Bravo Reports Results of Pre-Feasibility Study for its Luanga Project

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Bravo Mining Corp.
Ticker
BRVO.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Pará State, Brazil
Primary commodity
Palladium
Secondary commodities
Platinum, Rhodium, Gold, Nickel, Copper
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-22 10:55:11 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Bravo Mining Corp. has announced strong Pre-Feasibility Study results for its Luanga Project in Brazil, reporting an after-tax NPV8% of US$1.45 billion and an IRR of 35.1%. The study includes a maiden Proven & Probable Mineral Reserve of 86.7 Mt grading 2.77 g/t PdEq for 7,731 kOz of contained PdEq, and improved metallurgical recoveries using Jameson Cell flotation technology. The company plans to advance permitting and a Definitive Feasibility Study, with an updated Mineral Resource expected in Q1 2027.

Reasoning: The Pre-Feasibility Study for the Luanga Project demonstrates robust economics with a significant after-tax NPV and IRR, supported by a maiden Mineral Reserve and improved metallurgical recoveries, marking a major de-risking milestone for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong economic metrics (NPV, IRR, payback)
  • Maiden Mineral Reserve declared
  • Improved metallurgical recoveries with Jameson Cell technology
  • Vertical integration strategy with ZPE benefits
  • Strategic geographical advantage and advancing permits
  • Well-funded for next steps

Negative factors

  • Mineral Reserve does not include 22,100m of 2026 infill and expansion drilling
  • PFS is based on a 2025 MRE, not the latest drilling
  • Inferred resources are not included in the Base Case mine plan
  • Copper is not included in the economic analysis, despite potential

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 85

Classification and evidence

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The PFS establishes a maiden Mineral Reserve for the Luanga Project.

Evidence · text

“Maiden Mineral Reserve Declared”

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The PFS declares a Proven Mineral Reserve of 17.7 Mt.

Evidence · table

“Proven Reserves”

Context: 17.7

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The PFS declares a Probable Mineral Reserve of 69.0 Mt.

Evidence · table

“Probable Reserves”

Context: 69.0

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The PFS reports a reserve conversion ratio of 55% relative to the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource tonnes and 74% on a PdEq1 metal contained basis, indicating a conversion of resources to reserves.

Evidence · text

“Reserve conversion ratio of 55% relative to the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource tonnes and 74% on a PdEq1metal contained basis.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The Mineral Reserve Estimates have been prepared by Mr. Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez, an independent QP under NI43-101.

Evidence · text

“The Mineral Reserve Estimates have been prepared by Mr. Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez, B.Sc Min. Eng., FAIG, FAusIMM, director of GE21, an independent QP under NI43-101.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The Mineral Reserve estimate explicitly states a defined cut-off grade of 0.87 g/t PdEq1.

Evidence · text

“Defined cut-off grade of 0.87 g/t PdEq1.”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance with the CIM Standards (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019), as required by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101).”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance with CIM Standards and Best Practices Guidelines, which are CRIRSCO-aligned and consistent with JORC principles.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Reserves are reported in accordance with the CIM Standards (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019), as required by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101).”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The PFS states that no Inferred Resource was counted as Mineral Reserve.

Evidence · text

“No Inferred Resource was counted as Mineral Reserve.”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resource estimate underpinning the Mineral Reserve has an effective date of February 18, 2025, which is over a year prior to the PFS announcement date of September 22, 2026.

Evidence · text

“The Mineral Resource estimate underpinning the Mineral Reserve has an effective date of February 18, 2025”

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: The document is a Pre-Feasibility Study for the Luanga Project.

Evidence · text

“Bravo Reports Results of Pre-Feasibility Study for its Luanga Project”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Forecast recoveries for gold (88%) and nickel (70.6%) are particularly high for a flotation circuit, and palladium (81.5%) is also strong.

Evidence · text

“forecast recoveries of 82% Pd, 80% Pt, 55% Rh, 88% Au and 71% Ni”

Recovery Improvingpositive

Recovery improved versus a like-for-like prior test program on the same domain and route.

Why it applies: Metallurgical test work demonstrated improved recoveries for palladium, gold, and nickel compared to the 2025 PEA.

Evidence · text

“Testing on representative Luanga sulphide material demonstrated improved recoveries relative to conventional flotation cells, particularly for palladium, gold and nickel, together with improved selectivity and reduced mass pull as compared to the 2025 PEA.”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The Base Case process plant is designed around a flotation concentrator incorporating Jameson Cell flotation technology.

Evidence · text

“flotation concentrator incorporating an updated comminution and Jameson cell flotation circuit”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: Bravo has undertaken an extensive metallurgical test work program focused on variability.

Evidence · text

“Bravo has undertaken an extensive metallurgical test work program focused on variability”

POX/BIOX Routeneutral

Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: the document describes a pox_biox route ("roasting")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 85. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (75)

provenLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 17700000Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 541Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6411fff745be91428634
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17700000
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
541
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for palladium, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the resource.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · platinumTonnes: 17700000Grade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 466Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6411fff745be91428634
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17700000
Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
466
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for platinum, contributing to the overall economic viability of the project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 17700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 70Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6411fff745be91428634
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
70
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for rhodium, adding to the overall economic value of the project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · goldTonnes: 17700000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 44Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6411fff745be91428634
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17700000
Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
44
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for gold, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · nickelTonnes: 17700000Grade: 0.1765Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 31239Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:6411fff745be91428634
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17700000
Grade
0.1765
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
31239
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for nickel, adding significant value to the polymetallic project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.1765”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 69000000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2062Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:80e57622e651e5be0203
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69000000
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2062
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · platinumTonnes: 69000000Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1442Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:80e57622e651e5be0203
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69000000
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1442
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for platinum, adding to the project's overall economic value.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 69000000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 226Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:80e57622e651e5be0203
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69000000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
226
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for rhodium, contributing to the project's economic potential.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · goldTonnes: 69000000Grade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 161Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:80e57622e651e5be0203
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69000000
Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
161
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for gold, adding to the polymetallic nature of the project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · nickelTonnes: 69000000Grade: 0.1786Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 123237Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:80e57622e651e5be0203
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69000000
Grade
0.1786
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
123237
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for nickel, significantly contributing to the project's economic potential.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.1786”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 4000000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 117Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:ca0913b1056c32dda2ff
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
117
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for palladium in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 4000000Grade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 115Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:ca0913b1056c32dda2ff
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
115
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for platinum in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 4000000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 15Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:ca0913b1056c32dda2ff
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
15
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for rhodium in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · goldTonnes: 4000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:ca0913b1056c32dda2ff
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
7
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for gold in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1009Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d5efd0171cc54245346e
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
32000000
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1009
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for palladium in fresh rock, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 32

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 694Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d5efd0171cc54245346e
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
32000000
Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
694
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for platinum in fresh rock, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 32

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 88Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d5efd0171cc54245346e
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
32000000
Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
88
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for rhodium in fresh rock, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 32

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · goldTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 46Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d5efd0171cc54245346e
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
32000000
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
46
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for gold in fresh rock, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 32

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · nickelTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 35282Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d5efd0171cc54245346e
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
32000000
Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
35282
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for nickel in fresh rock, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate.

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 32

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 6000000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 200Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:a9b2d9f97a9e8db3cac6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6000000
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
200
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · platinumTonnes: 6000000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 151Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:a9b2d9f97a9e8db3cac6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6000000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
151
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for platinum in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 6000000Grade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 23Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:a9b2d9f97a9e8db3cac6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6000000
Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
23
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for rhodium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · goldTonnes: 6000000Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:a9b2d9f97a9e8db3cac6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6000000
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
9
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for gold in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 2000000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 89Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:bb72d8bedda9620d1ced
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2000000
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
89
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in high talc material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · platinumTonnes: 2000000Grade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 43Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:bb72d8bedda9620d1ced
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2000000
Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
43
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for platinum in high talc material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 2000000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:bb72d8bedda9620d1ced
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2000000
Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for rhodium in high talc material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · goldTonnes: 2000000Grade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:bb72d8bedda9620d1ced
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2000000
Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
9
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for gold in high talc material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · nickelTonnes: 2000000Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3160Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:bb72d8bedda9620d1ced
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2000000
Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3160
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for nickel in high talc material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 2

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3583Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f493bd42dbe36ec33233
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3583
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.09
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in fresh rock, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · platinumTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2133Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f493bd42dbe36ec33233
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2133
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.09
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for platinum in fresh rock, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 318Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f493bd42dbe36ec33233
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
318
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.09
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for rhodium in fresh rock, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · goldTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 193Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f493bd42dbe36ec33233
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
193
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.09
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for gold in fresh rock, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · nickelTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 156406Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:f493bd42dbe36ec33233
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
156406
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.09
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for nickel in fresh rock, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 3000000Grade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 73Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cef5a118377268254c76
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3000000
Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
73
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 3000000Grade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 86Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cef5a118377268254c76
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3000000
Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
86
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for platinum in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 3000000Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 11Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cef5a118377268254c76
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3000000
Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
11
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for rhodium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · goldTonnes: 3000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cef5a118377268254c76
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for gold in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 100000Grade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:739ce9983925d0bcaf8a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
100000
Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in high talc material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:739ce9983925d0bcaf8a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for platinum in high talc material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:739ce9983925d0bcaf8a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for rhodium in high talc material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · goldTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:739ce9983925d0bcaf8a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for gold in high talc material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · nickelTonnes: 100000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 133Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:739ce9983925d0bcaf8a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
high_talc
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
100000
Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
133
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for nickel in high talc material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 75000000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2344Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d39100c5e0d3f1aa38b6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
75000000
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2344
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in fresh rock, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 75

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 75000000Grade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1389Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d39100c5e0d3f1aa38b6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
75000000
Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1389
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for platinum in fresh rock, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 75

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · rhodiumTonnes: 75000000Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 191Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d39100c5e0d3f1aa38b6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
75000000
Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
191
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for rhodium in fresh rock, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 75

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · goldTonnes: 75000000Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 123Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d39100c5e0d3f1aa38b6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
75000000
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
123
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for gold in fresh rock, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 75

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · nickelTonnes: 75000000Grade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 97586Contained Unit: tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:d39100c5e0d3f1aa38b6
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
75000000
Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
97586
Contained Unit
t
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq1

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for nickel in fresh rock, which is speculative and based on an older estimate.

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 75

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 17.7Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:4116e518a8f7ba59f53a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for palladium, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · platinumTonnes: 17.7Grade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:4116e518a8f7ba59f53a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for palladium, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · goldTonnes: 17.7Grade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:4116e518a8f7ba59f53a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for palladium, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

provenLuanga · nickelTonnes: 17.7Grade: 0.1765Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:4116e518a8f7ba59f53a
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
17.7
Grade
0.1765
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Proven Mineral Reserve for palladium, indicating high confidence in the economic viability of this portion of the resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Proven Reserve declared
  • High confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.1765”

Context: 17.7

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 69Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:46a4dad63642098c78f4
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · platinumTonnes: 69Grade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:46a4dad63642098c78f4
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · goldTonnes: 69Grade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:46a4dad63642098c78f4
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · nickelTonnes: 69Grade: 0.1786Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:46a4dad63642098c78f4
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
fresh_rock
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
69
Grade
0.1786
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.1786”

Context: 69.0

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 86.7Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c0709def194b5938a823
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · platinumTonnes: 86.7Grade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c0709def194b5938a823
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.68”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · goldTonnes: 86.7Grade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c0709def194b5938a823
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableLuanga · nickelTonnes: 86.7Grade: 0.1781Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:c0709def194b5938a823
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
86.7
Grade
0.1781
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-16

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a maiden Probable Mineral Reserve for palladium, contributing significantly to the project's economic viability. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve declared

Evidence · table

“0.1781”

Context: 86.7

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 4Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:e23395c9270e54545d26
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for palladium in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 4Grade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:e23395c9270e54545d26
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4
Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for palladium in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

measuredLuanga · goldTonnes: 4Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:e23395c9270e54545d26
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resource for palladium in oxide material, providing high confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High confidence category

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 2.01Grade: 2421Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:90e6af91ee0907ddd781
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2.01
Grade
2421
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“2,421”

Context: 2.01

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 2.01Grade: 1476Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:90e6af91ee0907ddd781
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2.01
Grade
1476
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“1,476”

Context: 2.01

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · goldTonnes: 2.01Grade: 128Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:90e6af91ee0907ddd781
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2.01
Grade
128
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“128”

Context: 2.01

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · nickelTonnes: 2.01Grade: 97719Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:90e6af91ee0907ddd781
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2.01
Grade
97719
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“97,719”

Context: 2.01

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 6Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:94c3ccf0ab31134af168
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · platinumTonnes: 6Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:94c3ccf0ab31134af168
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · goldTonnes: 6Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:94c3ccf0ab31134af168
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 6

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 10Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fbdd9b0ced6c52c5575d
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · platinumTonnes: 10Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fbdd9b0ced6c52c5575d
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedLuanga · goldTonnes: 10Grade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:fbdd9b0ced6c52c5575d
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10
Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource for palladium in oxide material, providing moderate confidence but based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · palladiumTonnes: 3Grade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cb63a83502c1bcdac157
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3
Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · platinumTonnes: 3Grade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cb63a83502c1bcdac157
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3
Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredLuanga · goldTonnes: 3Grade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Bernardo Horta de Cerqueira Viana, Porfírio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
Resource group id
resource:cb63a83502c1bcdac157
Deposit or zone
Luanga Project
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3
Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
0.87
Cutoff Unit
g/t PdEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.57
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t PdEq1
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource for palladium in oxide material, which is speculative and based on an older estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Negative factors

  • Estimate is stale (effective date Feb 2025)
  • Inferred category has high geological uncertainty

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (10)

flotationLuanga · palladiumRecovery: 81.5 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator incorporating Jameson Cell flotation circuit

Recovery

Recovery
81.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Palladium recovery of 81.5% is strong for a flotation circuit and shows improvement over prior testwork, indicating positive metallurgical progress.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Recovery Improving
  • Advanced test scale (locked-cycle)

Evidence · table

“81.5 %”

Context: Pd

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · platinumRecovery: 80 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator incorporating Jameson Cell flotation circuit

Recovery

Recovery
80 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Platinum recovery of 80% is strong for a flotation circuit, though it shows a slight decrease from previous estimates.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Advanced test scale (locked-cycle)

Negative factors

  • Slight decrease in recovery compared to prior PEA

Evidence · table

“80.0 %”

Context: Pt

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · rhodiumRecovery: 55 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator incorporating Jameson Cell flotation circuit

Recovery

Recovery
55 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rhodium recovery of 55% shows improvement over prior testwork, contributing positively to the project's economics.

Positive factors

  • Recovery Improving
  • Advanced test scale (locked-cycle)

Evidence · table

“55.0 %”

Context: Rh

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · goldRecovery: 88 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator incorporating Jameson Cell flotation circuit

Recovery

Recovery
88 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
100
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold recovery of 88% is exceptionally high for a flotation circuit and shows significant improvement over prior testwork, strongly de-risking the project.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Recovery Improving
  • Advanced test scale (locked-cycle)

Evidence · table

“88.0 %”

Context: Au

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · nickelRecovery: 70.6 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator incorporating Jameson Cell flotation circuit

Recovery

Recovery
70.6 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
7
Conc. Grade Unit
% Ni

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Nickel recovery of 70.6% is very strong for a flotation circuit and shows significant improvement over prior testwork, enhancing the project's economic viability.

Positive factors

  • High Recovery
  • Recovery Improving
  • Advanced test scale (locked-cycle)

Evidence · table

“70.6 %”

Context: Ni

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 70.6% is below the weak band (75%)

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · palladiumRecovery: 77 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
palladium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator

Recovery

Recovery
77 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
80
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical palladium recovery from the 2025 PEA, now superseded by improved results from the PFS.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, superseded by new testwork

Evidence · table

“77.0 %”

Context: Pd

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · platinumRecovery: 81 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
platinum
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator

Recovery

Recovery
81 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
80
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical platinum recovery from the 2025 PEA, now superseded by new testwork results.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, superseded by new testwork

Evidence · table

“81.0 %”

Context: Pt

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · rhodiumRecovery: 51 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
rhodium
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator

Recovery

Recovery
51 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
80
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical rhodium recovery from the 2025 PEA, now superseded by improved results from the PFS.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, superseded by new testwork

Evidence · table

“51.0 %”

Context: Rh

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · goldRecovery: 48 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
gold
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator

Recovery

Recovery
48 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
80
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t PGM+Au

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical gold recovery from the 2025 PEA, now significantly improved by new testwork results.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, superseded by new testwork

Evidence · table

“48.0 %”

Context: Au

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 48% is below the weak band (80%)

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

flotationLuanga · nickelRecovery: 50 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Luanga
Commodity
nickel
Region
brazil
Reported Region
Pará State, Brazil
Ticker
BRVO.V

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
flotation concentrator

Recovery

Recovery
50 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Laboratory
Base Metallurgical Laboratories (Intertek)
Consultant
Glencore Technology

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-02-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical nickel recovery from the 2025 PEA, now significantly improved by new testwork results.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, superseded by new testwork

Evidence · table

“50.0 %”

Context: Ni

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the mill_cil signal

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 50% is below the weak band (75%)

Byproduct Commodityneutral

The tested commodity is a byproduct rather than the primary economic driver.

Why it applies: the release describes a byproduct credit

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.