Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 m of 348 g/t Silver in Hole 449 at its Langis Project in Ontario

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
Brixton Metals Corporation
Ticker
BBB
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Ontario, Canada
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-06 13:05:31 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Brixton Metals announced high-grade to bonanza-grade silver drill results from 28 holes at its wholly-owned Langis Silver Project in Ontario, Canada. Key intercepts include 23.50 meters of 348 g/t silver, with sub-intervals up to 2.00 meters of 3,386 g/t silver, from hole LM-26-449. The company is accelerating its drilling program to establish a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate, with results extending known mineralization and confirming continuity across several zones.

Reasoning: Brixton Metals announced exceptional to bonanza-grade silver drill results from its Langis Project, with multiple intercepts exceeding 500 g/t Ag over significant widths. The results support the company's strategy to expand known mineralization and advance towards a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate, despite the lack of true width determinations for the reported intervals.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grades reported across multiple holes and zones, significantly exceeding exceptional thresholds for silver
  • Multiple wide intercepts with strong to exceptional grade-thickness products
  • Extension of known mineralization in the Shaft 6 South East area
  • High-density drilling strategy aimed at establishing a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure including certified lab and QP sign-off
  • Compositing parameters (cut-off grade, internal dilution) are transparently disclosed

Negative factors

  • True widths of mineralized intervals have not yet been determined, potentially overstating actual thickness
  • Some holes returned no significant intercepts, indicating variability or limits to mineralization continuity
  • Mineralization in S6-E is being intersected at greater depths, leading to a decision to move to shallower zones

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 47

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 47. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (47)

LM-26-419Langis · silverGrade: 54.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-419
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
54.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
140 m
To
142 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
140 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-419:140-142
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607550
Northing
5270728
Elevation
216.9 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall understanding of the mineralized zone.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“54.80”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-421Langis · silverGrade: 137.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-421
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
137.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.3 m
From
135.7 m
To
144 m
Hole Depth
258 m
Intercept Depth
135.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-421:135.7-144
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607451
Northing
5270726
Elevation
217 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept demonstrates strong silver mineralization over a moderate width, contributing positively to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade over a moderate width (8.3m at 137.45 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 1142 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“137.45”

Context: 8.30

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-421Langis · silverGrade: 343.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-421
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
343.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.95 m
From
137.05 m
To
140 m
Hole Depth
258 m
Intercept Depth
135.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-421:137.05-140
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607451
Northing
5270726
Elevation
217 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within LM-26-421 shows strong silver mineralization, contributing to the overall positive results.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (343.14 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (2.95m)
  • GT product of 1012 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“343.14”

Context: 2.95

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-421Langis · silverGrade: 140Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-421
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
140
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
150.45 m
To
150.95 m
Hole Depth
258 m
Intercept Depth
135.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-421:150.45-150.95
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607451
Northing
5270726
Elevation
217 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (140 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“140.00”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-421Langis · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-421
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
155 m
To
156 m
Hole Depth
258 m
Intercept Depth
135.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-421:155-156
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607451
Northing
5270726
Elevation
217 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (100 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“100.00”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-427Langis · silverGrade: 95.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-427
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
95.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
179 m
To
185 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
179 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-427:179-185
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607429
Northing
5270760
Elevation
217 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization in the zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade over a narrow width (6.0m at 95.55 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“95.55”

Context: 6.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-427Langis · silverGrade: 987Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-427
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
987
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
182 m
To
182.5 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
179 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-427:182-182.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607429
Northing
5270760
Elevation
217 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval within LM-26-427 shows exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (987 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 493.5 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“987.00”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 987 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.

Evidence · table

“987.00”

Context: 0.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-449Langis · silverGrade: 348.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-449
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
348.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23.5 m
From
203 m
To
226.5 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-449:203-226.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607559
Northing
5270725
Elevation
216.9 m
Azimuth
96 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly significant intercept with exceptional silver grade over a substantial width, representing a key highlight of the drilling program and contributing strongly to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (348.11 g/t Ag) over a strong width (23.5m)
  • GT product of 8180.585 g/t·m is exceptional
  • Main intercept highlighted in the release

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“348.11”

Context: 23.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 348.11 g/t is strong, and the GT product of 8180.585 g/t·m is exceptional, indicating a very high-value intercept.

Evidence · table

“348.11”

Context: 23.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-449Langis · silverGrade: 67.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-449
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
67.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
206.15 m
To
206.65 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-449:206.15-206.65
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607559
Northing
5270725
Elevation
216.9 m
Azimuth
96 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (67.6 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“67.60”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-449Langis · silverGrade: 129.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-449
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
129.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
212 m
To
213 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-449:212-213
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607559
Northing
5270725
Elevation
216.9 m
Azimuth
96 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (129.6 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“129.60”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-449Langis · silverGrade: 1974.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-449
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
1974.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
215 m
To
219 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-449:215-219
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607559
Northing
5270725
Elevation
216.9 m
Azimuth
96 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within LM-26-449 shows exceptional silver grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the high-grade nature of the overall intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (1,974.88 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (4.0m)
  • GT product of 7899.52 g/t·m is exceptional

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“1,974.88”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,974.88 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is exceptional.

Evidence · table

“1,974.88”

Context: 4.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-449Langis · silverGrade: 3386.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-449
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
3386.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
215.5 m
To
217.5 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
203 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-449:215.5-217.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-SE
Easting
607559
Northing
5270725
Elevation
216.9 m
Azimuth
96 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within LM-26-449 represents a bonanza-grade silver intercept, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (3,386.25 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (2.0m)
  • GT product of 6772.5 g/t·m is exceptional
  • Described as native silver, indicating high-quality mineralization

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“3,386.25”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 3,386.25 g/t is extremely high, well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is exceptional.

Evidence · table

“3,386.25”

Context: 2.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-429Langis · silverGrade: 95.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-429
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
95.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.35 m
From
181.65 m
To
188 m
Hole Depth
249 m
Intercept Depth
181.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-429:181.65-188
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607624
Northing
5270839
Elevation
220.8 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization in the zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade over a narrow width (6.35m at 95.35 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“95.35”

Context: 6.35

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-429Langis · silverGrade: 289Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-429
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
289
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
186 m
To
188 m
Hole Depth
249 m
Intercept Depth
181.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-429:186-188
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607624
Northing
5270839
Elevation
220.8 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-429 shows strong silver mineralization, contributing to the overall positive results.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (289 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (2.0m)
  • GT product of 578 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“289.00”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-431Langis · silverGrade: 240Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-431
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
240
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
227.7 m
To
228.25 m
Hole Depth
252 m
Intercept Depth
227.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-431:227.7-228.25
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607624
Northing
5270839
Elevation
220.8 m
Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow intercept shows strong silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (240 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.55m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“240.00”

Context: 0.55

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-433Langis · silverGrade: 85.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-433
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
85.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.5 m
From
192.5 m
To
203 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-433:192.5-203
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607618
Northing
5270819
Elevation
219.9 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver mineralization over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization in the zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade over a moderate width (10.5m at 85.74 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“85.74”

Context: 10.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-433Langis · silverGrade: 346.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-433
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
346.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
From
196.25 m
To
198.6 m
Hole Depth
276 m
Intercept Depth
192.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-433:196.25-198.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607618
Northing
5270819
Elevation
219.9 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-433 shows strong silver mineralization, contributing to the overall positive results.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (346.69 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (2.35m)
  • GT product of 814.72 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“346.69”

Context: 2.35

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-441Langis · silverGrade: 11.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-441
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
11.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.2 m
From
210 m
To
217.2 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
210 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-441:210-217.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607638
Northing
5270772
Elevation
219.5 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the zone but not a highlight.

Negative factors

  • Weak silver grade (11.55 g/t Ag)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“11.55”

Context: 7.20

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-441Langis · silverGrade: 61.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-441
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
61.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
214.5 m
To
215 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
210 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-441:214.5-215
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607638
Northing
5270772
Elevation
219.5 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (61.4 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“61.40”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-441Langis · silverGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-441
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
10.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.75 m
From
221 m
To
228.75 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
210 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-441:221-228.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607638
Northing
5270772
Elevation
219.5 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the zone but not a highlight.

Negative factors

  • Weak silver grade (10.8 g/t Ag)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“10.80”

Context: 7.75

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-441Langis · silverGrade: 88.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-441
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
88.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
228.25 m
To
228.75 m
Hole Depth
300 m
Intercept Depth
210 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-441:228.25-228.75
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607638
Northing
5270772
Elevation
219.5 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (88.5 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“88.50”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-443Langis · silverGrade: 43.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-443
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
43.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
206.5 m
To
207.5 m
Hole Depth
303 m
Intercept Depth
206.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-443:206.5-207.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607613
Northing
5270809
Elevation
220 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows weak silver grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the zone but not a highlight.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver grade (43.75 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“43.75”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-443Langis · silverGrade: 77.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-443
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
77.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
207 m
To
207.5 m
Hole Depth
303 m
Intercept Depth
206.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-443:207-207.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-E
Easting
607613
Northing
5270809
Elevation
220 m
Azimuth
85 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (77.7 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“77.70”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-426Langis · silverGrade: 208.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-426
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
208.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
124.5 m
To
131.5 m
Hole Depth
198 m
Intercept Depth
124.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-426:124.5-131.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing positively to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (208.39 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (7.0m)
  • GT product of 1458.73 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“208.39”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-426Langis · silverGrade: 1345Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-426
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
1345
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
129.5 m
To
130.5 m
Hole Depth
198 m
Intercept Depth
124.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-426:129.5-130.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-426 shows exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (1,345 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 1345 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“1,345.00”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,345 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is strong.

Evidence · table

“1,345.00”

Context: 1.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-426Langis · silverGrade: 2200Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-426
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
2200
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
130 m
To
130.5 m
Hole Depth
198 m
Intercept Depth
124.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-426:130-130.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
355 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval within LM-26-426 shows bonanza silver grade, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (2,200 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 1100 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“2,200.00”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 2,200 g/t is extremely high, well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is strong.

Evidence · table

“2,200.00”

Context: 0.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-428Langis · silverGrade: 259.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-428
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
259.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
127 m
To
131 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
127 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-428:127-131
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
3 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing positively to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (259.49 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (4.0m)
  • GT product of 1037.96 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“259.49”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-428Langis · silverGrade: 507.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-428
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
507.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
128 m
To
130 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
127 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-428:128-130
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
3 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-428 shows exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (507.95 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (2.0m)
  • GT product of 1015.9 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“507.95”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 507.95 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is strong.

Evidence · table

“507.95”

Context: 2.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-428Langis · silverGrade: 1090Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-428
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
1090
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
129 m
To
129.5 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
127 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-428:129-129.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
3 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval within LM-26-428 shows exceptional silver grade, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (1,090 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 545 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“1,090.00”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,090 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is moderate.

Evidence · table

“1,090.00”

Context: 0.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-428Langis · silverGrade: 59.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-428
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
59.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
134.75 m
To
136 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
127 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-428:134.75-136
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607401
Northing
5270805
Elevation
216.6 m
Azimuth
3 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow intercept shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (59.1 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.25m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“59.10”

Context: 1.25

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-435Langis · silverGrade: 41.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-435
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
41.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
132 m
To
137 m
Hole Depth
180 m
Intercept Depth
132 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-435:132-137
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607433
Northing
5270886
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-59 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the zone but not a highlight.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver grade (41.91 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (5.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“41.91”

Context: 5.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-435Langis · silverGrade: 102Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-435
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
102
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
132 m
To
133 m
Hole Depth
180 m
Intercept Depth
132 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-435:132-133
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607433
Northing
5270886
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
230 °
Dip
-59 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (102 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“102.00”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-442Langis · silverGrade: 221.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-442
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
221.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
119 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
119 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-442:119-128
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607432
Northing
5270895
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
215 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver mineralization over a moderate width, contributing positively to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (221.91 g/t Ag) over a moderate width (9.0m)
  • GT product of 1997.19 g/t·m is strong

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“221.91”

Context: 9.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-442Langis · silverGrade: 129.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-442
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
129.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m
From
120.5 m
To
122.85 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
119 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-442:120.5-122.85
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607432
Northing
5270895
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
215 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (129.2 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (2.35m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“129.20”

Context: 2.35

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-442Langis · silverGrade: 1605Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-442
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
1605
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
124.35 m
To
124.85 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
119 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-442:124.35-124.85
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607432
Northing
5270895
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
215 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval within LM-26-442 shows exceptional silver grade, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (1,605 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 802.5 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“1,605.00”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,605 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is moderate.

Evidence · table

“1,605.00”

Context: 0.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-442Langis · silverGrade: 665.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-442
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
665.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
126.8 m
To
128 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
119 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-442:126.8-128
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607432
Northing
5270895
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
215 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-442 shows exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (665.83 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 798.996 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.2m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“665.83”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 665.83 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is moderate.

Evidence · table

“665.83”

Context: 1.20

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-442Langis · silverGrade: 1055Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-442
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
1055
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
126.8 m
To
127.5 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
119 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-442:126.8-127.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6
Easting
607432
Northing
5270895
Elevation
218.8 m
Azimuth
215 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval within LM-26-442 shows exceptional silver grade, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (1,055 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 738.5 g/t·m is moderate

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.7m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“1,055.00”

Context: 0.70

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,055 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is moderate.

Evidence · table

“1,055.00”

Context: 0.70

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-412Langis · silverGrade: 666.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-412
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
666.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.45 m
From
124.65 m
To
131.1 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
124.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-412:124.65-131.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607210
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly significant intercept with exceptional silver grade over a narrow width, representing a key highlight of the drilling program and contributing strongly to the project's potential.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (666.95 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (6.45m)
  • GT product of 4300.3275 g/t·m is exceptional
  • Main intercept highlighted in the release

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“666.95”

Context: 6.45

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 666.95 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is exceptional.

Evidence · table

“666.95”

Context: 6.45

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-412Langis · silverGrade: 1339.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-412
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
1339.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.19 m
From
127.31 m
To
130.5 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
124.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-412:127.31-130.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607210
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within LM-26-412 shows exceptional silver grade over a narrow width, significantly contributing to the high-grade nature of the overall intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (1,339.39 g/t Ag) over a narrow width (3.19m)
  • GT product of 4272.99 g/t·m is exceptional

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“1,339.39”

Context: 3.19

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 1,339.39 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is exceptional.

Evidence · table

“1,339.39”

Context: 3.19

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-412Langis · silverGrade: 3570Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-412
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
3570
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
128.4 m
To
129.4 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
124.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-412:128.4-129.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607210
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-412 shows bonanza silver grade, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (3,570 g/t Ag)
  • GT product of 3570 g/t·m is exceptional

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“3,570.00”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 3,570 g/t is extremely high, well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver, and the GT product is exceptional.

Evidence · table

“3,570.00”

Context: 1.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-412Langis · silverGrade: 102.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-412
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
102.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.32 m
From
135.1 m
To
145.42 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
124.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-412:135.1-145.42
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607210
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver mineralization over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization in the zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (102.64 g/t Ag) over a moderate width (10.32m)

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“102.64”

Context: 10.32

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-412Langis · silverGrade: 584Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-412
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
584
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
137.5 m
To
138 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
124.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-412:137.5-138
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607210
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval within LM-26-412 shows exceptional silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade (584 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“584.00”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 584 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.

Evidence · table

“584.00”

Context: 0.50

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-412Langis · silverGrade: 441.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-412
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
441.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
141.5 m
To
143 m
Hole Depth
195 m
Intercept Depth
124.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-412:141.5-143
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607210
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212 m
Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval within LM-26-412 shows strong silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade (441.67 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“441.67”

Context: 1.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-417Langis · silverGrade: 20.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-417
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
20.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.98 m
From
107 m
To
119.98 m
Hole Depth
210 m
Intercept Depth
107 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-417:107-119.98
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607230
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212.9 m
Azimuth
305 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver mineralization over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the zone but not a highlight.

Negative factors

  • Weak silver grade (20.52 g/t Ag)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“20.52”

Context: 12.98

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-417Langis · silverGrade: 76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-417
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
107 m
To
108 m
Hole Depth
210 m
Intercept Depth
107 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-417:107-108
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607230
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212.9 m
Azimuth
305 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (76 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Narrow width (1.0m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“76.00”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-417Langis · silverGrade: 70.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-417
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
70.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
108.5 m
To
109 m
Hole Depth
210 m
Intercept Depth
107 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LM-26-417:108.5-109
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
S6-W
Easting
607230
Northing
5270820
Elevation
212.9 m
Azimuth
305 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Ag
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This very narrow sub-interval shows moderate silver grade, contributing to the overall mineralization in the hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade (70.1 g/t Ag)

Negative factors

  • Very narrow width (0.5m)
  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · table

“70.10”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that true widths have not yet been determined for reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilling lengths, and the true widths of the mineralized intervals have not yet been determined.”

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: The release details QA/QC protocols, including certified lab, blanks, duplicates, and certified reference materials, and is signed off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 2.0 m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50 m to 1.00 m intervals. Blanks, duplicates (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimit silver samples were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website.”

Compositing TransparentRejected · positive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Reason: The cut-off grade and internal dilution rules for compositing are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are length-weighted composites calculated at a 5 g/t Ag cut-off over contiguous samples, with limited internal dilution.”
LM-26-425Langis · silverGrade: 85.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LM-26-425
Project
Langis
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
BBB

Geometry

Grade
85.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.5 m
From
192.5 m
To
203 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
S6-SE
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Minerals
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver grade over a narrow width, but contributes to the overall understanding of the mineralized zone.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, true width not determined

Evidence · text

“10.50 m of 85.74 g/t silver from 192.50 m depth”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Brixton Metals Drills 4 m of 1,975 g/t Silver within 23.50 Accessibility: Skip TopNav Consumer Products and Services New"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.