Bullion Gold Launches Surface Exploration Programs at BODO and Langlade Projects
Original announcement by newsfile on
- Company
- Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp.
- Ticker
- BGD
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Québec
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Zinc, Gold, Silver, Cobalt
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 11:08:15 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp. has launched surface exploration programs at its BODO and Langlade projects in Québec. The company reported polymetallic drill results from the Langlade project, with several intercepts showing good copper equivalent grades, including high-grade sub-intervals. Additionally, high-grade rock sample highlights from the BODO project were released, indicating significant gold, silver, copper, and cobalt mineralization.
Reasoning: Bullion Gold Discoveries Corp. announced new surface exploration programs and reported promising polymetallic drill results from Langlade and high-grade surface sample highlights from BODO, indicating significant mineralization, despite some drill holes yielding no significant assays.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic intercepts in drill holes
- High-grade surface samples from BODO project
- Launch of new surface exploration programs
- QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP sign-off
- True width estimation provided for drill results
Negative factors
- Some drill holes returned no significant assays
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Facts used in scoring: 112
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions AGAT Laboratories, fire assay, four-acid digestion, ICP-OES, preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks, indicating QA/QC procedures.
Evidence · text
“Core samples were split in half, and one half was sent to AGAT Laboratories in Val-d'Or for analysis. Gold was analyzed by fire assay (50 g) with atomic absorption finish, while base metals were analyzed by four-acid digestion with ICP-OES finish. A separate fraction is prepared to independently analyze mineralized intervals with target grades greater than 1.00% Cu-Zn using Na₂O₂ fusion with ICP-OES or ICP-MS finish. Preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks are inserted into the sample stream.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Ms. Suzie Tremblay, a member of the Ordre des géologues du Québec (OGQ No. 10664), is named as a 'Qualified Person' and has reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“The scientific and technical information disclosed in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Ms. Suzie Tremblay, a member in good standing of the Ordre des géologues du Québec (OGQ No. 10664), who is a "Qualified Person" within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: The CuEq calculation is provided with metal prices and formula, but explicitly states 'no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries'.
Evidence · table
“no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries”
Context: The CuEq calculation is based on metal prices of US$4,684/oz Au, US$75.55/oz Ag, US$5.963/lb Cu, and US$1.556/lb Zn. CuEq = (Cu ppm + (Ag g/t × 184.771) + (Au g/t × 11,455.5) + (Zn ppm × 0.26094)) / 10,000. CuEq is used to calculate cut-off grades for exploration purposes, and no adjustments have been made for metal recoveries.
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The reported widths correspond to core lengths, and true thickness is estimated at approximately 80-85% of core length, meaning only apparent width is directly reported.
Evidence · table
“The reported widths correspond to core lengths. True thickness is estimated at approximately 80-85% of core length, depending on the angles of deviation.”
Context: The reported widths correspond to core lengths. True thickness is estimated at approximately 80-85% of core length, depending on the angles of deviation.
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 112. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (112)
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 37.9 m intercept at 0.21% Cu (0.45% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 37.9 m intercept at 0.22% Zn (0.45% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 37.9 m intercept at 0.05 g/t Au (0.45% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 7.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37.9 m
- From
- 107.6 m
- To
- 145.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:107.6-145.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 37.9 m intercept at 7.38 g/t Ag (0.45% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“7.38”
Context: 37.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 4.0 m at 0.60% Cu (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 4.0 m at 1.10% Zn (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 4.0 m at 0.06 g/t Au (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 14.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 114 m
- To
- 118 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:114-118
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 4.0 m at 14.35 g/t Ag (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“14.35”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.75% Cu (1.19% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.22% Zn (1.19% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.05 g/t Au (1.19% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 120 m
- To
- 121 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:120-121
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 17.60 g/t Ag (1.19% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“17.60”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.72% Cu (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.14% Zn (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.01 g/t Au (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 24.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 122 m
- To
- 123 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:122-123
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.0 m at 24.60 g/t Ag (1.22% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“24.60”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 0.96% Cu (1.40% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.96”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 0.09% Zn (1.40% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 0.12 g/t Au (1.40% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 14.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:136-136.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 14.80 g/t Ag (1.40% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“14.80”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 3.0 m at 0.18% Cu (0.82% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · zincGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 3.0 m at 0.08% Zn (0.82% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 3.0 m at 0.14 g/t Au (0.82% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-29Langlade · silverGrade: 24.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-29
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 139.5 m
- To
- 142.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 107.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-29:139.5-142.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 3.0 m at 24.55 g/t Ag (0.82% CuEq) within LAN-26-29, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“24.55”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.5 m intercept at 0.35% Cu (0.80% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.5 m intercept at 0.37% Zn (0.80% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.5 m intercept at 0.09 g/t Au (0.80% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 13.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 98.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:98.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.5 m intercept at 13.16 g/t Ag (0.80% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“13.16”
Context: 6.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 0.81% Cu (2.32% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 0.75% Zn (2.32% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 0.56 g/t Au (2.32% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 36.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 99 m
- To
- 99.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:99-99.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.5 m at 36.10 g/t Ag (2.32% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“36.10”
Context: 0.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · copperGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 2.5 m at 0.54% Cu (1.16% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 2.5 m at 0.51% Zn (1.16% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 2.5 m at 0.10 g/t Au (1.16% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-30Langlade · silverGrade: 19.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-30
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 102.5 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 98.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-30:102.5-105
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.16
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 2.5 m at 19.90 g/t Ag (1.16% CuEq) within LAN-26-30, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“19.90”
Context: 2.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 21.9 m intercept at 0.20% Cu (0.42% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 21.9 m intercept at 0.30% Zn (0.42% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 21.9 m intercept at 0.05 g/t Au (0.42% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 86.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:64.5-86.4
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.42
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 21.9 m intercept at 4.68 g/t Ag (0.42% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“4.68”
Context: 21.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 0.29% Cu (1.15% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 2.35% Zn (1.15% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“2.35”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 0.05 g/t Au (1.15% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:66-67.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.15
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 10.70 g/t Ag (1.15% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“10.70”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 0.64% Cu (1.35% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · zincGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 1.16% Zn (1.35% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 0.03 g/t Au (1.35% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-31Langlade · silverGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-31
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 70 m
- To
- 71.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-31:70-71.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.35
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.2 m at 13.50 g/t Ag (1.35% CuEq) within LAN-26-31, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“13.50”
Context: 1.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 5.5 m intercept at 0.12% Cu (0.27% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 5.5 m intercept at 0.14% Zn (0.27% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 5.5 m intercept at 0.03 g/t Au (0.27% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-80
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 5.5 m intercept at 4.00 g/t Ag (0.27% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: 5.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.8 m at 1.15% Cu (1.92% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.8 m at 0.18% Zn (1.92% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.8 m at 0.08 g/t Au (1.92% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 34.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 64.5 m
- To
- 65.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:64.5-65.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 0.8 m at 34.4 g/t Ag (1.92% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Excellent copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“34.4”
Context: 0.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 11.5 m intercept at 0.16% Cu (0.33% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 11.5 m intercept at 0.12% Zn (0.33% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 11.5 m intercept at 0.07 g/t Au (0.33% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 2.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 102.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:91-102.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 11.5 m intercept at 2.92 g/t Ag (0.33% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“2.92”
Context: 11.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.48% Cu (0.89% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · zincGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.58% Zn (0.89% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 1.0 m at 0.10 g/t Au (0.89% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-32Langlade · silverGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-32
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 94 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-32:93-94
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 1.0 m at 7.40 g/t Ag (0.89% CuEq) within LAN-26-32, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“7.40”
Context: 1.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 22.0 m intercept at 0.20% Cu (0.41% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 22.0 m intercept at 0.15% Zn (0.41% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 22.0 m intercept at 0.06 g/t Au (0.41% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 5.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:68-90
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 22.0 m intercept at 5.05 g/t Ag (0.41% CuEq) from the Langlade project, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic intercept with copper equivalent grade
- Good intercept length for exploration
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“5.05”
Context: 22.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 2.0 m at 0.49% Cu (0.85% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 2.0 m at 0.26% Zn (0.85% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 2.0 m at 0.05 g/t Au (0.85% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 11.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 73.6 m
- To
- 75.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:73.6-75.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A sub-interval of 2.0 m at 11.97 g/t Ag (0.85% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic sub-interval with copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“11.97”
Context: 2.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.5 m at 0.34% Cu (1.02% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.5 m at 0.11% Zn (1.02% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.5 m at 0.46 g/t Au (1.02% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LAN-26-33Langlade · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LAN-26-33
- Project
- Langlade
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 85.5 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LAN-26-33:85.5-87
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval of 1.5 m at 6.70 g/t Ag (1.02% CuEq) within LAN-26-33, indicating significant polymetallic mineralization, with true width estimated at 80-85% of core length.
Positive factors
- High-grade polymetallic sub-interval
- Good copper equivalent grade
Negative factors
- Metal equivalent calculation does not adjust for metal recoveries
Evidence · table
“6.70”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 77BODO · goldGrade: 6.85Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 6.85 g/t Au, indicating significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“6.85”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 78BODO · silverGrade: 63Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 63.00 g/t Ag, indicating significant silver mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“63.00”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 79BODO · copperGrade: 2.82Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.82
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 2.82% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“2.82”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 80BODO · cobaltGrade: 116Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 116
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 116 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“116”
Context: F671605
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 81BODO · goldGrade: 4.14Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 4.14 g/t Au, indicating significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“4.14”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 82BODO · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 1.30 g/t Ag, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 83BODO · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 0.01% Cu, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 84BODO · cobaltGrade: 28Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 28
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 28 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“28”
Context: F671606
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 85BODO · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 0.65 g/t Au, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 86BODO · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 11.00 g/t Ag, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“11.00”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 87BODO · copperGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 1.38% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 88BODO · cobaltGrade: 61Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 61
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 61 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“61”
Context: F671613
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 89BODO · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 0.28 g/t Au, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 90BODO · silverGrade: 16.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 16.10 g/t Ag, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“16.10”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 91BODO · copperGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 2.21% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“2.21”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 92BODO · cobaltGrade: 72Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 72
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 72 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“72”
Context: F671616
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 93BODO · goldGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 2.53 g/t Au, indicating significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 94BODO · silverGrade: 137Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 137
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 137.00 g/t Ag, indicating significant silver mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“137.00”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 95BODO · copperGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 15.20% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“15.20”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 96BODO · cobaltGrade: 577Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 577
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 577 ppm Co, indicating significant cobalt mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong cobalt grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“577”
Context: F671617
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 97BODO · goldGrade: 4.17Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 4.17 g/t Au, indicating significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“4.17”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 98BODO · silverGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 5.90 g/t Ag, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“5.90”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 99BODO · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 0.24% Cu, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 100BODO · cobaltGrade: 52Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 52
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 52 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“52”
Context: F671703
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 101BODO · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 0.58 g/t Au, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 102BODO · silverGrade: 69.4Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 69.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 69.40 g/t Ag, indicating significant silver mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“69.40”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 103BODO · copperGrade: 3.96Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.96
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 3.96% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“3.96”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 104BODO · cobaltGrade: 215Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 215
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 215 ppm Co, indicating significant cobalt mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong cobalt grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“215”
Context: F671707
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 105BODO · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 1.16 g/t Au, indicating significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 106BODO · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 66.00 g/t Ag, indicating significant silver mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“66.00”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 107BODO · copperGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 3.22% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 108BODO · cobaltGrade: 7Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 7 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: F671713
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 109BODO · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 2.20 g/t Au, indicating significant gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“2.20”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 110BODO · silverGrade: 62.4Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 62.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 62.40 g/t Ag, indicating significant silver mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“62.40”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 111BODO · copperGrade: 6.83Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.83
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade surface sample from the BODO project returned 6.83% Cu, indicating significant copper mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“6.83”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 112BODO · cobaltGrade: 20Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- BODO
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec
- Ticker
- BGD
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Rivon Lake area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- AGAT Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A surface sample from the BODO project returned 20 ppm Co, indicating polymetallic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence in surface sample
- Polymetallic mineralization
Evidence · table
“20”
Context: F671714
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.