Brixton Metals Drills 13.0m of 594 g/t Silver Including 0.5m of 7,900 g/t Silver at its Langis Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Brixton Metals Corporation
- Ticker
- BBB
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 02:22:56 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Brixton Metals announced high-grade silver drill results from its Langis Project, highlighted by 13.0m of 594 g/t silver, including 0.5m of 7,900 g/t silver, in hole LM-26-350. These intercepts are from the S6-SE target area, which shows strong potential for new high-grade discoveries with limited historic workings. The company plans to accelerate drilling to advance towards a maiden resource estimate.
Reasoning: Brixton Metals reported exceptional high-grade silver intercepts, including a bonanza grade of 7,900 g/t silver over 0.5m and 594 g/t silver over 13.0m, from its Langis Project. These results represent a significant step-out and expansion opportunity in a previously underexplored area (S6-SE), indicating strong potential for new high-grade discoveries. The company has disclosed robust QA/QC protocols and a Qualified Person sign-off, although true widths have not yet been determined for the reported intervals.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade_intercept
- high_grade_width_product
- step_out_extension
- new_zone_potential
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Facts used in scoring: 34
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a dedicated 'Quality Assurance & Quality Control' section detailing procedures, lab accreditations, and QP sign-off.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance & Quality Control Quality assurance and quality control protocols for drill core sampling were developed by Brixton. Core samples were mostly taken at 1.5m intervals. High-grade intervals were taken at 0.50m to 1.00m intervals. Blank, duplicate (lab pulp), and certified reference materials were inserted at a combined rate of up to 15%. Core samples were cut in half, bagged, zip-tied, and sent directly to the ALS Minerals preparation facility in Sudbury, Ontario. ALS Minerals Laboratories is registered to ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 17025 accreditations for laboratory procedures. Samples were analyzed at ALS Laboratory Facilities in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Ag, Pb, Cu, and Zn, as well as 48 additional elements, were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP-MS finish. Overlimits for silver were analyzed using fire assay and gravimetric finish, and/or fire assay and gravimetric finish on concentrates. The certified reference materials were acquired from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, and the standards inserted varied with the type and abundance of mineralization observed in the primary sample. Blank material used consisted of non-mineralized siliceous landscaping rock. A copy of the QAQC protocols is available on the Company’s website. Qualified Person (QP) Mr. Martin Ethier, P.Geo., is a consultant for the Company who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Ethier has verified the referenced data and analytical results disclosed in this press release and has approved the technical information presented herein.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr. Martin Ethier, P.Geo., is explicitly named as a Qualified Person who has verified and approved the technical information in the press release.
Evidence · text
“Mr. Martin Ethier, P.Geo., is a consultant for the Company who is a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Ethier has verified the referenced data and analytical results disclosed in this press release and has approved the technical information presented herein.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill campaign is explicitly targeting 'infill' of established high-grade silver zones.
Evidence · text
“The 2026 drill campaign marks a significant milestone, targeting both infill and expansion of established high-grade silver zones.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 34. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (34)
LM-26-289S6-S · silverGrade: 115.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-289
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 115.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 147 m
- Hole Depth
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607374
- Northing
- 5270726
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 6.0m at 115.4 g/t silver is a moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the strong threshold. It contributes to the overall resource definition but is not a highlight. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“115.40”
Context: 6.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-289S6-S · silverGrade: 1130Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-289
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 1130
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 142.5 m
- To
- 143 m
- Hole Depth
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-289:142.5-143.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607374
- Northing
- 5270726
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 0.5m at 1130 g/t silver is an exceptional grade for an epithermal silver deposit, significantly exceeding the 500 g/t threshold. While narrow, it indicates high-grade mineralization within the broader interval. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“1130.00”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-289S6-S · silverGrade: 76.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-289
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 76.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 172 m
- To
- 174 m
- Hole Depth
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607374
- Northing
- 5270726
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 2.0m at 76.41 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“76.41”
Context: 2.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-332S6-S · silverGrade: 76.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-332
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 76.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.25 m
- From
- 83.75 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 85 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 4.25m at 76.67 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“76.67”
Context: 4.25
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-332S6-S · silverGrade: 480Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-332
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 480
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 101.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 201 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-332:101.0-101.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 85 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 0.5m at 480 g/t silver is a strong grade for an epithermal silver deposit, approaching the exceptional threshold. While narrow, it indicates high-grade mineralization. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- high_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“480.00”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-350S6-SE · silverGrade: 200.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-350
- Project
- S6-SE
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 200.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40 m
- From
- 176 m
- To
- 216 m
- Hole Depth
- 258 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607480
- Northing
- 5270820
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 218.1 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 40.0m at 200.11 g/t silver is a strong grade and exceptional grade-width product (8004.4 g/t·m) for an epithermal silver deposit. It represents a significant expansion in the S6-SE area, which has limited historic drilling. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_intercept
- high_grade_width_product
- step_out_extension
- new_zone_potential
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“200.11”
Context: 40.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The intercept is located in the S6-SE target area, which is described as a 'meaningful expansion opportunity' and has 'limited historic mine workings and historic drilling', indicating an extension beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“The latest results from hole LM-26-350 confirm the S6-SE target area as a meaningful expansion opportunity within the general Shaft 6 zone at the Langis Project”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-350S6-SE · silverGrade: 594.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-350
- Project
- S6-SE
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 594.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 193 m
- To
- 206 m
- Hole Depth
- 258 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-350:193.0-206.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607480
- Northing
- 5270820
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 218.1 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 13.0m at 594.43 g/t silver is an exceptional grade and exceptional grade-width product (7727.59 g/t·m) for an epithermal silver deposit, significantly exceeding the 500 g/t threshold. It represents a significant expansion in the S6-SE area, which has limited historic drilling. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_intercept
- high_grade_width_product
- step_out_extension
- new_zone_potential
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“594.43”
Context: 13.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The intercept is located in the S6-SE target area, which is described as a 'meaningful expansion opportunity' and has 'limited historic mine workings and historic drilling', indicating an extension beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“The latest results from hole LM-26-350 confirm the S6-SE target area as a meaningful expansion opportunity within the general Shaft 6 zone at the Langis Project”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-350S6-SE · silverGrade: 873Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-350
- Project
- S6-SE
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 873
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 193 m
- To
- 195 m
- Hole Depth
- 258 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-350:193.0-195.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607480
- Northing
- 5270820
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 218.1 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 2.0m at 873 g/t silver is an exceptional grade and strong grade-width product (1746 g/t·m) for an epithermal silver deposit, significantly exceeding the 500 g/t threshold. It contributes to the significant expansion in the S6-SE area. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade_intercept
- high_grade_width_product
- step_out_extension
- new_zone_potential
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“873.00”
Context: 2.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The intercept is located in the S6-SE target area, which is described as a 'meaningful expansion opportunity' and has 'limited historic mine workings and historic drilling', indicating an extension beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“The latest results from hole LM-26-350 confirm the S6-SE target area as a meaningful expansion opportunity within the general Shaft 6 zone at the Langis Project”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-350S6-SE · silverGrade: 7900Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-350
- Project
- S6-SE
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 7900
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 204.7 m
- To
- 205.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 258 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-350:204.7-205.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607480
- Northing
- 5270820
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 218.1 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 0.5m at 7,900 g/t silver is an exceptionally high-grade bonanza intercept, significantly exceeding the 500 g/t threshold and the 75th percentile of peer comparison. Its grade-width product (3950 g/t·m) is also very strong. It represents a significant expansion in the S6-SE area, which has limited historic drilling. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade_intercept
- high_grade_width_product
- step_out_extension
- new_zone_potential
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“7900.00”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 0.5m at 7,900 g/t silver is exceptionally high-grade, far exceeding the 500 g/t threshold for silver and the 75th percentile of peer comparison for epithermal silver deposits.
Evidence · table
“7900.00”
Context: 0.50
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The intercept is located in the S6-SE target area, which is described as a 'meaningful expansion opportunity' and has 'limited historic mine workings and historic drilling', indicating an extension beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“The latest results from hole LM-26-350 confirm the S6-SE target area as a meaningful expansion opportunity within the general Shaft 6 zone at the Langis Project”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-308S6-S · silverGrade: 11.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-308
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 97 m
- To
- 99.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270685
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 2.7m at 11.66 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“11.66”
Context: 2.70
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-308S6-S · silverGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-308
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 97.85 m
- To
- 98.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 168 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-308:97.85-98.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270685
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 0.5m at 23.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“23.50”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-309S6-S · silverGrade: 62.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-309
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 62.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.15 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 157.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 210 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270685
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 7.15m at 62.83 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“62.83”
Context: 7.15
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-309S6-S · silverGrade: 242Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-309
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 242
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 156.55 m
- To
- 157.15 m
- Hole Depth
- 210 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-309:156.55-157.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270685
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 0.6m at 242 g/t silver is a strong grade for an epithermal silver deposit, exceeding the 200 g/t threshold. While narrow, it indicates high-grade mineralization. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- strong_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“242.00”
Context: 0.60
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-313S6-S · silverGrade: 18.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-313
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 175 m
- To
- 176 m
- Hole Depth
- 207 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270685
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 1.0m at 18.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“18.70”
Context: 1.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-314S6-S · silverGrade: 47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-314
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 59 m
- To
- 61 m
- Hole Depth
- 198 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270665
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 270 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 2.0m at 47.0 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“47.00”
Context: 2.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-315S6-S · silverGrade: 13.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-315
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 167 m
- Hole Depth
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270665
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 30.0m at 13.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“13.07”
Context: 30.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-315S6-S · silverGrade: 26.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-315
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 137 m
- To
- 144 m
- Hole Depth
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-315:137.0-144.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270665
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.1 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 7.0m at 26.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“26.38”
Context: 7.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-316S6-S · silverGrade: 67.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-316
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 116.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 222 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607367
- Northing
- 5270644
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 212.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 4.5m at 67.74 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“67.74”
Context: 4.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-316S6-S · silverGrade: 165Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-316
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 165
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 115.5 m
- To
- 116 m
- Hole Depth
- 222 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-316:115.5-116.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607367
- Northing
- 5270644
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 212.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 0.5m at 165 g/t silver is a moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the moderate threshold but below the strong threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“165.00”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-317S6-S · silverGrade: 35.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-317
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.5 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607367
- Northing
- 5270644
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 212.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 1.5m at 35.84 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“35.84”
Context: 1.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-317S6-S · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-317
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 110
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 145.6 m
- To
- 146 m
- Hole Depth
- 240 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-317:145.6-146.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607367
- Northing
- 5270644
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 212.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 0.4m at 110 g/t silver is a moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the moderate threshold but below the strong threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“110.00”
Context: 0.40
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-320S6-S · silverGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-320
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 129 m
- Hole Depth
- 129 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270790
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 215.4 m
- Azimuth
- 180 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 16.0m at 5.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“5.30”
Context: 16.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-321S6-S · silverGrade: 21.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-321
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 104 m
- To
- 123.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 186 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270790
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 215.4 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 19.8m at 21.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“21.33”
Context: 19.80
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-321S6-S · silverGrade: 134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-321
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 134
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 113 m
- To
- 115 m
- Hole Depth
- 186 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-321:113.0-115.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270790
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 215.4 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 2.0m at 134 g/t silver is a moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the moderate threshold but below the strong threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“134.00”
Context: 2.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-322S6-S · silverGrade: 10.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-322
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.8 m
- From
- 180.2 m
- To
- 211 m
- Hole Depth
- 213 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270790
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 215.4 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 30.8m at 10.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“10.34”
Context: 30.80
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-328S6-S · silverGrade: 58.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-328
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 147 m
- To
- 152 m
- Hole Depth
- 249 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270810
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 215.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 5.0m at 58.2 g/t silver is a weak to moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the weak threshold but below the moderate threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“58.20”
Context: 5.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-328S6-S · silverGrade: 132.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-328
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 132.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 147 m
- To
- 149 m
- Hole Depth
- 249 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-328:147.0-149.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270810
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 215.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 2.0m at 132.76 g/t silver is a moderate grade for an epithermal silver deposit, falling above the moderate threshold but below the strong threshold. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade_intercept
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“132.76”
Context: 2.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-331S6-S · silverGrade: 8.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-331
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 183 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 27.0m at 8.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“8.09”
Context: 27.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-331S6-S · silverGrade: 23.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-331
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 183 m
- Hole Depth
- 204 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-331:178.0-183.0
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 90 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval of 5.0m at 23.64 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“23.64”
Context: 5.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-333S6-S · silverGrade: 7.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-333
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 98 m
- To
- 110 m
- Hole Depth
- 216 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 12.0m at 7.82 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“7.82”
Context: 12.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-333S6-S · silverGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-333
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 124 m
- To
- 137.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 216 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-333:124.0-137.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 95 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 13.5m at 3.46 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“3.46”
Context: 13.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-334S6-S · silverGrade: 15.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-334
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 90 m
- To
- 93.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 96 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 85 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 3.8m at 15.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“15.87”
Context: 3.80
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-336S6-S · silverGrade: 6.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-336
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 142 m
- To
- 144.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 2.7m at 6.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“6.85”
Context: 2.70
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
LM-26-336S6-S · silverGrade: 6.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LM-26-336
- Project
- S6-S
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Ticker
- BBB
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.95 m
- From
- 184.65 m
- To
- 206.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LM-26-336:184.65-206.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 607385
- Northing
- 5270770
- CRS
- UTM
- Elevation
- 214.9 m
- Azimuth
- 80 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept of 21.95m at 6.91 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) for an epithermal silver deposit, indicating low grade. True width is not determined.
Positive factors
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“6.91”
Context: 21.95
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined.
Evidence · text
“Reported intervals are drilling length, and the true width of the mineralized intervals has not yet been determined”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.