Bullion Gold Launches Surface Exploration Programs at BODO and Langlade Projects

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp.
Ticker
BGD
Exchange
TSX
Region
Québec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver, Zinc, Cobalt
Document categories
Drill results, Other, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-21 10:24:38 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp. has launched surface exploration programs at its BODO and Langlade projects in Québec. The company reported new drill results from the Langlade project, with several holes showing polymetallic mineralization, including a 4.0m intercept at 1.22% CuEq and a 0.5m intercept at 2.32% CuEq. Additionally, high-grade surface rock samples were reported from the BODO project, with values up to 15.20% Cu, 6.85 g/t Au, and 137.00 g/t Ag.

Reasoning: The company announced new surface exploration programs and reported new drill results from Langlade and high-grade surface samples from BODO, indicating continued exploration activity and potential, despite some drill holes returning no significant assays and a lack of recovery adjustments in the CuEq calculation.

Positive factors

  • New drill results reported with polymetallic mineralization, including some higher-grade intercepts.
  • High-grade surface samples from BODO project indicate potential.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, and a Qualified Person has approved the technical information.
  • True width estimation is provided for drill intercepts.

Negative factors

  • Several drill holes returned no significant assays, indicating barren sections.
  • Metal equivalent calculation explicitly states no adjustments for metal recoveries, which can overstate economic value.
  • Surface sampling results are early-stage exploration and require follow-up drilling.

Facts used in scoring: 112

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states: 'True thickness is estimated at approximately 80-85% of core length, depending on the angles of deviation.'

Evidence · text

“True thickness is estimated at approximately 80-85% of core length, depending on the angles of deviation.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including sending samples to AGAT Laboratories, assay methods (fire assay, four-acid digestion, ICP-OES, ICP-MS, Na₂O₂ fusion), and insertion of preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks.

Evidence · text

“Core samples were split in half, and one half was sent to AGAT Laboratories in Val-d'Or for analysis. Gold was analyzed by fire assay (50 g) with atomic absorption finish, while base metals were analyzed by four-acid digestion with ICP-OES finish. A separate fraction is prepared to independently analyze mineralized intervals with target grades greater than 1.00% Cu-Zn using Na₂O₂ fusion with ICP-OES or ICP-MS finish. Preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks are inserted into the sample stream.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Ms. Suzie Tremblay, a member of the Ordre des géologues du Québec (OGQ No. 10664), is identified as a 'Qualified Person' within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information disclosed in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Ms. Suzie Tremblay, a member in good standing of the Ordre des géologues du Québec (OGQ No. 10664), who is a "Qualified Person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: The CuEq calculation explicitly states that 'no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries', which reduces the transparency and reliability of the equivalent grade.

Evidence · text

“no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries”

Exploration Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The drilling program targeted a prospective area for a potential extension of mineralization, indicating an exploration focus rather than resource definition.

Evidence · text

“The program targeted a prospective area for a potential extension of mineralization.”

Surface Samplingneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The BODO project program includes 'stripping, rock sampling, channel sampling and geological mapping', which are surface exploration activities.

Evidence · text

“BODO project - Rivon Lake area: stripping, rock sampling, channel sampling and geological mapping”

No Significant Assaysnegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Drill holes LAN-26-34, LAN-26-35, and LAN-26-36 are explicitly reported as having 'No significant assays'.

Evidence · table

“No significant assays”

Context: LAN-26-34

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 9 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 112. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (76)

LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
37.9 m
True Width
30.32 m
From
107.6 m
To
145.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 37.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 30.32

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
37.9 m
True Width
30.32 m
From
107.6 m
To
145.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 37.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 30.32

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.9 m
True Width
30.32 m
From
107.6 m
To
145.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 37.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 30.32

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 7.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
7.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
37.9 m
True Width
30.32 m
From
107.6 m
To
145.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“7.38”

Context: 37.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 30.32

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
True Width
3.2 m
From
114 m
To
118 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:114-118

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
True Width
3.2 m
From
114 m
To
118 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:114-118

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A higher-grade zinc sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
True Width
3.2 m
From
114 m
To
118 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:114-118

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 14.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
14.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
True Width
3.2 m
From
114 m
To
118 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:114-118

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade slightly below prior best, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“14.35”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
120 m
To
121 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:120-121

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
120 m
To
121 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:120-121

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below average for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
120 m
To
121 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:120-121

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
17.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
120 m
To
121 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:120-121

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade consistent with prior results, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“17.60”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
122 m
To
123 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:122-123

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
122 m
To
123 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:122-123

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
122 m
To
123 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:122-123

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is extremely low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is extremely low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 24.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
24.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
122 m
To
123 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:122-123

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported with a strong silver grade, exceeding prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with strong silver grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“24.60”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:136-136.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow, higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.96”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:136-136.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:136-136.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 14.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
14.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
136 m
To
136.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:136-136.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade consistent with prior results, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“14.80”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
139.5 m
To
142.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
139.5 m
To
142.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
139.5 m
To
142.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 24.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-29
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
24.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
139.5 m
To
142.5 m
Intercept Depth
107.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported with a strong silver grade, exceeding prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with strong silver grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“24.55”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.5 m
True Width
5.2 m
From
98.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:98.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate copper grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.5 m
True Width
5.2 m
From
98.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:98.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate zinc grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
True Width
5.2 m
From
98.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:98.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 13.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
13.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
True Width
5.2 m
From
98.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:98.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade consistent with prior results, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“13.16”

Context: 6.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
99 m
To
99.5 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:99-99.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow, higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
99 m
To
99.5 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:99-99.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate zinc grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
99 m
To
99.5 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:99-99.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported with a strong gold grade, exceeding prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with strong gold grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 36.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
36.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.4 m
From
99 m
To
99.5 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:99-99.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported with an exceptional silver grade, exceeding prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with exceptional silver grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“36.10”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
True Width
2 m
From
102.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:102.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
True Width
2 m
From
102.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:102.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate zinc grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
True Width
2 m
From
102.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:102.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 19.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-30
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
19.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
True Width
2 m
From
102.5 m
To
105 m
Intercept Depth
98.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-30:102.5-105

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported with a strong silver grade, exceeding prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with strong silver grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“19.90”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.9 m
True Width
17.52 m
From
64.5 m
To
86.4 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.52

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
21.9 m
True Width
17.52 m
From
64.5 m
To
86.4 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.52

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
True Width
17.52 m
From
64.5 m
To
86.4 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.52

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
4.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
True Width
17.52 m
From
64.5 m
To
86.4 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“4.68”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.52

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
66 m
To
67.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:66-67.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below average for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
2.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
66 m
To
67.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:66-67.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported with a strong zinc grade, close to prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with strong zinc grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“2.35”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
66 m
To
67.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:66-67.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
66 m
To
67.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:66-67.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.15
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade consistent with prior results, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“10.70”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
70 m
To
71.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:70-71.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
70 m
To
71.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:70-71.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate zinc grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
70 m
To
71.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:70-71.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is extremely low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is extremely low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-31
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
13.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
70 m
To
71.2 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-31:70-71.2

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade consistent with prior results, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“13.50”

Context: 1.2

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.96

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
4.4 m
From
64.5 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-80

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
4.4 m
From
64.5 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-80

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
4.4 m
From
64.5 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-80

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is extremely low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is extremely low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.5 m
True Width
4.4 m
From
64.5 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-80

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“4.00”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.64 m
From
64.5 m
To
65.3 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow, higher-grade copper sub-interval was reported, showing improved grades within the broader intercept, though CuEq lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • Higher-grade sub-interval reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.64

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.64 m
From
64.5 m
To
65.3 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.64

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.64 m
From
64.5 m
To
65.3 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.64

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 34.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
34.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.64 m
From
64.5 m
To
65.3 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.92
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported with an exceptional silver grade, exceeding prior best, though the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported with exceptional silver grade.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“34.4”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.64

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.5 m
True Width
9.2 m
From
91 m
To
102.5 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:91-102.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 9.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11.5 m
True Width
9.2 m
From
91 m
To
102.5 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:91-102.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 9.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.5 m
True Width
9.2 m
From
91 m
To
102.5 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:91-102.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 9.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
2.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.5 m
True Width
9.2 m
From
91 m
To
102.5 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:91-102.5

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.33
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“2.92”

Context: 11.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 9.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
93 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:93-94

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate copper grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is moderate for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
93 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:93-94

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate zinc grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is moderate for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
93 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:93-94

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-32
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
7.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.8 m
From
93 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
64.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-32:93-94

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“7.40”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.8

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22 m
True Width
17.6 m
From
68 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:68-90

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the copper grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22 m
True Width
17.6 m
From
68 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:68-90

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
True Width
17.6 m
From
68 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:68-90

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 5.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
5.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
True Width
17.6 m
From
68 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:68-90

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“5.05”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 17.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
73.6 m
To
75.6 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate copper grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
73.6 m
To
75.6 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is modest for a VMS deposit, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below average for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
73.6 m
To
75.6 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the gold grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 11.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
11.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
True Width
1.6 m
From
73.6 m
To
75.6 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A new polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with silver grade consistent with prior results, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“11.97”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.2 m
From
85.5 m
To
87 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:85.5-87

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate copper grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is moderate for VMS copper deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.2 m
From
85.5 m
To
87 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:85.5-87

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the zinc grade is very low, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is very low for VMS zinc deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.2 m
From
85.5 m
To
87 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:85.5-87

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, with moderate gold grade, though CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is moderate for gold.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LAN-26-33
Project
Langlade
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
BGD

Geometry

Grade
6.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.2 m
From
85.5 m
To
87 m
Intercept Depth
68 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LAN-26-33:85.5-87

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow polymetallic drill intercept was reported, but the silver grade is modest, and the CuEq calculation lacks recovery adjustments.

Positive factors

  • New drill intercept reported.
  • True width estimated.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Grade is below average for VMS silver deposits.
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for recoveries.

Evidence · table

“6.70”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.2

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metallurgical Results (36)

Fact 1BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671605

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“6.85”

Context: F671605

Fact 2BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671605

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade silver surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“63.00”

Context: F671605

Fact 3BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671605

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“2.82”

Context: F671605

Fact 4BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671605

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“116”

Context: F671605

Fact 5BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671606

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“4.14”

Context: F671606

Fact 6BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671606

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result with very low grade.

Positive factors

  • Silver presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is very low for silver.

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: F671606

Fact 7BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671606

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, though it is an early-stage result with extremely low grade.

Positive factors

  • Copper presence in surface sample reported.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is extremely low for copper.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: F671606

Fact 8BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671606

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, though it is an early-stage result with low grade.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is low for cobalt.

Evidence · table

“28”

Context: F671606

Fact 9BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671613

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: F671613

Fact 10BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671613

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Silver presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: F671613

Fact 11BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671613

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“1.38”

Context: F671613

Fact 12BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671613

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“61”

Context: F671613

Fact 13BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671616

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: F671616

Fact 14BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671616

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Silver presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“16.10”

Context: F671616

Fact 15BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671616

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“2.21”

Context: F671616

Fact 16BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671616

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“72”

Context: F671616

Fact 17BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671617

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“2.53”

Context: F671617

Fact 18BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671617

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional silver grade in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“137.00”

Context: F671617

Fact 19BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671617

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional copper grade in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“15.20”

Context: F671617

Fact 20BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671617

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High cobalt presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“577”

Context: F671617

Fact 21BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671703

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“4.17”

Context: F671703

Fact 22BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671703

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result with very low grade.

Positive factors

  • Silver presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is very low for silver.

Evidence · table

“5.90”

Context: F671703

Fact 23BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671703

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Copper presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result with very low grade.

Positive factors

  • Copper presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is very low for copper.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: F671703

Fact 24BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671703

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“52”

Context: F671703

Fact 25BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671707

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: F671707

Fact 26BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671707

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade silver surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“69.40”

Context: F671707

Fact 27BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671707

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“3.96”

Context: F671707

Fact 28BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671707

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“215”

Context: F671707

Fact 29BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671713

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence in surface sample reported.
  • Indicates exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: F671713

Fact 30BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671713

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade silver surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“66.00”

Context: F671713

Fact 31BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671713

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“3.22”

Context: F671713

Fact 32BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671713

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, though it is an early-stage result with very low grade.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is very low for cobalt.

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: F671713

Fact 33BODO · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671714

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade gold surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: F671714

Fact 34BODO · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671714

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade silver surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“62.40”

Context: F671714

Fact 35BODO · copperView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671714

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade copper surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating strong exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper surface sample reported.
  • Indicates strong exploration potential.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.

Evidence · table

“6.83”

Context: F671714

Fact 36BODO · cobaltView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
BODO
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Québec
Ticker
BGD

Test Work

Sample
F671714

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Cobalt presence in a surface sample was reported from the BODO project, indicating exploration potential, though it is an early-stage result with low grade.

Positive factors

  • Cobalt presence in surface sample reported.

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface sample, not drill results.
  • Grade is low for cobalt.

Evidence · table

“20”

Context: F671714

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.