British King Gold Project: Filing of NI43-101 Technical Report

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Central Iron Ore Limited
Ticker
CIO
Exchange
TSX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Other
Extracted
2026-08-21 05:07:24 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Central Iron Ore Limited has filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report updating the Mineral Resource Estimate for the British King Gold Project in Western Australia. The update, supported by 2025 RC drilling, reports a total resource of 311,800 tonnes at 6.20 g/t gold, consisting of Indicated and Inferred categories.

Reasoning: The filing of a NI 43-101 technical report updating the MRE provides formal validation of the resource and metallurgical amenability, though the resource remains in the early-to-mid stage (Indicated/Inferred).

Positive factors

  • Resource update provides increased geological and grade confidence
  • Metallurgical test work confirms amenability to standard CIL processing
  • NI 43-101 compliant technical report filed

Negative factors

  • Resource is entirely Inferred and Indicated (no Measured/Proven)

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The company announced the filing of a NI 43-101 Technical Report.

Evidence · text

“filed a National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report”

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes an Indicated category.

Evidence · table

“Indicated”

Context: 227,300

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes an Inferred category.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 84,500

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Andrew Bewsher, MAIG, is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed and approved the report.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person Mr Andrew Bewsher, MAIG... has reviewed and approved”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (2)

indicatedgoldTonnes: 227300Grade: 5.78Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 42200Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
CIO

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
227300
Grade
5.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
42200
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-10-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource grade of 5.78 g/t gold is strong.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for an indicated resource

Evidence · table

“5.78”

Context: 227,300

inferredgoldTonnes: 84500Grade: 7.36Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 20000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
CIO

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
84500
Grade
7.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
20000
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-10-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade intercept in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • High grade for an inferred resource

Negative factors

  • Inferred category implies lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“7.36”

Context: 84,500

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.