BULGOLD Defines the 2.2km-Long BL Vein Corridor at the Lutila Gold Project

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
BULGOLD Inc.
Ticker
ZLTO.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Slovak Republic
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Arsenic, Antimony
Document categories
Drill results, Other, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-15 12:23:57 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

BULGOLD Inc. has defined a 2.2-kilometer-long BL Vein corridor at its Lutila Gold Project in the Slovak Republic, significantly expanding the project's prospective footprint. This definition is based on systematic mapping, prospecting, and synthesis of historical data, including low-grade gold intercepts from 2004-2006 drilling (e.g., 26.2m at 0.91g/t Au). Recent BULGOLD surface rock samples averaged 0.56g/t Au and showed strong pathfinder geochemistry, supporting a low-sulfidation epithermal model. While the reported drill results are historical and generally low-grade, the large scale of the new target indicates potential for future high-grade discoveries.

Reasoning: BULGOLD has defined a significant 2.2km-long BL Vein corridor, expanding the Lutila Gold Project's prospective area. This is supported by historical low-grade drill intercepts and robust surface geochemistry. While the historical drill grades are below typical economic thresholds for underground epithermal deposits and no new drilling was reported, the large scale of the target and the geological model provide future exploration potential.

Positive factors

  • Large structural trend defined (2.2km BL Vein corridor) significantly scales up prospective footprint
  • Historical drilling confirms gold mineralization, establishing subsurface presence
  • Robust surface geochemistry with gold and pathfinder elements supports epithermal model
  • Project located in an established European mining district with existing infrastructure
  • Exploration target for underground, high-grade gold and silver quartz veins
  • BULGOLD's current surface sampling includes QA/QC

Negative factors

  • All reported drill results are historical (2004-2006) and generally low-grade, falling below 'weak' thresholds for underground epithermal gold
  • No new drill assays reported in this release
  • QA/QC protocols for historical data are unknown and explicitly stated as unreliable
  • Cyanide use is prohibited in Slovakia, which could impact processing options for gold
  • Surface sample grades, while positive for surface, are not exceptional compared to global epithermal drill grades
  • True width not stated for historical drill intercepts

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 67

Classification and evidence

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 67. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (6)

KG-BL-1Lutila · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KG-BL-1
Project
Lutila
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
slovak republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.3 m
From
84.4 m
To
89.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
84.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KG-BL-1:84.4-89.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
345791
Northing
5391545
Elevation
508 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade intercept, below weak threshold for underground epithermal gold, with no QA/QC disclosure.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result
  • Low grade (1.26 g/t Au) for underground epithermal deposit (below weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au)
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 5.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Drill results are from 2004-2006 program, re-released in 2026.

Evidence · text

“Historical diamond drilling data from 2004 confirms low-grade gold (Au) mineralisation”

No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: The release explicitly states that no independent QA/QC protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes.

Evidence · text

“No independent quality assurance/quality control protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes and therefore the analytical results, data and information may be unreliable.”

Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

“significant intercepts calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off”

Internal Dilution DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated with a 2m maximum internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“2m maximum internal dilution”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: The vein structure contains minor stibnite (antimony sulfide) and surface samples show elevated arsenic and antimony.

Evidence · text

“minor stibnite (antimony sulfide)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intervals are given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The definition of the 2.2km BL Vein corridor extends the prospective footprint of the North East Block.

Evidence · text

“Delineating the 2.2-kilometre-long BL Vein target significantly scales up the prospective footprint of the North East Block.”
KG-BL-1Lutila · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KG-BL-1
Project
Lutila
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
slovak republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.2 m
From
97 m
To
123.2 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
84.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KG-BL-1:97-123.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
345791
Northing
5391545
Elevation
508 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade intercept, below weak threshold for underground epithermal gold, with no QA/QC disclosure.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result
  • Low grade (0.91 g/t Au) for underground epithermal deposit (below weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au)
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 26.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Drill results are from 2004-2006 program, re-released in 2026.

Evidence · text

“Historical diamond drilling data from 2004 confirms low-grade gold (Au) mineralisation”

No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: The release explicitly states that no independent QA/QC protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes.

Evidence · text

“No independent quality assurance/quality control protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes and therefore the analytical results, data and information may be unreliable.”

Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

“significant intercepts calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off”

Internal Dilution DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated with a 2m maximum internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“2m maximum internal dilution”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: The vein structure contains minor stibnite (antimony sulfide) and surface samples show elevated arsenic and antimony.

Evidence · text

“minor stibnite (antimony sulfide)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intervals are given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The definition of the 2.2km BL Vein corridor extends the prospective footprint of the North East Block.

Evidence · text

“Delineating the 2.2-kilometre-long BL Vein target significantly scales up the prospective footprint of the North East Block.”
KG-BL-1Lutila · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KG-BL-1
Project
Lutila
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
slovak republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m
From
138 m
To
143.1 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
84.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KG-BL-1:138-143.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
345791
Northing
5391545
Elevation
508 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade intercept, below weak threshold for underground epithermal gold, with no QA/QC disclosure.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result
  • Low grade (0.63 g/t Au) for underground epithermal deposit (below weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au)
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 5.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Drill results are from 2004-2006 program, re-released in 2026.

Evidence · text

“Historical diamond drilling data from 2004 confirms low-grade gold (Au) mineralisation”

No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: The release explicitly states that no independent QA/QC protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes.

Evidence · text

“No independent quality assurance/quality control protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes and therefore the analytical results, data and information may be unreliable.”

Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

“significant intercepts calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off”

Internal Dilution DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated with a 2m maximum internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“2m maximum internal dilution”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: The vein structure contains minor stibnite (antimony sulfide) and surface samples show elevated arsenic and antimony.

Evidence · text

“minor stibnite (antimony sulfide)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intervals are given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The definition of the 2.2km BL Vein corridor extends the prospective footprint of the North East Block.

Evidence · text

“Delineating the 2.2-kilometre-long BL Vein target significantly scales up the prospective footprint of the North East Block.”
KG-BL-2Lutila · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KG-BL-2
Project
Lutila
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
slovak republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.3 m
From
51.7 m
To
76 m
Hole Depth
220.8 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KG-BL-2:51.7-76
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
345684
Northing
5391551
Elevation
538 m
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade intercept, below weak threshold for underground epithermal gold, with no QA/QC disclosure.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result
  • Low grade (0.76 g/t Au) for underground epithermal deposit (below weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au)
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 24.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Drill results are from 2004-2006 program, re-released in 2026.

Evidence · text

“Historical diamond drilling data from 2004 confirms low-grade gold (Au) mineralisation”

No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: The release explicitly states that no independent QA/QC protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes.

Evidence · text

“No independent quality assurance/quality control protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes and therefore the analytical results, data and information may be unreliable.”

Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

“significant intercepts calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off”

Internal Dilution DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated with a 2m maximum internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“2m maximum internal dilution”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: The vein structure contains minor stibnite (antimony sulfide) and surface samples show elevated arsenic and antimony.

Evidence · text

“minor stibnite (antimony sulfide)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intervals are given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The definition of the 2.2km BL Vein corridor extends the prospective footprint of the North East Block.

Evidence · text

“Delineating the 2.2-kilometre-long BL Vein target significantly scales up the prospective footprint of the North East Block.”
KG-BL-2Lutila · goldGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KG-BL-2
Project
Lutila
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
slovak republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.7 m
From
156.3 m
To
168 m
Hole Depth
220.8 m
Intercept Depth
51.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KG-BL-2:156.3-168
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
345684
Northing
5391551
Elevation
538 m
Azimuth
120 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade intercept, below weak threshold for underground epithermal gold, with no QA/QC disclosure.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result
  • Low grade (0.94 g/t Au) for underground epithermal deposit (below weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au)
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 11.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Drill results are from 2004-2006 program, re-released in 2026.

Evidence · text

“Historical diamond drilling data from 2004 confirms low-grade gold (Au) mineralisation”

No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: The release explicitly states that no independent QA/QC protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes.

Evidence · text

“No independent quality assurance/quality control protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes and therefore the analytical results, data and information may be unreliable.”

Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

“significant intercepts calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off”

Internal Dilution DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated with a 2m maximum internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“2m maximum internal dilution”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: The vein structure contains minor stibnite (antimony sulfide) and surface samples show elevated arsenic and antimony.

Evidence · text

“minor stibnite (antimony sulfide)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intervals are given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The definition of the 2.2km BL Vein corridor extends the prospective footprint of the North East Block.

Evidence · text

“Delineating the 2.2-kilometre-long BL Vein target significantly scales up the prospective footprint of the North East Block.”
KG-BL-3Lutila · goldGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KG-BL-3
Project
Lutila
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
slovak republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Geometry

Grade
2.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.45 m
From
191.35 m
To
191.8 m
Hole Depth
350 m
Intercept Depth
191.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KG-BL-3:191.35-191.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
345891
Northing
5391387
Elevation
473 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic, antimony

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2004-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical low-grade and very narrow intercept, below weak threshold for underground epithermal gold, with no QA/QC disclosure.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result
  • Low grade (2.21 g/t Au) for underground epithermal deposit (below weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au)
  • Very narrow intercept (0.45m)
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data
  • Apparent width only, true width not stated

Evidence · table

“2.21”

Context: 0.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: Drill results are from 2004-2006 program, re-released in 2026.

Evidence · text

“Historical diamond drilling data from 2004 confirms low-grade gold (Au) mineralisation”

No QA/QC DisclosureRejected · negative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Reason: The release explicitly states that no independent QA/QC protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes.

Evidence · text

“No independent quality assurance/quality control protocols are known for these historic samples and drill holes and therefore the analytical results, data and information may be unreliable.”

Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off.

Evidence · text

“significant intercepts calculated using a 0.5g/t Au cut-off”

Internal Dilution DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: Intercepts are calculated with a 2m maximum internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“2m maximum internal dilution”

Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Reason: The vein structure contains minor stibnite (antimony sulfide) and surface samples show elevated arsenic and antimony.

Evidence · text

“minor stibnite (antimony sulfide)”

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: Intervals are given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation stated.

Evidence · table

“Interval (m)”

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The definition of the 2.2km BL Vein corridor extends the prospective footprint of the North East Block.

Evidence · text

“Delineating the 2.2-kilometre-long BL Vein target significantly scales up the prospective footprint of the North East Block.”

Metallurgical Results (61)

Fact 1Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5072

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391390
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Strong surface gold grade (4.44 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above strong threshold of 2 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“4.44”
Fact 2Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5072

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391390
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“36.8”
Fact 3Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5072

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391390
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“78”
Fact 4Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5072

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391390
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“444”
Fact 5Lutila Gold Project · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95705

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391447
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong surface gold grade from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Strong surface gold grade (3.9 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above strong threshold of 2 g/t Au for surface comparison)
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“3.90”
Fact 6Lutila Gold Project · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95705

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391447
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate surface silver grade from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface silver grade
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“28.9”
Fact 7Lutila Gold Project · arsenicView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95705

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391447
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface arsenic as a pathfinder from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“251”
Fact 8Lutila Gold Project · antimonyView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95705

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391447
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface antimony as a pathfinder from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“317”
Fact 9Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5071

Location

Easting
345731
Northing
5391370
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Strong surface gold grade (3.6 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above strong threshold of 2 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“3.60”
Fact 10Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5071

Location

Easting
345731
Northing
5391370
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“33.1”
Fact 11Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5071

Location

Easting
345731
Northing
5391370
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“49”
Fact 12Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5071

Location

Easting
345731
Northing
5391370
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“562”
Fact 13Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-64

Location

Easting
345775
Northing
5391409
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Strong surface gold grade (3.48 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above strong threshold of 2 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“3.48”
Fact 14Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-64

Location

Easting
345775
Northing
5391409
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“3”
Fact 15Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5070

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391360
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Strong surface gold grade (2.89 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above strong threshold of 2 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“2.89”
Fact 16Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5070

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391360
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“22”
Fact 17Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5070

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391360
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“69”
Fact 18Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5070

Location

Easting
345728
Northing
5391360
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“512”
Fact 19Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5073

Location

Easting
345727
Northing
5391405
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Strong surface gold grade (2.63 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 2.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“2.63”
Fact 20Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5073

Location

Easting
345727
Northing
5391405
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“26.5”
Fact 21Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5073

Location

Easting
345727
Northing
5391405
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“111”
Fact 22Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5073

Location

Easting
345727
Northing
5391405
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“264”
Fact 23Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5074

Location

Easting
345744
Northing
5391434
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (1.37 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“1.37”
Fact 24Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5074

Location

Easting
345744
Northing
5391434
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“22.8”
Fact 25Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5074

Location

Easting
345744
Northing
5391434
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“60”
Fact 26Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5074

Location

Easting
345744
Northing
5391434
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“439”
Fact 27Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5076

Location

Easting
345740
Northing
5391520
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (1.06 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above moderate threshold of 1 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“1.06”
Fact 28Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5076

Location

Easting
345740
Northing
5391520
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“12.5”
Fact 29Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5076

Location

Easting
345740
Northing
5391520
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“93”
Fact 30Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5076

Location

Easting
345740
Northing
5391520
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“568”
Fact 31Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5075

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391441
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (1.04 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above moderate threshold of 1 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“1.04”
Fact 32Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5075

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391441
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“6.8”
Fact 33Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5075

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391441
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“21”
Fact 34Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5075

Location

Easting
345737
Northing
5391441
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“277”
Fact 35Lutila Gold Project · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95987

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345770
Northing
5392315
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate surface gold grade from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.85 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“0.85”
Fact 36Lutila Gold Project · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95987

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345770
Northing
5392315
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low surface silver grade from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“11.4”
Fact 37Lutila Gold Project · arsenicView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95987

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345770
Northing
5392315
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface arsenic as a pathfinder from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“196”
Fact 38Lutila Gold Project · antimonyView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95987

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345770
Northing
5392315
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface antimony as a pathfinder from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“94”
Fact 39Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-79

Location

Easting
345787
Northing
5391570
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.75 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“0.75”
Fact 40Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-79

Location

Easting
345787
Northing
5391570
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“10.7”
Fact 41Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5077

Location

Easting
345751
Northing
5391583
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.64 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“0.64”
Fact 42Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5077

Location

Easting
345751
Northing
5391583
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“15.5”
Fact 43Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5077

Location

Easting
345751
Northing
5391583
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“56”
Fact 44Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5077

Location

Easting
345751
Northing
5391583
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“373”
Fact 45Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5080

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5392383
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.6 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“0.60”
Fact 46Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5080

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5392383
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“4.7”
Fact 47Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5080

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5392383
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“335”
Fact 48Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5080

Location

Easting
345781
Northing
5392383
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“104”
Fact 49Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5062

Location

Easting
345845
Northing
5390833
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.57 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“0.57”
Fact 50Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5062

Location

Easting
345845
Northing
5390833
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“2.1”
Fact 51Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5062

Location

Easting
345845
Northing
5390833
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“666”
Fact 52Lutila Gold Project · antimonyHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 5062

Location

Easting
345845
Northing
5390833
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface antimony as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“2,019”
Fact 53Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-65

Location

Easting
345797
Northing
5392371
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.57 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (above weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“0.57”
Fact 54Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-65

Location

Easting
345797
Northing
5392371
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“3”
Fact 55Lutila Gold Project · arsenicHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-65

Location

Easting
345797
Northing
5392371
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical surface arsenic as a pathfinder, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“654”
Fact 56Lutila Gold Project · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-80

Location

Easting
345787
Northing
5391570
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate historical surface gold grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Moderate surface gold grade (0.5 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (at weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“0.50”
Fact 57Lutila Gold Project · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID SL97-80

Location

Easting
345787
Northing
5391570
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low historical surface silver grade, but with no QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade

Negative factors

  • Historical sample with no specific date
  • No QA/QC disclosure for historical data

Evidence · table

“9”
Fact 58Lutila Gold Project · goldView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95984

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345792
Northing
5392392
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low surface gold grade from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Low surface gold grade (0.48 g/t Au) for epithermal deposit (at weak threshold of 0.5 g/t Au for surface comparison)
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“0.48”
Fact 59Lutila Gold Project · silverView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95984

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345792
Northing
5392392
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low surface silver grade from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Low surface silver grade
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“3.3”
Fact 60Lutila Gold Project · arsenicView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95984

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345792
Northing
5392392
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface arsenic as a pathfinder from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Arsenic as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“354”
Fact 61Lutila Gold Project · antimonyView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lutila Gold Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
slovak republic
Reported Region
Slovak Republic
Ticker
ZLTO.V

Test Work

Sample
SAMPLE ID 95984

Lab

Laboratory
SGS Burgas

Location

Easting
345792
Northing
5392392
CRS
UTM zone 34N
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Surface antimony as a pathfinder from current BULGOLD sampling with disclosed QA/QC.

Positive factors

  • Antimony as a pathfinder element supporting the epithermal model
  • QA/QC disclosed for current samples

Evidence · table

“87”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.