Bullion Gold obtient 22,2 g/t Au + 24,5 g/t Ag sur 1 mètre dans la rainure R21 à Terragold
Original announcement by newsfile on
- Company
- Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp.
- Ticker
- BGD
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Québec
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-09 18:47:57 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp. has announced high-grade surface trenching results at its Terragold project in Quebec, highlighted by a 22.2 g/t Au and 24.5 g/t Ag intercept over 1.0 metre in trench R21. The results validate historical high-grade drill intersections and support the project's exploration potential in the Abitibi greenstone belt.
Reasoning: The release reports a bonanza-grade gold intercept (22.2 g/t) in a surface trenching program, providing tangible proof of mineralization at the Terragold project.
Positive factors
- High-grade surface intercepts
- QA/QC disclosed
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The 22.2 g/t Au intercept is exceptionally high grade.
Evidence · text
“22,20 g/t Au + 24,50 g/t Ag sur 1,0 mètre”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions certified AGAT labs and specific QA/QC protocols including standards, blanks, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“Les échantillons de rainures ont été préparés et analysés par les Laboratoires AGAT... certifié ISO/IEC 17025.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true widths are currently unknown for the trenching results.
Evidence · text
“Les largeurs véritables sont inconnues pour le moment.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Suzie Tremblay, a member of the Ordre des géologues du Québec, has reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“L'information scientifique et technique divulguée dans ce communiqué a été examinée et approuvée par Mme Suzie Tremblay”
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("CIP")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (4)
R21Terragold · goldGrade: 22.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- R21
- Project
- Terragold
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- R21:0.0-1.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Est
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 22.2 g/t Au is an exceptional grade for this deposit type.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“22,20 g/t Au + 24,50 g/t Ag sur 1,0 mètre”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
R21Terragold · silverGrade: 24.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- R21
- Project
- Terragold
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- R21:0.0-1.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Est
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High silver grade accompanying gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“22,20 g/t Au + 24,50 g/t Ag sur 1,0 mètre”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
R21Terragold · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- R21
- Project
- Terragold
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- R21:0.0-9.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Est
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Solid gold grade over a significant width in a trench.
Evidence · text
“2,80 g/t Au + 3,65 g/t Ag sur 9,6 mètres dans la rainure R21”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
R21Terragold · silverGrade: 3.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- R21
- Project
- Terragold
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
- Group ID
- R21:0.0-9.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Est
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver byproduct in the main R21 intercept.
Evidence · text
“2,80 g/t Au + 3,65 g/t Ag sur 9,6 mètres dans la rainure R21”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.