (4.36%) content
Negative factors
- Moderate silver grade
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: 2.80
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 4.19Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.98 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.19
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.98 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 249 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:245.8-249.0
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 232.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a significantly higher silver grade and strong silver equivalent grade, indicating a high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Higher silver grade within a broader intercept
- Strong silver equivalent grade
- Significant lead content (10.62%)
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“4.19”
Context: 0.98
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 15.7Grade Unit: oz/tonIntercept: 0.21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.7
- Grade Unit
- oz/ton
- Intercept
- 0.21 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:245.8-246.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SVL Lab
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 818.95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows exceptional silver and bonanza silver equivalent grades, primarily driven by very high lead content, representing a significant high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
- Bonanza silver equivalent grade
- Very high lead (33.40%) and zinc (1.09%) content
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length
- True width is estimated, not directly measured
Evidence · table
“15.70”
Context: 0.21
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver equivalent grade of 818.95 g/t AgEq is exceptionally high, well above the typical thresholds for polymetallic deposits.
Evidence · table
“818.95”
Context: 0.21
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards, and analysis by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the insertion of blanks and standards in all sample batches. QA samples inserted into the assay batches for holes reported here all passed analyses of blanks and certified reference standards. ... SVL Analytical, Inc. is a full-service environmental and geochemical laboratory and holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for Fire Assay and Geochemistry.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is unknown and estimated from 3D modeling, not directly measured.
Evidence · text
“Intercepts listed are drilled length; true thickness is unknown from current data and is estimated from 3D modeling at 50-60% of drilled length for BHD26-17, 18, and BHP26-22; 75% for BHP26-20; and 85-95% for BHP26-19, 21 and 24.”
Fact 18Bunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 499.89Grade Unit: g/t AgEqView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 499.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 300
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AgEq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: At a 300 g/t AgEq cut-off, the exploration target continues to show very high-grade material and substantial contained metal, indicating robust mineralization.
Positive factors
- Very high silver equivalent grade at a high cut-off
- Significant contained metal
- QP sign-off
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- This is an 'Exploration Target Estimate' and not a formal mineral resource
Evidence · table
“499.89”
Context: 90,694
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The document explicitly states this is an 'Exploration Target Estimate' and 'no mineral resource estimate exists for the Cate-8 Target', implying a conceptual or inferred level of confidence.
Evidence · text
“The Cate-8 Exploration Target Estimate (the “ Target Estimate, Cate-8 Target ”)”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The table clearly states the cut-off grade used for the estimate.
Evidence · table
“300”
Context: 499.89
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Sam Bourque, Chief Geologist of Bunker Hill, is the designated Qualified Person for this news release and has reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“Sam Bourque (AIPG CPG #11775), Chief Geologist of Bunker Hill, is the Company's designated Qualified Person for this news release within the meaning of NI 43-101. Mr. Bourque has reviewed and approved the technical information contained herein.”
Fact 19Bunker Hill MineView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The drawdown provides necessary liquidity for ongoing operations and mine ramp-up, which is positive for project execution, but it's from an existing facility rather than new capital.
Positive factors
- Provides additional financial flexibility
- Supports ongoing operations and ramp-up to commercial production
Negative factors
- Drawdown on existing facility, not new capital raised
- Indicates ongoing need for external funding
Evidence · text
“Bunker Hill also announces that it has drawn an additional US$2,000,000 under the existing Standby Facility, provided to the Company by Teck Metals Ltd.”
BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHD26-17
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHD26-17:317.5-330
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: BHD26-17
BHD26-17Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 3.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHD26-17
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.5 m
- From
- 317.5 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHD26-17:317.5-330
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.17 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 39.6 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.17”
Context: BHD26-17
includingBunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 323 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:323-330
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: including
includingBunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 323 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:323-330
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.36 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 30.5 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.36”
Context: including
includingBunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 162.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 162.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 323 m
- To
- 330 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:323-330
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 162.96 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1140.7 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“162.96”
Context: including
BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 5.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-19
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 208 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-19:203-208
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.93 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 29.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.93”
Context: BHP26-19
BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-19
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 208 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-19:203-208
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.88”
Context: BHP26-19
BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-19
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 237.5 m
- To
- 240.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: BHP26-19
BHP26-19Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 5.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-19
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 237.5 m
- To
- 240.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-19:237.5-240.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.93 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 17.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.93”
Context: BHP26-19
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 158.7 m
- To
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.69 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 14.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.69 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: BHP26-21
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 158.7 m
- To
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:158.7-167.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.08 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 35.9 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.08”
Context: BHP26-21
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.8 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: BHP26-21
BHP26-21Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-21
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.8 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-21:226.8-237.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.07 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 22.4 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.07”
Context: BHP26-21
IncludingBunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 227.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:226.8-227.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: Including
IncludingBunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 27.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 227.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:226.8-227.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27.8 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 16.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 27.8 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27.80”
Context: Including
IncludingBunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 380.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 380.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 226.8 m
- To
- 227.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:226.8-227.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 380.57 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 228.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 380.57 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“380.57”
Context: Including
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 320.5 m
- To
- 326.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.99 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.99 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: BHP26-22
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 320.5 m
- To
- 326.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:320.5-326.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.44 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 21.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.44”
Context: BHP26-22
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 337.3 m
- To
- 343 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:337.3-343
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.43 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: BHP26-22
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 3.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.7 m
- From
- 337.3 m
- To
- 343 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:337.3-343
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.53 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 20.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.53”
Context: BHP26-22
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 355.4 m
- To
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:355.4-368
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.88 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: BHP26-22
BHP26-22Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 2.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-22
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 12.6 m
- From
- 355.4 m
- To
- 368 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-22:355.4-368
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.85 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 35.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.85”
Context: BHP26-22
includingBunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 362.2 m
- To
- 365.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:362.2-365.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.25 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.25 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.25”
Context: including
includingBunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 6.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 362.2 m
- To
- 365.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:362.2-365.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.18 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.18 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.18”
Context: including
includingBunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 72.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 72.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 362.2 m
- To
- 365.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:362.2-365.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 72.69 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 218.1 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“72.69”
Context: including
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.8 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 209.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:202-209.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.50”
Context: BHP26-24
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.8 m
- From
- 202 m
- To
- 209.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:202-209.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.44 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 34.6 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.44”
Context: BHP26-24
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 234.2 m
- To
- 234.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.86 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.86”
Context: BHP26-24
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 41.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 234.2 m
- To
- 234.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:234.2-234.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41.1 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 28.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 41.1 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“41.10”
Context: BHP26-24
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:245.8-255
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.28 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: BHP26-24
BHP26-24Bunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 4.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BHP26-24
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.2 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BHP26-24:245.8-255
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.36 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 40.1 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.36”
Context: BHP26-24
includingBunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 249 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:245.8-249
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: including
includingBunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 10.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 249 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:245.8-249
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.62 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 34.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.62 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.62”
Context: including
includingBunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 143.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- including
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 143.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 249 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- including:245.8-249
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 143.79 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 460.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“143.79”
Context: including
which includesBunker Hill Mine · zincGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- which includes
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- which includes:245.8-246.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: which includes
which includesBunker Hill Mine · leadGrade: 33.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- which includes
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- which includes:245.8-246.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.4 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 33.4 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33.40”
Context: which includes
which includesBunker Hill Mine · silverGrade: 538.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- which includes
- Project
- Bunker Hill Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- BNKR
Geometry
- Grade
- 538.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 245.8 m
- To
- 246.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- which includes:245.8-246.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 538.29 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 376.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 538.29 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“538.29”
Context: which includes
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.